Honda Accord vs Nissan Altima
Honda Accord
Reliable midsize sedan with strong resale value and proven track record.
Budget-conscious buyers seeking long-term value, daily commuters, families planning to keep the vehicle 7+ years
Nissan Altima
Mid-size sedan offering performance and value pricing
First-time car buyers with tight budgets, drivers prioritizing cargo space, those planning shorter ownership periods (3-5 years)
Short Answer
The Honda Accord edges ahead with better fuel efficiency (38 MPG combined), higher reliability ratings (92/100 vs 85/100), and stronger resale value retention at 58%, while the Nissan Altima offers more interior space and a lower starting price ($28,950 vs $32,650).
Our Verdict
AI-assistedChoose the Honda Accord if you prioritize fuel efficiency, long-term reliability, and resale value—it's the smarter long-term investment for practical buyers. Choose the Nissan Altima if you want lower upfront cost, more cargo space, and stronger acceleration while still maintaining excellent safety ratings.
Was this verdict helpful?
Choose Honda Accord if
Budget-conscious buyers seeking long-term value, daily commuters, families planning to keep the vehicle 7+ years
Choose Nissan Altima if
First-time car buyers with tight budgets, drivers prioritizing cargo space, those planning shorter ownership periods (3-5 years)
Track this comparison
Get notified when prices change, new specs ship, or our verdict updates.
Triggers: price change new spec verdict update
No spam. Stop anytime.
Key Differences at a Glance
Key Facts & Figures
| Metric | Honda Accord | Nissan Altima | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard Touchscreen Size(inches) | 10.2 inches | — | — |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 47-48 MPG combined | — | — |
| Starting Price (2026)(USD) | $29,590 | — | — |
| City Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 48 MPG | — | — |
| Highway Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 47 MPG | — | — |
| Interior Width (Front Legroom)(inches) | 38.4 inches | — | — |
| Cargo Capacity(cubic feet) | 15.8 cu ft | — | — |
| Safety Rating (NHTSA Overall)(stars) | 5 stars | — | — |
| Engine Torque(lb-ft) | 180 lb-ft (hybrid est.) | — | — |
| Fuel Tank Capacity(gallons) | 14.8 gallons | — | — |
| Estimated MPG Combined(MPG) | 48 MPG (hybrid) | — | — |
| Infotainment Screen Size(inches) | 12.3-inch display | — | — |
| Seating Capacity(seats) | 5 seats | — | — |
| Cargo Space(cu-ft) | 14.8 cu-ft (est.) | — | — |
| Engine Horsepower(hp) | 204 hp (hybrid) | — | — |
| Engine Displacement & Power(hp) | 2.0L naturally aspirated, 201 hp | — | — |
| 0-60 Acceleration(seconds) | 8.8 seconds | — | — |
| Highway Fuel Economy(MPG) | 38 MPG | — | — |
| Cargo Space(cu ft) | 103.1 cu ft | — | — |
| Starting MSRP(USD) | $28,500 | — | — |
| Infotainment Display(inches diagonal) | 8 inches | — | — |
| Wheelbase(inches) | 112.8 inches | — | — |
| Starting MSRP (2025 Base Model)(USD) | $32,650 | $28,950 | +13% |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy(mpg) | 38 MPG | 32 MPG | +19% |
| J.D. Power Reliability Score(points out of 100) | 92/100 | 85/100 | +8% |
| 5-Year Resale Value Retention(percent) | 58% | 52% | +12% |
| Trunk/Cargo Capacity(cubic feet) | 16.7 cu ft | 18.4 cu ft | -9% |
| Maximum Engine Output (Turbo)(HP) | 252 HP | 278 HP | -9% |
| Rear Legroom(inches) | 38.3 in | 37.9 in | +1% |
| NHTSA Overall Safety Rating(stars) | 5/5 stars | 5/5 stars | — |
| Starting MSRP (2025)(USD) | $28,500 | $28,500 | — |
| Base Engine Power(hp) | 188 hp (4-cyl naturally aspirated) | 188 hp (4-cyl naturally aspirated) | — |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Standard Engine)(MPG) | 26-30 MPG | 26-30 MPG | — |
| J.D. Power Reliability Rating(score/100) | 85/100 | 85/100 | — |
| 3-Year Resale Value Retention(%) | 58% | 58% | — |
| Highway Cabin Noise Level(dB) | 73 dB | 73 dB | — |
| Turbocharged Engine Option(hp) | 260 hp (2.0L Turbo) | 260 hp (2.0L Turbo) | — |
All figures sourced from publicly available data. Last updated Jun 2026.
