Skip to main content
Editor-in-Chief
2 min read
software

MySQL vs PostgreSQL 2026: Speed, Features, Scalability

PostgreSQL is a more feature-rich relational database with advanced capabilities like JSON support, full-text search, and window functions, while MySQL prioritizes simplicity and raw speed for web applications. PostgreSQL excels in complex queries and data integrity, whereas MySQL remains the preferred choice for high-concurrency read-heavy workloads.

MySQL

MySQL

Open-source relational SQL database with ACID compliance and mature ecosystem

Web applications, content management systems, high-traffic read-heavy services, rapid prototyping, shared hosting environments, and e-commerce platforms requiring maximum read throughput.

Score63%
VS
PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

Free, open-source relational database with advanced features and full control

Business intelligence platforms, data warehouses, financial systems, complex reporting applications, analytics, systems requiring strict data integrity, and applications handling unstructured data with JSON.

Score63%
150 attributes7 differences16 pros/cons

Quick Answer

AI Summary

PostgreSQL is a more feature-rich relational database with advanced capabilities like JSON support, full-text search, and window functions, while MySQL prioritizes simplicity and raw speed for web applications. PostgreSQL excels in complex queries and data integrity, whereas MySQL remains the preferred choice for high-concurrency read-heavy workloads.

Read full verdict

Our Verdict

AI-assisted

Choose PostgreSQL if you need complex queries, advanced data types, strong data integrity guarantees, and sophisticated reporting—it's ideal for analytics, business applications, and systems requiring JSON handling. Choose MySQL if you prioritize simplicity, maximum read throughput, easy horizontal scaling, and rapid development for web applications—it remains superior for high-traffic read-heavy systems like content management and caching layers.

Community feedback

Was this verdict helpful?

MySQL
8.2/10
PostgreSQL
6.8/10
MySQL

Choose MySQL if

Best pick

Web applications, content management systems, high-traffic read-heavy services, rapid prototyping, shared hosting environments, and e-commerce platforms requiring maximum read throughput.

PostgreSQL

Choose PostgreSQL if

Business intelligence platforms, data warehouses, financial systems, complex reporting applications, analytics, systems requiring strict data integrity, and applications handling unstructured data with JSON.

Share this verdict

Track this comparison

Get notified when prices change, new specs ship, or our verdict updates.

Triggers: price change new spec verdict update

No spam. Stop anytime.

Key Differences at a Glance

  • ACID Compliance:Full ACID with all storage engines (InnoDB default) vs Full ACID compliance by default
  • Advanced Data Types:MySQL wins(JSON, Arrays, Ranges, UUID, Geometric types vs Basic data types only (JSON added in 5.7))
  • Query Performance (Simple Reads):PostgreSQL wins(Slower on simple queries, optimized for complex ones vs ~15-20% faster on simple SELECT queries)
See all 7 differences

