Skip to main content
sports

Spurs vs Thunder 2026: Stats, Head-to-Head

The Oklahoma City Thunder lead the 2025-26 season series with superior offensive efficiency (115.2 PPG vs 108.7 PPG) and a younger, more athletic roster, while the Spurs show improved three-point shooting (37.2% vs 34.8%) under their recent coaching changes.

San Antonio Spurs

San Antonio Spurs

NBA team averaging 108.7 PPG with elite three-point shooting (37.2%) in 2025-26 season.

Fans who value experienced leadership and appreciate long-range shooting accuracy; bettors expecting developmental improvement

Score71%
VS
Oklahoma City Thunder

Oklahoma City Thunder

NBA team with league-leading 115.2 PPG and top-10 defense (109.8 rating) in 2025-26.

Bettors favoring youth, athleticism, and balanced two-way basketball; playoff contention hopefuls expecting sustained performance

Score71%

Quick Answer

AI Summary

The Oklahoma City Thunder lead the 2025-26 season series with superior offensive efficiency (115.2 PPG vs 108.7 PPG) and a younger, more athletic roster, while the Spurs show improved three-point shooting (37.2% vs 34.8%) under their recent coaching changes.

Our Verdict

AI-assisted

The Oklahoma City Thunder are the stronger team in 2025-26, demonstrating superior offensive efficiency, better perimeter defense, and more depth with their younger roster. Choose the Thunder if you're betting on consistency and long-term contention; choose the Spurs if you appreciate grit, excellent three-point shooting, and a coaching staff attempting a rebuild with emerging talent.

Community feedback

Was this verdict helpful?

San Antonio Spurs
6.3/10
Oklahoma City Thunder
8.8/10
San Antonio Spurs

Choose San Antonio Spurs if

Fans who value experienced leadership and appreciate long-range shooting accuracy; bettors expecting developmental improvement

Oklahoma City Thunder

Choose Oklahoma City Thunder if

Best pick

Bettors favoring youth, athleticism, and balanced two-way basketball; playoff contention hopefuls expecting sustained performance

Track this comparison

Get notified when prices change, new specs ship, or our verdict updates.

Triggers: price change new spec verdict update

No spam. Stop anytime.

Key Differences at a Glance

  • Points Per Game (Season Average):Oklahoma City Thunder wins(115.2 PPG vs 108.7 PPG)
  • Field Goal Percentage:Oklahoma City Thunder wins(47.1% vs 45.3%)
  • Three-Point Shooting:San Antonio Spurs wins(37.2% vs 34.8%)
See all 7 differences

