Toyota Camry vs Honda Accord 2026 Comparison
Quick Answer
AI SummaryThe 2026 Toyota Camry emphasizes efficiency and ease of driving with 225 hp and 51 MPG capability, while the Honda Accord offers more engaging driving dynamics and a hybrid option with 204 hp. Both are excellent midsize sedans; your choice depends on whether you prioritize fuel economy or driving engagement.
Read full verdictBoth the 2026 Toyota Camry and Honda Accord are outstanding midsize sedans with distinct strengths. The Camry excels in fuel efficiency and everyday comfort, while the Accord offers superior driving engagement and modern technology features like Google built-in integration. Your choice should reflect whether you prioritize maximum fuel economy and ease of driving or prefer a more spirited, tech-forward driving experience.
Was this verdict helpful?
Choose Toyota Camry if
Buyers seeking exceptional fuel efficiency, daily commuters, and those prioritizing comfort and accessibility over driving thrills
Choose Honda Accord if
Best pickDriving enthusiasts, tech-savvy buyers, those wanting larger fuel capacity, and anyone prioritizing engaging handling with modern features
Share this verdict
Track this comparison
Get notified when prices change, new specs ship, or our verdict updates.
Triggers: price change new spec verdict update
No spam. Stop anytime.
Key Differences at a Glance
- Maximum Horsepower:✓ Toyota Camry wins(225 hp @ 6000 RPM vs 204 hp (hybrid option))
- Fuel Tank Capacity:✓ Honda Accord wins(14.8 gallons vs 13 gallons)
- Estimated Fuel Economy:✓ Toyota Camry wins(51 MPG combined vs 48 MPG combined (hybrid est.))
Key Facts & Figures
81 numeric metrics compared
| Metric | Toyota Camry | Honda Accord | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starting Price (2026)(USD) | $32,500 (estimated) | $29,590 | |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 49-50 MPG combined | 47-48 MPG combined | |
| Standard Touchscreen Size(inches) | 8 inches | 10.2 inches | |
| City Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 53 MPG | 48 MPG | |
| Highway Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 46 MPG | 47 MPG | |
| Interior Width (Front Legroom)(inches) | 38.6 inches | 38.4 inches | |
| Cargo Capacity(cubic feet) | 15.1 cu ft | 15.8 cu ft | |
| Safety Rating (NHTSA Overall)(stars) | 5 stars | 5 stars | |
| Engine Horsepower(hp) | 225 hp @ 6000 RPM | 204 hp (hybrid) | |
| Engine Torque(lb-ft) | 163 lb-ft @ 5200 RPM | 180 lb-ft (hybrid est.) | |
| Fuel Tank Capacity(gallons) | 13 gallons | 14.8 gallons | |
| Estimated MPG Combined(MPG) | 51 MPG | 48 MPG (hybrid) | |
| Infotainment Screen Size(inches) | 10.2-inch digital cluster | 12.3-inch display | |
| Seating Capacity(seats) | 5 seats | 5 seats | |
| Cargo Space(cubic feet) | 15.1 cu-ft | 14.8 cu-ft (est.) | |
| Starting MSRP (2026)(USD) | $29,765 | — | — |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Standard Non-Hybrid)(mpg) | 33 mpg | — | — |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(mpg) | 52 mpg | — | — |
| J.D. Power Dependability Rating(ranking) | 94/100 | — | — |
| 3-Year Resale Value Retention(%) | 63% | — | — |
| Standard Infotainment Display Size(inches) | 8 inches | 7.0 inches | |
| Rear Seat Legroom(inches) | 38.3 inches | — | — |
| Consumer Reports Owner Satisfaction(score out of 10) | 8.2/10 | — | — |
| Starting MSRP (2025)(USD) | $29,390 | — | — |
| Base Engine Power(horsepower) | 203 hp (4-cyl naturally aspirated) | 192 hp turbocharged | |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Standard Engine)(mpg) | 28-32 MPG | 33 mpg | |
