Toyota Camry vs Honda Accord 2026 Comparison
The 2026 Toyota Camry emphasizes efficiency and ease of driving with 225 hp and 51 MPG capability, while the Honda Accord offers more engaging driving dynamics and a hybrid option with 204 hp. Both are excellent midsize sedans; your choice depends on whether you prioritize fuel economy or driving engagement.
Toyota Camry
Best-selling midsize sedan known for reliability, value, and resale strength.
Buyers seeking exceptional fuel efficiency, daily commuters, and those prioritizing comfort and accessibility over driving thrills
Honda Accord
Reliable midsize sedan with strong resale value and proven track record.
Driving enthusiasts, tech-savvy buyers, those wanting larger fuel capacity, and anyone prioritizing engaging handling with modern features
Quick Answer
AI SummaryThe 2026 Toyota Camry emphasizes efficiency and ease of driving with 225 hp and 51 MPG capability, while the Honda Accord offers more engaging driving dynamics and a hybrid option with 204 hp. Both are excellent midsize sedans; your choice depends on whether you prioritize fuel economy or driving engagement.
Our Verdict
AI-assistedBoth the 2026 Toyota Camry and Honda Accord are outstanding midsize sedans with distinct strengths. The Camry excels in fuel efficiency and everyday comfort, while the Accord offers superior driving engagement and modern technology features like Google built-in integration. Your choice should reflect whether you prioritize maximum fuel economy and ease of driving or prefer a more spirited, tech-forward driving experience.
Was this verdict helpful?
Choose Toyota Camry if
Buyers seeking exceptional fuel efficiency, daily commuters, and those prioritizing comfort and accessibility over driving thrills
Choose Honda Accord if
Best pickDriving enthusiasts, tech-savvy buyers, those wanting larger fuel capacity, and anyone prioritizing engaging handling with modern features
Track this comparison
Get notified when prices change, new specs ship, or our verdict updates.
Triggers: price change new spec verdict update
No spam. Stop anytime.
Key Differences at a Glance
- Maximum Horsepower:✓ Toyota Camry wins(225 hp @ 6000 RPM vs 204 hp (hybrid option))
- Fuel Tank Capacity:✓ Honda Accord wins(14.8 gallons vs 13 gallons)
- Estimated Fuel Economy:✓ Toyota Camry wins(51 MPG combined vs 48 MPG combined (hybrid est.))
Key Facts & Figures
50 numeric metrics compared
| Metric | Toyota Camry | Honda Accord | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starting Price (2026)(USD) | $32,500 (estimated) | $29,590 | |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 49-50 MPG combined | 47-48 MPG combined | |
| Standard Touchscreen Size(inches) | 8 inches | 10.2 inches | |
| City Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 53 MPG | 48 MPG | |
| Highway Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 46 MPG | 47 MPG | |
| Interior Width (Front Legroom)(inches) | 38.6 inches | 38.4 inches | |
| Cargo Capacity(cubic feet) | 15.1 cu ft | 15.8 cu ft | |
| Safety Rating (NHTSA Overall)(stars) | 5 stars | 5 stars | |
| Engine Horsepower(hp) | 225 hp @ 6000 RPM | 204 hp (hybrid) | |
| Engine Torque(lb-ft) | 163 lb-ft @ 5200 RPM | 180 lb-ft (hybrid est.) | |
| Fuel Tank Capacity(gallons) | 13 gallons | 14.8 gallons | |
