Skip to main content
software

GitHub vs Codeberg 2026: Comparison

GitHub is a Microsoft-owned platform with 100+ million repositories and comprehensive CI/CD tools, while Codeberg is a non-profit, open-source alternative with a focus on user privacy and no corporate ownership. GitHub dominates market share but Codeberg appeals to developers prioritizing data sovereignty and open-source principles.

GitHub

GitHub

Microsoft-owned web-based Git repository hosting with 100+ million repositories and integrated CI/CD.

Professional teams, enterprises, open-source maintainers, and developers wanting the largest community and most integrations.

Score63%
VS
C

Codeberg

Non-profit open-source Git hosting platform based in Germany with focus on privacy and GDPR compliance.

Privacy-conscious developers, European users requiring GDPR compliance, open-source purists, and teams wanting to support non-profit infrastructure.

Score63%

Quick Answer

AI Summary

GitHub is a Microsoft-owned platform with 100+ million repositories and comprehensive CI/CD tools, while Codeberg is a non-profit, open-source alternative with a focus on user privacy and no corporate ownership. GitHub dominates market share but Codeberg appeals to developers prioritizing data sovereignty and open-source principles.

Our Verdict

AI-assisted

Choose GitHub if you need the largest developer ecosystem, superior CI/CD integrations, and access to millions of open-source projects—ideal for professional teams and businesses. Choose Codeberg if you prioritize data privacy, want to support a non-profit alternative, and are comfortable with a smaller community focused on open-source principles.

Community feedback

Was this verdict helpful?

GitHub
9.3/10
Codeberg
5.7/10
C
GitHub

Choose GitHub if

Best pick

Professional teams, enterprises, open-source maintainers, and developers wanting the largest community and most integrations.

C

Choose Codeberg if

Privacy-conscious developers, European users requiring GDPR compliance, open-source purists, and teams wanting to support non-profit infrastructure.

Track this comparison

Get notified when prices change, new specs ship, or our verdict updates.

Triggers: price change new spec verdict update

No spam. Stop anytime.

Key Differences at a Glance

  • Ownership Model:Codeberg wins(Non-profit Codeberg e.V. vs Microsoft-owned (acquired 2018))
  • Repository Count:GitHub wins(100+ million repositories vs ~500,000 repositories)
  • Free Private Repositories:Unlimited with free tier vs Unlimited with free tier
See all 7 differences

Key Facts & Figures

32 numeric metrics compared

MetricGitHubCodebergRatio
Built-in CI/CD Minutes (Free Plan)(minutes/month)2000 minutes with Actions
Storage (Free Plan)(GB)Unlimited LFS (with 1GB free tier)
Monthly Active Users(millions)Over 100 million developers
Starting Price (Per User/Month)(USD)$21 for Teams
Total Active Users(millions)100 million
Starting Price (Pro Plan)(USD/month)$21
Third-party Integrations(integrations)~1000+
Average Time to Get Started(hours)1-2 hours
Free Tier Build Minutes per Month(minutes)2,000 minutes (GitHub Actions)
Minimum Paid Plan Cost(USD/month)$4/user/month (GitHub Team)
Repository Storage Limit (Free)(GB)Unlimited repos, 100 GB/repo max
Public Repositories Hosted(repositories)100+ million~500,000
Free CI/CD Minutes (Private Repos)(minutes/month)2,000 (GitHub Actions)0 (requires external setup)
Pricing for Private Repositories(USD/month)Free (unlimited)Free (unlimited)
Free Tier Monthly CI/CD Minutes(minutes)2,000 (public) / 500 (private)
Pro Plan Monthly Cost(USD)$4 per user/month
Marketplace Extensions Available(count)7,500+
Public Repositories(count)Unlimited (97M+ total)
Enterprise Cloud Platform Uptime SLA(percent)99.9%
Version Control Systems Supported(count)1 (Git only)
Third-Party Integrations(count)10,000+
GitHub Actions Free Tier Minutes(minutes/month)3,000
Public Repositories (Total)(repositories)100,000,000+
Self-Hosting Cost (Per User/Year)(USD)$231+ (GitHub Enterprise)
Marketplace Integrations(count)10,000+
Monthly Cost per User (Team Plan)(USD)$21
Active Developer Community(millions of users)100M+ registered
Free CI/CD Minutes Per Month(minutes)2,000 (GitHub Actions)0 (requires external CI)
Public Open-Source Repositories(millions)80M+ public repos
Third-Party Integrations Available(count)10,000+ GitHub Apps~100 integrations
Total Repositories(millions)100+ million~500,000
Free Repository Storage Limit(GB)Unlimited repositories (1GB LFS limit)Unlimited (10GB per repo)

