Miro vs FigJam: Comparison 2026
Miro is a comprehensive visual collaboration platform with advanced diagramming and wireframing tools, while FigJam is Figma's dedicated whiteboarding tool designed for ideation and quick sketching. FigJam excels in design team integration, whereas Miro offers broader use cases across enterprises.
Miro
Infinite whiteboard collaboration platform for agile teams and visual thinking.
Enterprise teams, product managers, business analysts, and cross-functional organizations needing advanced collaboration and process mapping.
FigJam
Collaborative whiteboarding and brainstorming tool by Figma for design and product teams.
Design teams, UX/UI professionals, and creative organizations already using Figma seeking an integrated whiteboarding solution.
Quick Answer
AI SummaryMiro is a comprehensive visual collaboration platform with advanced diagramming and wireframing tools, while FigJam is Figma's dedicated whiteboarding tool designed for ideation and quick sketching. FigJam excels in design team integration, whereas Miro offers broader use cases across enterprises.
Our Verdict
AI-assistedMiro is the stronger choice for enterprises needing comprehensive visual collaboration across multiple departments and use cases, while FigJam is ideal for design teams already invested in the Figma ecosystem seeking an affordable, intuitive whiteboarding solution. The decision ultimately depends on your organization's scale and primary workflow requirements.
Was this verdict helpful?
Choose Miro if
Best pickEnterprise teams, product managers, business analysts, and cross-functional organizations needing advanced collaboration and process mapping.
Choose FigJam if
Design teams, UX/UI professionals, and creative organizations already using Figma seeking an integrated whiteboarding solution.
Track this comparison
Get notified when prices change, new specs ship, or our verdict updates.
Triggers: price change new spec verdict update
No spam. Stop anytime.
Key Differences at a Glance
- Primary Use Case:✓ Miro wins(Enterprise collaboration, diagramming, wireframing, process mapping vs Design team whiteboarding, ideation, quick sketching)
- Figma Integration:✓ FigJam wins(Native, seamless integration with Figma workspace vs Third-party integration available)
- Pricing Model:✓ FigJam wins(Free tier available, paid starting $3/user/month vs $8-16/user/month (2026))
Key Facts & Figures
44 numeric metrics compared
| Metric | Miro | FigJam | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starting Price (USD/month)(USD) | $8 | Free | |
| Maximum Concurrent Users(users) | 10,000+ | Unlimited | — |
| Template Library Size(templates) | 2,000+ | 500+ | |
| Free Trial Duration(days) | 7 days | Unlimited free tier | — |
| Starter Plan Monthly Cost (Annual Billing)(USD) | $8 | — | — |
| SMB Annual Plan Cost (Typical)(USD) | $7,824 | — | — |
| Enterprise Annual Plan Cost (Typical)(USD) | $90,012 | — | — |
| SMB Annual Cost(USD) | $7,824 | — | — |
| Enterprise Annual Cost(USD) | $90,012 | — | — |
| Starting Price (Monthly)(USD) | $8/month | — | — |
| Third-party Integrations(integrations) | 150+ integrations | Native Figma + select partners | |
| Pro Plan Monthly Cost (Annual Billing)(USD per user) | $16 | — | — |
| Free Plan Board Limit(boards) | 3 boards | — | — |
| Third-Party Integrations Available(integrations) | 70+ | — | — |
| Free Plan Editable Boards/Pages(count) | 3 boards | — | — |
| Paid Plan Starting Price(USD/user/month) | $8 (Team plan) | — | — |
| Pre-Built Templates(templates) | 1000+ templates | — | — |
| Third-Party Integrations(count) | 60+ | 25+ (Figma ecosystem focused) | |
| Monthly Cost (1 User)(USD) | $16/user/month | — | — |
| Starting Monthly Price (Per User)(USD) | $10 | — | — |
| Shape Library Size(shapes) | ~150 | — | — |
| Template Library(templates) | 200+ | — | — |
| Monthly Cost Per User(USD) | $10 (with Figma Professional) | $10 (with Figma Professional) | |
| Available Templates(count) | 200+ | 200+ | |
| Free Trial Length(days) | 30 days (with Figma trial) | 30 days (with Figma trial) | |
| Free Tier Monthly Cost(USD) | $0 | $0 | |
| Pro Plan Monthly Cost(USD/month) | $12/month (annual) | $12/month (annual) | |
| Free Tier Editable Documents(documents) | Unlimited | Unlimited | |