| Estimated MPG Combined(MPG) | 51 MPG | 48 MPG (hybrid) | |
| Infotainment Screen Size(inches) | 10.2-inch digital cluster | 12.3-inch display | |
| Seating Capacity(seats) | 5 seats | 5 seats | |
| Cargo Space(cu-ft) | 15.1 cu-ft | 14.8 cu-ft (est.) | |
| Starting MSRP (2026)(USD) | $29,765 | — | — |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Standard Non-Hybrid)(mpg) | 33 mpg | — | — |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(mpg) | 52 mpg | — | — |
| J.D. Power Dependability Rating(ranking) | 94/100 | — | — |
| 3-Year Resale Value Retention(%) | 63% | — | — |
| Standard Infotainment Display Size(inches) | 8 inches | — | — |
| Rear Seat Legroom(inches) | 38.3 inches | — | — |
| Consumer Reports Owner Satisfaction(score out of 10) | 8.2/10 | — | — |
| Starting MSRP (2025)(USD) | $29,390 | — | — |
| Base Engine Power(hp) | 203 hp (4-cyl naturally aspirated) | — | — |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Standard Engine)(MPG) | 28-32 MPG | — | — |
| J.D. Power Reliability Rating(out of 5) | 92/100 | — | — |
| Highway Cabin Noise Level(dB) | 71 dB | — | — |
| Starting Price (MSRP 2026)(USD) | $28,045 | — | — |
| Highway Fuel Economy(mpg) | 33 MPG | 38 MPG | |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy(mpg) | 28 MPG | 38 MPG | |
| Base Engine Power Output(hp) | 203 hp | — | — |
| Base Engine Torque(lb-ft) | 184 lb-ft | — | — |
| 0-60 MPH Acceleration(seconds) | 8.2 seconds | — | — |
| Trunk Capacity(cubic feet) | 15.1 cu ft | — | — |
| Infotainment Screen Size (Standard)(inches) | 8 inches | — | — |
| 5-Year Residual Value Retention(percent) | 58% | — | — |
| Engine Displacement & Power(hp) | 2.0L naturally aspirated, 201 hp | 2.0L naturally aspirated, 201 hp | |
| 0-60 Acceleration(seconds) | 8.8 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
| Cargo Space(cubic feet) | 103.1 cu ft | 103.1 cu ft | |
| Starting MSRP(USD) | $28,500 | $28,500 | |
| Infotainment Display(inches) | 8 inches | 8 inches | |
| Wheelbase(inches) | 112.8 inches | 112.8 inches | |
| Starting MSRP (2025 Base Model)(USD) | $32,650 | $32,650 | |
| J.D. Power Reliability Score(points) | 92/100 | 92/100 | |
| 5-Year Resale Value Retention(%) | 58% | 58% | |
| Trunk Cargo Capacity(cu ft) | 16.7 cu ft | 16.7 cu ft | |
| Maximum Engine Output (Turbo)(HP) | 252 HP | 252 HP | |
| Rear Legroom(inches) | 38.3 in | 38.3 in | |
| NHTSA Overall Safety Rating(percentile) | 5/5 stars | 5/5 stars |
Sourced from publicly available data ·
Key Differences
8 attributes compared head-to-head
- 225 hp @ 6000 RPM(winner)Maximum Horsepower204 hp (hybrid option)
- 13 gallonsFuel Tank Capacity14.8 gallons(winner)
- 51 MPG combined(winner)Estimated Fuel Economy48 MPG combined (hybrid est.)
- 10.2-inch customizable digital clusterInfotainment Display12.3-inch display with Google built-in(winner)
- Standard cap designStandard Fueling SystemCap-less fueling system(winner)
- Qi-compatible standard(winner)Wireless ChargingAvailable on select trims
- Easier to drive, more accessibleDriving CharacterMore engaging and fun to drive
- Contemporary modern stylingDesign PhilosophyTimeless design that ages well
- Maximum Horsepower
Toyota Camry
225 hp @ 6000 RPM(winner)
Honda Accord
204 hp (hybrid option)
- Fuel Tank Capacity
Toyota Camry
13 gallons
Honda Accord
14.8 gallons(winner)
