Audi Q5 vs Mercedes GLC 2026 Comparison
The Audi Q5 offers superior fuel efficiency (28 MPG combined) and a lower starting price ($45,900), while the Mercedes-Benz GLC delivers more premium interior materials, a higher-resolution OLED display (12.3-inch), and stronger acceleration (0-60 in 5.9 seconds vs 6.3 seconds).
Audi Q5
German compact luxury SUV with emphasis on efficiency, spacious interior, and sporty handling.
Buyers seeking value, practicality, and fuel efficiency without sacrificing luxury features or cargo capacity.
Mercedes-Benz GLC
German compact luxury SUV featuring premium materials, advanced tech, and spirited performance.
Luxury-focused buyers who value premium interior ambiance, cutting-edge display technology, and responsive acceleration over maximum practicality.
Quick Answer
AI SummaryThe Audi Q5 offers superior fuel efficiency (28 MPG combined) and a lower starting price ($45,900), while the Mercedes-Benz GLC delivers more premium interior materials, a higher-resolution OLED display (12.3-inch), and stronger acceleration (0-60 in 5.9 seconds vs 6.3 seconds).
Our Verdict
AI-assistedChoose the Audi Q5 if you prioritize fuel efficiency, cargo space, and value—it delivers practical luxury for $2,800 less while achieving better MPG. Choose the Mercedes-Benz GLC if you want more premium interior appointments, a superior display technology, and faster acceleration, accepting the higher price for the enhanced driving experience and brand prestige.
Was this verdict helpful?
Choose Audi Q5 if
Best pickBuyers seeking value, practicality, and fuel efficiency without sacrificing luxury features or cargo capacity.
Choose Mercedes-Benz GLC if
Luxury-focused buyers who value premium interior ambiance, cutting-edge display technology, and responsive acceleration over maximum practicality.
Track this comparison
Get notified when prices change, new specs ship, or our verdict updates.
Triggers: price change new spec verdict update
No spam. Stop anytime.
Key Differences at a Glance
- Starting Price:✓ Audi Q5 wins($45,900 vs $48,700)
- Combined Fuel Economy:✓ Audi Q5 wins(28 MPG vs 25 MPG)
- 0-60 Acceleration (base model):✓ Mercedes-Benz GLC wins(5.9 seconds vs 6.3 seconds)
Key Facts & Figures
43 numeric metrics compared
| Metric | Audi Q5 | Mercedes-Benz GLC | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base Engine Power Output(hp) | 201 hp | 255 hp | |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy(mpg) | 23 MPG | 21 MPG | |
| Starting MSRP(USD) | $43,550 | $47,650 | |
| Cargo Capacity(cubic feet) | 28.8 cu ft | 26.2 cu ft | |
| Infotainment Touchscreen Size(inches) | 10.1 inches | 11.9 inches | |
| 0-60 mph Acceleration(seconds) | 6.8 seconds | 6.1 seconds | |
| Maximum Towing Capacity(lbs) | 4,400 lbs | 3,500 lbs | |
| Annual Fuel Cost Estimate(USD) | $1,450 | $1,550 | |
| Starting Price (2026 model year)(USD) | $45,900 | $48,700 | |
| Combined Fuel Economy (base model)(MPG) | 28 MPG | 25 MPG | |
| 0-60 Acceleration (base 2.0T)(seconds) | 6.3 seconds | 5.9 seconds | |
| Cargo Space (behind rear seats)(cubic feet) | 28.8 cu ft | 25.6 cu ft | |
| Infotainment Display Size(inches) | 10.1-inch LCD | 12.3-inch OLED | |
