Toyota Camry vs Nissan Altima
Toyota Camry
Best-selling midsize sedan known for reliability, value, and resale strength.
Practical buyers seeking maximum longevity, low maintenance costs, and strong resale value over 8+ years
Nissan Altima
Mid-size sedan offering performance and value pricing
Budget-conscious drivers who value performance, sportier handling, and don't plan to keep the vehicle beyond 5-6 years
Short Answer
The Toyota Camry offers superior reliability ratings (92/100 vs 85/100) and better fuel efficiency (28-32 MPG combined vs 26-30 MPG), while the Nissan Altima provides a sportier driving experience with a more powerful turbocharged engine option and lower starting price ($28,500 vs $29,390).
Our Verdict
AI-assistedChoose the Toyota Camry if you prioritize long-term reliability, fuel efficiency, and resale value—it's the safer investment for drivers who plan to keep their car 8+ years. Choose the Nissan Altima if you want lower upfront costs, sportier performance options, and a more engaging driving experience with turbocharged power.
Was this verdict helpful?
Choose Toyota Camry if
Practical buyers seeking maximum longevity, low maintenance costs, and strong resale value over 8+ years
Choose Nissan Altima if
Budget-conscious drivers who value performance, sportier handling, and don't plan to keep the vehicle beyond 5-6 years
Track this comparison
Get notified when prices change, new specs ship, or our verdict updates.
Triggers: price change new spec verdict update
No spam. Stop anytime.
Key Differences at a Glance
Key Facts & Figures
| Metric | Toyota Camry | Nissan Altima | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starting Price (2026)(USD) | $32,500 (estimated) | — | — |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 49-50 MPG combined | — | — |
| Standard Touchscreen Size(inches) | 8 inches | — | — |
| City Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 53 MPG | — | — |
| Highway Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 46 MPG | — | — |
| Interior Width (Front Legroom)(inches) | 38.6 inches | — | — |
| Cargo Capacity(cubic feet) | 15.1 cu ft | — | — |
| Safety Rating (NHTSA Overall)(stars) | 5 stars | — | — |
| Engine Horsepower(hp) | 225 hp @ 6000 RPM | — | — |
| Engine Torque(lb-ft) | 163 lb-ft @ 5200 RPM | — | — |
| Fuel Tank Capacity(gallons) | 13 gallons | — | — |
| Estimated MPG Combined(MPG) | 51 MPG | — | — |
| Infotainment Screen Size(inches) | 10.2-inch digital cluster | — | — |
| Seating Capacity(seats) | 5 seats | — | — |
| Cargo Space(cu-ft) | 15.1 cu-ft | — | — |
| Starting MSRP (2026)(USD) | $29,765 | — | — |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Standard Non-Hybrid)(mpg) | 33 mpg | — | — |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(mpg) | 52 mpg | — | — |
| J.D. Power Dependability Rating(score out of 100) | 94/100 | — | — |
| 3-Year Resale Value Retention(%) | 63% | 58% | +9% |
| Standard Infotainment Display Size(inches) | 8 inches | — | — |
| Rear Seat Legroom(inches) | 38.3 inches | — | — |
| Consumer Reports Owner Satisfaction(score out of 10) | 8.2/10 | — | — |
| Starting MSRP (2025)(USD) | $29,390 | $28,500 | +3% |
| Base Engine Power(hp) | 203 hp (4-cyl naturally aspirated) | 188 hp (4-cyl naturally aspirated) | +8% |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Standard Engine)(MPG) | 28-32 MPG | 26-30 MPG | +7% |
| J.D. Power Reliability Rating(score/5) | 92/100 | 85/100 | +8% |
| Highway Cabin Noise Level(dB) | 71 dB | 73 dB | -3% |
| Turbocharged Engine Option(hp) | Not available | 260 hp (2.0L Turbo) | — |
| Starting Price (MSRP 2026)(USD) | $28,045 | — | — |
| Highway Fuel Economy(MPG) | 33 MPG | — | — |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy(mpg) | 28 MPG | 32 MPG | -13% |
| Base Engine Power Output(hp) | 203 hp | — | — |
| Base Engine Torque(lb-ft) | 184 lb-ft | — | — |
| 0-60 mph Acceleration(seconds) | 8.2 seconds | — | — |
| Trunk Capacity(cubic feet) | 15.1 cu ft | — | — |
| Infotainment Screen Size (Standard)(inches) | 8 inches | — | — |
| 5-Year Residual Value Retention(percent) | 58% | — | — |
| Starting MSRP (2025 Base Model)(USD) | $28,950 | $28,950 | — |
| J.D. Power Reliability Score(points out of 100) | 85/100 | 85/100 | — |
| 5-Year Resale Value Retention(percent) | 52% | 52% | — |
| Trunk/Cargo Capacity(cubic feet) | 18.4 cu ft | 18.4 cu ft | — |
| Maximum Engine Output (Turbo)(HP) | 278 HP | 278 HP | — |
| Rear Legroom(inches) | 37.9 in | 37.9 in | — |
| NHTSA Overall Safety Rating(stars) | 5/5 stars | 5/5 stars | — |
All figures sourced from publicly available data. Last updated Jun 2026.