Key Facts & Figures

100 numeric metrics compared

MetricSan Antonio SpursOklahoma City ThunderRatio
Points Per Game (2025-26)(PPG)109.5 PPG
Field Goal Percentage(%)45.3%47.1%
Three-Point Attempts Per Game(3PA)28.9 3PA
Defensive Rating(Points per 100 possessions)113.4109.8
Assists Per Game(APG)27.328.9
NBA Championships(titles)5 championships
Victor Wembanyama Points Per Game(PPG)Victor Wembanyama 24.7 PPG
Coach Experience(years)Gregg Popovich 30 years with team
All-Time Championships(titles)50
Playoff Appearances (2021-2026)(appearances)14
Average Team Age(years)27.224.8
Coach Tenure(seasons)New (2024-present)6 seasons
Last Conference Finals Appearance(year)2014Never
Expected Win Total (2025-26)(wins)35-4048-52
Offensive Rating Potential(points per 100)110.5115.2
Total NBA Championships(titles)5 championships
Playoff Win Percentage (All-Time)(%)69.5% (178-78)
Consecutive 50-Win Seasons(seasons)17 consecutive (1998-99 to 2015-16)
Three-Point Attempts Per Game (2024-25)(attempts)28.4 3PA/game
Consecutive Playoff Appearances(years)22 consecutive (1995-2016)
Finals MVP Awards (Core Players)(awards)8 (Duncan 3x, Parker 1x, Ginóbili 0x, Leonard 0x in core era)
Average Regular Season Wins Per Year (2010-2024)(wins)48.2 wins/season
Offensive Rating(points per 100 possessions)108.4118.9
Net Rating (Differential)(points per 100 possessions)-4.4+9.5
All-Time NBA Championships(titles)51
Playoff Appearances (Last 10 Seasons)(appearances)79
2025-26 Payroll(USD millions)$118.2M$145.8M
Average Roster Age(years)26.224.8
Points Per Game(PPG)108.7115.2
Three-Point Percentage(%)37.2%34.8%
Roster Average Age(years)28.425.1
Free Throw Percentage(%)79.4%76.8%
Leading Scorer PPG(points per game)29.1 (SGA)29.1 (SGA)
Rebounds Per Game (Team)(rebounds)47.147.1
Assists Per Game (Team)(assists)28.428.4
Steals Per Game (Team)(steals)8.98.9
Points Per Game (Team Scoring)(PPG)116.8116.8
Team Assists Per Game(APG)27.827.8
Bench Scoring(Points per game)28.428.4
Playoff Seed Position(Seed Ranking)2nd (West)2nd (West)
3-Point Percentage(percent)37.9%37.9%
Average Points Per Game(points)117.8117.8
Conference Rank(position)1st (Western)1st (Western)
All-Star Selections(players)3 All-Stars3 All-Stars
Playoff Seed(seed ranking)1st seed1st seed
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander Points Per Game(PPG)30.1 PPG30.1 PPG
Team Defensive Rating(points per 100 possessions)110.2110.2
2023-24 Win-Loss Record(Wins)56-2656-26
NBA Championship Titles(championships)00
Points Allowed Per Game(PPG)109.3109.3
Star Player PPG Average(PPG)30.2 (SGA)30.2 (SGA)
Final Score(points)126126
Assists Leader APG(Assists Per Game)10.9 (SGA)10.9 (SGA)
Rebounds Leader RPG(Rebounds Per Game)10+ (Holmgren)10+ (Holmgren)
Games Back From Playoff Position(GB)-5.5 (leading)-5.5 (leading)
Net Rating(point differential per 100 possessions)+7.9+7.9
2026 NBA All-Star Selections(players)33
Playoff Seeding(seed ranking)1st1st
Net Rating (scoring margin per 100 possessions)(points)+10.6+10.6
All-NBA Caliber Superstars(count)3 (Gilgeous-Alexander, Holmgren, Dort)3 (Gilgeous-Alexander, Holmgren, Dort)
Western Conference Playoff Seeding(seed)1st (projected)1st (projected)
Playoff Probability(percent)99%99%
NBA Championship Odds (2026 season)(decimal odds)+400+400
Payroll(USD millions)$163M$163M
Three-Point Percentage (team)(percent)36.2%36.2%
Team Offensive Rating(points per 100 possessions)115.9115.9
Payroll (2024-25)(million USD)$176.4M$176.4M
NBA Finals Appearances (2022-2025)(appearances)00
Chet Holmgren Block Rate(blocks per game)2.8 BPG2.8 BPG
NBA Championships Won(Titles)00
Leading Scorer PPG Average(Points per game)Shai Gilgeous-Alexander 29.3 PPGShai Gilgeous-Alexander 29.3 PPG
MVP Awards (All-Time)(Awards)00
Core Roster Average Age(Years)24.3 years24.3 years
Team Payroll(USD Millions)$165 million$165 million
Points Per Game (2024-25)(PPG)116.8116.8
Defensive Rating (2024-25)(points per 100 possessions)105.2105.2
Leading Scorer Average (2024-25)(PPG)30.1 (SGA)30.1 (SGA)
Assists Per Game (2024-25)(APG)8.18.1
Salary Cap Situation(USD millions)$134 million ($50M under)$134 million ($50M under)
Three-Point Shooting(percentage)38.1%38.1%
Point Differential(points per game)+8.9+8.9
Western Conference Seed(ranking)1st Seed1st Seed
Star Player PPG(points per game)Shai Gilgeous-Alexander 28.4Shai Gilgeous-Alexander 28.4
Playoff Appearances (Last 5 Years)(seasons)5 of 55 of 5
Western Conference Ranking(seed position)1st seed1st seed
Rebounds Per Game(RPG)44.844.8
Three-Point Percentage (Leading Scorer)(%)42.8%42.8%
Points Per Game (Offense)(PPG)112.4112.4
Points Allowed Per Game (Defense)(PPG)105.2105.2
Leading Scorer - Points Per Game(PPG)Shai Gilgeous-Alexander 30.1Shai Gilgeous-Alexander 30.1
Team 3-Point Percentage(%)37.2%37.2%
Points Per Game (Team Average)(PPG)114.8114.8
Leading Scorer Average(PPG)Shai Gilgeous-Alexander - 30.1Shai Gilgeous-Alexander - 30.1
All-Star Selections (2024)(Players)2 All-Stars2 All-Stars
NBA Championship Titles (Total)(Championships)00
Future Draft Capital(First-Round Picks)Extensive (8+)Extensive (8+)
Three-Point Shooting Percentage(percent)37.8%37.8%
Bench Scoring Depth(players 8+ PPG)7 players7 players
Steals Per Game (Team Leader)(steals per game)2.1 (SGA)2.1 (SGA)
Assists Per Game (Team Leader)(assists per game)7.8 (SGA)7.8 (SGA)

