Toyota Camry vs Honda Accord 2026 Comparison
Quick Answer
AI SummaryThe 2026 Toyota Camry emphasizes efficiency and ease of driving with 225 hp and 51 MPG capability, while the Honda Accord offers more engaging driving dynamics and a hybrid option with 204 hp. Both are excellent midsize sedans; your choice depends on whether you prioritize fuel economy or driving engagement.
Read full verdictBoth the 2026 Toyota Camry and Honda Accord are outstanding midsize sedans with distinct strengths. The Camry excels in fuel efficiency and everyday comfort, while the Accord offers superior driving engagement and modern technology features like Google built-in integration. Your choice should reflect whether you prioritize maximum fuel economy and ease of driving or prefer a more spirited, tech-forward driving experience.
Was this verdict helpful?
Choose Toyota Camry if
Buyers seeking exceptional fuel efficiency, daily commuters, and those prioritizing comfort and accessibility over driving thrills
Choose Honda Accord if
Best pickDriving enthusiasts, tech-savvy buyers, those wanting larger fuel capacity, and anyone prioritizing engaging handling with modern features
Share this verdict
Track this comparison
Get notified when prices change, new specs ship, or our verdict updates.
Triggers: price change new spec verdict update
No spam. Stop anytime.
Key Differences at a Glance
- Maximum Horsepower:✓ Toyota Camry wins(225 hp @ 6000 RPM vs 204 hp (hybrid option))
- Fuel Tank Capacity:✓ Honda Accord wins(14.8 gallons vs 13 gallons)
- Estimated Fuel Economy:✓ Toyota Camry wins(51 MPG combined vs 48 MPG combined (hybrid est.))
Key Facts & Figures
81 numeric metrics compared
| Metric | Toyota Camry | Honda Accord | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starting Price (2026)(USD) | $32,500 (estimated) | $29,590 | |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 49-50 MPG combined | 47-48 MPG combined | |
| Standard Touchscreen Size(inches) | 8 inches | 10.2 inches | |
| City Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 53 MPG | 48 MPG | |
| Highway Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 46 MPG | 47 MPG | |
| Interior Width (Front Legroom)(inches) | 38.6 inches | 38.4 inches | |
| Cargo Capacity(cubic feet) | 15.1 cu ft | 15.8 cu ft | |
| Safety Rating (NHTSA Overall)(stars) | 5 stars | 5 stars | |
| Engine Horsepower(hp) | 225 hp @ 6000 RPM | 204 hp (hybrid) | |
| Engine Torque(lb-ft) | 163 lb-ft @ 5200 RPM | 180 lb-ft (hybrid est.) | |
| Fuel Tank Capacity(gallons) | 13 gallons | 14.8 gallons | |
| Estimated MPG Combined(MPG) | 51 MPG | 48 MPG (hybrid) | |
| Infotainment Screen Size(inches) | 10.2-inch digital cluster | 12.3-inch display | |
| Seating Capacity(seats) | 5 seats | 5 seats | |
| Cargo Space(cubic feet) | 15.1 cu-ft | 14.8 cu-ft (est.) | |
| Starting MSRP (2026)(USD) | $29,765 | — | — |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Standard Non-Hybrid)(mpg) | 33 mpg | — | — |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(mpg) | 52 mpg | — | — |
| J.D. Power Dependability Rating(ranking) | 94/100 | — | — |
| 3-Year Resale Value Retention(%) | 63% | — | — |
| Standard Infotainment Display Size(inches) | 8 inches | 7.0 inches | |
| Rear Seat Legroom(inches) | 38.3 inches | — | — |
| Consumer Reports Owner Satisfaction(score out of 10) | 8.2/10 | — | — |
| Starting MSRP (2025)(USD) | $29,390 | — | — |
| Base Engine Power(horsepower) | 203 hp (4-cyl naturally aspirated) | 192 hp turbocharged | |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Standard Engine)(mpg) | 28-32 MPG | 33 mpg | |