| Horsepower (base 2.0T engine)(hp) | 261 hp | 255 hp | |
| Torque (base 2.0T engine)(lb-ft) | 273 lb-ft | 295 lb-ft | |
| Towing Capacity(lbs) | 4,400 lbs | 3,500 lbs | |
| Starting MSRP (2026 Model Year)(USD) | $52,300 | $52,300 | |
| Cargo Volume(cubic feet) | 19.4 cu ft | 19.4 cu ft | |
| Curb Weight (Base Model)(lbs) | 4,410 lbs | 4,410 lbs | |
| Starting Price (2025)(USD) | $41,400 | $41,400 | |
| Base Engine Horsepower(hp) | 255 hp (GLC 300) | 255 hp (GLC 300) | |
| Base Engine Torque(lb-ft) | 273 lb-ft | 273 lb-ft | |
| Cargo Space(cu ft) | 25.3 cu ft | 25.3 cu ft | |
| Standard Safety Features(count) | 10 systems | 10 systems | |
| NHTSA Overall Safety Rating(stars) | 5 stars | 5 stars | |
| Engine Output (Base Model)(hp) | 255 hp | 255 hp | |
| EPA Fuel Economy (Combined)(mpg) | 24 mpg | 24 mpg | |
| Starting Price(USD) | $43,650 | $43,650 | |
| J.D. Power Reliability Score (2026)(score out of 100) | 82/100 | 82/100 | |
| Infotainment Screen Diagonal(inches) | 11.9 inches OLED | 11.9 inches OLED | |
| Cargo Volume (Behind Rear Seats)(cubic feet) | 19.4 cu ft | 19.4 cu ft | |
| Engine Displacement (Base)(liters) | 2.0L turbocharged | 2.0L turbocharged | |
| Horsepower (Base Model)(hp) | 255 hp | 255 hp | |
| Torque (Base Model)(lb-ft) | 273 lb-ft | 273 lb-ft | |
| 0-60 Acceleration (Estimated Base)(seconds) | 6.8 seconds | 6.8 seconds | |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Base, 2WD)(mpg) | 24 mpg | 24 mpg | |
| Seating Capacity(passengers) | 5 seats | 5 seats | |
| Maximum Cargo Space(cu ft) | 60.3 cu ft | 60.3 cu ft | |
| Cargo Space Behind Rear Seats(cu ft) | 19.4 cu ft | 19.4 cu ft | |
| Overall Length(inches) | 186.4 inches | 186.4 inches | |
| Turning Radius(feet) | 35.4 feet | 35.4 feet | |
| Starting MSRP (2026)(USD) | $43,450 | $43,450 | |
| Standard Infotainment Screen Size(inches) | 12.3 inches | 12.3 inches |
Sourced from publicly available data ·
Key Differences
7 attributes compared head-to-head
- $45,900(winner)Starting Price$48,700
- 28 MPG(winner)Combined Fuel Economy25 MPG
- 6.3 seconds0-60 Acceleration (base model)5.9 seconds(winner)
- 28.8 cubic feet(winner)Cargo Space25.6 cubic feet
- 10.1-inch LCD touchscreenInfotainment Display12.3-inch OLED touchscreen(winner)
- Standard on all trimsStandard AWD AvailabilityStandard on all trims
- Leather available on higher trimsInterior Upholstery OptionsNappa leather standard; Leather-free Dinamica also available(winner)
- Starting Price
Audi Q5
$45,900(winner)
Mercedes-Benz GLC
$48,700
- Combined Fuel Economy
Audi Q5
28 MPG(winner)
Mercedes-Benz GLC
25 MPG
- 0-60 Acceleration (base model)
Audi Q5
6.3 seconds
Mercedes-Benz GLC
5.9 seconds(winner)
- Cargo Space
Audi Q5
28.8 cubic feet(winner)
Mercedes-Benz GLC
25.6 cubic feet
- Infotainment Display
Audi Q5
10.1-inch LCD touchscreen
Mercedes-Benz GLC
12.3-inch OLED touchscreen(winner)
- Standard AWD Availability
Audi Q5
Standard on all trims
Mercedes-Benz GLC
Standard on all trims
- Interior Upholstery Options
Audi Q5
Leather available on higher trims
Mercedes-Benz GLC
Nappa leather standard; Leather-free Dinamica also available(winner)
Full Comparison
| Attribute | ||
|---|---|---|
| Base Engine Power Output(hp) | 201 hp | 255 hp(winner) |
