Skip to main content
VS
military

US vs Russian Fighter Aircraft 2026 Comparison

The US maintains quantitative and qualitative air superiority with 3,101 combat aircraft compared to Russia's 1,524, along with more advanced 5th-generation stealth platforms (F-22, F-35) and superior logistics infrastructure, while Russia emphasizes supermaneuverability and long-range missile capabilities in platforms like the Su-57 and Su-35.

US

United States Fighters (F-22, F-35, F-16)

Advanced stealth multirole fighters with global reach and extensive logistics support

Extended global military operations, air superiority over peer competitors, network-integrated multi-domain warfare, and sustained power projection

Score70%
Learn More
VS
RF

Russian Fighters (Su-57, Su-35, Su-75)

Supermaneuverable fighters with thrust vectoring and long-range missile focus for regional air defense

Regional air defense, cost-conscious modernization, close-range dogfighting tactics, and supermaneuverable engagement in defined theaters

Score55%
Learn More

Quick Answer

AI Summary

The US maintains quantitative and qualitative air superiority with 3,101 combat aircraft compared to Russia's 1,524, along with more advanced 5th-generation stealth platforms (F-22, F-35) and superior logistics infrastructure, while Russia emphasizes supermaneuverability and long-range missile capabilities in platforms like the Su-57 and Su-35.

Our Verdict

AI-assisted

The United States dominates in overall air superiority through fleet size (2x larger combat aircraft inventory), logistics infrastructure, and proven 5th-generation stealth technology maturity. Choose US fighters for sustained global power projection, advanced beyond-visual-range capabilities, and ecosystem integration. Choose Russian fighters for regional air defense, supermaneuverability in dogfighting scenarios, and cost-effective multirole capabilities, though with operational limitations against modern US systems.

Community feedback

Was this verdict helpful?

U
United States Fighters (F-22, F-35, F-16)
9/10
Russian Fighters (Su-57, Su-35, Su-75)
6/10
R
U

Choose United States Fighters (F-22, F-35, F-16) if

Best pick

Extended global military operations, air superiority over peer competitors, network-integrated multi-domain warfare, and sustained power projection

R

Choose Russian Fighters (Su-57, Su-35, Su-75) if

Regional air defense, cost-conscious modernization, close-range dogfighting tactics, and supermaneuverable engagement in defined theaters

Track this comparison

Get notified when prices change, new specs ship, or our verdict updates.

Triggers: price change new spec verdict update

No spam. Stop anytime.

Key Differences at a Glance

  • Total Combat Aircraft:✓ United States Fighters (F-22, F-35, F-16) wins(3,101 aircraft vs 1,524 aircraft)
  • Transport Aircraft Fleet:✓ United States Fighters (F-22, F-35, F-16) wins(1,483 aircraft vs 515 aircraft)
  • 5th-Generation Stealth Fighters:✓ United States Fighters (F-22, F-35, F-16) wins(F-22, F-35 (operational since 2005-2015) vs Su-57 (limited operational since 2019))
See all 7 differences

Key Facts & Figures

7 numeric metrics compared

MetricUnited States Fighters (F-22, F-35, F-16)Russian Fighters (Su-57, Su-35, Su-75)Ratio
Total Combat Aircraft(aircraft count)3,1011,524
Transport Aircraft Fleet(aircraft count)1,483515
Helicopter Fleet Size(aircraft count)5,4421,604
Bomber Aircraft Count(aircraft count)147152
Trainer Aircraft Fleet(aircraft count)1,598442
F-22 Raptor Operational Service Entry(year)2005N/A—
Su-57 Operational Service Entry(year)N/A2019—

Sourced from publicly available data ·

Key Differences

7 attributes compared head-to-head

US
6United States Fighters (F-22, F-35, F-16)
United States Fighters (F-22, F-35, F-16) leads
RF
1Russian Fighters (Su-57, Su-35, Su-75)
  • Total Combat Aircraft

    United States Fighters (F-22, F-35, F-16)

    3,101 aircraft(winner)

    Russian Fighters (Su-57, Su-35, Su-75)