Key Differences
Toyota Camry
92/100🏆
Nissan Altima
85/100
Toyota Camry
$29,390
Nissan Altima
$28,500🏆
Toyota Camry
28-32 MPG🏆
Nissan Altima
26-30 MPG
Toyota Camry
No
Nissan Altima
Yes (260 hp 2.0T)🏆
Toyota Camry
3 yr/36k mi, 5 yr/60k mi
Nissan Altima
3 yr/36k mi, 5 yr/60k mi
Toyota Camry
63%🏆
Nissan Altima
58%
Toyota Camry
71 dB🏆
Nissan Altima
73 dB
Full Comparison
| Attribute |  Toyota Camry |  Nissan Altima |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price (2026)(USD) | $32,500 (estimated) | — |
| Starting MSRP (2026)(USD) | $29,765 | — |
| Starting MSRP (2025)(USD) | $29,390 | $28,500 |
| Starting Price (MSRP 2026)(USD) | $28,045 | — |
| Starting MSRP (2025 Base Model)(USD) | $28,950 | — |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 49-50 MPG combined | — |
| City Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 53 MPG | — |
| Highway Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 46 MPG | — |
| Estimated MPG Combined(MPG) | 51 MPG | — |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Standard Non-Hybrid)(mpg) | 33 mpg | — |
Show 4 more attributesEPA Combined Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(mpg) 52 mpg — EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Standard Engine)(MPG) 28-32 MPG 26-30 MPG Highway Fuel Economy(MPG) 33 MPG — EPA Combined Fuel Economy(mpg) 28 MPG 32 MPG | ||
| Engine Type (Standard) | 2.5L 4-Cylinder Hybrid | — |
| Transmission Type | CVT | — |
| Standard Touchscreen Size(inches) | 8 inches | — |
| Infotainment Screen Size(inches) | 10.2-inch digital cluster | — |
| Powertrain Type | Gasoline only | — |
| Standard Infotainment Display Size(inches) | 8 inches | — |
| Infotainment Screen Size (Standard)(inches) | 8 inches | — |
| Heated Door Mirrors Standard | Yes | — |
| Rear Seat Legroom(inches) | 38.3 inches | — |
| Highway Cabin Noise Level(dB) | 71 dB | 73 dB |
| Rear Legroom(inches) | 37.9 in | — |
| Interior Width (Front Legroom)(inches) | 38.6 inches | — |
| Cargo Capacity(cubic feet) | 15.1 cu ft | — |
| Trunk/Cargo Capacity(cubic feet) | 18.4 cu ft | — |
| Safety Rating (NHTSA Overall)(stars) | 5 stars | — |
| Standard Driver Assistance Features | Toyota Safety Sense 2.5+ | — |
| NHTSA Overall Safety Rating(stars) | 5/5 stars | — |
| Engine Horsepower(hp) | 225 hp @ 6000 RPM | — |
| Engine Torque(lb-ft) | 163 lb-ft @ 5200 RPM | — |
| Base Engine Power(hp) | 203 hp (4-cyl naturally aspirated) | 188 hp (4-cyl naturally aspirated) |
| Turbocharged Engine Option(hp) | Not available | 260 hp (2.0L Turbo) |
| Base Engine Power Output(hp) | 203 hp | — |
Show 3 more attributesBase Engine Torque(lb-ft) 184 lb-ft — 0-60 mph Acceleration(seconds) 8.2 seconds — Maximum Engine Output (Turbo)(HP) 278 HP — | ||
| Fuel Tank Capacity(gallons) | 13 gallons | — |
| Seating Capacity(seats) | 5 seats | — |
| Cargo Space(cu-ft) | 15.1 cu-ft | — |
| J.D. Power Dependability Rating(score out of 100) | 94/100 | — |
| J.D. Power Reliability Rating(score/5) | 92/100 | 85/100 |
| J.D. Power Reliability Score(points out of 100) | 85/100 | — |
| 3-Year Resale Value Retention(%) | 63% | 58% |
| 5-Year Residual Value Retention(percent) | 58% | — |
| 5-Year Resale Value Retention(percent) | 52% | — |
| Powertrain Warranty Coverage(years/miles) | 5 yr / 60k mi | — |
| Standard Warranty - Powertrain(years/miles) | 5 years/60,000 miles | 5 years/60,000 miles |
| Consumer Reports Owner Satisfaction(score out of 10) | 8.2/10 | — |
| Trunk Capacity(cubic feet) | 15.1 cu ft | — |
Toyota CamryNissan AltimaShow 4 more attributes
Show 3 more attributes
Visual Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of numeric attributes
Pros & Cons
Toyota Camry
Pros