Sourced from publicly available data ·

Key Differences

7 attributes compared head-to-head

GitHub
4GitHub
GitHub leads1 tie
C
2Codeberg
  • Ownership Model

    GitHub

    Microsoft-owned (acquired 2018)

    Codeberg

    Non-profit Codeberg e.V.(winner)

  • Repository Count

    GitHub

    100+ million repositories(winner)

    Codeberg

    ~500,000 repositories

  • Free Private Repositories

    GitHub

    Unlimited with free tier

    Codeberg

    Unlimited with free tier

  • Built-in CI/CD (Actions)

    GitHub

    GitHub Actions included free(winner)

    Codeberg

    Woodpecker CI (separate setup)

  • Data Storage Location

    GitHub

    Microsoft servers (US-based)

    Codeberg

    Germany (GDPR-compliant)(winner)

  • Monthly Active Users

    GitHub

    70+ million developers(winner)

    Codeberg

    ~150,000 registered users

  • Community/Ecosystem Size

    GitHub

    Largest developer ecosystem globally(winner)

    Codeberg

    Small but growing open-source focused

Full Comparison

GitHub
CCodeberg
Built-in CI/CD Minutes (Free Plan)(minutes/month)
2000 minutes with Actions
Built-in CI/CD Included
Yes (Actions)
Self-Hosting Support
Enterprise edition only ($231/user/year minimum)
Self-Hosting Option(available)
GitHub Enterprise (paid, proprietary)
Gitea (open-source, free)
Storage (Free Plan)(GB)
Unlimited LFS (with 1GB free tier)
SAST Security Scanning
Advanced with CodeQL (free on public repos)
Built-in Code Scanning & Security Features
Advanced (SAST, secret scanning, dependency alerts)
Basic (requires external tools)
Monthly Active Users(millions)
Over 100 million developers
Free Plan Available
Yes, with unlimited repositories
Starting Price (Per User/Month)(USD)
$21 for Teams
Starting Price (Pro Plan)(USD/month)
$21
Minimum Paid Plan Cost(USD/month)
$4/user/month (GitHub Team)
Pro Plan Monthly Cost(USD)
$4 per user/month
Show 3 more attributes
Self-Hosting Cost (Per User/Year)(USD)
$231+ (GitHub Enterprise)
Free Public Repo Storage(GB)
Unlimited
Monthly Cost per User (Team Plan)(USD)
$21
Total Active Users(millions)
100 million
Public Repositories
~200 million
Free Private Repositories
Unlimited
Serverless Functions Support
GitHub Functions (beta/limited)
Built-in Analytics Dashboard
Basic insights for Actions only
Serverless Function Support
No (code storage only)
Free Private Repository Limit
Unlimited repos
Jira Integration Quality
Third-party plugin
Third-party Integrations(integrations)
~1000+
Marketplace Extensions Available(count)
7,500+
Marketplace Integrations(count)
10,000+
Native Jira Integration
GitHub Apps marketplace plugin
Average Time to Get Started(hours)
1-2 hours
Free Tier Build Minutes per Month(minutes)
2,000 minutes (GitHub Actions)
Deploy Preview Generation
Via GitHub Pages or custom workflow
Primary Use Case
Version control & code collaboration
Repository Storage Limit (Free)(GB)
Unlimited repos, 100 GB/repo max
Public Repositories Hosted(repositories)
100+ million
~500,000
Free CI/CD Minutes (Private Repos)(minutes/month)
2,000 (GitHub Actions)
0 (requires external setup)
Data Privacy Compliance(null)
GDPR-compliant (multiple regions)
GDPR-native (Germany-only)
Data Tracking & Analytics(null)
User analytics enabled by default
Zero tracking/analytics
Data Residency Compliance
US-based servers, limited EU compliance
Germany-based, GDPR-certified
Pricing for Private Repositories(USD/month)
Free (unlimited)
Free (unlimited)
Free Tier Monthly CI/CD Minutes(minutes)
