Laravel vs Rails
Laravel
Modern PHP web application framework with elegant syntax and comprehensive tooling
Startups and agencies needing rapid prototyping, teams familiar with PHP, projects requiring high throughput
Rails
Mature Ruby web framework emphasizing convention over configuration and developer happiness
Enterprise teams with Ruby expertise, long-term product development, teams prioritizing code convention over raw performance
Short Answer
Laravel is a modern PHP framework with superior documentation and faster performance (2-3x throughput), while Rails is a mature Ruby framework with established conventions and a larger ecosystem of gems. Laravel dominates new projects in 2026, with 65% of new web frameworks chosen by developers favoring Laravel over Rails.
Our Verdict
AI-assistedChoose Laravel if you need faster time-to-market, better performance out of the box, and more modern PHP tooling with extensive documentation. Choose Rails if you're building a long-term enterprise system, value Rails' opinionated structure and mature ecosystem, or have a team experienced with Ruby conventions.
Was this verdict helpful?
Choose Laravel if
Startups and agencies needing rapid prototyping, teams familiar with PHP, projects requiring high throughput
Choose Rails if
Enterprise teams with Ruby expertise, long-term product development, teams prioritizing code convention over raw performance
Track this comparison
Get notified when prices change, new specs ship, or our verdict updates.
Triggers: price change new spec verdict update
No spam. Stop anytime.
Key Differences at a Glance
Key Facts & Figures
| Metric | Laravel | Rails | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| GitHub Stars | 187,000 | 56,000+ | +234% |
| Average Development Speed (MVP)(weeks) | 1.5 weeks | — | — |
| Job Openings (Global, 2025)(positions) | 38,000 | — | — |
| Average Page Load Time(ms) | 95ms | — | — |
| Developer Satisfaction (2025 Survey)(percentage) | 89% | — | — |
| Installation Size(MB) | ~50 MB | — | — |
| Time to Build CRUD App(hours) | 2-4 hours | — | — |
| Available Third-Party Packages(count) | ~200,000 packages | — | — |
| Market Share Among PHP Developers(%) | 64% of PHP frameworks | — | — |
| Average Response Time (Benchmark)(ms) | 45-60 ms per request | — | — |
| Average Development Time (Basic Site)(weeks) | 4-12 weeks | — | — |
| Global Market Share(%) | ~3% | — | — |
| Reported Security Vulnerabilities (2024)(CVEs) | 23 core CVEs | — | — |
| Available Plugins & Extensions(count) | ~10,000 packages (Composer) | — | — |
| Monthly Hosting Cost (Basic)(USD) | $20-50 | — | — |
| Maximum Concurrent Users (Optimized)(users) | 100,000+ | — | — |
| Initial Setup Time(minutes) | 8-12 minutes (Laravel installer + composer) | — | — |
| Cold Start Latency (Serverless)(milliseconds) | 800-1200ms (PHP cold starts) | — | — |
| Average Page Build Time (SSG)(seconds) | 0.8-1.5s per page (Blade templating) | — | — |
| Monthly NPM/Composer Downloads(millions) | 2.5M (Packagist) | — | — |
| Hosting Cost (Entry-Level Annual)(USD) | $24-60/year (shared PHP hosting) | — | — |
| Ecosystem Package Count(thousands) | 280K (Packagist registry) | — | — |
| Learning Curve (Time to Productivity)(weeks) | 2-3 weeks | — | — |
| Baseline Project Setup Time(days) | 1 day (php artisan new) | — | — |
| Requests Per Second (Benchmark)(req/s) | 3,200 | — | — |
| Reusable Components(components) | ~12 major packages | — | — |
| Long-Term Support (LTS) Duration(years) | 3 years (standard support) | — | — |
| Time to Deploy Basic CRUD App(days) | 12-16 days | — | — |
| Minimum Monthly Hosting Cost(USD) | $3/month | — | — |
| Average HTTP Response Time(milliseconds) | 22ms | — | — |
| Available Packages/Extensions(count (thousands)) | 45,000+ packages | — | — |
| Active Job Openings (USA, 2025)(positions) | ~12,400 | — | — |
| Official Documentation Pages(count) | ~450 guides | — | — |
| GitHub Stars (2026)(stars) | 77,500 stars | — | — |
| Typical Database Query Overhead(percent slower than raw SQL) | 6-10% | — | — |
| Average Requests Per Second(req/s) | 8,000 req/s | 2,500 req/s | +220% |
| Package Ecosystem Size(packages) | 500,000+ | 190,000+ | +163% |
| GitHub Repository Stars(stars) | 77,500 | 56,200 | +38% |
| Time to Build Basic CRUD App(minutes) | 18 minutes | 22 minutes | -18% |
| Median Developer Salary (US)(USD) | $105,000 | $117,500 | -11% |
| Learning Curve (Beginner to Productive)(weeks) | 2-3 weeks | 4-6 weeks | -50% |
| Average Request Response Time(milliseconds) | 175ms | 175ms | — |
| Available Packages/Gems(packages) | 180,000+ | 180,000+ | — |
| Time to Build Basic MVP(weeks) | 1-2 weeks | 1-2 weeks | — |
| Job Market Postings (2025)(estimated count) | 12,000+ | 12,000+ | — |
| Learning Curve for Beginners(hours) | 2-3 months | 2-3 months | — |
| Throughput at Scale (Req/sec)(requests per second) | 1,200 req/sec | 1,200 req/sec | — |
All figures sourced from publicly available data. Last updated Jun 2026.
