Skip to main content
VS
automotive

BMW i7 vs Mercedes-EQS 2025: Range, Price & Performance

The BMW i7 offers a more luxurious interior and faster acceleration (0-60 in 4.6s), while the Mercedes-EQS provides superior range (453 miles) and a more advanced infotainment system with OLED displays. Both are premium electric sedans targeting different buyer priorities.

BI

BMW i7 (2024-2025)

Premium all-electric luxury sedan with performance-focused engineering and minimalist interior design.

Performance-focused luxury buyers who value acceleration, handling dynamics, and drive engagement over raw range.

Score63%
Check Price
VS
M(

Mercedes-EQS (2024-2025)

Ultra-luxury electric sedan emphasizing comfort, technology, and extended range with futuristic design.

Long-distance commuters and luxury buyers who prioritize range, cutting-edge technology, and a serene riding experience over sportiness.

Score63%
Check Price

Quick Answer

AI Summary

The BMW i7 offers a more luxurious interior and faster acceleration (0-60 in 4.6s), while the Mercedes-EQS provides superior range (453 miles) and a more advanced infotainment system with OLED displays. Both are premium electric sedans targeting different buyer priorities.

Our Verdict

AI-assisted

Choose the BMW i7 if you prioritize dynamic performance, a cozier cabin design, and German engineering precision with exceptional acceleration. Choose the Mercedes-EQS if you value longer range capability, cutting-edge OLED technology, faster charging times, and a more spacious rear cabin—it's the better choice for long-distance travel and tech-forward buyers.

Community feedback

Was this verdict helpful?

B

Choose BMW i7 (2024-2025) if

Performance-focused luxury buyers who value acceleration, handling dynamics, and drive engagement over raw range.

M

Choose Mercedes-EQS (2024-2025) if

Long-distance commuters and luxury buyers who prioritize range, cutting-edge technology, and a serene riding experience over sportiness.

Track this comparison

Get notified when prices change, new specs ship, or our verdict updates.

Triggers: price change new spec verdict update

No spam. Stop anytime.

Key Differences at a Glance

  • EPA Range:✓ Mercedes-EQS (2024-2025) wins(453 miles vs 380 miles)
  • 0-60 Acceleration:✓ BMW i7 (2024-2025) wins(4.6 seconds vs 5.5 seconds)
  • Starting Price (2024):✓ Mercedes-EQS (2024-2025) wins($104,400 vs $119,400)
See all 7 differences

Key Facts & Figures

8 numeric metrics compared

MetricBMW i7 (2024-2025)Mercedes-EQS (2024-2025)Ratio
EPA Range (xDrive50/EQS 580)(miles)453 miles453 miles
0-60 Acceleration (xDrive50/EQS 580)(seconds)5.5 seconds5.5 seconds
Starting MSRP (2024 Model Year)(USD)$104,400$104,400
Battery Capacity(mAh)107.8 kWh107.8 kWh
Infotainment Display Size(inches)17.7 inches (curved OLED)17.7 inches (curved OLED)
DC Fast Charging (10-80%)(minutes)25 minutes25 minutes
Wheelbase (Interior Space)(inches)125.0 inches125.0 inches
Maximum Horsepower(hp)516 hp (EQS 580)516 hp (EQS 580)

Sourced from publicly available data ·

Key Differences

7 attributes compared head-to-head

BI
2BMW i7 (2024-2025)
Mercedes-EQS (2024-2025) leads
M(
5Mercedes-EQS (2024-2025)
  • EPA Range

    BMW i7 (2024-2025)

    380 miles

    Mercedes-EQS (2024-2025)

    453 miles(winner)

  • 0-60 Acceleration

    BMW i7 (2024-2025)

    4.6 seconds(winner)

    Mercedes-EQS (2024-2025)

    5.5 seconds

  • Starting Price (2024)

    BMW i7 (2024-2025)

    $119,400

    Mercedes-EQS (2024-2025)

    $104,400(winner)

  • Battery Capacity (xDrive50)

    BMW i7 (2024-2025)

    111.5 kWh(winner)

    Mercedes-EQS (2024-2025)

    107.8 kWh

  • Infotainment Display

    BMW i7 (2024-2025)

    14.9-inch curved glass (LCD)

    Mercedes-EQS (2024-2025)

    17.7-inch OLED (curved)(winner)

  • DC Fast Charging (10-80%)

    BMW i7 (2024-2025)

    31 minutes

    Mercedes-EQS (2024-2025)

    25 minutes(winner)

  • Wheelbase

    BMW i7 (2024-2025)

    123.6 inches

    Mercedes-EQS (2024-2025)

    125.0 inches(winner)

Full Comparison

BBMW i7 (2024-2025)
MMercedes-EQS (2024-2025)
EPA Range (xDrive50/EQS 580)(miles)
453 miles
—
0-60 Acceleration (xDrive50/EQS 580)(seconds)
5.5 seconds
—
Maximum Horsepower(hp)
516 hp (EQS 580)
—
Starting MSRP (2024 Model Year)(USD)
$104,400
—
Battery Capacity(mAh)
107.8 kWh
—
Infotainment Display Size(inches)
17.7 inches (curved OLED)
—
DC Fast Charging (10-80%)(minutes)
25 minutes
—
Wheelbase (Interior Space)(inches)
125.0 inches
—

Pros & Cons

10 pros·6 cons across both

BI
M(
BI

BMW i7 (2024-2025)

+5-3

Pros

  • Fastest acceleration in class at 4.6s (0-60 mph) with 516 hp in xDrive50 variant
  • Largest battery available (111.5 kWh) with more usable capacity than EQS
  • Signature BMW driving dynamics with sport-tuned suspension and precise steering
  • Minimalist interior with ambient lighting and sustainable leather alternatives
  • Available iDrive 8 with voice control and gesture recognition

Cons

  • Shortest EPA range (380 miles) of the two models limits highway practicality
  • Higher starting price at $119,400 vs EQS at $104,400 (15% premium)
  • Smaller infotainment screen (14.9-inch LCD) appears dated vs EQS OLED display
M(

Mercedes-EQS (2024-2025)

+5-3

Pros

  • Industry-leading EPA range of 453 miles (EQS 580) supports cross-country travel
  • Revolutionary 17.7-inch curved OLED display with 2,560x1,440 resolution and true blacks
  • Faster DC charging: 10-80% in 25 minutes vs BMW's 31 minutes
  • Larger wheelbase (125.0 inches) creates more rear legroom and passenger comfort
  • Lower starting price of $104,400 for equivalent performance tier

Cons

  • Slower acceleration (5.5s 0-60) sacrifices performance vs i7's 4.6-second sprint
  • Slightly smaller battery capacity (107.8 kWh) than BMW's 111.5 kWh offering
  • OLED display prone to burn-in after extended use of static navigation arrows

Frequently Asked Questions

5 questions

  1. The Mercedes-EQS is superior for long-distance travel with 453-mile EPA range versus the BMW i7's 380 miles—a 73-mile advantage that translates to one fewer charging stop per 1,000 miles. The EQS also charges 10-80% in 25 minutes (vs. BMW's 31 minutes), reducing charging time by 6 minutes per session. For frequent highway driving, the EQS is the clear winner.

Related Comparisons

12 more to explore

Related Articles

5 articles

Explore More

Related comparisons and categories

Explore Entities

More Automotive

People Also Compare

AI generated