RTX 5080 vs RTX 4080 Super
The RTX 5080 delivers 35-40% better performance with full ray tracing and DLSS 4 support, while the RTX 4080 Super remains a capable 4K card at a lower price point. The 5080 uses advanced 5nm process technology versus the 4080 Super's 5nm, resulting in significantly higher TFLOPS and memory bandwidth.
NVIDIA RTX 5080
Flagship Blackwell architecture GPU with 10,752 CUDA cores and 576 GB/s memory bandwidth for next-gen gaming.
4K ultra gaming enthusiasts, content creators, and future-proofing budget
NVIDIA RTX 4080 Super
Ada architecture GPU with 10,240 CUDA cores delivering excellent 4K performance at proven value.
Budget-conscious 4K gamers and 1440p enthusiasts wanting proven performance
Quick Answer
AI SummaryThe RTX 5080 delivers 35-40% better performance with full ray tracing and DLSS 4 support, while the RTX 4080 Super remains a capable 4K card at a lower price point. The 5080 uses advanced 5nm process technology versus the 4080 Super's 5nm, resulting in significantly higher TFLOPS and memory bandwidth.
Our Verdict
AI-assistedChoose the RTX 5080 if you want maximum performance for 4K gaming at 120+ fps, future-proof ray tracing capabilities, and DLSS 4 Frame Generation technology. Choose the RTX 4080 Super if you primarily play at 1440p, want strong 4K 60fps performance, and prefer saving $200 with a proven, mature architecture.
Was this verdict helpful?
Choose NVIDIA RTX 5080 if
Best pick4K ultra gaming enthusiasts, content creators, and future-proofing budget
Choose NVIDIA RTX 4080 Super if
Budget-conscious 4K gamers and 1440p enthusiasts wanting proven performance
Track this comparison
Get notified when prices change, new specs ship, or our verdict updates.
Triggers: price change new spec verdict update
No spam. Stop anytime.
Key Differences at a Glance
- GPU Architecture:✓ NVIDIA RTX 5080 wins(Blackwell (5nm) vs Ada (5nm))
- CUDA Cores:✓ NVIDIA RTX 5080 wins(10,752 cores vs 10,240 cores)
- Memory Bandwidth:✓ NVIDIA RTX 5080 wins(576 GB/s vs 432 GB/s)
Key Facts & Figures
8 numeric metrics compared
| Metric | NVIDIA RTX 5080 | NVIDIA RTX 4080 Super | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| CUDA Cores(cores) | 10,752 | 10,240 | +5% |
| Memory Interface(bit) | 320-bit | 320-bit | |
| Memory Bandwidth(GB/s) | 576 GB/s | 432 GB/s | +33% |
| FP32 Performance(TFLOPS) | 54.9 TFLOPS | 41.1 TFLOPS | +34% |
| Boost Clock(GHz) | 2.55 GHz | 2.55 GHz | |
| VRAM Capacity(GB) | 16 GB GDDR7 | 16 GB GDDR6X | |
| Power Consumption(watts) | 575W TDP | 320W TDP | +80% |
| Launch Price (MSRP)(USD) | $999 | $799 | +25% |
Sourced from publicly available data · Jul 2026
Key Differences
7 attributes compared head-to-head
- Blackwell (5nm)GPU ArchitectureAda (5nm)
- 10,752 coresCUDA Cores10,240 cores
- 576 GB/sMemory Bandwidth432 GB/s
- 2.55 GHzBoost Clock Speed2.55 GHz
- 54.9 TFLOPSTensor Performance (FP32)41.1 TFLOPS
- $999MSRP at Launch$799
- 3rd Gen RT Cores (advanced)Ray Tracing Performance3rd Gen RT Cores (standard)
- GPU Architecture
NVIDIA RTX 5080
Blackwell (5nm)
NVIDIA RTX 4080 Super
Ada (5nm)
- CUDA Cores
NVIDIA RTX 5080
10,752 cores
NVIDIA RTX 4080 Super
10,240 cores
- Memory Bandwidth
NVIDIA RTX 5080
576 GB/s
NVIDIA RTX 4080 Super
432 GB/s
- Boost Clock Speed
NVIDIA RTX 5080
2.55 GHz
NVIDIA RTX 4080 Super
2.55 GHz
- Tensor Performance (FP32)
NVIDIA RTX 5080
54.9 TFLOPS
NVIDIA RTX 4080 Super
41.1 TFLOPS
- MSRP at Launch
NVIDIA RTX 5080
$999
NVIDIA RTX 4080 Super
$799
- Ray Tracing Performance
NVIDIA RTX 5080
3rd Gen RT Cores (advanced)
NVIDIA RTX 4080 Super
3rd Gen RT Cores (standard)
Full Comparison
| Attribute | NVIDIA RTX 5080 | NVIDIA RTX 4080 Super |
|---|---|---|
| CUDA Cores(cores) | 10,752 | 10,240 |
| Memory Interface(bit) | 320-bit | 320-bit |
| Memory Bandwidth(GB/s) | 576 GB/s | 432 GB/s |
| Boost Clock(GHz) | 2.55 GHz | 2.55 GHz |
| FP32 Performance(TFLOPS) | 54.9 TFLOPS | 41.1 TFLOPS |
| VRAM Capacity(GB) | 16 GB GDDR7 | 16 GB GDDR6X |
| Power Consumption(watts) | 575W TDP | 320W TDP |
| Launch Price (MSRP)(USD) | $999 | $799 |
Pros & Cons
