Honda Accord vs Mazda 6
Honda Accord
Reliable midsize sedan with strong resale value and proven track record.
Commuters, families, and budget-conscious buyers prioritizing efficiency and space
Mazda 6
Upscale midsize sedan emphasizing driving dynamics and premium interior design.
Driving enthusiasts, younger buyers, and those willing to trade cargo space for performance and handling
Short Answer
The Honda Accord offers more interior space (103.1 cu ft cargo) and better fuel efficiency (38 MPG highway), while the Mazda 6 delivers a more engaging driving experience with its 2.5L turbo engine (250 hp) and sport-tuned suspension, making it the choice for handling enthusiasts.
Our Verdict
AI-assistedChoose the Honda Accord if you prioritize fuel efficiency, spacious cargo capacity, and affordability with a practical daily driver that excels on long highway commutes. Choose the Mazda 6 if you value spirited driving dynamics, turbocharged performance, and a more engaging steering feel with premium build quality, willing to sacrifice some interior space for driving satisfaction.
Was this verdict helpful?
Choose Honda Accord if
Commuters, families, and budget-conscious buyers prioritizing efficiency and space
Choose Mazda 6 if
Driving enthusiasts, younger buyers, and those willing to trade cargo space for performance and handling
Track this comparison
Get notified when prices change, new specs ship, or our verdict updates.
Triggers: price change new spec verdict update
No spam. Stop anytime.
Key Differences at a Glance
Key Facts & Figures
| Metric | Honda Accord | Mazda 6 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard Touchscreen Size(inches) | 10.2 inches | โ | โ |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 47-48 MPG combined | โ | โ |
| Starting Price (2026)(USD) | $29,590 | โ | โ |
| City Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 48 MPG | โ | โ |
| Highway Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 47 MPG | โ | โ |
| Interior Width (Front Legroom)(inches) | 38.4 inches | โ | โ |
| Cargo Capacity(cubic feet) | 15.8 cu ft | โ | โ |
| Safety Rating (NHTSA Overall)(stars) | 5 stars | โ | โ |
| Engine Torque(lb-ft) | 180 lb-ft (hybrid est.) | โ | โ |
| Fuel Tank Capacity(gallons) | 14.8 gallons | โ | โ |
| Estimated MPG Combined(MPG) | 48 MPG (hybrid) | โ | โ |
| Infotainment Screen Size(inches) | 12.3-inch display | โ | โ |
| Seating Capacity(seats) | 5 seats | โ | โ |
| Cargo Space(cu-ft) | 14.8 cu-ft (est.) | โ | โ |
| Engine Horsepower(hp) | 204 hp (hybrid) | โ | โ |
| Engine Displacement & Power(hp) | 2.0L naturally aspirated, 201 hp | 2.5L turbocharged, 250 hp | -20% |
| 0-60 Acceleration(seconds) | 8.8 seconds | 7.4 seconds | +19% |
| Highway Fuel Economy(MPG) | 38 MPG | 31 MPG | +23% |
| Cargo Space(cu ft) | 103.1 cu ft | 88.8 cu ft | +16% |
| Starting MSRP(USD) | $28,500 | $29,400 | -3% |
| Infotainment Display(inches diagonal) | 8 inches | 8.8 inches | -9% |
| Wheelbase(inches) | 112.8 inches | 111.4 inches | +1% |
| Starting MSRP (2025 Base Model)(USD) | $32,650 | โ | โ |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy(mpg) | 38 MPG | 26 MPG | +46% |
| J.D. Power Reliability Score(points out of 100) | 92/100 | โ | โ |
| 5-Year Resale Value Retention(percent) | 58% | โ | โ |
| Trunk/Cargo Capacity(cubic feet) | 16.7 cu ft | โ | โ |
| Maximum Engine Output (Turbo)(HP) | 252 HP | โ | โ |
| Rear Legroom(inches) | 38.3 in | โ | โ |
| NHTSA Overall Safety Rating(stars) | 5/5 stars | โ | โ |
| Starting Price (MSRP 2026)(USD) | $29,450 | $29,450 | โ |
| Base Engine Power Output(hp) | 187 hp | 187 hp | โ |
| Base Engine Torque(lb-ft) | 186 lb-ft | 186 lb-ft | โ |
| 0-60 mph Acceleration(seconds) | 7.9 seconds | 7.9 seconds | โ |
| Trunk Capacity(cubic feet) | 14.2 cu ft | 14.2 cu ft | โ |
| Infotainment Screen Size (Standard)(inches) | 8.8 inches | 8.8 inches | โ |
| 5-Year Residual Value Retention(percent) | 51% | 51% | โ |
All figures sourced from publicly available data. Last updated Jun 2026.
