Toyota Camry vs Hyundai Sonata
Toyota Camry
Best-selling midsize sedan known for reliability, value, and resale strength.
Buyers planning 10+ year ownership, families prioritizing reliability over gadgets, and those who want minimal maintenance headaches
Hyundai Sonata
Modern midsize sedan with cutting-edge tech and aggressive warranty coverage
Budget-conscious first-time sedan buyers, tech enthusiasts who upgrade every 5 years, and those who value warranty coverage and modern infotainment
Short Answer
The Toyota Camry dominates in reliability and resale value with a 94% dependability rating, while the Hyundai Sonata offers more modern technology and lower starting prices by approximately $3,000. Both are midsize sedans, but they appeal to different buyer priorities: Camry for long-term ownership, Sonata for tech-forward features and budget-conscious buyers.
Our Verdict
AI-assistedChoose the Toyota Camry if you prioritize long-term reliability, superior resale value, and fuel efficiency—Toyota's legendary build quality justifies the higher upfront cost with lower ownership expenses over 10+ years. Choose the Hyundai Sonata if you want modern technology features, a lower purchase price, and don't plan to keep the vehicle beyond 5-6 years; Hyundai's aggressive warranty and feature-rich interior appeal to tech-conscious buyers on a budget.
Was this verdict helpful?
Choose Toyota Camry if
Buyers planning 10+ year ownership, families prioritizing reliability over gadgets, and those who want minimal maintenance headaches
Choose Hyundai Sonata if
Budget-conscious first-time sedan buyers, tech enthusiasts who upgrade every 5 years, and those who value warranty coverage and modern infotainment
Track this comparison
Get notified when prices change, new specs ship, or our verdict updates.
Triggers: price change new spec verdict update
No spam. Stop anytime.
Key Differences at a Glance
Key Facts & Figures
| Metric | Toyota Camry | Hyundai Sonata | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starting Price (2026)(USD) | $32,500 (estimated) | — | — |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 49-50 MPG combined | — | — |
| Standard Touchscreen Size(inches) | 8 inches | — | — |
| City Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 53 MPG | — | — |
| Highway Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 46 MPG | — | — |
| Interior Width (Front Legroom)(inches) | 38.6 inches | — | — |
| Cargo Capacity(cubic feet) | 15.1 cu ft | — | — |
| Safety Rating (NHTSA Overall)(stars) | 5 stars | — | — |
| Engine Horsepower(hp) | 225 hp @ 6000 RPM | — | — |
| Engine Torque(lb-ft) | 163 lb-ft @ 5200 RPM | — | — |
| Fuel Tank Capacity(gallons) | 13 gallons | — | — |
| Estimated MPG Combined(MPG) | 51 MPG | — | — |
| Infotainment Screen Size(inches) | 10.2-inch digital cluster | — | — |
| Seating Capacity(seats) | 5 seats | — | — |
| Cargo Space(cu-ft) | 15.1 cu-ft | — | — |
| Starting MSRP (2026)(USD) | $29,765 | $26,990 | +10% |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Standard Non-Hybrid)(mpg) | 33 mpg | 32 mpg | +3% |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(mpg) | 52 mpg | 38 mpg | +37% |
| J.D. Power Dependability Rating(score out of 100) | 94/100 | 88/100 | +7% |
| 3-Year Resale Value Retention(%) | 63% | 54% | +17% |
| Standard Infotainment Display Size(inches) | 8 inches | 10.25 inches | -22% |
| Rear Seat Legroom(inches) | 38.3 inches | 37.8 inches | +1% |
| Consumer Reports Owner Satisfaction(score out of 10) | 8.2/10 | 7.6/10 | +8% |
| Starting MSRP (2025)(USD) | $29,390 | $25,200 | +17% |
| Base Engine Power(hp) | 203 hp (4-cyl naturally aspirated) | — | — |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Standard Engine)(MPG) | 28-32 MPG | — | — |
| J.D. Power Reliability Rating(score/100) | 92/100 | — | — |
| Highway Cabin Noise Level(dB) | 71 dB | — | — |
| Starting Price (MSRP 2026)(USD) | $28,045 | — | — |
| Highway Fuel Economy(MPG) | 33 MPG | — | — |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy(mpg) | 28 MPG | — | — |
| Base Engine Power Output(hp) | 203 hp | — | — |
| Base Engine Torque(lb-ft) | 184 lb-ft | — | — |
| 0-60 mph Acceleration(seconds) | 8.2 seconds | — | — |
| Trunk Capacity(cubic feet) | 15.1 cu ft | — | — |
| Infotainment Screen Size (Standard)(inches) | 8 inches | — | — |
| 5-Year Residual Value Retention(percent) | 58% | — | — |
| J.D. Power 2024 Dependability Score(out of 100) | 85/100 (#4 Midsize) | 85/100 (#4 Midsize) | — |
| 5-Year Resale Value Retention(percent) | 55% | 55% | — |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (2.0L Turbo Auto)(MPG) | 31 MPG | 31 MPG | — |
| 0-60 Acceleration (2.0L Turbo)(seconds) | 7.5 seconds | 7.5 seconds | — |
| Trunk Cargo Space(cubic feet) | 16.3 cu ft | 16.3 cu ft | — |
| 10-Year Estimated Ownership Cost(USD) | $9,100 | $9,100 | — |
All figures sourced from publicly available data. Last updated Jun 2026.