| J.D. Power Reliability Rating(score out of 100) | 92/100 | 85 | |
| Highway Cabin Noise Level(dB) | 71 dB | — | — |
| Starting Price (MSRP 2026)(USD) | $28,045 | — | — |
| Highway Fuel Economy(MPG) | 33 MPG | 38 MPG | |
| Base Engine Power Output(hp) | 203 hp | — | — |
| Base Engine Torque(lb-ft) | 184 lb-ft | — | — |
| 0-60 mph Acceleration(seconds) | 8.2 seconds | — | — |
| Trunk Capacity(cubic feet) | 15.1 cu ft | 16.7 cu ft | |
| Infotainment Screen Size (Standard)(inches) | 8 inches | — | — |
| 5-Year Residual Value Retention(percent) | 58% | — | — |
| Starting Price (2026 LE/S Trim)(USD) | $29,745 | — | — |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy(mpg) | 32 MPG (LE gasoline) | 38 MPG | |
| 5-Year Reliability Rating(percent) | 86% | — | — |
| 5-Year Resale Value Retention(%) | 58% retained | 56% | |
| Trunk/Cargo Volume(cubic feet) | 15.1 cu ft | — | — |
| Owner Satisfaction (J.D. Power 2025)(score/100) | 84/100 | — | — |
| Fuel Tank Capacity(liters) | 14.5 L | — | — |
| Starting Price(USD) | $28,650 | — | — |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Gas)(MPG) | 32 MPG | — | — |
| Hybrid EPA Combined Fuel Economy(MPG) | 52 MPG | — | — |
| Annual Maintenance Cost(USD) | $289 | — | — |
| J.D. Power 2025 Dependability Rating(Score/100) | 87/100 | — | — |
| Infotainment Screen Diagonal(inches) | 8 inches | — | — |
| Standard Horsepower (Gas)(HP) | 203 HP | — | — |
| Base Model MSRP(USD) | $28,050 | — | — |
| Base Engine Horsepower(hp) | 203 hp (2.5L naturally aspirated) | — | — |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Base)(mpg) | 33 MPG combined | — | — |
| Hybrid Model Efficiency(MPG) | 51 MPG combined | — | — |
| J.D. Power Reliability Ranking(rank) | Rank #2 | — | — |
| Average Annual Maintenance Cost (Years 1-5)(USD) | $386 | — | — |
| Engine Displacement & Power(hp) | 2.0L naturally aspirated, 201 hp | 2.0L naturally aspirated, 201 hp | |
| 0-60 Acceleration(seconds) | 8.8 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
| Cargo Space(cubic feet) | 103.1 cu ft | 103.1 cu ft | |
| Infotainment Display(inches) | 8 inches | 8 inches | |
| Wheelbase(mm) | 112.8 inches | 112.8 inches | |
| Starting MSRP (2025 Base Model)(USD) | $32,650 | $32,650 | |
| J.D. Power Reliability Score(points) | 92/100 | 92/100 | |
| Trunk Cargo Capacity(cu ft) | 16.7 cu ft | 16.7 cu ft | |
| Maximum Engine Output (Turbo)(HP) | 252 HP | 252 HP | |
| Rear Legroom(inches) | 38.4 inches | 38.4 inches | |
| NHTSA Overall Safety Rating(stars) | 5/5 stars | 5/5 stars | |
| Starting MSRP(USD) | $28,550 | $28,550 | |
| Highway Fuel Economy (Base Model)(MPG) | 38 MPG | 38 MPG | |
| Cargo Capacity(cubic feet) | 16.7 | 16.7 | |
| Turbo Engine Horsepower(hp) | 252 hp | 252 hp | |
| Turbo Engine Torque(lb-ft) | 273 lb-ft | 273 lb-ft | |
| Turning Radius(feet) | 37.4 feet | 37.4 feet | |
| Standard Infotainment Screen(inches) | 8 inches | 8 inches | |
| 0-60 Time (Turbo)(seconds) | 6.5 seconds | 6.5 seconds | |
| Starting Price (2025 Base Model)(USD) | $29,990 | $29,990 | |
| Highway Fuel Economy (Base)(MPG) | 38 MPG | 38 MPG | |
| Combined Fuel Economy (Base)(MPG) | 32 MPG | 32 MPG | |
| Trunk Cargo Space(cubic feet) | 16.7 cu ft | 16.7 cu ft | |
| J.D. Power Owner Satisfaction(points) | 822/1000 | 822/1000 | |
| Hybrid Option Combined Fuel Economy(mpg) | 52 mpg | 52 mpg |
Sourced from publicly available data ·
Key Differences
8 attributes compared head-to-head
- 225 hp @ 6000 RPM(winner)Maximum Horsepower204 hp (hybrid option)
- 13 gallonsFuel Tank Capacity14.8 gallons(winner)
- 51 MPG combined(winner)Estimated Fuel Economy48 MPG combined (hybrid est.)
