Toyota Camry vs Mazda 6
Toyota Camry
Best-selling midsize sedan known for reliability, value, and resale strength.
Buyers seeking maximum reliability, fuel efficiency, and low total cost of ownership; families needing proven durability.
Mazda 6
Upscale midsize sedan emphasizing driving dynamics and premium interior design.
Drivers who prioritize engaging handling, modern styling, and a premium driving experience over lowest purchase price and resale value.
Short Answer
The Toyota Camry prioritizes reliability and value with a starting price of $28,045 and 33 MPG highway, while the Mazda 6 emphasizes driving dynamics with a more engaging steering feel and starting price of $29,450. The Camry outsells the 6 by roughly 3-to-1 in the US market.
Our Verdict
AI-assistedChoose the Toyota Camry if you prioritize affordability, fuel efficiency, reliability ratings, and strong resale value—it's the practical choice for most sedan buyers. Choose the Mazda 6 if you value engaging handling, a premium interior feel, and prefer a more connected driving experience over lowest-cost ownership.
Was this verdict helpful?
Choose Toyota Camry if
Buyers seeking maximum reliability, fuel efficiency, and low total cost of ownership; families needing proven durability.
Choose Mazda 6 if
Drivers who prioritize engaging handling, modern styling, and a premium driving experience over lowest purchase price and resale value.
Track this comparison
Get notified when prices change, new specs ship, or our verdict updates.
Triggers: price change new spec verdict update
No spam. Stop anytime.
Key Differences at a Glance
Key Facts & Figures
| Metric | Toyota Camry | Mazda 6 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starting Price (2026)(USD) | $32,500 (estimated) | — | — |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 49-50 MPG combined | — | — |
| Standard Touchscreen Size(inches) | 8 inches | — | — |
| City Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 53 MPG | — | — |
| Highway Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 46 MPG | — | — |
| Interior Width (Front Legroom)(inches) | 38.6 inches | — | — |
| Cargo Capacity(cubic feet) | 15.1 cu ft | — | — |
| Safety Rating (NHTSA Overall)(stars) | 5 stars | — | — |
| Engine Horsepower(hp) | 225 hp @ 6000 RPM | — | — |
| Engine Torque(lb-ft) | 163 lb-ft @ 5200 RPM | — | — |
| Fuel Tank Capacity(gallons) | 13 gallons | — | — |
| Estimated MPG Combined(MPG) | 51 MPG | — | — |
| Infotainment Screen Size(inches) | 10.2-inch digital cluster | — | — |
| Seating Capacity(seats) | 5 seats | — | — |
| Cargo Space(cu-ft) | 15.1 cu-ft | — | — |
| Starting MSRP (2026)(USD) | $29,765 | — | — |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Standard Non-Hybrid)(mpg) | 33 mpg | — | — |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(mpg) | 52 mpg | — | — |
| J.D. Power Dependability Rating(score out of 100) | 94/100 | — | — |
| 3-Year Resale Value Retention(%) | 63% | — | — |
| Standard Infotainment Display Size(inches) | 8 inches | — | — |
| Rear Seat Legroom(inches) | 38.3 inches | — | — |
| Consumer Reports Owner Satisfaction(score out of 10) | 8.2/10 | — | — |
| Starting MSRP (2025)(USD) | $29,390 | — | — |
| Base Engine Power(hp) | 203 hp (4-cyl naturally aspirated) | — | — |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Standard Engine)(MPG) | 28-32 MPG | — | — |
| J.D. Power Reliability Rating(score/100) | 92/100 | — | — |
| Highway Cabin Noise Level(dB) | 71 dB | — | — |
| Starting Price (MSRP 2026)(USD) | $28,045 | $29,450 | -5% |
| Highway Fuel Economy(MPG) | 33 MPG | 31 MPG | +6% |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy(mpg) | 28 MPG | 26 MPG | +8% |
| Base Engine Power Output(hp) | 203 hp | 187 hp | +9% |
| Base Engine Torque(lb-ft) | 184 lb-ft | 186 lb-ft | -1% |
| 0-60 mph Acceleration(seconds) | 8.2 seconds | 7.9 seconds | +4% |
| Trunk Capacity(cubic feet) | 15.1 cu ft | 14.2 cu ft | +6% |
| Infotainment Screen Size (Standard)(inches) | 8 inches | 8.8 inches | -9% |
| 5-Year Residual Value Retention(percent) | 58% | 51% | +14% |
| Engine Displacement & Power(hp) | 2.5L turbocharged, 250 hp | 2.5L turbocharged, 250 hp | — |
| 0-60 Acceleration(seconds) | 7.4 seconds | 7.4 seconds | — |
| Cargo Space(cu ft) | 88.8 cu ft | 88.8 cu ft | — |
| Starting MSRP(USD) | $29,400 | $29,400 | — |
| Infotainment Display(inches diagonal) | 8.8 inches | 8.8 inches | — |
| Wheelbase(inches) | 111.4 inches | 111.4 inches | — |
All figures sourced from publicly available data. Last updated Jun 2026.
