iPhone vs Samsung 2025: Specs & Performance
iPhone leads in processor speed (A18 Pro: 3.46 GHz vs Snapdragon 8 Gen 3: 3.3 GHz) and software optimization, while Samsung offers superior display technology (120Hz AMOLED vs 60Hz LCD on base models) and faster charging (45W vs 20W on iPhone 15).
iPhone (Apple)
Premium iOS smartphone with A-series processors and tight hardware-software integration
Users invested in Apple ecosystem, those prioritizing processing power and long-term software support, professionals needing reliable video/photo tools
Samsung (Android)
Android flagship with superior displays, faster charging, and extensive customization options
Android enthusiasts, users wanting fast charging and high-refresh displays, power users needing stylus features or expandable storage
Quick Answer
AI SummaryiPhone leads in processor speed (A18 Pro: 3.46 GHz vs Snapdragon 8 Gen 3: 3.3 GHz) and software optimization, while Samsung offers superior display technology (120Hz AMOLED vs 60Hz LCD on base models) and faster charging (45W vs 20W on iPhone 15).
Our Verdict
AI-assistedChoose iPhone if you prioritize processing power, software stability, seamless ecosystem integration, and long-term resale value. Choose Samsung if you want superior display refresh rates, faster charging, expandable storage options, and greater customization through Android's flexibility.
Was this verdict helpful?
Choose iPhone (Apple) if
Users invested in Apple ecosystem, those prioritizing processing power and long-term software support, professionals needing reliable video/photo tools
Choose Samsung (Android) if
Best pickAndroid enthusiasts, users wanting fast charging and high-refresh displays, power users needing stylus features or expandable storage
Track this comparison
Get notified when prices change, new specs ship, or our verdict updates.
Triggers: price change new spec verdict update
No spam. Stop anytime.
Key Differences at a Glance
- Processor Performance:✓ iPhone (Apple) wins(Apple A18 Pro - 3.46 GHz, 8-core vs Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 - 3.3 GHz, 8-core)
- Display Refresh Rate (Standard Model):✓ Samsung (Android) wins(120 Hz (Galaxy S24) vs 60 Hz (iPhone 15))
- Fast Charging Speed:✓ Samsung (Android) wins(45W (Galaxy S24 Ultra) vs 20W (iPhone 15) / 35W (iPhone 16 Pro))
Key Facts & Figures
13 numeric metrics compared
| Metric | iPhone (Apple) | Samsung (Android) | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor Clock Speed (Max)(GHz) | 3.46 GHz | 3.3 GHz | |
| Display Refresh Rate (Standard)(Hz) | 60 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Peak Brightness (HDR)(nits) | 2000 nits | 2600 nits | |
| Fast Charging Speed (Top Model)(W) | 35W | 45W | |
| Battery Capacity (Standard Model)(mAh) | 3,582 mAh | 4,000 mAh | |
| Main Camera Resolution(MP) | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Base Model Starting Price(USD) | $799 | $799 | |
| OS Update Support Years(years) | 7 years | 7 years | |
| 2-Year Resale Value Retention(percent) | 45% | 45% | |
| 5-Month Device Depreciation(percent) | 46.6% | 46.6% | |
| Guaranteed Software Updates(years) | 7 years (flagships), 2-3 (budget) | 7 years (flagships), 2-3 (budget) | |
| Entry-Level Phone Starting Price(USD) | $199 | $199 | |
| Galaxy A57 Battery Life (2026)(hours) | Galaxy A57: 66 hours | Galaxy A57: 66 hours |
Sourced from publicly available data ·
Key Differences
7 attributes compared head-to-head
- Apple A18 Pro - 3.46 GHz, 8-core(winner)Processor PerformanceSnapdragon 8 Gen 3 - 3.3 GHz, 8-core
- 60 Hz (iPhone 15)Display Refresh Rate (Standard Model)120 Hz (Galaxy S24)(winner)
- 20W (iPhone 15) / 35W (iPhone 16 Pro)Fast Charging Speed45W (Galaxy S24 Ultra)(winner)
- 48MP (iPhone 16)Camera Megapixels (Main)50MP (Galaxy S24)
- 3,582 mAh (iPhone 15)Battery Capacity4,000 mAh (Galaxy S24)(winner)
- Up to 7 years guaranteedSoftware Update SupportUp to 7 years guaranteed (Galaxy S24+)
- $799 (iPhone 15)Price Entry Level (2025)$799 (Galaxy S24)
- Processor Performance
iPhone (Apple)
Apple A18 Pro - 3.46 GHz, 8-core(winner)
Samsung (Android)
Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 - 3.3 GHz, 8-core
- Display Refresh Rate (Standard Model)
iPhone (Apple)
60 Hz (iPhone 15)
Samsung (Android)
120 Hz (Galaxy S24)(winner)
- Fast Charging Speed
iPhone (Apple)
20W (iPhone 15) / 35W (iPhone 16 Pro)
Samsung (Android)
45W (Galaxy S24 Ultra)(winner)
- Camera Megapixels (Main)
iPhone (Apple)
48MP (iPhone 16)
Samsung (Android)
50MP (Galaxy S24)
- Battery Capacity
iPhone (Apple)
3,582 mAh (iPhone 15)
Samsung (Android)
4,000 mAh (Galaxy S24)(winner)
- Software Update Support
iPhone (Apple)
Up to 7 years guaranteed
Samsung (Android)
Up to 7 years guaranteed (Galaxy S24+)
- Price Entry Level (2025)
iPhone (Apple)
$799 (iPhone 15)
Samsung (Android)
$799 (Galaxy S24)
Full Comparison
| Attribute | iPhone (Apple) | Samsung (Android) |
|---|---|---|
| Processor Clock Speed (Max)(GHz) | 3.46 GHz(winner) | 3.3 GHz |
| Galaxy A57 Battery Life (2026)(hours) | Galaxy A57: 66 hours | — |