2,000 (public) / 500 (private)
Public Repositories(count)
Unlimited (97M+ total)
Version Control Systems Supported(count)
1 (Git only)
Enterprise Cloud Platform Uptime SLA(percent)
99.9%
Code Review Required Approvers(feature depth)
Configurable required reviewers + CODEOWNERS enforcement
HIPAA Compliance Eligible(boolean)
No
Average Deployment Time(minutes)
N/A (requires external CI/CD)
Free Tier Deployments Per Day(deployments/day)
Unlimited (via Actions)
Next.js Framework Integration
Community integrations only
Third-Party Integrations(count)
10,000+
Third-Party Integrations Available(count)
10,000+ GitHub Apps
~100 integrations
GitHub Actions Free Tier Minutes(minutes/month)
3,000
Edge Function Latency Reduction(milliseconds)
Not applicable
Public Repositories (Total)(repositories)
100,000,000+
Free Tier CI/CD Minutes(minutes/month)
Unlimited (via GitHub Actions)
Built-in CI/CD Integration
GitHub Actions (separate workflow service)
Web-based Code Review
Pull Requests with detailed approval workflows
Enterprise Compliance Features
Audit logs, SSO, IP allowlisting (Enterprise only)
Active Developer Community(millions of users)
100M+ registered
Free CI/CD Minutes Per Month(minutes)
2,000 (GitHub Actions)
0 (requires external CI)
Free Repository Storage Limit(GB)
Unlimited repositories (1GB LFS limit)
Unlimited (10GB per repo)
Team-Level SSO Support (Non-Enterprise)
No, Enterprise tier required ($231/user/year)
Public Open-Source Repositories(millions)
80M+ public repos
Total Repositories(millions)
100+ million
~500,000
Monthly Active Users(millions)
70+ million
~0.15 million
Organization Type
For-profit (Microsoft subsidiary)
Non-profit (Codeberg e.V.)

Pros & Cons

10 pros·6 cons across both

GitHub
C
GitHub

GitHub

+5-3

Pros

  • 100+ million repositories with massive ecosystem and third-party integrations
  • GitHub Actions provides free CI/CD pipeline automation with 2,000 free minutes/month
  • Unlimited free private repositories and collaborators on all plans
  • Advanced security features including code scanning, secret management, and dependency alerts
  • Extensive marketplace with 10,000+ GitHub Apps for workflow automation

Cons

  • Microsoft corporate ownership creates privacy concerns for some developers
  • Free tier storage limited to 1GB per repository for LFS (Large File Storage)
  • Vendor lock-in risk due to GitHub-specific features and integrations
C

Codeberg

+5-3

Pros

  • Non-profit model ensures no venture capital pressure or acquisition risk
  • Servers located in Germany with full GDPR compliance and EU data residency
  • Free tier includes unlimited repositories, collaborators, and 10GB storage per repository
  • 100% open-source infrastructure using Gitea for full transparency
  • No algorithmic feeds or tracking—privacy-first approach to platform design

Cons

  • Much smaller community (~150k users vs 70M on GitHub) limits discoverability
  • Fewer third-party integrations and limited CI/CD options (requires external Woodpecker CI setup)
  • Limited advanced security features compared to GitHub's built-in code scanning

Frequently Asked Questions

5 questions

  1. Yes, Codeberg uses TLS encryption for all connections and stores data in Germany with GDPR compliance. However, it lacks GitHub's advanced features like automated code scanning and secret scanning, so teams handling sensitive code may need additional security tools.

12 more to explore

5 articles

Explore More

Related comparisons and categories

AI generated