Key Differences
Honda Accord
201 hp (2.0L naturally aspirated)
Mazda 6
250 hp (2.5L turbocharged)๐
Honda Accord
38 MPG๐
Mazda 6
36 MPG
Honda Accord
103.1 cu ft๐
Mazda 6
88.8 cu ft
Honda Accord
8.8 seconds
Mazda 6
7.4 seconds๐
Honda Accord
$28,500๐
Mazda 6
$29,400
Honda Accord
8 inches
Mazda 6
8.8 inches๐
Honda Accord
CVT automatic
Mazda 6
6-speed automatic๐
Full Comparison
| Attribute | ||
|---|---|---|
| Engine Type (Standard) | 2.0L Turbocharged or Hybrid Optional | โ |
| Transmission Type | CVT | โ |
| Standard Touchscreen Size(inches) | 10.2 inches | โ |
| Infotainment Screen Size(inches) | 12.3-inch display | โ |
| Powertrain Type | Gasoline and Hybrid options | โ |
| Infotainment Display(inches diagonal) | 8 inches | 8.8 inches |
| Infotainment Screen Size (Standard)(inches) | 8.8 inches | โ |
| Heated Door Mirrors Standard | No | โ |
| Rear Legroom(inches) | 38.3 in | โ |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 47-48 MPG combined | โ |
| City Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 48 MPG | โ |
| Highway Fuel Economy (Hybrid)(MPG) | 47 MPG | โ |
| Estimated MPG Combined(MPG) | 48 MPG (hybrid) | โ |
| Highway Fuel Economy(MPG) | 38 MPG | 31 MPG |
Show 1 more attributeEPA Combined Fuel Economy(mpg) 38 MPG 26 MPG | ||
| Starting Price (2026)(USD) | $29,590 | โ |
| Starting MSRP(USD) | $28,500 | $29,400 |
| Starting MSRP (2025 Base Model)(USD) | $32,650 | โ |
| Starting Price (MSRP 2026)(USD) | $29,450 | โ |
| Interior Width (Front Legroom)(inches) | 38.4 inches | โ |
| Cargo Capacity(cubic feet) | 15.8 cu ft | โ |
| Trunk/Cargo Capacity(cubic feet) | 16.7 cu ft | โ |
| Safety Rating (NHTSA Overall)(stars) | 5 stars | โ |
| Standard Driver Assistance Features | Honda Sensing Elite | โ |
| NHTSA Overall Safety Rating(stars) | 5/5 stars | โ |
| Engine Torque(lb-ft) | 180 lb-ft (hybrid est.) | โ |
| Engine Horsepower(hp) | 204 hp (hybrid) | โ |
| Engine Displacement & Power(hp) | 2.0L naturally aspirated, 201 hp | 2.5L turbocharged, 250 hp |
| 0-60 Acceleration(seconds) | 8.8 seconds | 7.4 seconds |
| Maximum Engine Output (Turbo)(HP) | 252 HP | โ |
Show 3 more attributesBase Engine Power Output(hp) 187 hp โ Base Engine Torque(lb-ft) 186 lb-ft โ 0-60 mph Acceleration(seconds) 7.9 seconds โ | ||
| Fuel Tank Capacity(gallons) | 14.8 gallons | โ |
| Seating Capacity(seats) | 5 seats | โ |
| Cargo Space(cu-ft) | 14.8 cu-ft (est.) | โ |
| Cargo Space(cu ft) | 103.1 cu ft | 88.8 cu ft |
| Transmission Type | CVT automatic (10-speed on some trims) | 6-speed automatic |
| Wheelbase(inches) | 112.8 inches | 111.4 inches |
| J.D. Power Reliability Score(points out of 100) | 92/100 | โ |
| 5-Year Resale Value Retention(percent) | 58% | โ |
| 5-Year Residual Value Retention(percent) | 51% | โ |
| Trunk Capacity(cubic feet) | 14.2 cu ft | โ |
Show 1 more attribute
Show 3 more attributes
Visual Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of numeric attributes
Pros & Cons
Honda Accord
Pros
- 38 MPG highway rating for excellent fuel efficiency
- 103.1 cu ft cargo space, best-in-class for midsize sedans
- Reliable CVT transmission with 10-speed option on higher trims
- Starting price of $28,500, most affordable entry option
- Honda's legendary reliability with strong resale value
Cons
- 201 hp engine feels underpowered compared to turbocharged competitors