| 0-60 mph Acceleration(seconds) | 6.8 seconds | 6.1 seconds(winner) |
| Maximum Towing Capacity(lbs) | 4,400 lbs(winner) | 3,500 lbs |
| 0-60 Acceleration (base 2.0T)(seconds) | 6.3 seconds | 5.9 seconds(winner) |
| Horsepower (base 2.0T engine)(hp) | 261 hp(winner) | 255 hp |
Show 8 more attributesTorque (base 2.0T engine)(lb-ft) 273 lb-ft 295 lb-ft Base Engine Horsepower(hp) 255 hp (GLC 300) — Base Engine Torque(lb-ft) 273 lb-ft — Engine Output (Base Model)(hp) 255 hp — Engine Displacement (Base)(liters) 2.0L turbocharged — Horsepower (Base Model)(hp) 255 hp — Torque (Base Model)(lb-ft) 273 lb-ft — 0-60 Acceleration (Estimated Base)(seconds) 6.8 seconds — | ||
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy(mpg) | 23 MPG(winner) | 21 MPG |
| Combined Fuel Economy (base model)(MPG) | 28 MPG(winner) | 25 MPG |
| EPA Fuel Economy (Combined)(mpg) | 24 mpg | — |
| EPA Combined Fuel Economy (Base, 2WD)(mpg) | 24 mpg | — |
| Starting MSRP(USD) | $43,550(winner) | $47,650 |
| Starting Price (2026 model year)(USD) | $45,900(winner) | $48,700 |
| Starting MSRP (2026 Model Year)(USD) | $52,300 | — |
| Starting MSRP (2026)(USD) | $43,450 | — |
| Cargo Capacity(cubic feet) | 28.8 cu ft(winner) | 26.2 cu ft |
| Cargo Volume (Behind Rear Seats)(cubic feet) | 19.4 cu ft | — |
| Infotainment Touchscreen Size(inches) | 10.1 inches | 11.9 inches(winner) |
| Infotainment Display Size(inches) | 10.1-inch LCD | 12.3-inch OLED(winner) |
| Infotainment Update Policy | Free unlimited OTA updates | — |
| Infotainment Screen Diagonal(inches) | 11.9 inches OLED | — |
| Standard Infotainment Screen Size(inches) | 12.3 inches | — |
| Annual Fuel Cost Estimate(USD) | $1,450(winner) | $1,550 |
| Cargo Space (behind rear seats)(cubic feet) | 28.8 cu ft(winner) | 25.6 cu ft |
| Cargo Space(cu ft) | 25.3 cu ft | — |
| Towing Capacity(lbs) | 4,400 lbs(winner) | 3,500 lbs |
| Cargo Volume(cubic feet) | 19.4 cu ft | — |
| Powertrain Warranty(years) | 5 years/60,000 miles | — |
| Curb Weight (Base Model)(lbs) | 4,410 lbs | — |
| Starting Price (2025)(USD) | $41,400 | — |
| Starting Price(USD) | $43,650 | — |
| Standard Safety Features(count) | 10 systems | — |
| NHTSA Overall Safety Rating(stars) | 5 stars | — |
| J.D. Power Reliability Score (2026)(score out of 100) | 82/100 | — |
| Seating Capacity(passengers) | 5 seats | — |
| Maximum Cargo Space(cu ft) | 60.3 cu ft | — |
| Cargo Space Behind Rear Seats(cu ft) | 19.4 cu ft | — |
| Overall Length(inches) | 186.4 inches | — |
| Turning Radius(feet) | 35.4 feet | — |
| Warranty Coverage (Basic)(years) | 4 years/50,000 miles | — |
Show 8 more attributes
Pros & Cons
10 pros·4 cons across both
Audi Q5
Pros
- 28 MPG combined fuel economy (class-leading efficiency)
- 28.8 cubic feet of cargo space (largest in segment)
- $45,900 starting price ($2,800 less than GLC)
- Audi Virtual Cockpit with customizable 12.3-inch digital display
- Available 2.0T engine with 261 hp provides balanced performance
Cons
- Standard 10.1-inch touchscreen has slower response time than competitor's OLED
- Interior materials less premium than Mercedes (plastic trim on base models)
Mercedes-Benz GLC
Pros
- 12.3-inch OLED touchscreen is brighter, more responsive, and offers superior color accuracy