| J.D. Power Reliability Rating(score out of 100) | 92/100 | 85 | |
| Highway Cabin Noise Level(dB) | 71 dB | — | — |
| Starting Price (MSRP 2026)(USD) | $28,045 | — | — |
| Highway Fuel Economy(MPG) | 33 MPG | 38 MPG | |
| Base Engine Power Output(hp) | 203 hp | — | — |
| Base Engine Torque(lb-ft) | 184 lb-ft | — | — |
| 0-60 mph Acceleration(seconds) | 8.2 seconds | — | — |
| Trunk Capacity(cubic feet) | 15.1 cu ft | 16.7 cu ft | |
| Infotainment Screen Size (Standard)(inches) | 8 inches | — | — |
| 5-Year Residual Value Retention(percent) | 58% | — | — |
| Starting Price (2026 LE/S Trim)(USD) | $29,745 | — | — |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy(mpg) | 32 MPG (LE gasoline) | 38 MPG | |
| 5-Year Reliability Rating(percent) | 86% | — | — |
| 5-Year Resale Value Retention(%) | 58% retained | 56% | |
| Trunk/Cargo Volume(cubic feet) | 15.1 cu ft | — | — |
| Owner Satisfaction (J.D. Power 2025)(score/100) | 84/100 | — | — |
| Fuel Tank Capacity(liters) | 14.5 L | — | — |
| Starting Price(USD) | $28,650 | — | — |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Gas)(MPG) | 32 MPG | — | — |
| Hybrid EPA Combined Fuel Economy(MPG) | 52 MPG | — | — |
| Annual Maintenance Cost(USD) | $289 | — | — |
| J.D. Power 2025 Dependability Rating(Score/100) | 87/100 | — | — |
| Infotainment Screen Diagonal(inches) | 8 inches | — | — |
| Standard Horsepower (Gas)(HP) | 203 HP | — | — |
| Base Model MSRP(USD) | $28,050 | — | — |
| Base Engine Horsepower(hp) | 203 hp (2.5L naturally aspirated) | — | — |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Base)(mpg) | 33 MPG combined | — | — |
| Hybrid Model Efficiency(MPG) | 51 MPG combined | — | — |
| J.D. Power Reliability Ranking(rank) | Rank #2 | — | — |
| Average Annual Maintenance Cost (Years 1-5)(USD) | $386 | — | — |
| Engine Displacement & Power(hp) | 2.0L naturally aspirated, 201 hp | 2.0L naturally aspirated, 201 hp | |
| 0-60 Acceleration(seconds) | 8.8 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
| Cargo Space(cubic feet) | 103.1 cu ft | 103.1 cu ft | |
| Infotainment Display(inches) | 8 inches | 8 inches | |
| Wheelbase(mm) | 112.8 inches | 112.8 inches | |
| Starting MSRP (2025 Base Model)(USD) | $32,650 | $32,650 | |
| J.D. Power Reliability Score(points) | 92/100 | 92/100 | |
| Trunk Cargo Capacity(cu ft) | 16.7 cu ft | 16.7 cu ft | |
| Maximum Engine Output (Turbo)(HP) | 252 HP | 252 HP | |
| Rear Legroom(inches) | 38.4 inches | 38.4 inches | |
| NHTSA Overall Safety Rating(stars) | 5/5 stars | 5/5 stars | |
| Starting MSRP(USD) | $28,550 | $28,550 | |
| Highway Fuel Economy (Base Model)(MPG) | 38 MPG | 38 MPG | |
| Cargo Capacity(cubic feet) | 16.7 | 16.7 | |
| Turbo Engine Horsepower(hp) | 252 hp | 252 hp | |
| Turbo Engine Torque(lb-ft) | 273 lb-ft | 273 lb-ft | |
| Turning Radius(feet) | 37.4 feet | 37.4 feet | |
| Standard Infotainment Screen(inches) | 8 inches | 8 inches | |
| 0-60 Time (Turbo)(seconds) | 6.5 seconds | 6.5 seconds | |
| Starting Price (2025 Base Model)(USD) | $29,990 | $29,990 | |
| Highway Fuel Economy (Base)(MPG) | 38 MPG | 38 MPG | |
| Combined Fuel Economy (Base)(MPG) | 32 MPG | 32 MPG | |
| Trunk Cargo Space(cubic feet) | 16.7 cu ft | 16.7 cu ft | |
| J.D. Power Owner Satisfaction(points) | 822/1000 | 822/1000 | |
| Hybrid Option Combined Fuel Economy(mpg) | 52 mpg | 52 mpg |
Sourced from publicly available data ·
Key Differences
8 attributes compared head-to-head
- 225 hp @ 6000 RPM(winner)Maximum Horsepower204 hp (hybrid option)
- 13 gallonsFuel Tank Capacity14.8 gallons(winner)
- 51 MPG combined(winner)Estimated Fuel Economy48 MPG combined (hybrid est.)
