Toyota Camry vs Nissan Altima 2026 Comparison
The Toyota Camry leads in reliability ratings (86% vs 79% in dependability surveys) and resale value retention (62% after 5 years vs 56%), while the Nissan Altima offers more standard tech features and a lower starting price ($28,690 vs $29,745). Both are midsize sedans, but the Camry prioritizes longevity while the Altima emphasizes value and features.
Toyota Camry
Midsize sedan known for reliability, fuel efficiency, and strong resale value.
Long-term owners, resale-conscious buyers, fleet operators, and those prioritizing reliability over initial cost savings.
Nissan Altima
Midsize sedan emphasizing value, tech features, and performance-oriented styling.
Budget-conscious buyers, those planning to trade in within 4-5 years, and drivers wanting modern tech features without premium pricing.
Quick Answer
AI SummaryThe Toyota Camry leads in reliability ratings (86% vs 79% in dependability surveys) and resale value retention (62% after 5 years vs 56%), while the Nissan Altima offers more standard tech features and a lower starting price ($28,690 vs $29,745). Both are midsize sedans, but the Camry prioritizes longevity while the Altima emphasizes value and features.
Our Verdict
AI-assistedChoose the Toyota Camry if you prioritize long-term reliability, lower maintenance costs, and strong resale value — it's the safer investment for drivers keeping their car 7+ years. Choose the Nissan Altima if you want lower upfront costs, more tech features as standard, and don't mind a steeper depreciation curve — it's better for budget-conscious buyers planning to trade in after 4-5 years.
Was this verdict helpful?
Choose Toyota Camry if
Best pickLong-term owners, resale-conscious buyers, fleet operators, and those prioritizing reliability over initial cost savings.
Choose Nissan Altima if
Budget-conscious buyers, those planning to trade in within 4-5 years, and drivers wanting modern tech features without premium pricing.
Track this comparison
Get notified when prices change, new specs ship, or our verdict updates.
Triggers: price change new spec verdict update
No spam. Stop anytime.
Key Differences at a Glance
- Starting Price (2026 Base Model):✓ Nissan Altima wins($28,690 vs $29,745)
- 5-Year Reliability Rating:✓ Toyota Camry wins(86% vs 79%)
- 5-Year Resale Value Retention:✓ Toyota Camry wins(62% vs 56%)
Key Facts & Figures
50 numeric metrics compared
| Metric | Toyota Camry | Nissan Altima | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starting Price (2026)(USD) | $32,500 (estimated) | — | — |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 49-50 MPG combined | — | — |
| Standard Touchscreen Size(inches) | 8 inches | — | — |
| City Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 53 MPG | — | — |
| Highway Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 46 MPG | — | — |
| Interior Width (Front Legroom)(inches) | 38.6 inches | — | — |
| Cargo Capacity(cubic feet) | 15.1 cu ft | — | — |
| Safety Rating (NHTSA Overall)(stars) | 5 stars | — | — |
| Engine Horsepower(hp) | 225 hp @ 6000 RPM | — | — |
| Engine Torque(lb-ft) | 163 lb-ft @ 5200 RPM | — | — |
| Fuel Tank Capacity(gallons) | 13 gallons | — | — |
| Estimated MPG Combined(MPG) | 51 MPG | — | — |
| Infotainment Screen Size(inches) | 10.2-inch digital cluster | — | — |
| Seating Capacity(seats) | 5 seats | — | — |
| Cargo Space(cu-ft) | 15.1 cu-ft | — | — |
| Starting MSRP (2026)(USD) | $29,765 | — | — |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Standard Non-Hybrid)(mpg) | 33 mpg | — | — |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(mpg) | 52 mpg | — | — |