- Estimated Fuel Economy
Toyota Camry
51 MPG combined(winner)
Honda Accord
48 MPG combined (hybrid est.)
- Infotainment Display
Toyota Camry
10.2-inch customizable digital cluster
Honda Accord
12.3-inch display with Google built-in(winner)
- Standard Fueling System
Toyota Camry
Standard cap design
Honda Accord
Cap-less fueling system(winner)
- Wireless Charging
Toyota Camry
Qi-compatible standard(winner)
Honda Accord
Available on select trims
- Driving Character
Toyota Camry
Easier to drive, more accessible
Honda Accord
More engaging and fun to drive
- Design Philosophy
Toyota Camry
Contemporary modern styling
Honda Accord
Timeless design that ages well
Full Comparison
| Attribute | Toyota Camry | Honda Accord |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price (2026)(USD) | $32,500 (estimated) | $29,590(winner) |
| Starting MSRP (2026)(USD) | $29,765 | — |
| Starting MSRP (2025)(USD) | $29,390 | — |
| Starting Price (MSRP 2026)(USD) | $28,045 | — |
| Starting MSRP(USD) | $28,500 | — |
Show 1 more attributeStarting MSRP (2025 Base Model)(USD) $32,650 — | ||
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 49-50 MPG combined(winner) | 47-48 MPG combined |
| City Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 53 MPG(winner) | 48 MPG |
| Highway Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 46 MPG | 47 MPG(winner) |
| Estimated MPG Combined(MPG) | 51 MPG(winner) | 48 MPG (hybrid) |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Standard Non-Hybrid)(mpg) | 33 mpg | — |
Show 4 more attributesEPA Combined Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(mpg) 52 mpg — EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Standard Engine)(MPG) 28-32 MPG — Highway Fuel Economy(mpg) 33 MPG 38 MPG EPA Combined Fuel Economy(mpg) 28 MPG 38 MPG | ||
| Engine Type (Standard) | 2.5L 4-Cylinder Hybrid | 2.0L Turbocharged or Hybrid Optional |
| Transmission Type | CVT | CVT |
| Standard Touchscreen Size(inches) | 8 inches | 10.2 inches(winner) |
| Infotainment Screen Size(inches) | 10.2-inch digital cluster | 12.3-inch display(winner) |
| Powertrain Type | Gasoline only | Gasoline and Hybrid options |
| Standard Infotainment Display Size(inches) | 8 inches | — |
| Infotainment Screen Size (Standard)(inches) | 8 inches | — |
Show 1 more attributeInfotainment Display(inches) 8 inches — | ||
| Heated Door Mirrors Standard | Yes | No |
| Highway Cabin Noise Level(dB) | 71 dB | — |
| Rear Legroom(inches) | 38.3 in | — |
| Interior Width (Front Legroom)(inches) | 38.6 inches(winner) | 38.4 inches |
| Cargo Capacity(cubic feet) | 15.1 cu ft | 15.8 cu ft(winner) |
| Safety Rating (NHTSA Overall)(stars) | 5 stars | 5 stars |
| Standard Driver Assistance Features | Toyota Safety Sense 2.5+ | Honda Sensing Elite |
| NHTSA Overall Safety Rating(percentile) | 5/5 stars | — |
| Engine Horsepower(hp) | 225 hp @ 6000 RPM(winner) | 204 hp (hybrid) |
| Engine Torque(lb-ft) | 163 lb-ft @ 5200 RPM | 180 lb-ft (hybrid est.)(winner) |
| Base Engine Power(hp) | 203 hp (4-cyl naturally aspirated) | — |
| Turbocharged Engine Option(hp) | Not available | — |
| Base Engine Power Output(hp) | 203 hp | — |
Show 5 more attributesBase Engine Torque(lb-ft) 184 lb-ft — 0-60 MPH Acceleration(seconds) 8.2 seconds — Engine Displacement & Power(hp) 2.0L naturally aspirated, 201 hp — 0-60 Acceleration(seconds) 8.8 seconds — Maximum Engine Output (Turbo)(HP) 252 HP — | ||
| Fuel Tank Capacity(gallons) | 13 gallons | 14.8 gallons(winner) |
| Seating Capacity(seats) | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Cargo Space(cu-ft) | 15.1 cu-ft(winner) | 14.8 cu-ft (est.) |
| Cargo Space(cubic feet) | 103.1 cu ft | — |
| Trunk Cargo Capacity(cu ft) | 16.7 cu ft | — |
| J.D. Power Dependability Rating(ranking) | 94/100 | — |
| J.D. Power Reliability Rating(out of 5) | 92/100 | — |
| 3-Year Resale Value Retention(%) | 63% | — |
| 5-Year Residual Value Retention(percent) | 58% | — |
| 5-Year Resale Value Retention(%) | 58% | — |
| Powertrain Warranty Coverage(miles) | 5 yr / 60k mi | — |
| Standard Warranty - Powertrain(years/miles) | 5 years/60,000 miles | — |
| Rear Seat Legroom(inches) | 38.3 inches | — |
| Trunk Capacity(cubic feet) | 15.1 cu ft | — |