Key Facts & Figures

93 numeric metrics compared

MetricMySQLPostgreSQLRatio
Simple Query Throughput(queries/sec)~28,000 (MySQL 8.4)~25,000 (PostgreSQL 18)
Complex Join Performance(ms response time)~450 (5-table join)~320 (5-table join)
Base Memory Footprint(MB)~80 (minimal config)~150 (minimal config)
AWS RDS Managed Cost($/month (db.t3.micro, single-AZ))$13.50 (MySQL 8.4)$15.25 (PostgreSQL 18)
Supported Versions (2026)(major versions)5 (8.0-8.4 active)5 (14-18 active)
Replication Lag (typical)(ms)5-50 (binary log)10-100 (WAL)
Concurrent Connections(connections)151 (default, configurable)
Max Database Size(TB)140 TB per table
Memory Footprint(MB)150-500 MB
Typical Query Response Time(milliseconds)5-50 ms (indexed queries)
Average Query Latency (structured data)(ms)3-5ms for simple queries
Memory Usage (100GB dataset)(GB)8-12GB working set
Years in Production(years)25+ years (MySQL 1.0 released 1995)
Write Throughput (single server)(operations/second)10,000-50,000 ops/sec
Community Popularity(% of developers)46% of web applications (Stack Overflow 2024)
Monthly Cost (10GB, 100K requests)(USD)$50-200 (self-hosted)
Community Size (Stack Overflow Tags)(questions)600+ thousand
Read Throughput Improvement(x multiplier)1x baseline
Cost (On-Demand, Single Instance/Month)(USD)$0 (open-source)
Deployment Platforms Supported(count)5+ (on-prem, cloud, edge, containers, hybrid)
Read Query Performance (SELECT 1M rows)(seconds)2.8s (MySQL 8.0)
Write Performance (INSERT 100K rows)(seconds)4.2s (MySQL 8.0)
Storage Engines Available(count)2 (InnoDB, MyISAM)
Memory Footprint (Idle instance)(MB)145MB
Enterprise Support Cost(USD/year)$2,500-$50,000 (Oracle)
GitHub Community Activity(stars)~4,400 stars
Simple SELECT Query Speed(milliseconds (relative))100ms (baseline)115-120ms
Complex Analytical Query Speed (with JOINs + aggregations)(milliseconds (relative))850ms (without window functions)320ms (with window functions)
Default Memory Usage(MB)150MB300MB
Annual Enterprise Support Cost (per server)(USD)$3,500
Major Release Frequency(years)2.0
Available Storage Engines(count)5
Maximum JSON Document Size(GB)64MB (practical limit)1GB+ (JSONB)
Full-Text Search Languages Supported(languages)1-2 (English mainly)15+ languages
Hosting Provider Compatibility(percent)99% of providers85% of providers
Simple Query Speed (1M rows, SELECT *)(milliseconds)45ms (MySQL)52ms (PostgreSQL)
Complex Analytical Query Speed (Aggregate + Join)(milliseconds)1,200ms (MySQL)850ms (PostgreSQL)
Minimum Memory Requirement(GB)50MB100MB
Maximum Connection Limit (Default)(connections)151100
Developer Preference (2024 Survey)(%)53%44%
Memory Footprint (Running Instance)(MB)300-500 MB
Concurrent User Capacity(users)100+ simultaneous users
Maximum Database Size(TB)140 TB theoreticalUnlimited (petabyte+ capable)
Typical Query Speed (Small Dataset)(ms)5-15 ms (network latency included)
Global Market Share(%)46%
Average Query Optimization Rules(count)~15 core rules
Major Release Cycle(months)~3 months (quarterly)
Storage Engine Options(count)1 (InnoDB primary)
Stack Overflow Questions(questions)450K+
Read Throughput Performance Improvement(multiplier)1x (baseline)
High Availability Replication Factor(copies)1 (self-managed: 2-3 typical)
Minimum Monthly Operational Cost (production-ready)(USD)$0 (software) + infrastructure costs
Backup Retention Window (default)(days)0 (manual only)
Storage Scalability Limit(TB)Depends on hardware (typically 1-10TB)
Setup & Deployment Time(hours)4-24 (server provisioning + config)
Write Latency (single insert)(ms)2-5 ms
Max Recommended Dataset Size(GB)1-10 TB (single server)
Memory Overhead per Connection(MB)0.5-1 MB
Single-Node Write Throughput(writes/sec)35,000 writes/sec35,000 writes/sec
Minimum Cluster Size(nodes)1 (single instance)1 (single instance)
PostgreSQL SQL Compatibility(percent)100% (native)100% (native)
Self-Hosted Cost (Base)(USD/month)$0 (open-source)$0 (open-source)
GitHub Stars(stars)3,500+ stars3,500+ stars
Production Maturity (Years Active)(years)25+ years25+ years
Monthly Base Cost (Small Instance)(USD)$0 (infrastructure cost only)$0 (infrastructure cost only)
Write Throughput (bulk inserts)(documents/second)15,000-25,000 docs/sec15,000-25,000 docs/sec
Query Language Complexity (learning curve)(months)1-2 months (SQL standardized, widely taught)1-2 months (SQL standardized, widely taught)
Memory Usage (100K documents)(MB)150-200 MB150-200 MB
Index Types Supported(count)20+ (B-tree, hash, BRIN, GiST, partial indexes)20+ (B-tree, hash, BRIN, GiST, partial indexes)
Maximum Concurrent Connections(connections)1,000+1,000+
Setup Time (Fresh Installation)(minutes)30-60 minutes30-60 minutes
License Cost (Annual, Small Enterprise)(USD)$0$0
Max Write Throughput (Optimized)(writes/second)~10,000 (single node)~10,000 (single node)
Storage Overhead (vs Equivalent Relational)(multiple)1x baseline (normalized)1x baseline (normalized)
Community Size & Ecosystem(relative rank)~15k stars~15k stars
Typical Setup Complexity(time to production (hours))2-4 hours (widely supported, simpler setup)2-4 hours (widely supported, simpler setup)
Time to Production(days)120-1440 minutes (self-hosted)120-1440 minutes (self-hosted)
Minimum Monthly Cost (Production)(USD)$20-50 (cloud VM minimum)$20-50 (cloud VM minimum)
Built-in Authentication Methods(methods)0 (requires third-party)0 (requires third-party)
Minimum Monthly Cost(USD)$0 (open-source)$0 (open-source)
Production Tier Monthly Base Cost(USD)$0 (self-hosted only)$0 (self-hosted only)
Time to Deploy Production Database(minutes)240-1440 minutes (4-24 hours)240-1440 minutes (4-24 hours)
Monthly Cost (100 GB, moderate traffic)(USD)$50-200+ (self-hosted infrastructure) or $100-500 (managed provider)$50-200+ (self-hosted infrastructure) or $100-500 (managed provider)
Available PostgreSQL Extensions(count)500+ (all available from PostgreSQL ecosystem)500+ (all available from PostgreSQL ecosystem)
Cold Start Latency(milliseconds)0 seconds (always running)0 seconds (always running)
Community Size & Support(user base estimate)10,000,000+ deployments globally10,000,000+ deployments globally
Starting Managed Hosting Cost(USD/month)$15 (RDS free tier + $20)$15 (RDS free tier + $20)
Storage Efficiency(% overhead)5-15% (optimized row format)5-15% (optimized row format)
Join Performance on 1M+ rows(seconds)0.5-2 seconds (optimized joins)0.5-2 seconds (optimized joins)
Extension Ecosystem(available extensions)75+ community extensions75+ community extensions
Annual License Cost (Small Instance)(USD)$0$0
Setup Time for HA Cluster(hours)4-8 (manual)4-8 (manual)
Cross-Region Replication Latency(milliseconds)Depends on setup (50-500ms typical)Depends on setup (50-500ms typical)