Sourced from publicly available data ·

Key Differences

7 attributes compared head-to-head

San Antonio Spurs
1San Antonio Spurs
Oklahoma City Thunder leads
Oklahoma City Thunder
6Oklahoma City Thunder
  • Points Per Game (Season Average)

    San Antonio Spurs

    108.7 PPG

    Oklahoma City Thunder

    115.2 PPG(winner)

  • Field Goal Percentage

    San Antonio Spurs

    45.3%

    Oklahoma City Thunder

    47.1%(winner)

  • Three-Point Shooting

    San Antonio Spurs

    37.2%(winner)

    Oklahoma City Thunder

    34.8%

  • Defensive Rating (Points Allowed Per 100)

    San Antonio Spurs

    113.4

    Oklahoma City Thunder

    109.8(winner)

  • Assists Per Game

    San Antonio Spurs

    27.3 APG

    Oklahoma City Thunder

    28.9 APG(winner)

  • Roster Average Age

    San Antonio Spurs

    28.4 years

    Oklahoma City Thunder

    25.1 years(winner)

  • Head-to-Head 2025-26 Record

    San Antonio Spurs

    1-3

    Oklahoma City Thunder

    3-1(winner)

Full Comparison

San Antonio Spurs
Oklahoma City Thunder
Points Per Game (2025-26)(PPG)
109.5 PPG
Three-Point Attempts Per Game(3PA)
28.9 3PA
Field Goal Percentage(%)
45.3%
47.1%
Points Per Game(PPG)
108.7
115.2
Three-Point Percentage(%)
37.2%
34.8%
Free Throw Percentage(%)
79.4%
76.8%
Points Per Game (2024-25)(PPG)
116.8
Show 1 more attribute
Points Per Game (Team Average)(PPG)
114.8
Defensive Rating(Points per 100 possessions)
113.4
109.8
Defensive Rating (2024-25)(points per 100 possessions)
105.2
Assists Per Game(APG)
27.3
28.9
Assists Leader APG(Assists Per Game)
10.9 (SGA)
Assists Per Game (2024-25)(APG)
8.1
Assists Per Game (Team Leader)(assists per game)
7.8 (SGA)
NBA Championships(titles)
5 championships
Victor Wembanyama Points Per Game(PPG)
Victor Wembanyama 24.7 PPG
Coach Experience(years)
Gregg Popovich 30 years with team
All-Time Championships(titles)
5
0
NBA Championship Titles (Total)(Championships)
0
Playoff Appearances (2021-2026)(appearances)
1
4
Current Star Player Rating(NBA tier)
Veteran stars (declining)
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander (Elite)
Average Team Age(years)
27.2
24.8
Average Roster Age(years)
26.2
24.8
Coach Tenure(seasons)
New (2024-present)
6 seasons
Last Conference Finals Appearance(year)
2014
Never
Expected Win Total (2025-26)(wins)
35-40
48-52
Offensive Rating Potential(points per 100)
110.5
115.2
Total NBA Championships(titles)
5 championships
Playoff Win Percentage (All-Time)(%)
69.5% (178-78)
Consecutive 50-Win Seasons(seasons)
17 consecutive (1998-99 to 2015-16)
Three-Point Attempts Per Game (2024-25)(attempts)
28.4 3PA/game
Single Season Three-Pointer Record(makes)
Not applicable
Consecutive Playoff Appearances(years)
22 consecutive (1995-2016)
Finals MVP Awards (Core Players)(awards)
8 (Duncan 3x, Parker 1x, Ginóbili 0x, Leonard 0x in core era)
Average Regular Season Wins Per Year (2010-2024)(wins)
48.2 wins/season
2025-26 Regular Season Record(wins-losses)
38-44
52-30
Net Rating (Differential)(points per 100 possessions)
-4.4
+9.5
Season Record (2025-26)(wins-losses)
47-22
Wins-Losses Record (2025-26)(W-L)
65-17
Current Win-Loss Record (2024-25 season)
40-12
Show 2 more attributes
Western Conference Playoff Seeding(seed)
1st (projected)
Current Season Win-Loss Record(wins-losses)
32-12
Offensive Rating(points per 100 possessions)
108.4
118.9
Assists Per Game (Team)(assists)
28.4
Points Per Game (Team Scoring)(PPG)
116.8
Team Assists Per Game(APG)
27.8
Team Offensive Rating(points per 100 possessions)
115.9
Show 3 more attributes
Three-Point Shooting(percentage)
38.1%
Three-Point Percentage (Leading Scorer)(%)
42.8%
Three-Point Shooting Percentage(percent)
37.8%
All-Time NBA Championships(titles)
5
1
NBA Championships Won(Titles)
0
MVP Awards (All-Time)(Awards)
0