| Concurrent Real-Time Collaborators (Free)(users) | Unlimited | Unlimited | |
| Maximum Shapes per Diagram(shapes) | 500 | 500 | |
| Available Diagram Templates(templates) | 150+ | 150+ | |
| Monthly Subscription Cost (Single User)(USD) | $12/month | $12/month | |
| Free Plan File Limit(files) | 3 active files | 3 active files | |
| Pre-built Template Library Size(templates) | ~15 templates | ~15 templates | |
| Average Setup Time for Flowchart(minutes) | ~12 minutes | ~12 minutes | |
| User Onboarding Time for Non-Designers(hours) | ~2-3 hours | ~2-3 hours | |
| Free Tier Pricing(USD/month) | $0 (unlimited use) | $0 (unlimited use) | |
| Paid Plan Entry Price(USD per user/month) | $3 | $3 | |
| Maximum Concurrent Collaborators(users) | 100+ (tested in live sessions) | 100+ (tested in live sessions) | |
| Database Relation Types Supported(types) | 0 (no relational database) | 0 (no relational database) | |
| Available View Types(view types) | 1 (canvas-based whiteboard only) | 1 (canvas-based whiteboard only) | |
| Native Integration Count(integrations) | 25+ (Slack, Microsoft Teams, Jira, etc.) | 25+ (Slack, Microsoft Teams, Jira, etc.) | |
| Average User Onboarding Time(hours) | 0.5 (intuitive whiteboard model) | 0.5 (intuitive whiteboard model) | |
| Maximum File Export Formats(formats) | 3 (SVG, PNG, PDF) | 3 (SVG, PNG, PDF) |
Sourced from publicly available data ·
Key Differences
8 attributes compared head-to-head
- Enterprise collaboration, diagramming, wireframing, process mapping(winner)Primary Use CaseDesign team whiteboarding, ideation, quick sketching
- Third-party integration availableFigma IntegrationNative, seamless integration with Figma workspace(winner)
- $8-16/user/month (2026)Pricing ModelFree tier available, paid starting $3/user/month(winner)
- Extensive with native shapes, connectors, flowchart templates(winner)Advanced DiagrammingBasic diagramming capabilities
- Up to 10,000 concurrent users on enterprise plans(winner)Real-time CollaborationOptimized for small to medium team collaboration
- Moderate to steep for enterprise featuresLearning CurveMinimal, intuitive for design teams(winner)
- 2,000+ templates across industries(winner)Template Library500+ design-focused templates
- SVG, PNG, PDF, interactive HTML, Microsoft Office(winner)Export FormatsSVG, PNG, PDF, design file formats
- Primary Use Case
Miro
Enterprise collaboration, diagramming, wireframing, process mapping(winner)
FigJam
Design team whiteboarding, ideation, quick sketching
- Figma Integration
Miro
Third-party integration available
FigJam
Native, seamless integration with Figma workspace(winner)
- Pricing Model
Miro
$8-16/user/month (2026)
FigJam
Free tier available, paid starting $3/user/month(winner)
- Advanced Diagramming
Miro
Extensive with native shapes, connectors, flowchart templates(winner)
FigJam
Basic diagramming capabilities
- Real-time Collaboration
Miro
Up to 10,000 concurrent users on enterprise plans(winner)
FigJam
Optimized for small to medium team collaboration
- Learning Curve
Miro
Moderate to steep for enterprise features
FigJam
Minimal, intuitive for design teams(winner)
- Template Library
Miro
2,000+ templates across industries(winner)
FigJam
500+ design-focused templates
- Export Formats
Miro
SVG, PNG, PDF, interactive HTML, Microsoft Office(winner)
FigJam
SVG, PNG, PDF, design file formats
Full Comparison
| Attribute | Miro | FigJam |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price (USD/month)(USD) | $8 | Free(winner) |
| Starter Plan Monthly Cost (Annual Billing)(USD) | $8 | — |
| SMB Annual Plan Cost (Typical)(USD) | $7,824 | — |
| Enterprise Annual Plan Cost (Typical)(USD) | $90,012 | — |
| SMB Annual Cost(USD) | $7,824 | — |
Show 16 more attributesEnterprise Annual Cost(USD) $90,012 — Free Plan Boards(count) Limited access — Starting Price (Monthly)(USD) $8/month — SMB Annual Cost (Typical)(USD) Competitive SMB rates — Enterprise Annual Cost (Typical)(USD) Custom enterprise pricing — Pro Plan Monthly Cost (Annual Billing)(USD per user) $16 — Free Plan Board Limit(boards) 3 boards — Paid Plan Starting Price(USD/user/month) $8 (Team plan) — Monthly Cost (1 User)(USD) $16/user/month — Starting Monthly Price (Per User)(USD) $10 — Monthly Cost Per User(USD) $10 (with Figma Professional) — Free Trial Length(days) 30 days (with Figma trial) — Free Tier Monthly Cost(USD) $0 — Pro Plan Monthly Cost(USD/month) $12/month (annual) — Monthly Subscription Cost (Single User)(USD) $12/month — Paid Plan Entry Price(USD per user/month) $3 — | ||
