Skip to main content
Editor-in-Chief
2 min read
software

Backblaze vs Carbonite 2026: Cloud Storage vs Backup

Backblaze is a cloud storage platform (B2) optimized for developers and businesses with superior upload speeds and transparent pricing, while Carbonite is an automatic personal/business backup solution focused on simplicity with unlimited storage and hands-off backup management.

BB

Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage

Developer-friendly cloud storage platform with S3-compatible API and transparent per-GB pricing.

Developers, DevOps teams, cloud-native applications, and enterprises needing scalable, API-first storage solutions.

Score63%
VS
C

Carbonite

Automatic cloud backup service offering unlimited storage with courier recovery and hybrid backup options.

Individual consumers, home office users, small businesses, and remote workers who prioritize simplicity and unlimited storage over technical control.

Score63%
8 attributes7 differences16 pros/cons

Quick Answer

AI Summary

Backblaze is a cloud storage platform (B2) optimized for developers and businesses with superior upload speeds and transparent pricing, while Carbonite is an automatic personal/business backup solution focused on simplicity with unlimited storage and hands-off backup management.

Read full verdict

Our Verdict

AI-assisted

Choose Backblaze if you need a scalable, API-driven cloud storage solution with excellent performance for developers, integrations, and enterprise workloads. Choose Carbonite if you want a simple, automatic backup solution for your computer that requires no technical setup and includes unlimited storage in a flat-rate subscription.

Community feedback

Was this verdict helpful?

Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage
5/10
Carbonite
10/10
Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage

Choose Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage if

Developers, DevOps teams, cloud-native applications, and enterprises needing scalable, API-first storage solutions.

Carbonite

Choose Carbonite if

Best pick

Individual consumers, home office users, small businesses, and remote workers who prioritize simplicity and unlimited storage over technical control.

Share this verdict

Track this comparison

Get notified when prices change, new specs ship, or our verdict updates.

Triggers: price change new spec verdict update

No spam. Stop anytime.

Key Differences at a Glance

  • Primary Use Case:Cloud storage platform for developers, businesses, and integrations vs Automatic backup service for personal computers and small businesses
  • Upload Performance (5MiB Files):Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage wins(Industry-leading in Q1 2026 benchmarks vs Not publicly benchmarked at comparable levels)
  • Storage Limits:Carbonite wins(Unlimited storage included in subscription vs Pay-per-GB with no hard limits (scalable))
See all 7 differences

Key Facts & Figures

2 numeric metrics compared

MetricBackblaze B2 Cloud StorageCarboniteRatio
Storage Pricing($/GB/month)$0.006/GB/monthUnlimited (varies by plan: $8.25-$24.92/month)
Annual Subscription Cost (10TB Storage)(USD)$720 ($0.006 × 10,000GB × 12 months)$99-$299 (flat rate, unlimited)

Sourced from publicly available data ·

Key Differences

7 attributes compared head-to-head

BB
2Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage
Evenly matched3 ties
C
2Carbonite
  • Primary Use Case

    Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage

    Cloud storage platform for developers, businesses, and integrations

    Carbonite

    Automatic backup service for personal computers and small businesses

  • Upload Performance (5MiB Files)

    Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage

    Industry-leading in Q1 2026 benchmarks(winner)

    Carbonite

    Not publicly benchmarked at comparable levels

  • Storage Limits

    Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage

    Pay-per-GB with no hard limits (scalable)

    Carbonite

    Unlimited storage included in subscription(winner)

  • Pricing Model

    Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage

    $0.006/GB/month + API transaction fees (transparent, usage-based)

    Carbonite

    $99-$299/year flat rate (predictable, all-inclusive)

  • Automation Level

    Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage

    Requires manual configuration or API integration

    Carbonite

    Fully automatic background backup (set and forget)(winner)

Full Comparison

Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage
Carbonite
Storage Pricing($/GB/month)
$0.006/GB/month
Unlimited (varies by plan: $8.25-$24.92/month)
Annual Subscription Cost (10TB Storage)(USD)
$720 ($0.006 × 10,000GB × 12 months)
$99-$299 (flat rate, unlimited)
Upload Speed Performance (5MiB Files)(Mbps (relative ranking))
Industry-leading (Q1 2026)
Not publicly benchmarked
Maximum Storage Capacity(TB)
Unlimited (scalable)
Unlimited
Backup Automation
Manual setup or API-driven (requires configuration)
Fully automatic (background process, no setup required)
API Availability(text)
Full REST API, S3-compatible, webhooks, CLI tools
Limited API access, primarily GUI-based
Physical Disaster Recovery(null)
Cloud-based recovery only
Courier recovery service included (physical hard drive delivery)
Hybrid Backup Support(null)
Not natively supported (requires third-party tools)
Native hybrid backup combining local and cloud backups

Pros & Cons

10 pros·6 cons across both

BB
C
BB

Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage

+5-3

Pros

Industry-leading upload performance (Q1 2026 benchmarks for 5MiB file uploads)
S3-compatible REST API enabling seamless third-party integrations
Transparent, predictable pricing at $0.006/GB/month with bundled egress
Highly scalable with no storage limits for growing businesses
Regional redundancy and disaster recovery options available

Cons

Requires technical knowledge or API integration for automation
Per-GB pricing scales quickly for large storage needs compared to flat-rate competitors
Steeper learning curve for non-technical users
C

Carbonite

+5-3

Pros

Unlimited cloud storage included in single flat-rate subscription ($99-$299/year)
Fully automatic background backup requiring zero manual intervention
Physical courier recovery option for rapid disaster recovery
Hybrid backup support combining local and cloud backup strategies
User-friendly interface designed for non-technical consumers and small businesses

Cons

Limited API access and developer tools for custom integrations
Performance metrics not publicly benchmarked or transparently shared
Less suitable for enterprise-scale operations or cloud-native workloads

Frequently Asked Questions

5 questions

  1. Carbonite is significantly better for personal computer backup because it provides fully automatic, hands-off backup that runs silently in the background. You install it once and never think about it again. Backblaze B2 is a cloud storage platform requiring technical setup and is not designed for automatic personal device backup.

  2. Backblaze B2 is purpose-built for developers and enterprises with a full REST API, S3 compatibility, webhooks, and integration capabilities. Carbonite lacks developer tools and is not suitable for programmatic access or cloud-native workloads. Backblaze's Q1 2026 performance benchmarks also demonstrate superior upload speeds.

  3. Backblaze B2 costs approximately $72 annually for 1TB ($0.006/GB × 1,000GB × 12 months). Carbonite costs $99-$299 annually (flat rate) regardless of whether you backup 1TB or 100TB, making Carbonite more cost-effective for larger backups but Backblaze better for small backups under 15TB.

  4. Carbonite offers a unique Courier Recovery service—they ship a physical hard drive with your backup data if internet recovery would take too long. Backblaze B2 only supports cloud-based recovery, which can take longer for very large datasets but is typically faster for smaller restores (under 100GB).

  5. Yes. Many users implement a hybrid strategy: use Carbonite for automatic personal computer backup and Backblaze B2 for archival, developer projects, or integrations with cloud applications. They serve different purposes and can complement each other in a comprehensive backup strategy.

Last updated
AI-assistedOur methodology