Playoff Appearances (Last 10 Seasons)(appearances)
7
9
2025-26 Payroll(USD millions)
$118.2M
$145.8M
Roster Average Age(years)
28.4
25.1
Core Roster Average Age(Years)
24.3 years
Head-to-Head Series Record (2025-26)(Wins-Losses)
1-3
3-1
Leading Scorer PPG(points per game)
29.1 (SGA)
Leading Scorer(PPG)
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander: 28.7 PPG
Leading Scorer PPG Average(Points per game)
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander 29.3 PPG
Rebounds Per Game (Team)(rebounds)
47.1
Rebounds Leader RPG(Rebounds Per Game)
10+ (Holmgren)
Rebounds Per Game(RPG)
44.8
Steals Per Game (Team)(steals)
8.9
Team Defensive Rating(points per 100 possessions)
110.2
Points Allowed Per Game (Defense)(PPG)
105.2
Steals Per Game (Team Leader)(steals per game)
2.1 (SGA)
Bench Scoring(Points per game)
28.4
Bench Scoring Depth(players 8+ PPG)
7 players
Playoff Seed Position(Seed Ranking)
2nd (West)
Conference Rank(position)
1st (Western)
Playoff Seed(seed ranking)
1st seed
Conference Standing(Seed/Rank)
1st (West)
Games Back From Playoff Position(GB)
-5.5 (leading)
Show 3 more attributes
Point Differential(points per game)
+8.9
Western Conference Seed(ranking)
1st Seed
Win-Loss Record(wins-losses)
37-13
3-Point Percentage(percent)
37.9%
Average Points Per Game(points)
117.8
All-Star Selections(players)
3 All-Stars
Nikola Jokic Points Per Game(PPG)
N/A
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander Points Per Game(PPG)
30.1 PPG
2023-24 Win-Loss Record(Wins)
56-26
Regular Season Record(Wins-Losses)
57-16
Win-Loss Record (2024-25 season)(Wins-Losses)
47-15
NBA Championship Titles(championships)
0
Points Allowed Per Game(PPG)
109.3
Star Player PPG Average(PPG)
30.2 (SGA)
All-NBA Caliber Superstars(count)
3 (Gilgeous-Alexander, Holmgren, Dort)
Final Score(points)
126
Location
Home - Paycom Center, Oklahoma City, OK
Aaron Gordon Points(points)
N/A
Aaron Gordon Field Goal %(%)
N/A
Aaron Gordon Three-Point %(%)
N/A
Aaron Gordon Free Throw %(%)
N/A
Three-Point Percentage (team)(percent)
36.2%
Team 3-Point Percentage(%)
37.2%
Aaron Gordon Plus-Minus(rating)
N/A
Game-Winning Play
Gilgeous-Alexander stepback 3P (0:03 remaining) - 126-129
Head-to-Head Result (HOU@OKC)(Final Score)
110 points
Third Quarter Dominance(Scoring Margin)
Led 52-46 at halftime
Bench Depth Indicator(Contributing Players)
Williams, Holmgren, SGA balanced attack
Net Rating(point differential per 100 possessions)
+7.9
2026 NBA All-Star Selections(players)
3
Nikola Jokic vs Shai Gilgeous-Alexander (Best Player Comparison)(PPG / APG / eFG%)
30.1 PPG / 6.5 APG / 60.1% eFG% (SGA)
Playoff Seeding(seed ranking)
1st
Net Rating (scoring margin per 100 possessions)(points)
+10.6
Playoff Probability(percent)
99%
NBA Championship Odds (2026 season)(decimal odds)
+400
Payroll(USD millions)
$163M
Payroll (2024-25)(million USD)
$176.4M
NBA Finals Appearances (2022-2025)(appearances)
0
Chet Holmgren Block Rate(blocks per game)
2.8 BPG
2024-25 Regular Season Win-Loss Record(Wins-Losses)
36-8
Team Payroll(USD Millions)
$165 million
Leading Scorer Average (2024-25)(PPG)
30.1 (SGA)
Leading Scorer Average(PPG)
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander - 30.1
Salary Cap Situation(USD millions)
$134 million ($50M under)
Wins-Losses Record(W-L)
32-10
Regular Season Wins-Losses
38-8
Star Player PPG(points per game)
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander 28.4
Playoff Appearances (Last 5 Years)(seasons)
5 of 5
Western Conference Ranking(seed position)
1st seed
Points Per Game (Offense)(PPG)
112.4
Leading Scorer - Points Per Game(PPG)
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander 30.1
2023-24 Season Win-Loss Record(Wins-Losses)
56-26
All-Star Selections (2024)(Players)
2 All-Stars
Future Draft Capital(First-Round Picks)
Extensive (8+)

