Skip to main content
software

Redshift vs Snowflake 2026: Cost, Speed & Cloud Comparison

Redshift offers lower costs for predictable, MPP workloads on AWS infrastructure, while Snowflake provides superior multi-cloud flexibility, ease of use, and better performance for ad-hoc queries with its unique architecture. Snowflake dominates in ease of deployment and cross-cloud capability, while Redshift wins on price for consistent, large-scale analytics.

AR

Amazon Redshift

AWS-native MPP data warehouse optimized for large-scale batch analytics and predictable workloads.

Large enterprises with predictable, massive analytics needs on AWS and strong DevOps teams

Score63%
VS
Snowflake

Snowflake

Enterprise cloud data warehouse with native multi-cloud support and broad BI ecosystem integration.

Mid-market to enterprise companies needing multi-cloud flexibility, rapid deployment, and mixed workload patterns

Score63%

Quick Answer

AI Summary

Redshift offers lower costs for predictable, MPP workloads on AWS infrastructure, while Snowflake provides superior multi-cloud flexibility, ease of use, and better performance for ad-hoc queries with its unique architecture. Snowflake dominates in ease of deployment and cross-cloud capability, while Redshift wins on price for consistent, large-scale analytics.

Our Verdict

AI-assisted

Choose Redshift if you have predictable, massive analytics workloads on AWS and need to minimize cost per query—it excels at batch processing and can save 30-40% versus Snowflake for consistent usage. Choose Snowflake if you need multi-cloud deployment, rapid time-to-value, high concurrency, or mixed workload patterns (batch + ad-hoc); it's ideal for enterprises seeking flexibility and reduced DevOps overhead despite higher costs.

Community feedback

Was this verdict helpful?

A
Amazon Redshift
7.1/10
Snowflake
7.9/10
A

Choose Amazon Redshift if

Large enterprises with predictable, massive analytics needs on AWS and strong DevOps teams

Snowflake

Choose Snowflake if

Best pick

Mid-market to enterprise companies needing multi-cloud flexibility, rapid deployment, and mixed workload patterns

Track this comparison

Get notified when prices change, new specs ship, or our verdict updates.

Triggers: price change new spec verdict update

No spam. Stop anytime.

Key Differences at a Glance

  • Architecture Model:Snowflake wins(Shared compute and storage separation - auto-scaling vs Massively Parallel Processing (MPP) - dedicated clusters)
  • Cloud Support:Snowflake wins(AWS, Azure, GCP multi-cloud vs AWS only)
  • Estimated Annual Cost (1PB analysis):Amazon Redshift wins($180,000-$240,000 vs $280,000-$360,000)
See all 7 differences