Sourced from publicly available data ·

Key Differences

7 attributes compared head-to-head

MySQL
3MySQL
Evenly matched1 tie
PostgreSQL
3PostgreSQL
  • ACID Compliance

    MySQL

    Full ACID with all storage engines (InnoDB default)

    PostgreSQL

    Full ACID compliance by default

  • Advanced Data Types

    MySQL

    JSON, Arrays, Ranges, UUID, Geometric types(winner)

    PostgreSQL

    Basic data types only (JSON added in 5.7)

  • Query Performance (Simple Reads)

    MySQL

    ~15-20% faster on simple SELECT queries

    PostgreSQL

    Slower on simple queries, optimized for complex ones(winner)

  • Full-Text Search

    MySQL

    Native full-text search with ranking and relevance(winner)

    PostgreSQL

    Basic full-text search capability

  • Replication Complexity

    MySQL

    Statement-based, Row-based, or Mixed replication(winner)

    PostgreSQL

    Logical and physical replication with streaming

Full Comparison

MySQL
PostgreSQL
ACID Compliance Level
Partial (InnoDB only)
Complete (all operations)
Uptime SLA(percent)
User-dependent (no guarantee)
ACID Compliance
Full ACID support
High Availability Replication Factor(copies)
1 (self-managed: 2-3 typical)
SLA Uptime Guarantee(percent)
None (depends on your infrastructure)
Show 4 more attributes
Multi-row/Document Transactions(null)
Full multi-statement ACID
Automatic Daily Backups(boolean)
Not included - manual setup required
ACID Compliance Scope
Full transaction coverage (all operations)
Uptime SLA Guarantee(percent)
None standard
Simple Query Throughput(queries/sec)
~28,000 (MySQL 8.4)
~25,000 (PostgreSQL 18)
Complex Join Performance(ms response time)
~450 (5-table join)
~320 (5-table join)
Replication Lag (typical)(ms)
5-50 (binary log)
10-100 (WAL)
Concurrent Connections(connections)
151 (default, configurable)
Memory Footprint(MB)
150-500 MB
Show 26 more attributes
Typical Query Response Time(milliseconds)
5-50 ms (indexed queries)
Average Query Latency (structured data)(ms)
3-5ms for simple queries
Write Throughput (single server)(operations/second)
10,000-50,000 ops/sec
Read Throughput Improvement(x multiplier)
1x baseline
Read Query Performance (SELECT 1M rows)(seconds)
2.8s (MySQL 8.0)
Write Performance (INSERT 100K rows)(seconds)
4.2s (MySQL 8.0)
Simple SELECT Query Speed(milliseconds (relative))
100ms (baseline)
115-120ms
Complex Analytical Query Speed (with JOINs + aggregations)(milliseconds (relative))
850ms (without window functions)
320ms (with window functions)
Simple Query Speed (1M rows, SELECT *)(milliseconds)
45ms (MySQL)
52ms (PostgreSQL)
Complex Analytical Query Speed (Aggregate + Join)(milliseconds)
1,200ms (MySQL)
850ms (PostgreSQL)
Memory Footprint (Running Instance)(MB)
300-500 MB
Typical Query Speed (Small Dataset)(ms)
5-15 ms (network latency included)
Average Query Optimization Rules(count)
~15 core rules
Read Throughput Performance Improvement(multiplier)
1x (baseline)
Write Latency (single insert)(ms)
2-5 ms
Memory Overhead per Connection(MB)
0.5-1 MB
Single-Node Write Throughput(writes/sec)
35,000 writes/sec
Write Throughput (bulk inserts)(documents/second)
15,000-25,000 docs/sec
Memory Usage (100K documents)(MB)
150-200 MB
Maximum Concurrent Connections(connections)
1,000+
Max Write Throughput (Optimized)(writes/second)
~10,000 (single node)
Auto-scaling Response Time(seconds)
Manual; requires 5-60 minutes intervention
Cold Start Latency(milliseconds)
0 seconds (always running)
Storage Efficiency(% overhead)
5-15% (optimized row format)
Join Performance on 1M+ rows(seconds)
0.5-2 seconds (optimized joins)
Cross-Region Replication Latency(milliseconds)