Key Differences
Toyota Camry
$28,045🏆
Mazda 6
$29,450
Toyota Camry
33 MPG🏆
Mazda 6
31 MPG
Toyota Camry
203 hp / 184 lb-ft🏆
Mazda 6
187 hp / 186 lb-ft
Toyota Camry
Toyota Safety Sense 2.5 (all trims)
Mazda 6
i-ACTIVSENSE (all trims)
Toyota Camry
5 years / 60,000 miles
Mazda 6
5 years / 60,000 miles
Toyota Camry
Moderate feedback
Mazda 6
Sport-tuned with higher feedback🏆
Toyota Camry
430,000 units🏆
Mazda 6
140,000 units
Full Comparison
| Attribute |  Toyota Camry |  Mazda 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price (2026)(USD) | $32,500 (estimated) | — |
| Starting MSRP (2026)(USD) | $29,765 | — |
| Starting MSRP (2025)(USD) | $29,390 | — |
| Starting Price (MSRP 2026)(USD) | $28,045 | $29,450 |
| Starting MSRP(USD) | $29,400 | — |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 49-50 MPG combined | — |
| City Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 53 MPG | — |
| Highway Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 46 MPG | — |
| Estimated MPG Combined(MPG) | 51 MPG | — |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Standard Non-Hybrid)(mpg) | 33 mpg | — |
Show 4 more attributesEPA Combined Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(mpg) 52 mpg — EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Standard Engine)(MPG) 28-32 MPG — Highway Fuel Economy(MPG) 33 MPG 31 MPG EPA Combined Fuel Economy(mpg) 28 MPG 26 MPG | ||
| Engine Type (Standard) | 2.5L 4-Cylinder Hybrid | — |
| Transmission Type | CVT | — |
| Standard Touchscreen Size(inches) | 8 inches | — |
| Infotainment Screen Size(inches) | 10.2-inch digital cluster | — |
| Powertrain Type | Gasoline only | — |
| Standard Infotainment Display Size(inches) | 8 inches | — |
| Infotainment Screen Size (Standard)(inches) | 8 inches | 8.8 inches |
Show 1 more attributeInfotainment Display(inches diagonal) 8.8 inches — | ||
| Heated Door Mirrors Standard | Yes | — |
| Rear Seat Legroom(inches) | 38.3 inches | — |
| Highway Cabin Noise Level(dB) | 71 dB | — |
| Interior Width (Front Legroom)(inches) | 38.6 inches | — |
| Cargo Capacity(cubic feet) | 15.1 cu ft | — |
| Safety Rating (NHTSA Overall)(stars) | 5 stars | — |
| Standard Driver Assistance Features | Toyota Safety Sense 2.5+ | — |
| Engine Horsepower(hp) | 225 hp @ 6000 RPM | — |
| Engine Torque(lb-ft) | 163 lb-ft @ 5200 RPM | — |
| Base Engine Power(hp) | 203 hp (4-cyl naturally aspirated) | — |
| Turbocharged Engine Option(hp) | Not available | — |
| Base Engine Power Output(hp) | 203 hp | 187 hp |
Show 4 more attributesBase Engine Torque(lb-ft) 184 lb-ft 186 lb-ft 0-60 mph Acceleration(seconds) 8.2 seconds 7.9 seconds Engine Displacement & Power(hp) 2.5L turbocharged, 250 hp — 0-60 Acceleration(seconds) 7.4 seconds — | ||
| Fuel Tank Capacity(gallons) | 13 gallons | — |
| Seating Capacity(seats) | 5 seats | — |
| Cargo Space(cu-ft) | 15.1 cu-ft | — |
| J.D. Power Dependability Rating(score out of 100) | 94/100 | — |
| J.D. Power Reliability Rating(score/100) | 92/100 | — |
| 3-Year Resale Value Retention(%) | 63% | — |
| 5-Year Residual Value Retention(percent) | 58% | 51% |
| Powertrain Warranty Coverage(years/miles) | 5 yr / 60k mi | — |
| Standard Warranty - Powertrain(years/miles) | 5 years/60,000 miles | — |
| Consumer Reports Owner Satisfaction(score out of 10) | 8.2/10 | — |
| Trunk Capacity(cubic feet) | 15.1 cu ft | 14.2 cu ft |
| Cargo Space(cu ft) | 88.8 cu ft | — |
| Transmission Type | 6-speed automatic | — |
| Wheelbase(inches) | 111.4 inches | — |
Toyota CamryMazda 6Show 4 more attributes
Show 1 more attribute
Show 4 more attributes
Visual Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of numeric attributes