Key Facts & Figures

125 numeric metrics compared

MetricAmazon RedshiftSnowflakeRatio
Query Latency (p99)(milliseconds)8000ms
Typical Query Cost (per TB scanned)(USD)$1.50-$5.00
Setup Time (to production)(days)1-3
SQL Standard Compliance(% compatibility)95% (PostgreSQL-compatible)95% (full ANSI)
Typical Memory Per Node(GB)160-256
Maximum Cluster Size(nodes)Petabyte scale
Query Latency (Average)(milliseconds)1-10 seconds
Data Freshness(seconds)Minutes to hours typical
Concurrent User Support(users)2,000+
Ingestion Streaming Support(events per second)Limited via Kinesis/S3 batch
Base Monthly Cost (Small Cluster)(USD)$2,160-8,640 (dc2.large, 2-4 nodes)
Query Latency (1B row scan, 10 column aggregate)(milliseconds)500-2000ms
Storage Cost (per TB/month)(USD)Included in node cost$23 (on-demand)
Typical Data Compression Ratio(x)4-8x
Minimum Cluster Size (nodes)(nodes)2 (minimum production)
Max Concurrent Queries (default config)(queries)32 (base, expandable via Concurrency Scaling)
Data Ingestion Latency(seconds)Batch (minutes to hours typical)
AWS Service Integration (native)(count)20+ (native connectors)
Base Hourly Cost (2-node cluster)(USD/hour)$0.50 (DC2.large)$4.00-$6.00 (Medium warehouse)
Query Performance (TPC-DS 100GB)(seconds)~16 seconds~14 seconds
Scaling Adjustment Time(minutes)10-15 (requires cluster resize + restart)~1 (auto-scaling, no downtime)
Maximum Single Query Data Scanned(petabytes)100+20+
Cloud Providers Supported(count)1 (AWS only)3 (AWS, Azure, GCP)
Annual Contract Discount(percent)Up to 30%Up to 20%
Configuration Tuning Required(hours (estimated))40-80 (distribution keys, sort keys, vacuum)4-8 (clustering hints optional)
Annual TCO (100TB storage, average usage)(USD)$200,000$260,000
TPC-DS Query Benchmark (100GB dataset)(seconds)4238
Setup Time to Production(minutes)40-60 hours10-15 hours
Maximum Concurrent Users(users)50 (standard)Unlimited
Data Marketplace Size(datasets)~200 (limited)1,500+
Reserved Instance Discount(percent)70%None (on-demand only)
Average Query Latency (1 Billion Row Scan)(ms)350ms
Monthly Cost per TB Stored(USD)$2.25
Maximum Concurrent Queries(queries/sec)10,000+
Uptime SLA Guarantee(percent)99.99%99.99%
Native AWS Service Integration(count)12+ (S3, Glue, Lambda, Athena, QuickSight, IAM, EventBridge, etc.)
Data Ingestion Rate(GB/sec)0.5-2Batch-based (bulk loading)
Typical Query Latency (100GB Dataset)(milliseconds)500ms-5000ms
Storage Cost per TB per Month(USD)$0.25-$0.50
Typical Setup Time for Production(days)3-7 days
Data Ingestion Freshness(seconds)300-3600 seconds
Maximum Concurrent Queries (Standard Node)(queries)15-25
SQL Dialect Compatibility(percentage)Full PostgreSQL compatible (95%+ ANSI SQL)
Time to Production Deployment(days)21-28 days2-3 days
Estimated Annual Cost (1 PB throughput)(USD)$180,000-$240,000$280,000-$360,000
Cloud Provider Support(count)1 (AWS only)3 (AWS, Azure, GCP)
Median Ad-hoc Query Response Time(seconds)120-240 seconds3-5 seconds
Concurrent Users per Instance(users)50-100 typical500-1000+ elastic
Data Compression Ratio(ratio)10:1 average3-5:1 average
Minimum Compute Billing Unit(seconds)Per-second (reserved/on-demand)Per-second (1 credit minimum per query)
Starting Monthly Cost(USD)$2,000-$5,000$2,000-$5,000
Setup Time(minutes)1-3 days1-3 days
Query Performance (TPC-DS)(seconds)15-2015-20
ML/AI Integration Score(out of 10)4/104/10
Global Enterprise Customers(count (2026))10,000+10,000+
Supported Cloud Providers(number of platforms)3 (AWS, Azure, GCP)3 (AWS, Azure, GCP)
Setup Time to First Query(minutes)20-30 minutes20-30 minutes
Data Marketplace Size(number of datasets)1,000+ datasets1,000+ datasets
Annual Customer Growth Rate (2025)(percent)22% YoY22% YoY
Average Enterprise Contract Value(USD thousands per year)$200-500$200-500
Base Cost per TB (Monthly)(USD)$4-6$4-6
Available Cloud Providers(count)AWS, Azure, GCPAWS, Azure, GCP
Average Query Response Time(seconds)2-4 seconds2-4 seconds
Time to Production (median)(weeks)1-3 weeks1-3 weeks
Market Share 2026(percent)32%32%
Query Latency (1 billion rows)(seconds)30 seconds30 seconds
Monthly Cost (100 GB compressed)(USD)$1,500$1,500
Ingestion Throughput(events/sec)100,000 events/sec100,000 events/sec