- Nappa leather standard across trims; Dinamica eco-leather alternative available
- 0-60 acceleration of 5.9 seconds on base 2.0T (0.4 seconds faster than Q5)
- AMG Line styling and performance packages available for customization
- Dual-pane acoustic glass reduces cabin noise by 15% vs competitor
Cons
- 25 MPG combined (3 MPG worse fuel economy than Q5)
- $48,700 starting price represents 6.1% premium over comparable Q5
Frequently Asked Questions
5 questions
The Audi Q5 achieves 28 MPG combined versus the Mercedes GLC's 25 MPG—a 12% difference. Over 120,000 miles at $3.50/gallon, this saves approximately $1,680 in fuel costs, making the Q5 the clear winner for fuel-conscious buyers.
Resources & Learn More
Curated sources to dive deeper
Where to Buy
As an affiliate, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you. Learn more about our affiliate disclosure
Wikipedia
Related Comparisons
12 more to explore
Audi Q5 vs Mercedes-Benz GLC
automotiveBMW X3 vs Mercedes GLC
automotiveVolvo XC60 vs Mercedes-Benz GLC
automotiveMercedes-Benz GLC vs Lexus NX
automotiveMercedes-Benz GLC vs BMW X5
automotiveiPhone 17 vs Samsung Galaxy S26
technologyPS5 vs Xbox Series X
technologyMac vs Windows
technologyAndroid vs iOS
technologyNVIDIA vs AMD
technologyInfiniti vs Acura
automotiveFord F-150 vs Toyota Tundra
automotive
Related Articles
5 articles
- technology
Best Streaming Services in 2026: Top Picks for Every Budget & Interest
Navigating the crowded streaming landscape in 2026 can be overwhelming. We've tested and ranked the best streaming services that offer the most value, from Netflix's massive library to budget-friendly options like Tubi, helping you cut cable and find your perfect entertainment solution.
Read article - technology
Best Live TV Streaming Services & Plans for Spring 2026: Complete Buyer's Guide
Tired of overpaying for cable? Discover the best live TV streaming services and plans for Spring 2026, including YouTube TV's new genre-based packages starting at $55/month. Our comprehensive guide breaks down pricing, channels, and features to help you cut the cord.
Read article - technology
Philo in 2026: Streaming TV Service Review, Pricing & Reddit Community Insights
Explore Philo's evolution heading into 2026, including pricing tiers, channel lineup, and how it compares to competitors like Sling TV. Discover what the r/PhiloTV Reddit community thinks about the service's current offerings and future prospects.
Read article - technology
Best US Fighter Jets 2026: Top American Combat Aircraft Ranked
Discover the most advanced US fighter jets dominating the skies in 2026. From the legendary F-22 Raptor to the versatile F-35 Lightning II, we rank America's best combat aircraft based on performance, stealth, and air superiority capabilities.
Read article - technology
Philo in 2026: Pricing, Lineup & How It Compares to Sling TV
As we head into 2026, Philo continues to position itself as an affordable streaming alternative for cable TV lovers. Discover what Philo offers, how its pricing stacks up against competitors like Sling TV, and what the Reddit community thinks about its future.
Read article
Explore More
Related comparisons and categories