    1,524 aircraft

  • Transport Aircraft Fleet

    United States Fighters (F-22, F-35, F-16)

    1,483 aircraft(winner)

    Russian Fighters (Su-57, Su-35, Su-75)

    515 aircraft

  • 5th-Generation Stealth Fighters

    United States Fighters (F-22, F-35, F-16)

    F-22, F-35 (operational since 2005-2015)(winner)

    Russian Fighters (Su-57, Su-35, Su-75)

    Su-57 (limited operational since 2019)

  • Helicopter Fleet

    United States Fighters (F-22, F-35, F-16)

    5,442 helicopters(winner)

    Russian Fighters (Su-57, Su-35, Su-75)

    1,604 helicopters

  • Supermaneuverability Capability

    United States Fighters (F-22, F-35, F-16)

    Limited (conventional design focus)

    Russian Fighters (Su-57, Su-35, Su-75)

    Su-35, Su-57 feature advanced thrust vectoring(winner)

  • Global Logistics Network

    United States Fighters (F-22, F-35, F-16)

    Extensive worldwide forward bases and supply chains(winner)

    Russian Fighters (Su-57, Su-35, Su-75)

    Limited to regional reach

  • Trainer Aircraft

    United States Fighters (F-22, F-35, F-16)

    1,598 trainers(winner)

    Russian Fighters (Su-57, Su-35, Su-75)

    442 trainers

Full Comparison

UUnited States Fighters (F-22, F-35, F-16)
RRussian Fighters (Su-57, Su-35, Su-75)
Total Combat Aircraft(aircraft count)
3,101
1,524
Transport Aircraft Fleet(aircraft count)
1,483
515
Helicopter Fleet Size(aircraft count)
5,442
1,604
Bomber Aircraft Count(aircraft count)
147
152
Trainer Aircraft Fleet(aircraft count)
1,598
442
F-22 Raptor Operational Service Entry(year)
2005
N/A
Su-57 Operational Service Entry(year)
N/A
2019
Global Logistics Network Reach(capability level)
Worldwide forward bases and supply chains
Regional/theater-limited reach

Pros & Cons

13 pros·8 cons across both

US
RF
US

United States Fighters (F-22, F-35, F-16)

+7-3

Pros

  • 3,101 total combat aircraft providing overwhelming numerical advantage
  • F-22 Raptor with 5th-generation stealth and supercruise capability (since 2005)
  • F-35 Lightning II with 360° sensor fusion and network-centric warfare integration
  • 5,442 helicopter fleet for comprehensive air mobility and support
  • Advanced beyond-visual-range missiles with proven integration
  • 1,483 transport aircraft enabling global force projection
  • Superior logistics infrastructure and worldwide forward bases

Cons

  • Higher operational and maintenance costs per aircraft
  • F-35 development program faced delays and cost overruns
  • Less emphasis on supermaneuverability compared to Russian designs
RF

Russian Fighters (Su-57, Su-35, Su-75)

+6-5

Pros

  • Su-57 features 5th-generation stealth with internal weapons bays and 360° sensor coverage
  • Su-35 advanced supermaneuverability with thrust vectoring for close-range combat
  • Long-range air-to-air missile capability for beyond-visual-range engagement
  • Su-75 emerging as cost-effective 5th-generation alternative
  • Lower per-unit acquisition and operating costs
  • Proven performance in regional conflicts (Syria, Ukraine)

Cons

  • 1,524 combat aircraft represents 51% of US inventory
  • Su-57 operational fleet remains limited (dozens vs hundreds of F-22/F-35)
  • Significantly constrained logistics and global reach compared to US
  • Limited beyond-visual-range missile integration maturity
  • Fewer trainer aircraft (442 vs 1,598) affecting pilot development pipeline

Frequently Asked Questions

5 questions

  1. The United States operates 3,101 combat aircraft compared to Russia's 1,524 as of 2026, providing a 2:1 numerical advantage in available fighter and attack platforms.

Related Comparisons

12 more to explore

Related Articles

1 article

Explore More

Related comparisons and categories

Explore Entities

More Military

People Also Compare

AI generated