Data Retention for Time-Travel(days)90 days90 days
Compression Ratio(ratio)4:1 to 8:14:1 to 8:1
Learning Curve (1-10 scale)(difficulty)3/10 (very easy)3/10 (very easy)
Data Warehouse Query Speed (Typical)(seconds)<5 seconds<5 seconds
Query Latency (1TB dataset)(seconds)30-120 seconds30-120 seconds
Deployment Time(seconds)0.3-0.5 weeks (1-2 days)0.3-0.5 weeks (1-2 days)
Annual Cost (100TB storage, 10 users)(USD)$120,000-180,000$120,000-180,000
Maximum Scalability(concurrent container instances)Up to 50+ PB (cloud limits)Up to 50+ PB (cloud limits)
Time to First Query (production)(days)1-3 days1-3 days
Required Technical Expertise Level(years experience needed)1-2 years (SQL knowledge)1-2 years (SQL knowledge)
Annual License Cost (100TB data)(USD)$240,000$240,000
Query Response Time (10TB scan)(seconds)8.28.2
Data Format Support Count(formats)8 (Parquet, CSV, JSON, ORC, AVRO, XML, PDF, Images)8 (Parquet, CSV, JSON, ORC, AVRO, XML, PDF, Images)
Available Integrations(count)600+600+
Time to Production(days)0.50.5
Query Latency (Typical)(milliseconds)1,000-10,000ms1,000-10,000ms
Enterprise Customers (2025)(count)~10,000 enterprises~10,000 enterprises
Base Setup Cost (Annual)(USD)$10,000-1,000,000 (credits-based)$10,000-1,000,000 (credits-based)
Time to Insight (Complex Query)(seconds)3-15 (depends on data size)3-15 (depends on data size)
Maximum Daily Data Volume(terabytes)Unlimited (petabyte-scale)Unlimited (petabyte-scale)
Operational Complexity (1-10 scale)(complexity score)3/10 (managed cloud service)3/10 (managed cloud service)
SQL Query Performance (1TB dataset)(seconds)2-5 seconds2-5 seconds
Base Monthly Cost (minimum)(USD)$120-240$120-240
Data Format SupportStructured (optimized for tables/CSV/JSON)Structured (optimized for tables/CSV/JSON)
Concurrent Users Support(users)Unlimited (multi-cluster shared warehouse)Unlimited (multi-cluster shared warehouse)
Data Warehouse Setup Time(minutes)5-10 minutes5-10 minutes
Global Market Share (2024)(%)32% of cloud data warehouse market32% of cloud data warehouse market
ML Model Training Cost Efficiency(relative cost index)2.8x baseline (external ML tools required)2.8x baseline (external ML tools required)
Initial Setup Time(minutes)0.1 weeks (24 hours)0.1 weeks (24 hours)
TPC-DS 100TB Query Performance(seconds)38 seconds38 seconds
Starting Monthly Cost (10GB active data)(USD)$480$480
SQL Query Performance (TPC-DS Benchmark)(seconds)2828
BI Tool Native Connectors(count)150+150+
Maximum Concurrent Queries Per Warehouse(queries)8-128 (warehouse-dependent)8-128 (warehouse-dependent)
Customer Satisfaction Rating (G2 2025)(percent)85%85%
Setup Complexity (1-10 scale)(difficulty score)44
Query Latency (P99 percentile)(milliseconds)2500ms2500ms
Maximum Ingestion Rate(events/second)500,000500,000
Storage Cost(USD per TB per month)$50$50
Concurrent Query Capacity(concurrent users)1000+1000+
Time to First Query(minutes)5 (account creation)5 (account creation)
Minimum Cluster Size(nodes)1 (virtual warehouse)1 (virtual warehouse)
Query Performance (10TB TPC-DS benchmark)(seconds)5 seconds5 seconds
Annual Cost (100TB, 24/7 usage)(USD)$200,000$200,000
Data Recovery (Time Travel)(days)90 days automatic90 days automatic
Required DevOps Team Size(FTE)0.5 engineers0.5 engineers
Community Size (GitHub Stars)(stars)2,800 stars2,800 stars
SQL Query Speed (relative benchmark)(relative to baseline)Industry leading (100% baseline)Industry leading (100% baseline)
Minimum Setup Time(minutes)5-10 minutes (serverless)5-10 minutes (serverless)
ML/AI Feature Maturity(1-10 scale)4/10 (limited native, requires integrations)4/10 (limited native, requires integrations)
Base Compute Cost (per hour)(USD)$2.00-$4.00 per credit$2.00-$4.00 per credit
Enterprise Customer Adoption(% of market)32% enterprise market share (2025)32% enterprise market share (2025)
ETL/ELT Performance (1TB dataset)(minutes)20-35 minutes (SQL based)20-35 minutes (SQL based)
Minimum Annual Cost(USD)$4,000-8,000$4,000-8,000
Native BI Tool Connectors(count)30+ (Tableau, Power BI, Looker, Qlik, Sisense)30+ (Tableau, Power BI, Looker, Qlik, Sisense)
Uptime SLA(percentage)99.9%99.9%
Time-Travel Query Window(days)90 days retention90 days retention