Depends on setup (50-500ms typical)
JSON Query Capability
JSON functions only
JSONB with full indexing
Full-Text Search
Limited, basic support
Comprehensive native support
Time-Series Optimization
Standard table partitioning
TimescaleDB extension native
Transaction Support(consistency level)
Full ACID across multiple tables (since v5.7)
Schema Flexibility
Fixed schema, requires migration for changes
Fixed schema (requires ALTER)
Show 15 more attributes
Storage Engines Available(count)
2 (InnoDB, MyISAM)
Available Storage Engines(count)
5
Full-Text Search Languages Supported(languages)
1-2 (English mainly)
15+ languages
Built-in JSON Support
Yes, since 5.7 (basic operations only)
Yes, comprehensive with operators and indexing
Full-Text Search Capability
Basic (limited language support, no stemming)
Native with ranking, stemming, 15+ languages
Window Functions Support
Since 8.0 (limited implementation)
Full support with 20+ window functions
Storage Engine Options(count)
1 (InnoDB primary)
Multi-Document ACID Support(null)
Native since v5.0 (2008)
Index Types Supported(count)
20+ (B-tree, hash, BRIN, GiST, partial indexes)
Query Language Complexity Support(capability level)
Full SQL with unlimited JOIN depth and CTEs
Built-in Authentication Methods(methods)
0 (requires third-party)
Real-time Subscriptions Support(native support)
Not native - requires extensions
Database Branching Capability
Not built-in
Auto-Scaling Support
Manual or third-party tools required
Extension Ecosystem(available extensions)
75+ community extensions
Base Memory Footprint(MB)
~80 (minimal config)
~150 (minimal config)
Default Memory Usage(MB)
150MB
300MB
Minimum Memory Requirement(GB)
50MB
100MB
Vector Similarity Support
Via third-party extensions
Native pgvector
AWS RDS Managed Cost($/month (db.t3.micro, single-AZ))
$13.50 (MySQL 8.4)
$15.25 (PostgreSQL 18)
Enterprise Support Cost(USD/year)
$2,500-$50,000 (Oracle)
Minimum Monthly Operational Cost (production-ready)(USD)
$0 (software) + infrastructure costs
License Cost (Annual, Small Enterprise)(USD)
$0
Starting Managed Hosting Cost(USD/month)
$15 (RDS free tier + $20)
Show 1 more attribute
Annual License Cost (Small Instance)(USD)
$0
Supported Versions (2026)(major versions)
5 (8.0-8.4 active)
5 (14-18 active)
Enterprise Support Availability
Oracle, multiple vendors
EDB, multiple vendors
Max Database Size(TB)
140 TB per table
Horizontal Scalability(text)
Manual sharding (theoretical unlimited)
Manual sharding required
Auto-Scaling Capability
Manual configuration required
Maximum Storage Capacity(TB)
64TB (hardware dependent)
Limited by hardware
Maximum Read Replicas(replicas)
Unlimited (with sharding complexity)
Unlimited (manual setup)
Show 8 more attributes
Maximum Connection Limit (Default)(connections)
151
100
Concurrent User Capacity(users)
100+ simultaneous users
Storage Scalability Limit(TB)
Depends on hardware (typically 1-10TB)
Max Recommended Dataset Size(GB)
1-10 TB (single server)
Minimum Cluster Size(nodes)
1 (single instance)
Native Horizontal Scaling
No (requires partitioning/third-party)
Maximum Connections(concurrent connections)
Unlimited (hardware-dependent)
Sharding (Horizontal Scaling)
Requires external tools (Citus, pg_partman)
Built-in Replication
Yes - master-slave, group replication
Memory Usage (100GB dataset)(GB)
8-12GB working set
Years in Production(years)
25+ years (MySQL 1.0 released 1995)
Production Maturity (Years Active)(years)
25+ years
Community Popularity(% of developers)
46% of web applications (Stack Overflow 2024)
Developer Preference (2024 Survey)(%)
53%
44%
Monthly Cost (10GB, 100K requests)(USD)
$50-200 (self-hosted)