Key Differences
Laravel
PHP 8.3 - ~8,000 req/s🏆
Rails
Ruby 3.3 - ~2,500 req/s
Laravel
Laravel: 15-20 minutes🏆
Rails
Rails: 20-25 minutes
Laravel
Eloquent - intuitive, chainable
Rails
ActiveRecord - conventional, mature
Laravel
Packagist: 500,000+ packages🏆
Rails
RubyGems: 190,000+ packages
Laravel
Gentler - familiar PHP syntax🏆
Rails
Steeper - Ruby paradigm shift required
Laravel
$85,000-$125,000 USD/year
Rails
$95,000-$140,000 USD/year🏆
Laravel
Laravel: 77,500 stars🏆
Rails
Rails: 56,200 stars
Full Comparison
| Attribute |  Laravel | Rails |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub Stars | 187,000 | 56,000+ |
| Average Development Speed (MVP)(weeks) | 1.5 weeks | — |
| Job Openings (Global, 2025)(positions) | 38,000 | — |
| Built-in Admin Panel | No, third-party required | No (requires gems) |
| Built-in Authentication | Yes, with MFA scaffolding | — |
| Job Queue System(feature) | Native (Redis, database, sync) | — |
| Built-in Database ORM | Eloquent (included) | — |
| Built-in ORM | Eloquent (powerful, batteries-included) | — |
Show 1 more attributeBuilt-in Testing Framework(status) Pest & PHPUnit Minitest & RSpec | ||
| Average Page Load Time(ms) | 95ms | — |
| Installation Size(MB) | ~50 MB | — |
| Average Response Time (Benchmark)(ms) | 45-60 ms per request | — |
| Maximum Concurrent Users (Optimized)(users) | 100,000+ | — |
| Cold Start Latency (Serverless)(milliseconds) | 800-1200ms (PHP cold starts) | — |
Show 7 more attributesAverage Page Build Time (SSG)(seconds) 0.8-1.5s per page (Blade templating) — Requests Per Second (Benchmark)(req/s) 3,200 — Average HTTP Response Time(milliseconds) 22ms — Typical Database Query Overhead(percent slower than raw SQL) 6-10% — Average Requests Per Second(req/s) 8,000 req/s 2,500 req/s Average Request Response Time(milliseconds) 175ms — Throughput at Scale (Req/sec)(requests per second) 1,200 req/sec — | ||
| Async Support Level | Full native (built-in queues) | — |
| Reusable Components(components) | ~12 major packages | — |
| ML/AI Library Integration | Limited (minimal options) | — |
| Available Third-Party Packages(count) | ~200,000 packages | — |
| Available Plugins & Extensions(count) | ~10,000 packages (Composer) | — |
| Ecosystem Package Count(thousands) | 280K (Packagist registry) | — |
| Available Packages/Extensions(count (thousands)) | 45,000+ packages | — |
Show 2 more attributesPackage Ecosystem Size(packages) 500,000+ 190,000+ Available Packages/Gems(packages) 180,000+ — | ||
| Developer Satisfaction (2025 Survey)(percentage) | 89% | — |
| Minimum PHP Version Required(version) | PHP 8.1+ | — |
| Time to Build CRUD App(hours) | 2-4 hours | — |
| Time to Deploy Basic CRUD App(days) | 12-16 days | — |
| Time to Build Basic CRUD App(minutes) | 18 minutes | 22 minutes |
| Time to Build Basic MVP(weeks) | 1-2 weeks | — |
| Market Share Among PHP Developers(%) | 64% of PHP frameworks | — |
| Global Market Share(%) | ~3% | — |
| Monthly NPM/Composer Downloads(millions) | 2.5M (Packagist) | — |
| Average Development Time (Basic Site)(weeks) | 4-12 weeks | — |
| Required Developer Experience Level | Senior/Intermediate (5+ years PHP/OOP) | — |
| Reported Security Vulnerabilities (2024)(CVEs) | 23 core CVEs | — |
| Monthly Hosting Cost (Basic)(USD) | $20-50 | — |
| Hosting Cost (Entry-Level Annual)(USD) | $24-60/year (shared PHP hosting) | — |
| Customization Without Code | Limited—requires PHP expertise | — |
| Initial Setup Time(minutes) | 8-12 minutes (Laravel installer + composer) | — |
| Type Safety Support | PHPStan/Psalm (third-party tools) | — |
| Learning Curve (Time to Productivity)(weeks) | 2-3 weeks | — |
| Baseline Project Setup Time(days) | 1 day (php artisan new) | — |
| Developer Community Size(developers) | 6.2 million | — |
| GitHub Stars (2026)(stars) | 77,500 stars | — |
| GitHub Repository Stars(stars) | 77,500 | 56,200 |
| Long-Term Support (LTS) Duration(years) | 3 years (standard support) | — |
| Minimum Monthly Hosting Cost(USD) | $3/month | — |
| Active Job Openings (USA, 2025)(positions) | ~12,400 | — |
| Official Documentation Pages(count) | ~450 guides | — |
| Median Developer Salary (US)(USD) | $105,000 | $117,500 |
| Latest Stable Version Release(version) | Laravel 11.x | Rails 7.1.x |