Key Differences
Honda Accord
38 MPG🏆
Nissan Altima
32 MPG
Honda Accord
$32,650
Nissan Altima
$28,950🏆
Honda Accord
92/100🏆
Nissan Altima
85/100
Honda Accord
58%🏆
Nissan Altima
52%
Honda Accord
16.7
Nissan Altima
18.4🏆
Honda Accord
252 HP (turbo)
Nissan Altima
278 HP (turbo)🏆
Honda Accord
5/5 stars overall
Nissan Altima
5/5 stars overall
Full Comparison
| Attribute | ||
|---|---|---|
| Engine Type (Standard) | 2.0L Turbocharged or Hybrid Optional | — |
| Transmission Type | CVT | — |
| Standard Touchscreen Size(inches) | 10.2 inches | — |
| Infotainment Screen Size(inches) | 12.3-inch display | — |
| Powertrain Type | Gasoline and Hybrid options | — |
| Infotainment Display(inches diagonal) | 8 inches | — |
| Heated Door Mirrors Standard | No | — |
| Rear Legroom(inches) | 38.3 in | 37.9 in |
| Highway Cabin Noise Level(dB) | 73 dB | — |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 47-48 MPG combined | — |
| City Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 48 MPG | — |
| Highway Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 47 MPG | — |
| Estimated MPG Combined(MPG) | 48 MPG (hybrid) | — |
| Highway Fuel Economy(MPG) | 38 MPG | — |
Show 2 more attributesEPA Combined Fuel Economy(mpg) 38 MPG 32 MPG EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Standard Engine)(MPG) 26-30 MPG — | ||
| Starting Price (2026)(USD) | $29,590 | — |
| Starting MSRP(USD) | $28,500 | — |
| Starting MSRP (2025 Base Model)(USD) | $32,650 | $28,950 |
| Starting MSRP (2025)(USD) | $28,500 | — |
| Interior Width (Front Legroom)(inches) | 38.4 inches | — |
| Cargo Capacity(cubic feet) | 15.8 cu ft | — |
| Trunk/Cargo Capacity(cubic feet) | 16.7 cu ft | 18.4 cu ft |
| Safety Rating (NHTSA Overall)(stars) | 5 stars | — |
| Standard Driver Assistance Features | Honda Sensing Elite | — |
| NHTSA Overall Safety Rating(stars) | 5/5 stars | 5/5 stars |
| Engine Torque(lb-ft) | 180 lb-ft (hybrid est.) | — |
| Engine Horsepower(hp) | 204 hp (hybrid) | — |
| Engine Displacement & Power(hp) | 2.0L naturally aspirated, 201 hp | — |
| 0-60 Acceleration(seconds) | 8.8 seconds | — |
| Maximum Engine Output (Turbo)(HP) | 252 HP | 278 HP |
Show 2 more attributesBase Engine Power(hp) 188 hp (4-cyl naturally aspirated) — Turbocharged Engine Option(hp) 260 hp (2.0L Turbo) — | ||
| Fuel Tank Capacity(gallons) | 14.8 gallons | — |
| Seating Capacity(seats) | 5 seats | — |
| Cargo Space(cu-ft) | 14.8 cu-ft (est.) | — |
| Cargo Space(cu ft) | 103.1 cu ft | — |
| Transmission Type | CVT automatic (10-speed on some trims) | — |
| Wheelbase(inches) | 112.8 inches | — |
| J.D. Power Reliability Score(points out of 100) | 92/100 | 85/100 |
| J.D. Power Reliability Rating(score/100) | 85/100 | — |
| 5-Year Resale Value Retention(percent) | 58% | 52% |
| 3-Year Resale Value Retention(%) | 58% | — |
| Standard Warranty - Powertrain(years/miles) | 5 years/60,000 miles | — |
Show 2 more attributes
Show 2 more attributes
Visual Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of numeric attributes
Pros & Cons
Honda Accord
Pros
- 38 MPG combined EPA rating saves $800-1,200 annually in fuel costs vs competitors
- 92/100 J.D. Power reliability score with 10-year powertrain warranty available
- 58% resale value retention after 5 years ($18,900 residual on $32,650 purchase)
- Apple CarPlay/Android Auto integration standard on all trims