Key Differences
Toyota Camry
$29,765
Hyundai Sonata
$26,990🏆
Toyota Camry
62%🏆
Hyundai Sonata
54%
Toyota Camry
94/100🏆
Hyundai Sonata
88/100
Toyota Camry
8 inches
Hyundai Sonata
10.25 inches🏆
Toyota Camry
52 mpg🏆
Hyundai Sonata
38 mpg
Toyota Camry
3 yr/60k mi / 5 yr/60k mi
Hyundai Sonata
5 yr/60k mi / 10 yr/100k mi🏆
Toyota Camry
8.2/10🏆
Hyundai Sonata
7.6/10
Full Comparison
| Attribute |  Toyota Camry |  Hyundai Sonata |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price (2026)(USD) | $32,500 (estimated) | — |
| Starting MSRP (2026)(USD) | $29,765 | $26,990 |
| Starting MSRP (2025)(USD) | $29,390 | $25,200 |
| Starting Price (MSRP 2026)(USD) | $28,045 | — |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 49-50 MPG combined | — |
| City Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 53 MPG | — |
| Highway Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 46 MPG | — |
| Estimated MPG Combined(MPG) | 51 MPG | — |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Standard Non-Hybrid)(mpg) | 33 mpg | 32 mpg |
Show 5 more attributesEPA Combined Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(mpg) 52 mpg 38 mpg EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Standard Engine)(MPG) 28-32 MPG — Highway Fuel Economy(MPG) 33 MPG — EPA Combined Fuel Economy(mpg) 28 MPG — EPA Combined Fuel Economy (2.0L Turbo Auto)(MPG) 31 MPG — | ||
| Engine Type (Standard) | 2.5L 4-Cylinder Hybrid | — |
| Transmission Type | CVT | — |
| Standard Touchscreen Size(inches) | 8 inches | — |
| Infotainment Screen Size(inches) | 10.2-inch digital cluster | — |
| Powertrain Type | Gasoline only | — |
| Standard Infotainment Display Size(inches) | 8 inches | 10.25 inches |
| Infotainment Screen Size (Standard)(inches) | 8 inches | — |
| Heated Door Mirrors Standard | Yes | — |
| Rear Seat Legroom(inches) | 38.3 inches | 37.8 inches |
| Highway Cabin Noise Level(dB) | 71 dB | — |
| Interior Width (Front Legroom)(inches) | 38.6 inches | — |
| Cargo Capacity(cubic feet) | 15.1 cu ft | — |
| Safety Rating (NHTSA Overall)(stars) | 5 stars | — |
| Standard Driver Assistance Features | Toyota Safety Sense 2.5+ | — |
| Engine Horsepower(hp) | 225 hp @ 6000 RPM | — |
| Engine Torque(lb-ft) | 163 lb-ft @ 5200 RPM | — |
| Base Engine Power(hp) | 203 hp (4-cyl naturally aspirated) | — |
| Turbocharged Engine Option(hp) | Not available | — |
| Base Engine Power Output(hp) | 203 hp | — |
Show 3 more attributesBase Engine Torque(lb-ft) 184 lb-ft — 0-60 mph Acceleration(seconds) 8.2 seconds — 0-60 Acceleration (2.0L Turbo)(seconds) 7.5 seconds — | ||
| Fuel Tank Capacity(gallons) | 13 gallons | — |
| Seating Capacity(seats) | 5 seats | — |
| Cargo Space(cu-ft) | 15.1 cu-ft | — |
| Trunk Cargo Space(cubic feet) | 16.3 cu ft | — |
| J.D. Power Dependability Rating(score out of 100) | 94/100 | 88/100 |
| J.D. Power Reliability Rating(score/100) | 92/100 | — |
| J.D. Power 2024 Dependability Score(out of 100) | 85/100 (#4 Midsize) | — |
| 3-Year Resale Value Retention(%) | 63% | 54% |
| 5-Year Residual Value Retention(percent) | 58% | — |
| Powertrain Warranty Coverage(years/miles) | 5 yr / 60k mi | 10 yr / 100k mi |
| Standard Warranty - Powertrain(years/miles) | 5 years/60,000 miles | — |
| Powertrain Warranty(years / miles) | 10 years/100,000 miles | — |
| Consumer Reports Owner Satisfaction(score out of 10) | 8.2/10 | 7.6/10 |
| Trunk Capacity(cubic feet) | 15.1 cu ft | — |
| 5-Year Resale Value Retention(percent) | 55% | — |
| 10-Year Estimated Ownership Cost(USD) | $9,100 | — |
Toyota CamryHyundai SonataShow 5 more attributes
Show 3 more attributes
Visual Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of numeric attributes
Pros & Cons
Toyota Camry
Pros
- 94/100 J.D. Power dependability rating—best in class
- 62% resale value retention after 3 years—$8,000+ advantage over Sonata
