Redshift vs Snowflake 2026: Cost, Speed & Cloud Comparison
Redshift offers lower costs for predictable, MPP workloads on AWS infrastructure, while Snowflake provides superior multi-cloud flexibility, ease of use, and better performance for ad-hoc queries with its unique architecture. Snowflake dominates in ease of deployment and cross-cloud capability, while Redshift wins on price for consistent, large-scale analytics.
Amazon Redshift
AWS-native MPP data warehouse optimized for large-scale batch analytics and predictable workloads.
Large enterprises with predictable, massive analytics needs on AWS and strong DevOps teams
Snowflake
Enterprise cloud data warehouse with native multi-cloud support and broad BI ecosystem integration.
Mid-market to enterprise companies needing multi-cloud flexibility, rapid deployment, and mixed workload patterns
Quick Answer
AI SummaryRedshift offers lower costs for predictable, MPP workloads on AWS infrastructure, while Snowflake provides superior multi-cloud flexibility, ease of use, and better performance for ad-hoc queries with its unique architecture. Snowflake dominates in ease of deployment and cross-cloud capability, while Redshift wins on price for consistent, large-scale analytics.
Our Verdict
AI-assistedChoose Redshift if you have predictable, massive analytics workloads on AWS and need to minimize cost per query—it excels at batch processing and can save 30-40% versus Snowflake for consistent usage. Choose Snowflake if you need multi-cloud deployment, rapid time-to-value, high concurrency, or mixed workload patterns (batch + ad-hoc); it's ideal for enterprises seeking flexibility and reduced DevOps overhead despite higher costs.
Was this verdict helpful?
Choose Amazon Redshift if
Large enterprises with predictable, massive analytics needs on AWS and strong DevOps teams
Choose Snowflake if
Best pickMid-market to enterprise companies needing multi-cloud flexibility, rapid deployment, and mixed workload patterns
Track this comparison
Get notified when prices change, new specs ship, or our verdict updates.
Triggers: price change new spec verdict update
No spam. Stop anytime.
Key Differences at a Glance
- Architecture Model:✓ Snowflake wins(Shared compute and storage separation - auto-scaling vs Massively Parallel Processing (MPP) - dedicated clusters)
- Cloud Support:✓ Snowflake wins(AWS, Azure, GCP multi-cloud vs AWS only)
- Estimated Annual Cost (1PB analysis):✓ Amazon Redshift wins($180,000-$240,000 vs $280,000-$360,000)
Key Facts & Figures
125 numeric metrics compared
| Metric | Amazon Redshift | Snowflake | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Query Latency (p99)(milliseconds) | 8000ms | — | — |
| Typical Query Cost (per TB scanned)(USD) | $1.50-$5.00 | — | — |
| Setup Time (to production)(days) | 1-3 | — | — |
| SQL Standard Compliance(% compatibility) | 95% (PostgreSQL-compatible) | 95% (full ANSI) | |
| Typical Memory Per Node(GB) | 160-256 | — | — |
| Maximum Cluster Size(nodes) | Petabyte scale | — | — |
| Query Latency (Average)(milliseconds) | 1-10 seconds | — | — |
| Data Freshness(seconds) | Minutes to hours typical | — | — |
| Concurrent User Support(users) | 2,000+ | — | — |
| Ingestion Streaming Support(events per second) | Limited via Kinesis/S3 batch | — | — |
| Base Monthly Cost (Small Cluster)(USD) | $2,160-8,640 (dc2.large, 2-4 nodes) | — | — |