- 10.2-inch customizable digital clusterInfotainment Display12.3-inch display with Google built-in(winner)
- Standard cap designStandard Fueling SystemCap-less fueling system(winner)
- Qi-compatible standard(winner)Wireless ChargingAvailable on select trims
- Easier to drive, more accessibleDriving CharacterMore engaging and fun to drive
- Contemporary modern stylingDesign PhilosophyTimeless design that ages well
- Maximum Horsepower
Toyota Camry
225 hp @ 6000 RPM(winner)
Honda Accord
204 hp (hybrid option)
- Fuel Tank Capacity
Toyota Camry
13 gallons
Honda Accord
14.8 gallons(winner)
- Estimated Fuel Economy
Toyota Camry
51 MPG combined(winner)
Honda Accord
48 MPG combined (hybrid est.)
- Infotainment Display
Toyota Camry
10.2-inch customizable digital cluster
Honda Accord
12.3-inch display with Google built-in(winner)
- Standard Fueling System
Toyota Camry
Standard cap design
Honda Accord
Cap-less fueling system(winner)
Full Comparison
| Attribute | ||
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price (2026)(USD) | $32,500 (estimated) | $29,590(winner) |
| Starting MSRP (2025)(USD) | $29,390 | — |
| Starting Price (MSRP 2026)(USD) | $28,045 | — |
| Starting Price (2026 LE/S Trim)(USD) | $29,745 | — |
| Starting Price(USD) | $28,650 | — |
Show 4 more attributesBase Model MSRP(USD) $28,050 — Starting MSRP (2025 Base Model)(USD) $32,650 — Starting MSRP(USD) $28,550 — Starting Price (2025 Base Model)(USD) $29,990 — | ||
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 49-50 MPG combined(winner) | 47-48 MPG combined |
| City Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 53 MPG(winner) | 48 MPG |
| Highway Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 46 MPG | 47 MPG(winner) |
| Estimated MPG Combined(MPG) | 51 MPG(winner) | 48 MPG (hybrid) |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Standard Non-Hybrid)(mpg) | 33 mpg | — |
Show 10 more attributesEPA Combined Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(mpg) 52 mpg — EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Standard Engine)(mpg) 28-32 MPG 33 mpg Highway Fuel Economy(MPG) 33 MPG 38 MPG EPA Combined Fuel Economy(mpg) 32 MPG (LE gasoline) 38 MPG EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Gas)(MPG) 32 MPG — Hybrid EPA Combined Fuel Economy(MPG) 52 MPG — EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Base)(mpg) 33 MPG combined — Hybrid Model Efficiency(MPG) 51 MPG combined — Highway Fuel Economy (Base Model)(MPG) 38 MPG — Hybrid Option Combined Fuel Economy(mpg) 52 mpg — | ||
| Engine Type (Standard) | 2.5L 4-Cylinder Hybrid | 2.0L Turbocharged or Hybrid Optional |
| Transmission Type | CVT | CVT |
| Standard Touchscreen Size(inches) | 8 inches | 10.2 inches(winner) |
| Infotainment Screen Size(inches) | 10.2-inch digital cluster | 12.3-inch display(winner) |
| Powertrain Type | Gasoline only | Gasoline and Hybrid options |
| Standard Infotainment Display Size(inches) | 8 inches(winner) | 7.0 inches |
| Infotainment Screen Size (Standard)(inches) | 8 inches | — |
Show 5 more attributesStandard Apple CarPlay/Android Auto Requires $1,500 upgrade — Infotainment Screen Diagonal(inches) 8 inches — Transmission Type CVT automatic (10-speed on some trims) — Infotainment Display(inches) 8 inches — Standard Infotainment Screen(inches) 8 inches — | ||
| Heated Door Mirrors Standard | Yes | No |
| Rear Seat Legroom(inches) | 38.3 inches | — |
| Highway Cabin Noise Level(dB) | 71 dB | — |
| Interior Width (Front Legroom)(inches) | 38.6 inches(winner) | 38.4 inches |
| Cargo Capacity(cubic feet) | 15.1 cu ft | 15.8 cu ft(winner) |
| Safety Rating (NHTSA Overall)(stars) | 5 stars | 5 stars |
| Standard Driver Assistance Features | Toyota Safety Sense 2.5+ | Honda Sensing Elite |
| NHTSA Overall Safety Rating(stars) | 5/5 stars | — |
| Engine Horsepower(hp) | 225 hp @ 6000 RPM(winner) | 204 hp (hybrid) |
| Engine Torque(lb-ft) | 163 lb-ft @ 5200 RPM | 180 lb-ft (hybrid est.)(winner) |
| Turbocharged Engine Option(hp) | Not available | — |
| Base Engine Power Output(hp) | 203 hp | — |