10 pros·6 cons across both
NVIDIA RTX 5080
Pros
- 35-40% higher FP32 performance (54.9 vs 41.1 TFLOPS)
- 576 GB/s memory bandwidth enables better 4K+ texture streaming
- DLSS 4 with Frame Generation for up to 8x performance boost
- Advanced ray tracing with improved ray/tensor core balance
- Lower power efficiency with newer 5nm process node optimization
Cons
- $999 MSRP is $200 more than 4080 Super
- Overkill for 1440p gaming where 4080 Super performs identically
- Limited game optimization for Frame Generation feature at launch
NVIDIA RTX 4080 Super
Pros
- $799 MSRP provides 20% better value proposition than 5080
- Mature driver ecosystem with 2+ years of game optimization
- Handles 4K gaming at 60-90fps in demanding titles reliably
- 10,240 CUDA cores with 432 GB/s memory bandwidth sufficient for 4K
- Proven stability and thermal performance in real-world deployments
Cons
- 33% lower tensor performance (41.1 vs 54.9 TFLOPS) impacts AI upscaling
- No DLSS 4 Frame Generation support limits future game performance gains
- Memory bandwidth limitation (432 vs 576 GB/s) affects ultra-high resolution textures
Frequently Asked Questions
5 questions
Yes, if you play demanding games at 4K 120+ fps or plan to use DLSS 4 Frame Generation. The 35-40% performance improvement justifies the premium for high-refresh 4K gaming. If you target 1440p or 4K 60fps, the 4080 Super performs identically and the extra $200 is not justified.
Resources & Learn More
Curated sources to dive deeper
Where to Buy
As an affiliate, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you. Learn more
Wikipedia
Related Comparisons
12 more to explore
- IvsS
iPhone 17 vs Samsung Galaxy S26
technology - PvsX
PS5 vs Xbox Series X
technology - MvsW
Mac vs Windows
technology - AvsI
Android vs iOS
technology - NvsA
NVIDIA vs AMD
technology - NvsD
Netflix vs Disney+
companies - AvsG
Apple iPhone 17 vs Google Pixel 10
technology - MvsW
MacBook Air vs Windows Laptop
technology - LvsW
Linux vs Windows
technology - IvsS
iPhone 17 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6
technology - MvsL
MacBook Pro vs Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon
technology - MvsW
MacBook vs Windows Laptops
technology
Related Articles
5 articles
- technology
Best Streaming Services in 2026: Top Picks for Every Budget & Interest
Navigating the crowded streaming landscape in 2026 can be overwhelming. We've tested and ranked the best streaming services that offer the most value, from Netflix's massive library to budget-friendly options like Tubi, helping you cut cable and find your perfect entertainment solution.
Read article - technology
Best Live TV Streaming Services & Plans for Spring 2026: Complete Buyer's Guide
Tired of overpaying for cable? Discover the best live TV streaming services and plans for Spring 2026, including YouTube TV's new genre-based packages starting at $55/month. Our comprehensive guide breaks down pricing, channels, and features to help you cut the cord.
Read article - technology
Philo in 2026: Streaming TV Service Review, Pricing & Reddit Community Insights
Explore Philo's evolution heading into 2026, including pricing tiers, channel lineup, and how it compares to competitors like Sling TV. Discover what the r/PhiloTV Reddit community thinks about the service's current offerings and future prospects.
Read article - technology
Best US Fighter Jets 2026: Top American Combat Aircraft Ranked
Discover the most advanced US fighter jets dominating the skies in 2026. From the legendary F-22 Raptor to the versatile F-35 Lightning II, we rank America's best combat aircraft based on performance, stealth, and air superiority capabilities.
Read article - technology
Philo in 2026: Pricing, Lineup & How It Compares to Sling TV
As we head into 2026, Philo continues to position itself as an affordable streaming alternative for cable TV lovers. Discover what Philo offers, how its pricing stacks up against competitors like Sling TV, and what the Reddit community thinks about its future.
Read article
Explore More
Related comparisons and categories