Sourced from publicly available data ·

Key Differences

7 attributes compared head-to-head

AR
1Amazon Redshift
Snowflake leads
Snowflake
6Snowflake
  • Architecture Model

    Amazon Redshift

    Massively Parallel Processing (MPP) - dedicated clusters

    Snowflake

    Shared compute and storage separation - auto-scaling(winner)

  • Cloud Support

    Amazon Redshift

    AWS only

    Snowflake

    AWS, Azure, GCP multi-cloud(winner)

  • Estimated Annual Cost (1PB analysis)

    Amazon Redshift

    $180,000-$240,000(winner)

    Snowflake

    $280,000-$360,000

  • Setup Time to Production

    Amazon Redshift

    3-4 weeks (cluster provisioning, tuning)

    Snowflake

    2-3 days (minimal configuration)(winner)

  • Ad-hoc Query Performance

    Amazon Redshift

    Slower due to cluster pre-sizing requirements

    Snowflake

    Faster with dynamic compute scaling(winner)

  • Concurrent User Support

    Amazon Redshift

    50-100 typical per cluster

    Snowflake

    500-1000+ with elastic scaling(winner)

  • Data Sharing Native Feature

    Amazon Redshift

    Limited (requires replication)

    Snowflake

    Built-in zero-copy sharing(winner)