- 10.2-inch customizable digital clusterInfotainment Display12.3-inch display with Google built-in(winner)
- Standard cap designStandard Fueling SystemCap-less fueling system(winner)
- Qi-compatible standard(winner)Wireless ChargingAvailable on select trims
- Easier to drive, more accessibleDriving CharacterMore engaging and fun to drive
- Contemporary modern stylingDesign PhilosophyTimeless design that ages well
- Maximum Horsepower
Toyota Camry
225 hp @ 6000 RPM(winner)
Honda Accord
204 hp (hybrid option)
- Fuel Tank Capacity
Toyota Camry
13 gallons
Honda Accord
14.8 gallons(winner)
- Estimated Fuel Economy
Toyota Camry
51 MPG combined(winner)
Honda Accord
48 MPG combined (hybrid est.)
- Infotainment Display
Toyota Camry
10.2-inch customizable digital cluster
Honda Accord
12.3-inch display with Google built-in(winner)
- Standard Fueling System
Toyota Camry
Standard cap design
Honda Accord
Cap-less fueling system(winner)
Full Comparison
| Attribute | ||
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price (2026)(USD) | $32,500 (estimated) | $29,590(winner) |
| Starting MSRP (2025)(USD) | $29,390 | — |
| Starting Price (MSRP 2026)(USD) | $28,045 | — |
| Starting Price (2026 LE/S Trim)(USD) | $29,745 | — |
| Base Model MSRP(USD) | $28,050 | — |
Show 3 more attributesStarting MSRP (2025 Base Model)(USD) $32,650 — Starting MSRP(USD) $28,550 — Starting Price (2025 Base Model)(USD) $29,990 — | ||
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 49-50 MPG combined(winner) | 47-48 MPG combined |
| City Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 53 MPG(winner) | 48 MPG |
| Highway Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 46 MPG | 47 MPG(winner) |
| Estimated MPG Combined(MPG) | 51 MPG(winner) | 48 MPG (hybrid) |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Standard Non-Hybrid)(mpg) | 33 mpg | — |
Show 10 more attributesEPA Combined Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(mpg) 52 mpg — EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Standard Engine)(mpg) 28-32 MPG 33 mpg Highway Fuel Economy(MPG) 33 MPG 38 MPG EPA Combined Fuel Economy(mpg) 32 MPG (LE gasoline) 38 MPG EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Gas)(MPG) 32 MPG — Hybrid EPA Combined Fuel Economy(MPG) 52 MPG — EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Base)(mpg) 33 MPG combined — Hybrid Model Efficiency(MPG) 51 MPG combined — Highway Fuel Economy (Base Model)(MPG) 38 MPG — Hybrid Option Combined Fuel Economy(mpg) 52 mpg — | ||
| Engine Type (Standard) | 2.5L 4-Cylinder Hybrid | 2.0L Turbocharged or Hybrid Optional |
| Transmission Type | CVT | CVT |
| Standard Touchscreen Size(inches) | 8 inches | 10.2 inches(winner) |
| Infotainment Screen Size(inches) | 10.2-inch digital cluster | 12.3-inch display(winner) |
| Powertrain Type | Gasoline only | Gasoline and Hybrid options |
| Standard Infotainment Display Size(inches) | 8 inches(winner) | 7.0 inches |
| Infotainment Screen Size (Standard)(inches) | 8 inches | — |
Show 5 more attributesStandard Apple CarPlay/Android Auto Requires $1,500 upgrade — Infotainment Screen Diagonal(inches) 8 inches — Transmission Type CVT automatic (10-speed on some trims) — Infotainment Display(inches) 8 inches — Standard Infotainment Screen(inches) 8 inches — | ||
| Heated Door Mirrors Standard | Yes | No |
| Rear Seat Legroom(inches) | 38.3 inches | — |
| Highway Cabin Noise Level(dB) | 71 dB | — |
| Interior Width (Front Legroom)(inches) | 38.6 inches(winner) | 38.4 inches |
| Cargo Capacity(cubic feet) | 15.1 cu ft | 15.8 cu ft(winner) |
| Safety Rating (NHTSA Overall)(stars) | 5 stars | 5 stars |