| Base Engine Torque(lb-ft) | 184 lb-ft | — |
Show 11 more attributes0-60 mph Acceleration(seconds) 8.2 seconds — Standard Horsepower (Gas)(HP) 203 HP — Base Engine Horsepower(hp) 203 hp (2.5L naturally aspirated) — Engine Displacement & Power(hp) 2.0L naturally aspirated, 201 hp — 0-60 Acceleration(seconds) 8.8 seconds — Maximum Engine Output (Turbo)(HP) 252 HP — Turbo Engine Horsepower(hp) 252 hp — Turbo Engine Torque(lb-ft) 273 lb-ft — 0-60 Time (Turbo)(seconds) 6.5 seconds — Highway Fuel Economy (Base)(MPG) 38 MPG — Combined Fuel Economy (Base)(MPG) 32 MPG — | ||
| Fuel Tank Capacity(gallons) | 13 gallons | 14.8 gallons(winner) |
| Seating Capacity(seats) | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Cargo Space(cubic feet) | 15.1 cu-ft(winner) | 14.8 cu-ft (est.) |
| Trunk Capacity(cubic feet) | 15.1 cu ft | 16.7 cu ft(winner) |
| Fuel Tank Capacity(liters) | 14.5 L | — |
Show 4 more attributesCargo Space(cubic feet) 103.1 cu ft — Trunk Cargo Capacity(cu ft) 16.7 cu ft — Cargo Capacity(cubic feet) 16.7 — Trunk Cargo Space(cubic feet) 16.7 cu ft — | ||
| Starting MSRP (2026)(USD) | $29,765 | — |
| J.D. Power Dependability Rating(ranking) | 94/100 | — |
| J.D. Power Reliability Rating(score out of 100) | 92/100(winner) | 85 |
| 5-Year Reliability Rating(percent) | 86% | — |
| J.D. Power 2025 Dependability Rating(Score/100) | 87/100 | — |
| J.D. Power Reliability Ranking(rank) | Rank #2 | — |
| 3-Year Resale Value Retention(%) | 63% | — |
| Powertrain Warranty Coverage(years / miles) | 5 yr / 60k mi | 5 years / 60,000 miles |
| Standard Warranty - Powertrain(years/miles) | 5 years/60,000 miles | — |
| Basic Warranty Coverage(months/miles) | 3 years / 36,000 miles | — |
| Consumer Reports Owner Satisfaction(score out of 10) | 8.2/10 | — |
| Owner Satisfaction (J.D. Power 2025)(score/100) | 84/100 | — |
| Base Engine Power(horsepower) | 203 hp (4-cyl naturally aspirated)(winner) | 192 hp turbocharged |
| 5-Year Residual Value Retention(percent) | 58% | — |
| 5-Year Resale Value Retention(%) | 58% retained(winner) | 56% |
| Trunk/Cargo Volume(cubic feet) | 15.1 cu ft | — |
| Annual Maintenance Cost(USD) | $289 | — |
| Average Annual Maintenance Cost (Years 1-5)(USD) | $386 | — |
| Wheelbase(mm) | 112.8 inches | — |
| J.D. Power Reliability Score(points) | 92/100 | — |
| J.D. Power Owner Satisfaction(points) | 822/1000 | — |
| Rear Legroom(inches) | 38.4 inches | — |
| Turning Radius(feet) | 37.4 feet | — |
Show 4 more attributes
Show 10 more attributes
Show 5 more attributes
Show 11 more attributes
Show 4 more attributes
Pros & Cons
10 pros·6 cons across both
Toyota Camry
Pros
Cons
Honda Accord
Pros
Cons
Frequently Asked Questions
5 questions
The 2026 Toyota Camry is more fuel-efficient, with an estimated 51 MPG combined rating compared to the Honda Accord's approximately 48 MPG combined. However, the Accord offers a hybrid option that bridges this gap while providing more engaging performance.
The Honda Accord is generally considered more engaging and fun to drive with responsive handling characteristics. The Toyota Camry prioritizes comfort and ease of driving, making it better for those seeking a relaxed daily commute experience.
Yes, the 2026 Toyota Camry comes standard with a Qi-compatible wireless charging pad across all trims, while the Honda Accord offers this feature on select higher trim levels.
The Honda Accord features Google built-in integration on its 12.3-inch display, offering seamless connectivity. The Camry includes wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto standard, but lacks the deeper Google ecosystem integration.
The Honda Accord has a larger fuel tank capacity at 14.8 gallons compared to the Toyota Camry's 13 gallons, providing about 1.8 gallons more range. The Accord also includes a modern cap-less fueling system.
Resources & Learn More
Curated sources to dive deeper
Where to Buy
As an affiliate, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you. Learn more about our affiliate disclosure
Wikipedia
Explore More
Related comparisons and categories