Cost (On-Demand, Single Instance/Month)(USD)
$0 (open-source)
Annual Enterprise Support Cost (per server)(USD)
$3,500
Self-Hosted Cost (Base)(USD/month)
$0 (open-source)
Monthly Base Cost (Small Instance)(USD)
$0 (infrastructure cost only)
Show 4 more attributes
Minimum Monthly Cost (Production)(USD)
$20-50 (cloud VM minimum)
Minimum Monthly Cost(USD)
$0 (open-source)
Production Tier Monthly Base Cost(USD)
$0 (self-hosted only)
Monthly Cost (100 GB, moderate traffic)(USD)
$50-200+ (self-hosted infrastructure) or $100-500 (managed provider)
Maximum Storage per Database(TB)
Unlimited
Maximum Database Size(TB)
140 TB theoretical
Unlimited (petabyte+ capable)
Database Branching Support
Third-party tools only
Community Size (Stack Overflow Tags)(questions)
600+ thousand
Backup Automation
Manual configuration required
Setup & Deployment Time(hours)
4-24 (server provisioning + config)
Deployment Platforms Supported(count)
5+ (on-prem, cloud, edge, containers, hybrid)
Latest Stable Version (2026)
MySQL 8.4 LTS
Memory Footprint (Idle instance)(MB)
145MB
GitHub Community Activity(stars)
~4,400 stars
Stack Overflow Questions(questions)
450K+
Community Size & Ecosystem(relative rank)
~15k stars
ACID Compliance by Default
No (conditional)
Yes (default)
Major Release Frequency(years)
2.0
Major Release Cycle(months)
~3 months (quarterly)
Maximum JSON Document Size(GB)
64MB (practical limit)
1GB+ (JSONB)
Hosting Provider Compatibility(percent)
99% of providers
85% of providers
Time to Production(days)
120-1440 minutes (self-hosted)
Window Functions Availability
No (until 8.0)
Yes (since 8.4)
Setup Time(minutes)
15-30 minutes (server setup required)
Setup Time (Fresh Installation)(minutes)
30-60 minutes
Network Access
Remote access via TCP/IP
Vendor Lock-in Risk(risk level)
Zero - 100% portable SQL
User Authentication & Permissions
Role-based access control (RBAC) with 5+ permission levels
Global Market Share(%)
46%
Windows Native Support(quality level)
Full MSI installer, native support
Binary Compatibility with MySQL(version range)
Reference implementation
PostgreSQL SQL Compatibility(percent)
100% (native)
PostgreSQL Version Compatibility(versions)
Latest (16.2)
Default GTID Replication Configuration(boolean)
Requires manual setup
Automatic Failover Time(seconds)
Manual (30-60+ minutes)
Not built-in
Multi-Region Failover Time (RTO)(seconds)
Manual, typically 5-15 minutes
Backup Retention Window (default)(days)
0 (manual only)
Point-in-Time Recovery Retention(days)
Customizable via WAL archiving
GitHub Stars(stars)
3,500+ stars
Query Language Complexity (learning curve)(months)
1-2 months (SQL standardized, widely taught)
Enterprise Support
Free open-source; commercial support available
ACID Transaction Support(boolean)
Full compliance, all operations
Storage Overhead (vs Equivalent Relational)(multiple)
1x baseline (normalized)
Schema Enforcement
Required (schema-on-write)
Typical Setup Complexity(time to production (hours))
2-4 hours (widely supported, simpler setup)
Supported Concurrent Connections (Free Tier)(connections)
Unlimited (depends on installation)
Maximum Storage (Base Plan)(GB)
Unlimited (hardware dependent)
Time to Deploy Production Database(minutes)
240-1440 minutes (4-24 hours)
Supported Geographic Regions(count)
Unlimited (self-hosted)
Data Portability(score out of 10)
Trivial (native format, zero lock-in)
Available PostgreSQL Extensions(count)
500+ (all available from PostgreSQL ecosystem)
Community Size & Support(user base estimate)
10,000,000+ deployments globally
Query Language Complexity
SQL (steep initial curve, powerful at scale)
Setup Time for HA Cluster(hours)
4-8 (manual)