| J.D. Power Dependability Rating(ranking) | 94/100 | — | — |
| 3-Year Resale Value Retention(%) | 63% | 58% | |
| Standard Infotainment Display Size(inches) | 8 inches | — | — |
| Rear Seat Legroom(inches) | 38.3 inches | — | — |
| Consumer Reports Owner Satisfaction(score out of 10) | 8.2/10 | — | — |
| Starting MSRP (2025)(USD) | $29,390 | $28,500 | |
| Base Engine Power(hp) | 203 hp (4-cyl naturally aspirated) | 188 hp (4-cyl naturally aspirated) | |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Standard Engine)(MPG) | 28-32 MPG | 26-30 MPG | |
| J.D. Power Reliability Rating(out of 5) | 92/100 | 85/100 | |
| Highway Cabin Noise Level(dB) | 71 dB | 73 dB | |
| Turbocharged Engine Option(hp) | Not available | 260 hp (2.0L Turbo) | — |
| Starting Price (MSRP 2026)(USD) | $28,045 | — | — |
| Highway Fuel Economy(mpg) | 33 MPG | — | — |
| Base Engine Power Output(hp) | 203 hp | — | — |
| Base Engine Torque(lb-ft) | 184 lb-ft | — | — |
| 0-60 mph Acceleration(seconds) | 8.2 seconds | — | — |
| Trunk Capacity(cubic feet) | 15.1 cu ft | — | — |
| Infotainment Screen Size (Standard)(inches) | 8 inches | — | — |
| 5-Year Residual Value Retention(percent) | 58% | — | — |
| Starting Price (2026 LE/S Trim)(USD) | $29,745 | $28,690 | |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy(MPG) | 32 MPG (LE gasoline) | 30 MPG (S gasoline) | |
| 5-Year Reliability Rating(percent) | 86% | 79% | |
| 5-Year Resale Value Retention(percent) | 62% | 56% | |
| Trunk/Cargo Volume(cubic feet) | 15.1 cu ft | 15.2 cu ft | |
| Owner Satisfaction (J.D. Power 2025)(score/100) | 84/100 | 81/100 | |
| Fuel Tank Capacity(liters) | 14.5 L | 14.8 L | |
| Starting MSRP (2025 Base Model)(USD) | $28,950 | $28,950 | |
| J.D. Power Reliability Score(points) | 85/100 | 85/100 | |
| Trunk Cargo Capacity(cu ft) | 18.4 cu ft | 18.4 cu ft | |
| Maximum Engine Output (Turbo)(HP) | 278 HP | 278 HP | |
| Rear Legroom(inches) | 37.9 in | 37.9 in | |
| NHTSA Overall Safety Rating(percentile) | 5/5 stars | 5/5 stars |
Sourced from publicly available data ·
Key Differences
7 attributes compared head-to-head
- $29,745Starting Price (2026 Base Model)$28,690(winner)
- 86%(winner)5-Year Reliability Rating79%
- 62%(winner)5-Year Resale Value Retention56%
- 32 MPG(winner)EPA Combined Fuel Economy (LE/S Trim)30 MPG
- 8 inchesStandard Touchscreen Size (Base Model)8 inches
- 15.1 cu ftCargo Space (Trunk Volume)15.2 cu ft(winner)
- 84/100(winner)Owner Satisfaction (J.D. Power 2025)81/100
- Starting Price (2026 Base Model)
Toyota Camry
$29,745
Nissan Altima
$28,690(winner)
- 5-Year Reliability Rating
Toyota Camry
86%(winner)
Nissan Altima
79%
- 5-Year Resale Value Retention
Toyota Camry
62%(winner)
Nissan Altima
56%
- EPA Combined Fuel Economy (LE/S Trim)
Toyota Camry
32 MPG(winner)
Nissan Altima
30 MPG
- Standard Touchscreen Size (Base Model)
Toyota Camry
8 inches
Nissan Altima
8 inches
- Cargo Space (Trunk Volume)
Toyota Camry
15.1 cu ft
Nissan Altima
15.2 cu ft(winner)
- Owner Satisfaction (J.D. Power 2025)
Toyota Camry
84/100(winner)
Nissan Altima
81/100
Full Comparison
| Attribute | Toyota Camry | Nissan Altima |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price (2026)(USD) | $32,500 (estimated) | — |
| Starting MSRP (2026)(USD) | $29,765 | — |
| Starting MSRP (2025)(USD) | $29,390 | $28,500(winner) |
| Starting Price (MSRP 2026)(USD) | $28,045 | — |
| Starting Price (2026 LE/S Trim)(USD) | $29,745 | $28,690(winner) |
Show 1 more attributeStarting MSRP (2025 Base Model)(USD) $28,950 — | ||
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 49-50 MPG combined | — |
| City Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 53 MPG | — |