| Standard Driver Assistance Features | Toyota Safety Sense 2.5+ | Honda Sensing Elite |
| NHTSA Overall Safety Rating(stars) | 5/5 stars | — |
| Engine Horsepower(hp) | 225 hp @ 6000 RPM(winner) | 204 hp (hybrid) |
| Engine Torque(lb-ft) | 163 lb-ft @ 5200 RPM | 180 lb-ft (hybrid est.)(winner) |
| Turbocharged Engine Option(hp) | Not available | — |
| Base Engine Power Output(hp) | 203 hp | — |
| Base Engine Torque(lb-ft) | 184 lb-ft | — |
Show 11 more attributes0-60 mph Acceleration(seconds) 8.2 seconds — Standard Horsepower (Gas)(HP) 203 HP — Base Engine Horsepower(hp) 203 hp (2.5L naturally aspirated) — Engine Displacement & Power(hp) 2.0L naturally aspirated, 201 hp — 0-60 Acceleration(seconds) 8.8 seconds — Maximum Engine Output (Turbo)(HP) 252 HP — Turbo Engine Horsepower(hp) 252 hp — Turbo Engine Torque(lb-ft) 273 lb-ft — 0-60 Time (Turbo)(seconds) 6.5 seconds — Highway Fuel Economy (Base)(MPG) 38 MPG — Combined Fuel Economy (Base)(MPG) 32 MPG — | ||
| Fuel Tank Capacity(gallons) | 13 gallons | 14.8 gallons(winner) |
| Seating Capacity(seats) | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Cargo Space(cubic feet) | 15.1 cu-ft(winner) | 14.8 cu-ft (est.) |
| Trunk Capacity(cubic feet) | 15.1 cu ft | 16.7 cu ft(winner) |
| Fuel Tank Capacity(liters) | 14.5 L | — |
Show 4 more attributesCargo Space(cubic feet) 103.1 cu ft — Trunk Cargo Capacity(cu ft) 16.7 cu ft — Cargo Capacity(cubic feet) 16.7 — Trunk Cargo Space(cubic feet) 16.7 cu ft — | ||
| Starting MSRP (2026)(USD) | $29,765 | — |
| Starting Price(USD) | $28,650 | — |
| J.D. Power Dependability Rating(ranking) | 94/100 | — |
| J.D. Power Reliability Rating(score out of 100) | 92/100(winner) | 85 |
| 5-Year Reliability Rating(percent) | 86% | — |
| J.D. Power 2025 Dependability Rating(Score/100) | 87/100 | — |
| J.D. Power Reliability Ranking(rank) | Rank #2 | — |
| 3-Year Resale Value Retention(%) | 63% | — |
| Powertrain Warranty Coverage(years / miles) | 5 yr / 60k mi | 5 years / 60,000 miles |
| Standard Warranty - Powertrain(years/miles) | 5 years/60,000 miles | — |
| Basic Warranty Coverage(months/miles) | 3 years / 36,000 miles | — |
| Consumer Reports Owner Satisfaction(score out of 10) | 8.2/10 | — |
| Owner Satisfaction (J.D. Power 2025)(score/100) | 84/100 | — |
| Base Engine Power(horsepower) | 203 hp (4-cyl naturally aspirated)(winner) | 192 hp turbocharged |
| 5-Year Residual Value Retention(percent) | 58% | — |
| 5-Year Resale Value Retention(%) | 58% retained(winner) | 56% |
| Trunk/Cargo Volume(cubic feet) | 15.1 cu ft | — |
| Annual Maintenance Cost(USD) | $289 | — |
| Average Annual Maintenance Cost (Years 1-5)(USD) | $386 | — |
| Wheelbase(mm) | 112.8 inches | — |
| J.D. Power Reliability Score(points) | 92/100 | — |
| J.D. Power Owner Satisfaction(points) | 822/1000 | — |
| Rear Legroom(inches) | 38.4 inches | — |
| Turning Radius(feet) | 37.4 feet | — |
Show 3 more attributes
Show 10 more attributes
Show 5 more attributes
Show 11 more attributes
Show 4 more attributes
Pros & Cons
10 pros·6 cons across both
Toyota Camry
Pros
Cons
Honda Accord
Pros
Cons
Frequently Asked Questions
4 questions