| Display Refresh Rate (Standard)(Hz) | 60 Hz | 120 Hz(winner) |
| Peak Brightness (HDR)(nits) | 2000 nits | 2600 nits(winner) |
| Fast Charging Speed (Top Model)(W) | 35W | 45W(winner) |
| Battery Capacity (Standard Model)(mAh) | 3,582 mAh | 4,000 mAh(winner) |
| Main Camera Resolution(MP) | 48 MP(winner) | 50 MP |
| Base Model Starting Price(USD) | $799 | $799 |
| OS Update Support Years(years) | 7 years | 7 years |
| 2-Year Resale Value Retention(percent) | 45% | — |
| 5-Month Device Depreciation(percent) | 46.6% | — |
| Guaranteed Software Updates(years) | 7 years (flagships), 2-3 (budget) | — |
| Entry-Level Phone Starting Price(USD) | $199 | — |
| Video Recording Quality | Competitive, faster camera processing | — |
| Hardware Customization Options | Foldables, stylus support, ultra-wide range | — |
| Ecosystem Lock-in Level | Low—open Android allows flexibility and switching | — |
iPhone (Apple)Pros & Cons
10 pros·5 cons across both
iPhone (Apple)
Pros
- A18 Pro chip delivers 3.46 GHz performance with industry-leading single-core speed
- Seamless ecosystem integration with Mac, iPad, Apple Watch, and AirPods
- Industry-leading computational photography with ProRAW and ProRes video
- 7 years of guaranteed OS updates and security patches
- Superior resale value retention (60-65% after 2 years vs Samsung's 50-55%)
Cons
- Base iPhone 15 limited to 60Hz refresh rate while competitors offer 120Hz at same price
- Slower 20W charging on iPhone 15 (35W on Pro models only)
- No expandable storage or USB-C file transfer speeds lag competitors
Samsung (Android)
Pros
- Galaxy S24 Ultra features 120Hz AMOLED display with 2600 nits peak brightness
- 45W fast charging (Galaxy S24 Ultra) charges 0-50% in 25 minutes
- MicroSD card slot for expandable storage (up to 1TB on select models)
- One UI provides deep Android customization and widget ecosystem
- S Pen stylus on Ultra models with advanced Air Actions functionality
Cons
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 processor slightly slower than A18 Pro in single-core benchmarks (3.3 GHz vs 3.46 GHz)
- Galaxy S24 base model more expensive at $799 with less differentiation from previous generation
Frequently Asked Questions
5 questions
Samsung Galaxy S24 typically lasts 1-2 hours longer per charge due to its 4,000 mAh battery (vs iPhone 15's 3,582 mAh) and more efficient Snapdragon processor. However, iPhone 16 Pro models with A18 Pro chip show improved efficiency, narrowing the gap to under 1 hour difference in real-world testing.
Resources & Learn More
Curated sources to dive deeper
Where to Buy
As an affiliate, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you. Learn more about our affiliate disclosure
Wikipedia
Related Comparisons
12 more to explore
iOS vs Samsung
softwareiPhone 17 vs Samsung Galaxy S26
technologyPS5 vs Xbox Series X
technologyMac vs Windows
technologyAndroid vs iOS
technologyNVIDIA vs AMD
technologyNetflix vs Disney+
companiesiPad Pro vs Android Tablet
technologyiPhone vs Samsung Galaxy
technologySamsung Galaxy S26 vs Xiaomi 16 Pro
technologyMacBook Air vs MacBook Pro 2026
technologyNotion AI vs Claude
technology
Related Articles
5 articles
- technology
Best Streaming Services in 2026: Top Picks for Every Budget & Interest
Navigating the crowded streaming landscape in 2026 can be overwhelming. We've tested and ranked the best streaming services that offer the most value, from Netflix's massive library to budget-friendly options like Tubi, helping you cut cable and find your perfect entertainment solution.
Read article - technology
Best Live TV Streaming Services & Plans for Spring 2026: Complete Buyer's Guide
Tired of overpaying for cable? Discover the best live TV streaming services and plans for Spring 2026, including YouTube TV's new genre-based packages starting at $55/month. Our comprehensive guide breaks down pricing, channels, and features to help you cut the cord.
Read article - technology
Philo in 2026: Streaming TV Service Review, Pricing & Reddit Community Insights
Explore Philo's evolution heading into 2026, including pricing tiers, channel lineup, and how it compares to competitors like Sling TV. Discover what the r/PhiloTV Reddit community thinks about the service's current offerings and future prospects.
Read article - technology
Best US Fighter Jets 2026: Top American Combat Aircraft Ranked
Discover the most advanced US fighter jets dominating the skies in 2026. From the legendary F-22 Raptor to the versatile F-35 Lightning II, we rank America's best combat aircraft based on performance, stealth, and air superiority capabilities.
Read article - technology
Philo in 2026: Pricing, Lineup & How It Compares to Sling TV
As we head into 2026, Philo continues to position itself as an affordable streaming alternative for cable TV lovers. Discover what Philo offers, how its pricing stacks up against competitors like Sling TV, and what the Reddit community thinks about its future.
Read article
Explore More
Related comparisons and categories