| Highway Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 46 MPG | — |
| Estimated MPG Combined(MPG) | 51 MPG | — |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Standard Non-Hybrid)(mpg) | 33 mpg | — |
Show 4 more attributesEPA Combined Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(mpg) 52 mpg — EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Standard Engine)(MPG) 28-32 MPG 26-30 MPG Highway Fuel Economy(mpg) 33 MPG — EPA Combined Fuel Economy(MPG) 32 MPG (LE gasoline) 30 MPG (S gasoline) | ||
| Engine Type (Standard) | 2.5L 4-Cylinder Hybrid | — |
| Transmission Type | CVT | — |
| Standard Touchscreen Size(inches) | 8 inches | — |
| Infotainment Screen Size(inches) | 10.2-inch digital cluster | — |
| Powertrain Type | Gasoline only | — |
| Standard Infotainment Display Size(inches) | 8 inches | — |
| Infotainment Screen Size (Standard)(inches) | 8 inches | — |
Show 1 more attributeStandard Apple CarPlay/Android Auto Requires $1,500 upgrade Standard on all trims | ||
| Heated Door Mirrors Standard | Yes | — |
| Highway Cabin Noise Level(dB) | 71 dB(winner) | 73 dB |
| Rear Legroom(inches) | 37.9 in | — |
| Interior Width (Front Legroom)(inches) | 38.6 inches | — |
| Cargo Capacity(cubic feet) | 15.1 cu ft | — |
| Safety Rating (NHTSA Overall)(stars) | 5 stars | — |
| Standard Driver Assistance Features | Toyota Safety Sense 2.5+ | — |
| NHTSA Overall Safety Rating(percentile) | 5/5 stars | — |
| Engine Horsepower(hp) | 225 hp @ 6000 RPM | — |
| Engine Torque(lb-ft) | 163 lb-ft @ 5200 RPM | — |
| Base Engine Power(hp) | 203 hp (4-cyl naturally aspirated)(winner) | 188 hp (4-cyl naturally aspirated) |
| Turbocharged Engine Option(hp) | Not available | 260 hp (2.0L Turbo) |
| Base Engine Power Output(hp) | 203 hp | — |
Show 3 more attributesBase Engine Torque(lb-ft) 184 lb-ft — 0-60 mph Acceleration(seconds) 8.2 seconds — Maximum Engine Output (Turbo)(HP) 278 HP — | ||
| Fuel Tank Capacity(gallons) | 13 gallons | — |
| Seating Capacity(seats) | 5 seats | — |
| Cargo Space(cu-ft) | 15.1 cu-ft | — |
| Trunk Cargo Capacity(cu ft) | 18.4 cu ft | — |
| J.D. Power Dependability Rating(ranking) | 94/100 | — |
| J.D. Power Reliability Rating(out of 5) | 92/100(winner) | 85/100 |
| 5-Year Reliability Rating(percent) | 86%(winner) | 79% |
| 3-Year Resale Value Retention(%) | 63%(winner) | 58% |
| 5-Year Residual Value Retention(percent) | 58% | — |
| 5-Year Resale Value Retention(percent) | 62%(winner) | 56% |
| Powertrain Warranty Coverage(miles) | 5 yr / 60k mi | — |
| Standard Warranty - Powertrain(years/miles) | 5 years/60,000 miles | 5 years/60,000 miles |
| Rear Seat Legroom(inches) | 38.3 inches | — |
| Trunk Capacity(cubic feet) | 15.1 cu ft | — |
| Consumer Reports Owner Satisfaction(score out of 10) | 8.2/10 | — |
| Owner Satisfaction (J.D. Power 2025)(score/100) | 84/100(winner) | 81/100 |
| Trunk/Cargo Volume(cubic feet) | 15.1 cu ft | 15.2 cu ft(winner) |
| Fuel Tank Capacity(liters) | 14.5 L | 14.8 L(winner) |
| J.D. Power Reliability Score(points) | 85/100 | — |
Toyota CamryNissan AltimaShow 1 more attribute
Show 4 more attributes
Show 1 more attribute
Show 3 more attributes
Pros & Cons
10 pros·4 cons across both
Toyota Camry
Pros
- 86% 5-year reliability rating (vs 79% Altima) — Toyota's legendary durability reduces repair costs
- 62% resale value retention after 5 years — saves $2,400-3,200 vs Altima over ownership
- 32 MPG combined fuel economy — 2 MPG better efficiency than Altima LE
- Hybrid option available (52 MPG combined) — lowest cost-per-mile among midsize sedans
- Available adaptive suspension — smoother ride on highways and rough roads