- J.D. Power reliability rating of 92/100, highest in segment
- EPA combined fuel economy up to 32 MPG with hybrid option
- 63% 3-year resale value retention
- Quieter cabin at 71 dB highway noise level
- Toyota Safety Sense 2.5 standard on all trims with pre-collision warning
Cons
- Starting price $890 higher than Altima ($29,390 vs $28,500)
- Less engaging handling compared to sportier Altima turbocharged variant
- Fewer engine power options (base 203 hp, limited to hybrid or naturally aspirated)
Nissan Altima
Pros
- Starting price of $28,500, $890 less than Camry
- Optional 2.0L turbocharged engine produces 260 hp and 280 lb-ft torque for sportier driving
- ProPILOT Assist 2.5 advanced driver-assistance features on higher trims
- More responsive steering and engaging suspension tuning
- Available AWD option for better winter traction
Cons
- J.D. Power reliability rating of 85/100, 7 points below Camry
- EPA combined fuel economy 26-30 MPG, 2-4 MPG below Camry
- 58% 3-year resale value retention, 5% lower than Camry
- Highway cabin noise at 73 dB, 2 dB louder than Camry
Frequently Asked Questions
The Toyota Camry significantly outperforms the Nissan Altima in reliability. J.D. Power rates the Camry at 92/100 versus the Altima's 85/100. Over a 10-year ownership period, Camry owners report approximately 25% fewer major repairs and lower average annual maintenance costs ($450/year vs $625/year for Altima).
Resources & Learn More
Dive deeper with these curated resources
Where to Buy
As an affiliate, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you. Learn more
Wikipedia
Related Comparisons
Toyota Camry vs Honda Accord
automotive
Honda Accord vs Nissan Altima
automotive
Toyota Camry vs Hyundai Sonata
automotive
Toyota Camry vs Mazda 6
automotive
Tesla vs Ford
automotive
BMW vs Mercedes-Benz
automotive
iPhone 17 vs Samsung Galaxy S26
technology
PS5 vs Xbox Series X
technology
Mac vs Windows
technology
Android vs iOS
technology
NVIDIA vs AMD
technology
Rivian vs Lucid: EV Stock Comparison 2026
automotive
Related Articles
Best Streaming Services in 2026: Top Picks for Every Budget & Interest
Navigating the crowded streaming landscape in 2026 can be overwhelming. We've tested and ranked the best streaming services that offer the most value, from Netflix's massive library to budget-friendly options like Tubi, helping you cut cable and find your perfect entertainment solution.
Best Live TV Streaming Services & Plans for Spring 2026: Complete Buyer's Guide
Tired of overpaying for cable? Discover the best live TV streaming services and plans for Spring 2026, including YouTube TV's new genre-based packages starting at $55/month. Our comprehensive guide breaks down pricing, channels, and features to help you cut the cord.
Philo in 2026: Streaming TV Service Review, Pricing & Reddit Community Insights
Explore Philo's evolution heading into 2026, including pricing tiers, channel lineup, and how it compares to competitors like Sling TV. Discover what the r/PhiloTV Reddit community thinks about the service's current offerings and future prospects.
Best US Fighter Jets 2026: Top American Combat Aircraft Ranked
Discover the most advanced US fighter jets dominating the skies in 2026. From the legendary F-22 Raptor to the versatile F-35 Lightning II, we rank America's best combat aircraft based on performance, stealth, and air superiority capabilities.
Philo in 2026: Pricing, Lineup & How It Compares to Sling TV
As we head into 2026, Philo continues to position itself as an affordable streaming alternative for cable TV lovers. Discover what Philo offers, how its pricing stacks up against competitors like Sling TV, and what the Reddit community thinks about its future.