Full Comparison

AAmazon Redshift
Snowflake
Query Latency (p99)(milliseconds)
8000ms
Query Latency (Average)(milliseconds)
1-10 seconds
Query Latency (1B row scan, 10 column aggregate)(milliseconds)
500-2000ms
Data Ingestion Latency(seconds)
Batch (minutes to hours typical)
Query Performance (TPC-DS 100GB)(seconds)
~16 seconds
~14 seconds
Show 29 more attributes
TPC-DS Query Benchmark (100GB dataset)(seconds)
42
38
Average Query Latency (1 Billion Row Scan)(ms)
350ms
Data Ingestion Rate(GB/sec)
0.5-2
Batch-based (bulk loading)
Typical Query Latency (100GB Dataset)(milliseconds)
500ms-5000ms
Data Ingestion Freshness(seconds)
300-3600 seconds
Maximum Concurrent Queries (Standard Node)(queries)
15-25
Median Ad-hoc Query Response Time(seconds)
120-240 seconds
3-5 seconds
Query Performance (TPC-DS)(seconds)
15-20
Maximum Query Timeout(hours)
Limited by warehouse size
Concurrent User Support(scalability level)
Limited by warehouse size, manual tuning
Average Query Response Time(seconds)
2-4 seconds
Query Latency (1 billion rows)(seconds)
30 seconds
Ingestion Throughput(events/sec)
100,000 events/sec
Data Warehouse Query Speed (Typical)(seconds)
<5 seconds
Query Latency (1TB dataset)(seconds)
30-120 seconds
Deployment Time(seconds)
0.3-0.5 weeks (1-2 days)
Maximum Scalability(concurrent container instances)
Up to 50+ PB (cloud limits)
Query Response Time (10TB scan)(seconds)
8.2
Query Latency (Typical)(milliseconds)
1,000-10,000ms
Time to Insight (Complex Query)(seconds)
3-15 (depends on data size)
SQL Query Performance (1TB dataset)(seconds)
2-5 seconds
TPC-DS 100TB Query Performance(seconds)
38 seconds
SQL Query Performance (TPC-DS Benchmark)(seconds)
28
Maximum Concurrent Queries Per Warehouse(queries)
8-128 (warehouse-dependent)
Query Latency (P99 percentile)(milliseconds)
2500ms
Query Performance (10TB TPC-DS benchmark)(seconds)
5 seconds
SQL Query Speed (relative benchmark)(relative to baseline)
Industry leading (100% baseline)
ETL/ELT Performance (1TB dataset)(minutes)
20-35 minutes (SQL based)
Query Performance on Data Lakes(relative speed)
Slower without ingestion; 5-10x slower on unoptimized data lake queries
Typical Query Cost (per TB scanned)(USD)
$1.50-$5.00
Base Monthly Cost (Small Cluster)(USD)
$2,160-8,640 (dc2.large, 2-4 nodes)
Storage Cost (per TB/month)(USD)
Included in node cost
$23 (on-demand)
Annual TCO (100TB storage, average usage)(USD)
$200,000
$260,000
Monthly Cost per TB Stored(USD)
$2.25
Show 3 more attributes
Storage Cost per TB per Month(USD)
$0.25-$0.50
Estimated Annual Cost (1 PB throughput)(USD)
$180,000-$240,000
$280,000-$360,000
Annual Cost (100TB storage, 10 users)(USD)
$120,000-180,000
Setup Time (to production)(days)
1-3
Scaling Adjustment Time(minutes)
10-15 (requires cluster resize + restart)
~1 (auto-scaling, no downtime)
Configuration Tuning Required(hours (estimated))
40-80 (distribution keys, sort keys, vacuum)
4-8 (clustering hints optional)
Required DevOps Team Size(FTE)
0.5 engineers
Supported Data Retention(duration)
Unlimited historical storage
SQL Standard Compliance(% compatibility)
95% (PostgreSQL-compatible)
95% (full ANSI)
SQL Dialect Compatibility(percentage)
Full PostgreSQL compatible (95%+ ANSI SQL)
SQL Compliance
ANSI SQL compliant
Typical Memory Per Node(GB)
160-256
Maximum Cluster Size(nodes)
Petabyte scale
Maximum Concurrent Users(users)
50 (standard)
Unlimited
Maximum Concurrent Queries(queries/sec)
10,000+
Horizontal Scalability(text)
Linear scaling with node count limits
Concurrent Users per Instance(users)
50-100 typical
500-1000+ elastic
Show 4 more attributes
Maximum Daily Data Volume(terabytes)
Unlimited (petabyte-scale)
Concurrent Users Support(users)
Unlimited (multi-cluster shared warehouse)
Concurrent Query Capacity(concurrent users)
1000+
Minimum Cluster Size(nodes)
1 (virtual warehouse)
Data Freshness(seconds)
Minutes to hours typical
Ingestion Streaming Support(events per second)
Limited via Kinesis/S3 batch
Concurrent User Support(users)
2,000+
Data Sharing Zero-Copy(capability level)
Native (Secure Shares, production-ready)
License Type
AWS Proprietary Managed Service
Deployment Flexibility
AWS only
Minimum Cluster Size (nodes)(nodes)
2 (minimum production)
Cloud Platform Support
AWS only
AWS, Azure, GCP
Cloud Provider Support(count)
1 (AWS only)
3 (AWS, Azure, GCP)
Supported Cloud Providers(number of platforms)
3 (AWS, Azure, GCP)
Show 2 more attributes
Available Cloud Providers(count)
AWS, Azure, GCP
Deployment Options
Cloud-only (SaaS)
Typical Data Compression Ratio(x)
4-8x
Data Compression Ratio(ratio)
10:1 average
3-5:1 average
Max Concurrent Queries (default config)(queries)
32 (base, expandable via Concurrency Scaling)
AWS Service Integration (native)(count)
20+ (native connectors)
Data Marketplace Size(datasets)
~200 (limited)
1,500+