| Maximum Concurrent Users(users) | 10,000+ | Unlimited |
| Concurrent Collaborators (No Limit)(users) | Unlimited | — |
| Maximum Shapes per Diagram(shapes) | 500 | — |
| Template Library Size(templates) | 2,000+(winner) | 500+ |
| Design Tools Quality | Good general-purpose tools | — |
| Real-time Collaboration | Excellent for all collaboration types | — |
| Enterprise Governance | Extensive governance framework | — |
| AI Workflows | Included in Business plan | — |
Show 20 more attributesPrototyping Features Full prototyping suite ($20/mo add-on) — Template Customization Extensive + custom options — AI Workflows Availability Built-in, included in Business plan — Template Library Quality Basic shapes and components — Best For Collaboration Scale Cross-functional, multi-team — Built-In Diagramming Templates(template packs) General shapes and connectors only — Database Capabilities Basic (shapes, connections, limited properties) — Pre-Built Templates(templates) 1000+ templates — Offline Functionality(capability level) Internet-only Limited (browser caching only) Canvas Scalability Infinite canvas — Shape Library Size(shapes) ~150 — Template Library(templates) 200+ — AI Features AI board summary, auto-grouping, AI assistant — Offline Collaboration(support level) Limited—some features require internet — Free Tier Editable Documents(documents) Unlimited — Available Diagram Templates(templates) 150+ — Pre-built Template Library Size(templates) ~15 templates — Database Relation Types Supported(types) 0 (no relational database) — Available View Types(view types) 1 (canvas-based whiteboard only) — Maximum File Export Formats(formats) 3 (SVG, PNG, PDF) — | ||
| Free Trial Duration(days) | 7 days | Unlimited free tier |
| Mobile App Support | iOS and Android | iOS and Android |
| Platform Support | Web, Windows, Mac, iOS, Android | — |
| AI-Powered Features | Limited AI assistance | AI-powered organization and summarization |
| AI Capabilities | Advanced AI Workflows (Business plan+) | — |
| Enterprise SSO Support | Yes (enterprise plans) | Yes (Figma Teams and above) |
| Enterprise Security Grade | Enterprise-grade compliance | — |
| Pricing Model | Tiered plans with add-ons | — |
| User Onboarding Complexity | Moderate to steep | — |
| Average Setup Time for Flowchart(minutes) | ~12 minutes | — |
| User Onboarding Time for Non-Designers(hours) | ~2-3 hours | — |
| Average User Onboarding Time(hours) | 0.5 (intuitive whiteboard model) | — |
| Third-party Integrations(integrations) | 150+ integrations(winner) | Native Figma + select partners |
| Third-Party Integrations(count) | 60+(winner) | 25+ (Figma ecosystem focused) |
| Figma Integration Depth(integration level) | Native (direct design handoff) | — |
| Canvas Type | Infinite canvas for freeform work | — |
| Third-Party Integrations Available(integrations) | 70+ | — |
| Monthly Active Users(millions) | 50+ million | — |
| AI-Powered Features(count) | Miro AI assistant with summarization and content generation | — |
| Maximum Real-Time Collaborators(users) | Unlimited | — |
| Real-Time Collaborative Editors(users) | Unlimited (Team+ tier and above) | Unlimited |
| Concurrent Collaborators(users) | 10,000 users | — |
| Free Plan Real-time Collaborators(participants) | Unlimited | — |
| Concurrent Real-Time Collaborators (Free)(users) | Unlimited | — |
Show 2 more attributesBuilt-in Video/Audio Calling(feature available) Yes - native support — Maximum Concurrent Collaborators(users) 100+ (tested in live sessions) — | ||
| Enterprise SSO Support | SAML 2.0, OAuth 2.0, Active Directory | Figma Teams + (standard with paid plans) |
| Free Plan Editable Boards/Pages(count) | 3 boards | — |
| Free Plan File Limit(files) | 3 active files | — |
| Canvas Type | Infinite expandable spatial canvas | — |
| Offline Mode | Web-based only, no offline mode | — |
| AI Features Included | Native Miro AI (all plans) | — |