Both are among the most reliable midsize sedans available, but Toyota holds a slight reliability edge based on long-term track records. J.D. Power's 2025 Vehicle Dependability Study and Consumer Reports' long-term owner data consistently show both Camry and Accord performing above average for midsize sedans, with Camry scoring marginally higher in multi-year reliability surveys. The most meaningful differentiator is hybrid system reliability: Toyota's hybrid system (essentially unchanged core technology since the original Prius in 1997) has a 25+ year track record of remarkable durability — many Prius and Camry Hybrid vehicles exceed 300,000+ miles with original hybrid batteries still functional. The 2026 Camry is now hybrid-only, making Toyota's superior hybrid reliability record relevant to every Camry purchase. Honda's hybrid system, introduced in the current generation, is newer and has less long-term data. For buyers planning to keep their vehicle 10+ years and prioritizing long-term reliability, Toyota's hybrid track record is a meaningful advantage.
Toyota Camry hybrid gets better gas mileage than Honda Accord hybrid. The 2026 Camry hybrid (FWD) is EPA-rated at 51 MPG combined; the Accord Hybrid is rated at 46 MPG combined — a 5 MPG difference. At typical US driving of 15,000 miles per year at $3.50/gallon, the Camry saves approximately $180/year in fuel costs. The Camry AWD hybrid rates 46 MPG combined (same as Accord hybrid FWD). Toyota's Hybrid Synergy Drive technology is more mature (developed over 25+ years) and tuned for maximum efficiency at the cost of some driving engagement. Honda's hybrid system prioritizes a balance between efficiency and performance — the Accord Hybrid delivers a more responsive driving experience than the Camry but at slightly lower peak efficiency. If fuel economy is the primary priority, Camry hybrid wins clearly. The base Accord (non-hybrid 1.5L turbo) rates 29 MPG combined — significantly lower than either hybrid but available as a lower cost-of-entry option that the hybrid-only Camry doesn't offer.
No — Toyota discontinued the non-hybrid Camry for the US market starting with the 2024 model year. The 2026 Toyota Camry is available exclusively as a hybrid in the United States. This was a strategic decision reflecting Toyota's commitment to its hybrid technology as the primary transition step toward full electrification, combined with production economics that made the hybrid powertrain cost-competitive with traditional engines at scale. The Camry hybrid's fuel economy (51 MPG combined FWD, 46 MPG AWD) and the maturing of Toyota's hybrid battery technology (available with 8yr/100K warranty) made the all-hybrid lineup commercially viable. For buyers who specifically want a non-hybrid Toyota midsize sedan, no option exists in the current lineup. The Honda Accord, by contrast, still offers a non-hybrid base variant (1.5L turbocharged, 29 MPG, $29,800 base) — making the Accord the remaining option for buyers who prefer a traditional powertrain at a lower entry price, or who are skeptical of hybrid complexity.
The Honda Accord and Toyota Camry are very similar in size — both are classified as midsize sedans and fit comfortably in a standard garage. Key measurements: Accord length: 195.7 inches; Camry length: 192.1 inches (Accord is slightly longer). Accord width: 73.3 inches; Camry width: 72.4 inches. Accord wheelbase: 111.4 inches; Camry wheelbase: 111.2 inches (essentially identical wheelbase). Interior: Accord has slightly more rear legroom (40.4 inches vs Camry's 38.9 inches) — meaningfully more comfortable for rear passengers on longer trips. Accord trunk: 16.7 cubic feet vs Camry trunk: 15.1 cubic feet — Accord has meaningfully more cargo capacity. For families who prioritize passenger comfort and cargo capacity, the Accord's extra dimensions are real advantages. The Camry is slightly more maneuverable in tight parking situations due to its shorter length. In practice, most shoppers don't feel a meaningful size difference between them, but the Accord's interior dimensions and cargo space edge does make a practical difference for larger families or regular cargo haulers.