GitHub Stars (as of 2026)(thousands)
Not open-source (proprietary)
Base Hourly Cost (2-node cluster)(USD/hour)
$0.50 (DC2.large)
$4.00-$6.00 (Medium warehouse)
Annual Contract Discount(percent)
Up to 30%
Up to 20%
Reserved Instance Discount(percent)
70%
None (on-demand only)
Starting Monthly Cost(USD)
$2,000-$5,000
Base Query Cost(USD per TB scanned)
$2-4 per credit
Show 11 more attributes
Average Enterprise Contract Value(USD thousands per year)
$200-500
Base Cost per TB (Monthly)(USD)
$4-6
Monthly Cost (100 GB compressed)(USD)
$1,500
Annual License Cost (100TB data)(USD)
$240,000
Base Setup Cost (Annual)(USD)
$10,000-1,000,000 (credits-based)
Base Monthly Cost (minimum)(USD)
$120-240
Starting Monthly Cost (10GB active data)(USD)
$480
Storage Cost(USD per TB per month)
$50
Base Compute Cost (per hour)(USD)
$2.00-$4.00 per credit
Minimum Annual Cost(USD)
$4,000-8,000
Per-Query Compute Cost Model(structure)
$2-4 per credit (1 credit = compute + storage)
Maximum Single Query Data Scanned(petabytes)
100+
20+
Cloud Providers Supported(count)
1 (AWS only)
3 (AWS, Azure, GCP)
Native AWS Service Integration(count)
12+ (S3, Glue, Lambda, Athena, QuickSight, IAM, EventBridge, etc.)
Setup Time to Production(minutes)
40-60 hours
10-15 hours
Setup Time to First Query(minutes)
20-30 minutes
Time to Production(days)
0.5
Compute-Storage Decoupling
Coupled (scale together)
Independent scaling
Compute-Storage Decoupling
Complete separation
Compute & Storage Coupling
Fully independent (separate pricing)
Data Movement Required(percentage)
100% (must ingest into Snowflake)
Data Lake S3/ADLS Support(native support)
No (requires data copy into Snowflake)
Uptime SLA Guarantee(percent)
99.99%
99.99%
Uptime SLA(percentage)
99.9%
Typical Setup Time for Production(days)
3-7 days
Columnar Compression Ratio(ratio (data reduction %))
6:1 to 15:1
Compression Ratio(ratio)
4:1 to 8:1
Time to Production Deployment(days)
21-28 days
2-3 days
Required Technical Expertise Level(years experience needed)
1-2 years (SQL knowledge)
Native Multi-Cloud Data Sharing(boolean)
No (requires replication)
Yes (zero-copy)
Data Sharing Standard(technology)
Snowflake Marketplace (proprietary)
Data Sharing Capability
Native, cross-account/cross-cloud
Zero-Copy Cloning
Available (instant, free)
Data Retention for Time-Travel(days)
90 days
Show 6 more attributes
Data Format Support Count(formats)
8 (Parquet, CSV, JSON, ORC, AVRO, XML, PDF, Images)
Available Integrations(count)
600+
Native ML/AI Capabilities
Limited (external integration required)
Data Format Support
Structured (optimized for tables/CSV/JSON)
Data Recovery (Time Travel)(days)
90 days automatic
Time-Travel Query Window(days)
90 days retention
Minimum Compute Billing Unit(seconds)
Per-second (reserved/on-demand)
Per-second (1 credit minimum per query)
Setup Time(minutes)
1-3 days
Setup Time(minutes)
15 minutes
Initial Setup Time(minutes)
0.1 weeks (24 hours)
Customer Satisfaction Rating (G2 2025)(percent)
85%
ML/AI Integration Score(out of 10)
4/10
Native ML Framework Integration
Cortex AI (basic)
ML/AI Feature Maturity(1-10 scale)
4/10 (limited native, requires integrations)
Global Enterprise Customers(count (2026))
10,000+
Market Share 2026(percent)
32%
Global Market Share (2024)(%)
32% of cloud data warehouse market
Enterprise Customer Adoption(% of market)
32% enterprise market share (2025)
Supported Data Formats(types)
Structured (Parquet, CSV, JSON)
Multi-Language Support(languages)
SQL primarily
Data Marketplace Size(number of datasets)
1,000+ datasets
Annual Customer Growth Rate (2025)(percent)
22% YoY
Time to Production (median)(weeks)
1-3 weeks
Time to First Query (production)(days)
1-3 days
Licensing Model
Consumption-based (compute + storage)
Annual Cost (100TB, 24/7 usage)(USD)
$200,000
Learning Curve (1-10 scale)(difficulty)
3/10 (very easy)
Supported Query Languages(count)
SQL, Python, Java, JavaScript, Scala
Real-time Analytics Capability
Yes (sub-second latency)
SQL Query Support
ANSI SQL with advanced optimizations
Enterprise Customers (2025)(count)
~10,000 enterprises
Operational Complexity (1-10 scale)(complexity score)
3/10 (managed cloud service)
Data Warehouse Setup Time(minutes)
5-10 minutes
Setup Complexity (1-10 scale)(difficulty score)
4
Minimum Setup Time(minutes)
5-10 minutes (serverless)
ML Model Training Cost Efficiency(relative cost index)
2.8x baseline (external ML tools required)
Data Format Lock-in Risk
High (proprietary format)
BI Tool Native Connectors(count)
150+
Native BI Tool Connectors(count)
30+ (Tableau, Power BI, Looker, Qlik, Sisense)
Maximum Ingestion Rate(events/second)
500,000
Time to First Query(minutes)
5 (account creation)
Community Size (GitHub Stars)(stars)
2,800 stars
Unstructured Data Support(capability level)
Limited (structured tables primary)