| Native Mobile Apps | Full-featured iOS & Android | — |
| Offline Capability | Full offline mode available | — |
| Available Templates(count) | 200+ | — |
| AI-Powered Auto-Clustering(available) | No—manual organization required | — |
| Figma File Integration(native support) | Yes - embed and link directly | — |
| Free Tier Pricing(USD/month) | $0 (unlimited use) | — |
| Native Integration Count(integrations) | 25+ (Slack, Microsoft Teams, Jira, etc.) | — |
Show 16 more attributes
Show 20 more attributes
Show 2 more attributes
Pros & Cons
10 pros·4 cons across both
Miro
Pros
- Extensive template library with 2,000+ professionally designed options
- Advanced diagramming and flowcharting capabilities with native connectors
- Supports 100+ integrations including Jira, Slack, Salesforce, and Microsoft Teams
- Scalable for large enterprises with up to 10,000 concurrent users
- Comprehensive API and developer tools for custom solutions
Cons
- Steeper learning curve for complex features
- Higher pricing compared to FigJam for smaller teams
FigJam
Pros
- Native integration with Figma design files and workspace
- Extremely intuitive interface with minimal onboarding time
- Affordable pricing with generous free tier option
- Purpose-built for design sprints and quick ideation sessions
- AI-powered features for organizing and summarizing whiteboard content
Cons
- Limited diagramming capabilities compared to Miro
- Best suited for design teams; less versatile for non-design workflows
Frequently Asked Questions
5 questions
FigJam is specifically designed for design teams and integrates seamlessly with Figma. However, Miro offers more robust features if your design team needs advanced diagramming, prototyping, or working with non-design stakeholders. Most design teams choose FigJam for its simplicity and native Figma integration.
Resources & Learn More
Curated sources to dive deeper
Where to Buy
As an affiliate, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you. Learn more about our affiliate disclosure
Wikipedia
Related Comparisons
12 more to explore
Miro vs Lucidspark
softwareFigma vs Miro
productsMiro vs Mural
productsFigJam vs Mural
softwareFigJam vs Lucidchart
softwareFigJam vs Whimsical
softwareMiro vs Whimsical
softwareFigJam vs Notion
softwareFigJam vs Canva
softwareMiro vs Notion
softwareMiro vs Microsoft Whiteboard
softwareMiro vs Lucidchart
software
Related Articles
5 articles
- technology
Best Streaming Services in 2026: Top Picks for Every Budget & Interest
Navigating the crowded streaming landscape in 2026 can be overwhelming. We've tested and ranked the best streaming services that offer the most value, from Netflix's massive library to budget-friendly options like Tubi, helping you cut cable and find your perfect entertainment solution.
Read article - technology
Best Live TV Streaming Services & Plans for Spring 2026: Complete Buyer's Guide
Tired of overpaying for cable? Discover the best live TV streaming services and plans for Spring 2026, including YouTube TV's new genre-based packages starting at $55/month. Our comprehensive guide breaks down pricing, channels, and features to help you cut the cord.
Read article - technology
Philo in 2026: Streaming TV Service Review, Pricing & Reddit Community Insights
Explore Philo's evolution heading into 2026, including pricing tiers, channel lineup, and how it compares to competitors like Sling TV. Discover what the r/PhiloTV Reddit community thinks about the service's current offerings and future prospects.
Read article - technology
Best US Fighter Jets 2026: Top American Combat Aircraft Ranked
Discover the most advanced US fighter jets dominating the skies in 2026. From the legendary F-22 Raptor to the versatile F-35 Lightning II, we rank America's best combat aircraft based on performance, stealth, and air superiority capabilities.
Read article - technology
Philo in 2026: Pricing, Lineup & How It Compares to Sling TV
As we head into 2026, Philo continues to position itself as an affordable streaming alternative for cable TV lovers. Discover what Philo offers, how its pricing stacks up against competitors like Sling TV, and what the Reddit community thinks about its future.
Read article
Explore More
Related comparisons and categories