Pros & Cons
Toyota Camry
Pros
- 33 MPG highway fuel economy (class-leading for non-hybrid)
- 203 hp base engine with strong low-end torque
- Consistently ranks top 3 in reliability surveys (J.D. Power)
- Starting price $1,405 less than Mazda 6
- Larger trunk at 15.1 cubic feet with 60/40 split rear seats
Cons
- Interior design feels dated compared to 6's modern cabin
- Steering lacks the sport-tuned feedback of competitors
- Less engaging driving dynamics overall
Mazda 6
Pros
- Sport-tuned steering with responsive, communicative feedback
- Premium Bose audio system (higher trims) with crystalline sound quality
- Modern interior with intuitive Mazda Connect infotainment
- Available all-wheel drive (Camry AWD adds $1,500 more)
- I-ACTIVSENSE collision mitigation comes standard on all trims
Cons
- 31 MPG highway is 2 MPG below Camry—costs ~$120 more annually in fuel
- Starting price $1,405 higher than Camry base model
- Lower residual values—depreciates 8-12% faster than Camry at 5 years
Frequently Asked Questions
The Toyota Camry ranks higher in J.D. Power Initial Quality Study (2024: 78/100 vs Mazda 6's 75/100) and has fewer reported powertrain issues long-term. Consumer Reports rates Camry as 'Above Average' while Mazda 6 is 'Average' for predicted reliability. Camry owners report 15-20% fewer repairs in the first 5 years.
Resources & Learn More
Dive deeper with these curated resources
Where to Buy
As an affiliate, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you. Learn more
Wikipedia
Related Comparisons
Toyota Camry vs Honda Accord
automotive
Honda Accord vs Mazda 6
automotive
Toyota Camry vs Hyundai Sonata
automotive
Toyota Camry vs Nissan Altima
automotive
Tesla vs Ford
automotive
BMW vs Mercedes-Benz
automotive
iPhone 17 vs Samsung Galaxy S26
technology
PS5 vs Xbox Series X
technology
Mac vs Windows
technology
Android vs iOS
technology
NVIDIA vs AMD
technology
Rivian vs Lucid: EV Stock Comparison 2026
automotive
Related Articles
Best Streaming Services in 2026: Top Picks for Every Budget & Interest
Navigating the crowded streaming landscape in 2026 can be overwhelming. We've tested and ranked the best streaming services that offer the most value, from Netflix's massive library to budget-friendly options like Tubi, helping you cut cable and find your perfect entertainment solution.
Best Live TV Streaming Services & Plans for Spring 2026: Complete Buyer's Guide
Tired of overpaying for cable? Discover the best live TV streaming services and plans for Spring 2026, including YouTube TV's new genre-based packages starting at $55/month. Our comprehensive guide breaks down pricing, channels, and features to help you cut the cord.
Philo in 2026: Streaming TV Service Review, Pricing & Reddit Community Insights
Explore Philo's evolution heading into 2026, including pricing tiers, channel lineup, and how it compares to competitors like Sling TV. Discover what the r/PhiloTV Reddit community thinks about the service's current offerings and future prospects.
Best US Fighter Jets 2026: Top American Combat Aircraft Ranked
Discover the most advanced US fighter jets dominating the skies in 2026. From the legendary F-22 Raptor to the versatile F-35 Lightning II, we rank America's best combat aircraft based on performance, stealth, and air superiority capabilities.
Philo in 2026: Pricing, Lineup & How It Compares to Sling TV
As we head into 2026, Philo continues to position itself as an affordable streaming alternative for cable TV lovers. Discover what Philo offers, how its pricing stacks up against competitors like Sling TV, and what the Reddit community thinks about its future.