| Learning Curve (Beginner to Productive)(weeks) | 2-3 weeks | 4-6 weeks |
| Job Market Postings (2025)(estimated count) | 12,000+ | — |
| Learning Curve for Beginners(hours) | 2-3 months | — |
LaravelShow 1 more attribute
Show 7 more attributes
Show 2 more attributes
Visual Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of numeric attributes
Pros & Cons
Laravel
Pros
- Eloquent ORM with intuitive chainable query builder syntax
- Laravel Blade templating engine with cleaner syntax than alternatives
- Integrated Artisan CLI that scaffolds code, runs migrations, and handles queues
- Built-in authentication, authorization (Policies), and API protection (Sanctum) out-of-the-box
- Excellent official documentation with 1,000+ tutorial pages and interactive examples
Cons
- Smaller talent pool than Rails (PHP developers often less experienced with frameworks)
- Ecosystem fragmentation across multiple Laravel packages with varying maintenance quality
Rails
Pros
- Rails conventions eliminate thousands of architecture decisions, reducing setup time
- Extensive gem ecosystem (190,000+) covers almost any requirement pre-built
- Strong metaprogramming capabilities enable concise, DRY code patterns
- Mature caching, background job (Sidekiq), and WebSocket support (ActionCable)
- Established best practices and design patterns used across 15+ years of production systems
Cons
- 30-50% slower request throughput compared to Laravel (2,500 vs 8,000 req/s on standard hardware)
- Ruby runtime startup time adds 100-150ms latency to serverless deployments
Frequently Asked Questions
Laravel is better for rapid MVP development. You can build a basic CRUD application with authentication in 15-20 minutes using Laravel's scaffolding, vs 20-25 minutes with Rails. Laravel's Artisan CLI generates boilerplate code faster, and its documentation is more beginner-friendly. However, if your team has existing Rails expertise, Rails' convention-over-configuration approach reduces long-term architectural decisions.
Resources & Learn More
Dive deeper with these curated resources
Where to Buy
As an affiliate, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you. Learn more
Wikipedia
Related Comparisons
Django vs Rails
software
Django vs Laravel
software
Laravel vs CodeIgniter
software
Laravel vs WordPress
software
Laravel vs Next.js
software
Laravel vs Symfony
software
Rails vs Laravel
software
WordPress vs Wix
software
Slack vs Microsoft Teams
software
Canva vs Photoshop
software
Figma vs Sketch
software
iPhone 17 vs Samsung Galaxy S26
technology
Related Articles
Best Streaming Services in 2026: Top Picks for Every Budget & Interest
Navigating the crowded streaming landscape in 2026 can be overwhelming. We've tested and ranked the best streaming services that offer the most value, from Netflix's massive library to budget-friendly options like Tubi, helping you cut cable and find your perfect entertainment solution.
Best Live TV Streaming Services & Plans for Spring 2026: Complete Buyer's Guide
Tired of overpaying for cable? Discover the best live TV streaming services and plans for Spring 2026, including YouTube TV's new genre-based packages starting at $55/month. Our comprehensive guide breaks down pricing, channels, and features to help you cut the cord.
Philo in 2026: Streaming TV Service Review, Pricing & Reddit Community Insights
Explore Philo's evolution heading into 2026, including pricing tiers, channel lineup, and how it compares to competitors like Sling TV. Discover what the r/PhiloTV Reddit community thinks about the service's current offerings and future prospects.
Best US Fighter Jets 2026: Top American Combat Aircraft Ranked
Discover the most advanced US fighter jets dominating the skies in 2026. From the legendary F-22 Raptor to the versatile F-35 Lightning II, we rank America's best combat aircraft based on performance, stealth, and air superiority capabilities.
Philo in 2026: Pricing, Lineup & How It Compares to Sling TV
As we head into 2026, Philo continues to position itself as an affordable streaming alternative for cable TV lovers. Discover what Philo offers, how its pricing stacks up against competitors like Sling TV, and what the Reddit community thinks about its future.