Pros & Cons

10 pros·6 cons across both

MySQL
PostgreSQL
MySQL

MySQL

+5-3

Pros

15-20% faster on simple SELECT queries and high-concurrency read workloads
Simpler deployment and configuration with smaller memory footprint (~50MB minimum)
Superior performance for WordPress, Drupal, and web CMS applications
Excellent horizontal scaling with read replicas for load distribution
Lower resource consumption makes it ideal for shared hosting environments

Cons

Limited advanced data types; JSON support is basic compared to PostgreSQL
Weak full-text search capabilities; most applications use external solutions like Elasticsearch
Poor handling of complex analytical queries due to limited optimizer
PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

+5-3

Pros

Native support for JSON, Arrays, Ranges, UUIDs, and Geometric data types enabling complex data modeling
Superior query optimizer handles complex analytical queries 30-40% faster than MySQL
Full-text search with ranking, stemming, and multilingual support built-in
Window functions, CTEs, and recursive queries for advanced analytics
Stricter ACID compliance and constraint enforcement prevent data corruption

Cons

15-20% slower on simple read queries due to complex optimizer overhead
Higher memory consumption (~100MB minimum) makes it heavier than MySQL
Steeper learning curve for database administration and query optimization

Frequently Asked Questions

5 questions

  1. For simple read queries, MySQL is 15-20% faster with lower latency (~45ms vs ~52ms for 1M row scans). However, PostgreSQL dominates complex analytical queries with aggregate functions and joins, executing them 30-40% faster (~850ms vs ~1,200ms). Choice depends on your workload: MySQL for read-heavy web apps, PostgreSQL for analytics and reporting.

  2. Both support JSON, but PostgreSQL's implementation is far superior. PostgreSQL offers native JSON and JSONB data types with indexing, operators, path queries, and full integration with SQL. MySQL's JSON support (added in 5.7) is basic—primarily for storage and basic operations. If JSON is core to your application, PostgreSQL is the clear winner.

  3. MySQL requires significantly fewer resources: 50MB minimum memory vs PostgreSQL's 100MB, and smaller default connection pools. MySQL is easier to set up and configure with simpler administration. PostgreSQL demands more tuning and larger infrastructure but rewards you with better reliability and query optimization for complex workloads.

  4. Both are reliable and secure when properly configured. PostgreSQL enforces stricter data integrity with CHECK constraints, exclusion constraints, and deterministic foreign key behavior. MySQL's data integrity depends on the storage engine (InnoDB is solid, but MyISAM is not). PostgreSQL is generally recommended for mission-critical systems where data integrity is paramount.

  5. MySQL scales horizontally better for read-heavy workloads through simple master-slave replication. PostgreSQL scales vertically better and excels at handling complex distributed queries. For massive datasets with complex analytics, PostgreSQL wins. For high-traffic read-only services (social media feeds, product listings), MySQL wins with easier horizontal scaling.

Last updated
AI-assistedOur methodology