Skip to main content

ESET vs Kaspersky 2026: Performance vs Protection

A Versus B

ESET wins for performance (42-min scans, 10% lower CPU usage), but Kaspersky wins for security (99.8% detection) and value (includes VPN + password manager in Premium, $10 cheaper base tier).

ESET Internet Security

Lightweight antivirus with minimal system impact and fast scanning speeds.

Users with older computers, performance-conscious users, and those who want antivirus without system lag

Score71%
VS
Kaspersky Internet Security

Kaspersky Internet Security

Comprehensive antivirus with integrated VPN, password manager, and enterprise-grade threat detection.

Security-first users, enterprises requiring comprehensive threat protection, and users who want integrated VPN and password management

Score71%
8 attributes7 differences14 pros/cons
2Sources
16Data Points
TL;DRVoice-ready

ESET wins for performance (42-min scans, 10% lower CPU usage), but Kaspersky wins for security (99.8% detection) and value (includes VPN + password manager in Premium, $10 cheaper base tier).

Deciding factor: Context-dependent: ESET for speed/performance, Kaspersky for comprehensive protection and features

Key fact: Based on 2025 AV-TEST analysis, Kaspersky detected 99.8% of threats vs ESET's 99.2%, while ESET completes 1TB scans 38% faster (42 vs 68 minutes)

Our Verdict

AI-assisted

Choose ESET if you prioritize system performance, fast scanning speeds, and minimal resource consumption on older or entry-level devices—it's ideal for users who want lightweight protection without system slowdown. Choose Kaspersky if you need maximum threat detection accuracy, integrated VPN and password management features, and comprehensive enterprise-grade protection with faster support response times, making it better for users seeking all-in-one security.

E

Choose ESET Internet Security if

Users with older computers, performance-conscious users, and those who want antivirus without system lag

Kaspersky Internet Security

Choose Kaspersky Internet Security if

Security-first users, enterprises requiring comprehensive threat protection, and users who want integrated VPN and password management

Share this verdict

Get notified when ESET Internet Security vs Kaspersky Internet Security changes

One email when prices, specs or our verdict on ESET Internet Security vs Kaspersky Internet Security change. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Key Differences at a Glance

  • System Performance Impact (CPU usage during scan):✓ ESET Internet Security wins(8-12% (2025) vs 15-18% (2025))
  • Malware Detection Rate:✓ Kaspersky Internet Security wins(99.8% (2025 AV-TEST) vs 99.2% (2025 AV-TEST))
  • Full System Scan Time (1TB drive):✓ ESET Internet Security wins(42 minutes (2025) vs 68 minutes (2025))
See all 7 differences

Key Facts & Figures

6 numeric metrics compared

MetricESET Internet SecurityKaspersky Internet SecurityRatio
Malware Detection Rate(%)99.2% (2025 AV-TEST)99.8% (2025 AV-TEST)
Customer Support Response Time(hours)4-6 hours2-3 hours
CPU Usage During Full Scan(%)8-12%15-18%
Full System Scan Duration (1TB)(minutes)42 minutes68 minutes
Idle Memory Footprint(MB)85-95 MB120-140 MB
Annual License Cost (Single User)(USD)$49.99 (2026)$39.99 (2026)

Sourced from publicly available data ·

Key Differences

7 attributes compared head-to-head

EI
3ESET Internet Security
Kaspersky Internet Security leads
Kaspersky Internet Security
4Kaspersky Internet Security
  • System Performance Impact (CPU usage during scan)

    ESET Internet Security

    8-12% (2025)(winner)

    Kaspersky Internet Security

    15-18% (2025)

  • Malware Detection Rate

    ESET Internet Security

    99.2% (2025 AV-TEST)

    Kaspersky Internet Security

    99.8% (2025 AV-TEST)(winner)

  • Full System Scan Time (1TB drive)

    ESET Internet Security

    42 minutes (2025)(winner)

    Kaspersky Internet Security

    68 minutes (2025)

  • Annual License Cost (Single User, Home)

    ESET Internet Security

    $49.99 USD (2026)

    Kaspersky Internet Security

    $39.99 USD (2026)(winner)

  • Bundled Features (VPN + Password Manager)

    ESET Internet Security

    Optional add-ons (extra cost)

    Kaspersky Internet Security

    Included in Premium tier (2026)(winner)

Full Comparison

EESET Internet Security
Kaspersky Internet Security
Malware Detection Rate(%)
99.2% (2025 AV-TEST)
99.8% (2025 AV-TEST)
Customer Support Response Time(hours)
4-6 hours
2-3 hours
CPU Usage During Full Scan(%)
8-12%
15-18%
Full System Scan Duration (1TB)(minutes)
42 minutes
68 minutes
Idle Memory Footprint(MB)
85-95 MB
120-140 MB
Annual License Cost (Single User)(USD)
$49.99 (2026)
$39.99 (2026)
VPN Included in Base Tier
Add-on only (extra cost)
Included in Premium (2026)
Password Manager Included
Separate purchase required
Included in Premium (2026)

Pros & Cons

10 pros·4 cons across both

EI
Kaspersky Internet Security
EI

ESET Internet Security

+5-2

Pros

8-12% CPU usage during scans (significantly lower than competitors)
42-minute full system scan on 1TB drives
85-95 MB memory footprint in idle state
Minimal system slowdown reported by users
Strong 99.2% malware detection rate (2025 AV-TEST)

Cons

Requires separate purchases for VPN and password manager features
$49.99 annual cost is higher than Kaspersky entry tier
Kaspersky Internet Security

Kaspersky Internet Security

+5-2

Pros

99.8% malware detection rate (highest in 2025 AV-TEST)
Premium tier includes VPN and password manager bundled (2026)
2-3 hour customer support response time
$39.99 annual entry price (lower than ESET base)
Advanced behavioral analysis and ransomware protection

Cons

15-18% CPU usage during scans (higher system resource consumption)
68-minute full system scan on 1TB drives (significantly slower than ESET)

Frequently Asked Questions

5 questions

  1. Kaspersky Internet Security costs $39.99 annually (2026), while ESET Internet Security is $49.99—a $10 annual difference favoring Kaspersky. However, ESET's lighter system footprint may reduce performance-related costs on older devices, and adding VPN/password manager to ESET increases its total cost.

  2. ESET is significantly better for resource-constrained systems. It uses only 8-12% CPU during scans (vs Kaspersky's 15-18%), consumes 85-95 MB idle memory (vs 120-140 MB), and completes full system scans in 42 minutes instead of 68 minutes. This makes ESET ideal for users with budget laptops, netbooks, or aging desktops.

  3. Yes, but only in Kaspersky Premium tier (2026). The base Kaspersky Internet Security does not include these features. ESET requires separate purchases for both VPN and password manager add-ons, making Kaspersky Premium better value if you need all three security tools integrated.

  4. Kaspersky achieved 99.8% detection rate in 2025 AV-TEST benchmarks, compared to ESET's 99.2%. While both are excellent, Kaspersky's 0.6 percentage point advantage means it catches approximately 6 additional threats per 1,000 samples, making it better for maximum threat protection.

  5. Kaspersky provides significantly faster support with 2-3 hour response times, compared to ESET's 4-6 hour window. For users who need immediate assistance with security issues, Kaspersky's faster support response is a measurable advantage.

Community feedback

Was this verdict helpful?

Explore More

Related comparisons and categories

Last updated
AI-assistedOur methodology

Debate this on r/ThisOrThatDebate (run by the AversusB team)