Pinot
0 comparisons available
About Pinot
Apache Pinot is an open-source real-time distributed OLAP datastore, originally developed at LinkedIn in 2013 to power user-facing analytics at scale and open-sourced in 2015. Pinot was donated to the Apache Software Foundation in 2018. Pinot's design philosophy is user-facing real-time analytics — powering LinkedIn's 'Who Viewed Your Profile,' 'Company Analytics,' and 'Job Analytics' features that serve hundreds of millions of members. Pinot ingests data in real-time from Kafka and Kinesis, stores it in columnar segments on deep storage (S3, HDFS), and serves multi-dimensional queries with consistent sub-second latency regardless of query complexity. Pinot's segment format uses star-tree indexing — a specialized multi-dimensional pre-aggregation structure that dramatically speeds up high-cardinality GROUP BY queries. Unlike Druid (which favors approximate analytics), Pinot provides exact real-time aggregations, and its upsert support (real-time record deduplication and updates) is stronger than Druid's. StarTree, founded by ex-LinkedIn engineers, offers Pinot as a managed cloud service (StarTree Cloud). Pinot integrates with Superset, Grafana, and Tableau for visualization. Major users include LinkedIn, Walmart, Etsy, Stripe, Uber, and Slack. Pinot's multi-stage query engine (MSQE) enables complex SQL joins across segments, addressing a historical limitation. Apache Pinot 1.0 shipped in 2023, followed by continued improvements in index types, real-time upserts, and cloud-native deployments.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Apache Pinot best for?
Pinot is purpose-built for user-facing real-time analytics — features that show analytics directly to end users with strict latency requirements (< 100ms). 'Who Viewed Your Profile', per-user dashboards, real-time campaign analytics, and ride-share surge pricing require the consistent low-latency that Pinot's star-tree index and segment design deliver. For internal BI dashboards with moderate latency, ClickHouse or BigQuery are simpler.
Pinot vs Druid — what are the real differences?
Both are real-time OLAP databases from similar eras with similar architectures. Key differences: Pinot has stronger upsert support (real-time record updates/deduplication), star-tree indexing for exact sub-second GROUP BY, and better MSQE join support. Druid has a more mature approximate analytics story (HLL/theta sketches) and slightly larger open-source community. Most new projects choosing between them pick ClickHouse for simplicity unless they specifically need LinkedIn/user-facing-scale real-time analytics.
Can Pinot handle data updates (upserts)?
Yes — Pinot's upsert feature allows real-time record deduplication and updates based on a primary key. New records with the same primary key overwrite previous values in the real-time segment, making it suitable for analytics on mutable datasets like order status, inventory levels, or user profile data that change frequently.
Top Alternatives to Pinot
Apache Druid
Similar real-time OLAP — Druid favors approximate analytics, Pinot for exact real-time results
ClickHouse
High-performance columnar OLAP — simpler to operate than Pinot for non-user-facing analytics
BigQuery
Serverless cloud DW — higher latency than Pinot; better for batch reporting, not user-facing analytics
Elasticsearch
Full-text search + analytics — choose Pinot for aggregation-heavy, not text-search-heavy workloads
Redshift
AWS managed DW — batch-oriented; Pinot outperforms on interactive real-time query latency
DuckDB
In-process analytical DB — DuckDB for local/embedded analytics, Pinot for distributed production scale
No comparisons found for Pinot yet.
Search for a comparison