- CVT transmission less engaging than traditional automatics for driving enthusiasts
Mazda 6
Pros
- 250 hp turbocharged engine delivers 7.4-second 0-60 acceleration
- 6-speed automatic transmission with superior feel and engagement versus CVT
- i-Activsense safety suite with adaptive LED headlights
- 8.8-inch infotainment display, larger than Accord base model
- Mazda's Jinba Ittai philosophy creates responsive, connected driving experience
Cons
- 88.8 cu ft cargo space is 14.3 cu ft less than Accord
- $29,400 starting MSRP is $900 more expensive than Accord base model
Frequently Asked Questions
The Mazda 6 is significantly more engaging, thanks to its 250 hp turbocharged engine (vs 201 hp in the Accord), 6-speed automatic transmission with better feedback, and sport-tuned suspension. The Accord prioritizes comfort and efficiency over driving dynamics. Mazda's Jinba Ittai philosophy results in tighter steering response and more connected handling, while the Accord's CVT transmission prioritizes smoothness over engagement.
Resources & Learn More
Dive deeper with these curated resources
Where to Buy
As an affiliate, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you. Learn more
Wikipedia
Related Comparisons
Toyota Camry vs Honda Accord
automotive
Honda Accord vs Nissan Altima
automotive
Honda Accord vs Hyundai Sonata
automotive
Toyota Camry vs Mazda 6
automotive
Tesla vs Ford
automotive
BMW vs Mercedes-Benz
automotive
iPhone 17 vs Samsung Galaxy S26
technology
PS5 vs Xbox Series X
technology
Mac vs Windows
technology
Android vs iOS
technology
NVIDIA vs AMD
technology
Rivian vs Lucid: EV Stock Comparison 2026
automotive
Related Articles
Best Streaming Services in 2026: Top Picks for Every Budget & Interest
Navigating the crowded streaming landscape in 2026 can be overwhelming. We've tested and ranked the best streaming services that offer the most value, from Netflix's massive library to budget-friendly options like Tubi, helping you cut cable and find your perfect entertainment solution.
Best Live TV Streaming Services & Plans for Spring 2026: Complete Buyer's Guide
Tired of overpaying for cable? Discover the best live TV streaming services and plans for Spring 2026, including YouTube TV's new genre-based packages starting at $55/month. Our comprehensive guide breaks down pricing, channels, and features to help you cut the cord.
Philo in 2026: Streaming TV Service Review, Pricing & Reddit Community Insights
Explore Philo's evolution heading into 2026, including pricing tiers, channel lineup, and how it compares to competitors like Sling TV. Discover what the r/PhiloTV Reddit community thinks about the service's current offerings and future prospects.
Best US Fighter Jets 2026: Top American Combat Aircraft Ranked
Discover the most advanced US fighter jets dominating the skies in 2026. From the legendary F-22 Raptor to the versatile F-35 Lightning II, we rank America's best combat aircraft based on performance, stealth, and air superiority capabilities.
Philo in 2026: Pricing, Lineup & How It Compares to Sling TV
As we head into 2026, Philo continues to position itself as an affordable streaming alternative for cable TV lovers. Discover what Philo offers, how its pricing stacks up against competitors like Sling TV, and what the Reddit community thinks about its future.