Expert Analysis: Toyota Camry vs Honda Accord
The Honda Accord and Toyota Camry are the two most enduring midsize sedans in America — a category once defined by broad consumer appeal, competitive reliability, and mainstream value. Both have survived the SUV migration that killed most sedan competitors, and in 2026 they've evolved significantly beyond their reputation as "sensible" cars to include genuinely engaging driving dynamics and advanced powertrains.
Toyota Camry entered a major redesign in 2024, now offering exclusively hybrid powertrains — Toyota discontinued the non-hybrid Camry entirely in the US for the first time, betting that hybrid efficiency is now a table-stakes expectation. The 2026 Camry's front-wheel-drive hybrid delivers 225 hp and an EPA-estimated 51 MPG combined (FWD), while all-wheel-drive hybrid variants rate approximately 46 MPG combined. Base price starts at $28,400 (LE FWD), progressing to XSE V6 AWD at approximately $42,000. Toyota's standard safety suite (Toyota Safety Sense 3.0) includes pre-collision system with pedestrian and cyclist detection, radar cruise control, lane departure alert with steering assist, and automatic high beams — all standard even on the base LE trim. The Camry's reputation for reliability is legendary: J.D. Power's 2025 Vehicle Dependability Study ranked Camry among the top midsize sedans, and Consumer Reports' reliability history shows consistent above-average scores over 10+ years. The trade-off: the Camry's hybrid-only lineup means no V6 engine option (popular in prior generations), and the interior design, while improved, still prioritizes utility over drama.
Honda Accord was redesigned for 2023 and continues strong in 2026. The Accord offers a broader powertrain lineup: a 1.5L turbocharged four-cylinder (base Sport trim, 192 hp), a 2.0L turbocharged hybrid (204-204 hp system, 46 MPG combined), and the Accord Hybrid Sport-L (240 hp system). Base Sport price: $29,800. Hybrid EX: $34,100. Hybrid Sport-L: $37,500. The Accord has historically been the driver's choice in this segment: sharper steering feel, more engaging handling dynamics, and better body roll control than the Camry — a distinction that persists in 2026 reviews. Honda's interior design is more premium than its price point suggests: the Accord's 12.3-inch digital instrument cluster, 10.2-inch center touchscreen (Google Built-In for Maps and Assistant), and physical climate controls have been praised as genuinely driver-focused. The Accord Hybrid's fuel economy (46 MPG combined) is competitive with Camry (51 MPG) but doesn't reach the same peak efficiency — Toyota's hybrid system is more mature. Honda Sensing (standard across all trims): collision mitigation, adaptive cruise, lane centering, traffic sign recognition.
Read 2 more paragraphsShow less
The 2026 verdict depends heavily on priorities:
**Fuel efficiency**: Toyota Camry hybrid (51 MPG) decisively beats Accord hybrid (46 MPG). For high-mileage drivers, this is significant. **Driving engagement**: Honda Accord leads — sharper steering, more athletic dynamics. If you drive for pleasure, Accord is more rewarding. **Reliability**: Both are exceptional. Toyota's hybrid reliability edge (15+ years of proven hybrid technology) is a meaningful differentiator in the hybrid-only era. **Interior**: Accord edges Camry for premium feel and driver-focused layout. Camry is more utilitarian. **Non-hybrid option**: Accord wins — Camry is hybrid-only in 2026, while Accord offers a base turbocharged non-hybrid for buyers who prefer simpler powertrains.
Resources & Learn More
Curated sources to dive deeper
Where to Buy
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Other links on this page may also earn us a commission, at no extra cost to you. Learn more about our affiliate disclosure
Wikipedia
Explore More
Related comparisons and categories