- Spacious 38.3-inch rear legroom for comfortable passenger seating
Cons
- Starting price of $32,650 is $3,700 higher than Altima base model
- Smaller 16.7 cu ft trunk limits luggage capacity for road trips
Nissan Altima
Pros
- $28,950 base price undercuts Accord by $3,700, saving money upfront
- 278 HP turbo engine delivers 12% more power than Accord's base turbocharged option
- 18.4 cubic foot trunk is 10% larger, accommodating more luggage and cargo
- Dual-zone climate control standard on SV trim and above
- Nissan Safety Shield 360 with automated emergency braking on all trims
Cons
- 32 MPG combined rating costs $800-1,200 more annually in fuel vs Accord over 5 years
- 85/100 J.D. Power reliability score ranks 7 points below Accord, indicating higher repair frequency
Frequently Asked Questions
The Honda Accord leads with 38 MPG combined EPA rating vs the Nissan Altima's 32 MPG. Over 5 years and 75,000 miles at $3.50/gallon, the Accord saves approximately $1,050 in fuel costs, making it more economical for commuters.
Resources & Learn More
Dive deeper with these curated resources
Where to Buy
As an affiliate, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you. Learn more
Wikipedia
Related Comparisons
Toyota Camry vs Honda Accord
automotive
Honda Accord vs Mazda 6
automotive
Honda Accord vs Hyundai Sonata
automotive
Toyota Camry vs Nissan Altima
automotive
Tesla vs Ford
automotive
BMW vs Mercedes-Benz
automotive
iPhone 17 vs Samsung Galaxy S26
technology
PS5 vs Xbox Series X
technology
Mac vs Windows
technology
Android vs iOS
technology
NVIDIA vs AMD
technology
Rivian vs Lucid Motors
automotive
Related Articles
Best Streaming Services in 2026: Top Picks for Every Budget & Interest
Navigating the crowded streaming landscape in 2026 can be overwhelming. We've tested and ranked the best streaming services that offer the most value, from Netflix's massive library to budget-friendly options like Tubi, helping you cut cable and find your perfect entertainment solution.
Best Live TV Streaming Services & Plans for Spring 2026: Complete Buyer's Guide
Tired of overpaying for cable? Discover the best live TV streaming services and plans for Spring 2026, including YouTube TV's new genre-based packages starting at $55/month. Our comprehensive guide breaks down pricing, channels, and features to help you cut the cord.
Philo in 2026: Streaming TV Service Review, Pricing & Reddit Community Insights
Explore Philo's evolution heading into 2026, including pricing tiers, channel lineup, and how it compares to competitors like Sling TV. Discover what the r/PhiloTV Reddit community thinks about the service's current offerings and future prospects.
Best US Fighter Jets 2026: Top American Combat Aircraft Ranked
Discover the most advanced US fighter jets dominating the skies in 2026. From the legendary F-22 Raptor to the versatile F-35 Lightning II, we rank America's best combat aircraft based on performance, stealth, and air superiority capabilities.
Philo in 2026: Pricing, Lineup & How It Compares to Sling TV
As we head into 2026, Philo continues to position itself as an affordable streaming alternative for cable TV lovers. Discover what Philo offers, how its pricing stacks up against competitors like Sling TV, and what the Reddit community thinks about its future.