Cons
- $29,745 starting price is $1,055 more than Altima base model
- Base model infotainment lacks smartphone integration (CarPlay/Android Auto) — requires upgrade
Nissan Altima
Pros
- $28,690 starting price — $1,055 cheaper than Camry LE, lower entry barrier
- Standard Apple CarPlay & Android Auto on all trims — base Camry requires $1,500 upgrade
- 14.8-liter fuel tank vs 14.5 Camry — 4% larger fuel capacity for longer range between fill-ups
- Available Intelligent All-Wheel Drive (e-AWD) — better traction in snow/wet conditions
- More aggressive exterior styling — sportier visual appeal than conservative Camry design
Cons
- 79% 5-year reliability rating — 7 points lower than Camry, statistically higher repair probability
- 56% resale value retention — loses $2,400-3,200 more value than Camry over 5 years
Frequently Asked Questions
5 questions
The Toyota Camry has a documented 86% 5-year reliability rating versus the Nissan Altima's 79%, per J.D. Power data. Toyota owners report 18% fewer unscheduled repairs. This 7-point gap means Altima owners spend an average of $800-1,200 more in repairs over 5 years.
Resources & Learn More
Curated sources to dive deeper
Where to Buy
As an affiliate, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you. Learn more about our affiliate disclosure
Wikipedia
Related Comparisons
12 more to explore
Toyota Camry vs Nissan Altima
automotiveToyota Camry vs Honda Accord
automotiveHonda Accord vs Nissan Altima
automotiveToyota Camry vs Hyundai Sonata
automotiveToyota Camry vs Mazda 6
automotiveiPhone 17 vs Samsung Galaxy S26
technologyPS5 vs Xbox Series X
technologyMac vs Windows
technologyAndroid vs iOS
technologyNVIDIA vs AMD
technologyMacBook Pro 14 vs MacBook Pro 16
automotiveGenesis G90 vs Lexus LS
automotive
Related Articles
5 articles
- technology
Best Streaming Services in 2026: Top Picks for Every Budget & Interest
Navigating the crowded streaming landscape in 2026 can be overwhelming. We've tested and ranked the best streaming services that offer the most value, from Netflix's massive library to budget-friendly options like Tubi, helping you cut cable and find your perfect entertainment solution.
Read article - technology
Best Live TV Streaming Services & Plans for Spring 2026: Complete Buyer's Guide
Tired of overpaying for cable? Discover the best live TV streaming services and plans for Spring 2026, including YouTube TV's new genre-based packages starting at $55/month. Our comprehensive guide breaks down pricing, channels, and features to help you cut the cord.
Read article - technology
Philo in 2026: Streaming TV Service Review, Pricing & Reddit Community Insights
Explore Philo's evolution heading into 2026, including pricing tiers, channel lineup, and how it compares to competitors like Sling TV. Discover what the r/PhiloTV Reddit community thinks about the service's current offerings and future prospects.
Read article - technology
Best US Fighter Jets 2026: Top American Combat Aircraft Ranked
Discover the most advanced US fighter jets dominating the skies in 2026. From the legendary F-22 Raptor to the versatile F-35 Lightning II, we rank America's best combat aircraft based on performance, stealth, and air superiority capabilities.
Read article - technology
Philo in 2026: Pricing, Lineup & How It Compares to Sling TV
As we head into 2026, Philo continues to position itself as an affordable streaming alternative for cable TV lovers. Discover what Philo offers, how its pricing stacks up against competitors like Sling TV, and what the Reddit community thinks about its future.
Read article
Explore More
Related comparisons and categories