| Consumer Reports Owner Satisfaction(score out of 10) | 8.2/10 | — |
| Transmission Type | CVT automatic (10-speed on some trims) | — |
| Wheelbase(inches) | 112.8 inches | — |
| J.D. Power Reliability Score(points) | 92/100 | — |
Toyota CamryHonda AccordShow 1 more attribute
Show 4 more attributes
Show 1 more attribute
Show 5 more attributes
Pros & Cons
10 pros·6 cons across both
Toyota Camry
Pros
- Excellent fuel economy at 51 MPG
- Powerful 225 hp engine provides strong acceleration
- Qi-compatible wireless charging standard across all trims
- Wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto come standard
- Easy to drive with user-friendly controls and responsive steering
Cons
- Smaller fuel tank capacity at 13 gallons
- Less engaging driving dynamics compared to competitors
- Interior technology slightly less advanced than class leaders
Honda Accord
Pros
- More fun and engaging driving experience with responsive handling
- Larger fuel tank capacity at 14.8 gallons for extended range
- Google built-in integration on 12.3-inch display for seamless connectivity
- Cap-less fueling system adds modern convenience
- Hybrid option available for eco-conscious drivers seeking performance
Cons
- Slightly lower horsepower on base engine at 204 hp
- Hybrid option may increase purchase price
- Learning curve for advanced infotainment system
Frequently Asked Questions
5 questions
The 2026 Toyota Camry is more fuel-efficient, with an estimated 51 MPG combined rating compared to the Honda Accord's approximately 48 MPG combined. However, the Accord offers a hybrid option that bridges this gap while providing more engaging performance.
Resources & Learn More
Curated sources to dive deeper
Where to Buy
As an affiliate, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you. Learn more about our affiliate disclosure
Wikipedia
Related Comparisons
12 more to explore
Honda Accord vs Mazda 6
automotiveHonda Accord vs Nissan Altima
automotiveHonda Accord vs Hyundai Sonata
automotiveToyota Camry vs Hyundai Sonata
automotiveToyota Camry vs Nissan Altima
automotiveToyota Camry vs Mazda 6
automotiveiPhone 17 vs Samsung Galaxy S26
technologyPS5 vs Xbox Series X
technologyMac vs Windows
technologyAndroid vs iOS
technologyNVIDIA vs AMD
technologyBMW 5 Series vs Mercedes-Benz E-Class
automotive
Related Articles
5 articles
- technology
Best Streaming Services in 2026: Top Picks for Every Budget & Interest
Navigating the crowded streaming landscape in 2026 can be overwhelming. We've tested and ranked the best streaming services that offer the most value, from Netflix's massive library to budget-friendly options like Tubi, helping you cut cable and find your perfect entertainment solution.
Read article - technology
Best Live TV Streaming Services & Plans for Spring 2026: Complete Buyer's Guide
Tired of overpaying for cable? Discover the best live TV streaming services and plans for Spring 2026, including YouTube TV's new genre-based packages starting at $55/month. Our comprehensive guide breaks down pricing, channels, and features to help you cut the cord.
Read article - technology
Philo in 2026: Streaming TV Service Review, Pricing & Reddit Community Insights
Explore Philo's evolution heading into 2026, including pricing tiers, channel lineup, and how it compares to competitors like Sling TV. Discover what the r/PhiloTV Reddit community thinks about the service's current offerings and future prospects.
Read article - technology
Best US Fighter Jets 2026: Top American Combat Aircraft Ranked
Discover the most advanced US fighter jets dominating the skies in 2026. From the legendary F-22 Raptor to the versatile F-35 Lightning II, we rank America's best combat aircraft based on performance, stealth, and air superiority capabilities.
Read article - technology
Philo in 2026: Pricing, Lineup & How It Compares to Sling TV
As we head into 2026, Philo continues to position itself as an affordable streaming alternative for cable TV lovers. Discover what Philo offers, how its pricing stacks up against competitors like Sling TV, and what the Reddit community thinks about its future.
Read article
Explore More
Related comparisons and categories