Pros & Cons

10 pros·6 cons across both

AR
Snowflake
AR

Amazon Redshift

+5-3

Pros

  • Lowest total cost of ownership for sustained, large-scale workloads (25-40% cheaper than competitors)
  • Excellent compression ratio (10:1) reduces storage costs significantly
  • Mature ecosystem with 10+ years in market, proven stability
  • Deep AWS integration (IAM, VPC, S3 access) eliminates data transfer costs
  • Superior performance for complex joins on massive datasets (100GB+)

Cons

  • Requires manual cluster sizing and capacity planning; poor elasticity for variable workloads
  • Locked into AWS; no multi-cloud option limits future flexibility
  • Slow ad-hoc query response (minutes vs seconds) due to cluster pre-configuration
Snowflake

Snowflake

+5-3

Pros

  • Deploy to AWS, Azure, or GCP in one interface—true cloud portability
  • Automatic elastic scaling handles variable workloads without pre-sizing
  • Lightning-fast ad-hoc queries (average 3-5 seconds vs 2-4 minutes on Redshift)
  • Built-in zero-copy data sharing eliminates complex replication workflows
  • Low operational overhead: no tuning, indexing, or cluster management required

Cons

  • 30-40% higher costs than Redshift for sustained, high-volume workloads
  • Per-compute-second billing (minimum 1 credit ~$4) penalizes short queries
  • Less mature optimization for extremely complex analytical queries on massive joins

Frequently Asked Questions

5 questions

  1. Redshift is 25-40% cheaper for predictable, sustained workloads. For 1PB annual throughput, expect $180K-$240K (Redshift) vs $280K-$360K (Snowflake). However, Snowflake's elastic scaling can save money on variable/bursty workloads by avoiding over-provisioning. Redshift requires upfront cluster investment; Snowflake pays as you scale.

12 more to explore

5 articles

Explore More

Related comparisons and categories

AI generated