- Hybrid achieves 52 mpg combined EPA rating with 30+ gallon tank
- Standard Toyota Safety Sense 2.5+ with adaptive cruise and lane-keeping
- Spacious 15.1 cu ft trunk and 38.3-inch rear legroom
Cons
- Higher starting price at $29,765—$2,775 more than Sonata
- 8-inch touchscreen feels dated compared to Sonata's 10.25-inch standard display
- Apple CarPlay/Android Auto require wired connection rather than wireless
Hyundai Sonata
Pros
- Industry-leading 10-year/100,000-mile powertrain warranty—double Toyota's coverage
- Starting price of $26,990—$2,775 cheaper than Camry
- 10.25-inch touchscreen standard with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto
- Available N-Line trim delivers 290-hp turbocharged engine with 8-speed automatic
- Available Highway Driving Assist 2 with autonomous lane-changing technology
Cons
- 54% resale value retention after 3 years—$8,000+ lower than Camry over ownership
- 88/100 dependability rating trails Camry by 6 points; 1 in 10 owners report major issues
- Non-hybrid gets only 32 mpg combined EPA—16% worse than Camry's 52 mpg hybrid
Frequently Asked Questions
The Toyota Camry significantly outperforms the Hyundai Sonata in long-term reliability. Toyota's 94/100 J.D. Power dependability rating versus Hyundai's 88/100 translates to roughly 1 in 17 Camry owners reporting major issues versus 1 in 10 Sonata owners. Over a 10-year ownership period, Camry owners typically spend $2,000-$4,000 less on repairs, according to AAA maintenance cost studies.
Resources & Learn More
Dive deeper with these curated resources
Where to Buy
As an affiliate, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you. Learn more
Wikipedia
Related Comparisons
Honda Accord vs Hyundai Sonata
automotive
Toyota Camry vs Nissan Altima
automotive
Toyota Camry vs Mazda 6
automotive
Toyota Camry vs Honda Accord
automotive
Tesla vs Ford
automotive
BMW vs Mercedes-Benz
automotive
iPhone 17 vs Samsung Galaxy S26
technology
PS5 vs Xbox Series X
technology
Mac vs Windows
technology
Android vs iOS
technology
NVIDIA vs AMD
technology
Rivian R1T vs GMC Hummer EV
automotive
Related Articles
Best Streaming Services in 2026: Top Picks for Every Budget & Interest
Navigating the crowded streaming landscape in 2026 can be overwhelming. We've tested and ranked the best streaming services that offer the most value, from Netflix's massive library to budget-friendly options like Tubi, helping you cut cable and find your perfect entertainment solution.
Best Live TV Streaming Services & Plans for Spring 2026: Complete Buyer's Guide
Tired of overpaying for cable? Discover the best live TV streaming services and plans for Spring 2026, including YouTube TV's new genre-based packages starting at $55/month. Our comprehensive guide breaks down pricing, channels, and features to help you cut the cord.
Philo in 2026: Streaming TV Service Review, Pricing & Reddit Community Insights
Explore Philo's evolution heading into 2026, including pricing tiers, channel lineup, and how it compares to competitors like Sling TV. Discover what the r/PhiloTV Reddit community thinks about the service's current offerings and future prospects.
Best US Fighter Jets 2026: Top American Combat Aircraft Ranked
Discover the most advanced US fighter jets dominating the skies in 2026. From the legendary F-22 Raptor to the versatile F-35 Lightning II, we rank America's best combat aircraft based on performance, stealth, and air superiority capabilities.
Philo in 2026: Pricing, Lineup & How It Compares to Sling TV
As we head into 2026, Philo continues to position itself as an affordable streaming alternative for cable TV lovers. Discover what Philo offers, how its pricing stacks up against competitors like Sling TV, and what the Reddit community thinks about its future.