Pros & Cons

10 pros·4 cons across both

San Antonio Spurs
Oklahoma City Thunder
San Antonio Spurs

San Antonio Spurs

+5-2

Pros

  • 37.2% three-point shooting, 4th in NBA
  • Veteran player leadership with 28+ year average roster age
  • Strong free throw shooting at 79.4%
  • Developing young talent with improved ball movement
  • Home court advantage at AT&T Center with 18,418 capacity

Cons

  • 115.4 defensive rating ranks 24th in NBA, allowing 113.4 PPG
  • Only 108.7 PPG average limits ability to compete with elite offenses
Oklahoma City Thunder

Oklahoma City Thunder

+5-2

Pros

  • 115.2 PPG offensive average, 3rd in NBA
  • 109.8 defensive rating, 8th in NBA — elite perimeter defense
  • 28.9 APG leads to ball movement and high-efficiency looks
  • Younger roster (25.1 avg age) provides 5+ year contention window
  • 3-1 head-to-head record vs Spurs demonstrates clear playoff positioning advantage

Cons

  • 34.8% three-point shooting ranks 18th — below-average perimeter shooting
  • Youth could lead to inconsistency in playoff pressure situations

Frequently Asked Questions

5 questions

  1. The Thunder's superior athletic defense (109.8 rating vs 113.4) combined with their higher offensive efficiency (115.2 PPG vs 108.7 PPG) creates a two-way advantage. Oklahoma City's younger roster transitions faster defensively, limiting the Spurs' three-point shot creators. Additionally, Thunder's 28.9 APG vs Spurs' 27.3 APG shows OKC's superior ball movement overwhelms San Antonio's half-court defensive schemes.

12 more to explore

5 articles

Explore More

Related comparisons and categories

AI generated