| Query Latency (1B row scan, 10 column aggregate)(milliseconds) | 500-2000ms | — | — |
| Storage Cost (per TB/month)(USD) | Included in node cost | $23 (on-demand) | |
| Typical Data Compression Ratio(x) | 4-8x | — | — |
| Minimum Cluster Size (nodes)(nodes) | 2 (minimum production) | — | — |
| Max Concurrent Queries (default config)(queries) | 32 (base, expandable via Concurrency Scaling) | — | — |
| Data Ingestion Latency(seconds) | Batch (minutes to hours typical) | — | — |
| AWS Service Integration (native)(count) | 20+ (native connectors) | — | — |
| Base Hourly Cost (2-node cluster)(USD/hour) | $0.50 (DC2.large) | $4.00-$6.00 (Medium warehouse) | |
| Query Performance (TPC-DS 100GB)(seconds) | ~16 seconds | ~14 seconds | |
| Scaling Adjustment Time(minutes) | 10-15 (requires cluster resize + restart) | ~1 (auto-scaling, no downtime) | |
| Maximum Single Query Data Scanned(petabytes) | 100+ | 20+ | |
| Cloud Providers Supported(count) | 1 (AWS only) | 3 (AWS, Azure, GCP) | |
| Annual Contract Discount(percent) | Up to 30% | Up to 20% | |
| Configuration Tuning Required(hours (estimated)) | 40-80 (distribution keys, sort keys, vacuum) | 4-8 (clustering hints optional) | |
| Annual TCO (100TB storage, average usage)(USD) | $200,000 | $260,000 | |
| TPC-DS Query Benchmark (100GB dataset)(seconds) | 42 | 38 | |
| Setup Time to Production(minutes) | 40-60 hours | 10-15 hours | |
| Maximum Concurrent Users(users) | 50 (standard) | Unlimited | — |
| Data Marketplace Size(datasets) | ~200 (limited) | 1,500+ | |
| Reserved Instance Discount(percent) | 70% | None (on-demand only) | |
| Average Query Latency (1 Billion Row Scan)(ms) | 350ms | — | — |
| Monthly Cost per TB Stored(USD) | $2.25 | — | — |
| Maximum Concurrent Queries(queries/sec) | 10,000+ | — | — |
| Uptime SLA Guarantee(percent) | 99.99% | 99.99% | |
| Native AWS Service Integration(count) | 12+ (S3, Glue, Lambda, Athena, QuickSight, IAM, EventBridge, etc.) | — | — |
| Data Ingestion Rate(GB/sec) | 0.5-2 | Batch-based (bulk loading) | — |
| Typical Query Latency (100GB Dataset)(milliseconds) | 500ms-5000ms | — | — |
| Storage Cost per TB per Month(USD) | $0.25-$0.50 | — | — |
| Typical Setup Time for Production(days) | 3-7 days | — | — |
| Data Ingestion Freshness(seconds) | 300-3600 seconds | — | — |
| Maximum Concurrent Queries (Standard Node)(queries) | 15-25 | — | — |
| SQL Dialect Compatibility(percentage) | Full PostgreSQL compatible (95%+ ANSI SQL) | — | — |
| Time to Production Deployment(days) | 21-28 days | 2-3 days | |
| Estimated Annual Cost (1 PB throughput)(USD) | $180,000-$240,000 | $280,000-$360,000 | |
| Cloud Provider Support(count) | 1 (AWS only) | 3 (AWS, Azure, GCP) | |
| Median Ad-hoc Query Response Time(seconds) | 120-240 seconds | 3-5 seconds | |
| Concurrent Users per Instance(users) | 50-100 typical | 500-1000+ elastic | |
| Data Compression Ratio(ratio) | 10:1 average | 3-5:1 average | |
| Minimum Compute Billing Unit(seconds) | Per-second (reserved/on-demand) | Per-second (1 credit minimum per query) | |
| Starting Monthly Cost(USD) | $2,000-$5,000 | $2,000-$5,000 | |
| Setup Time(minutes) | 1-3 days | 1-3 days | |
| Query Performance (TPC-DS)(seconds) | 15-20 | 15-20 | |
| ML/AI Integration Score(out of 10) | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
| Global Enterprise Customers(count (2026)) | 10,000+ | 10,000+ | |
| Supported Cloud Providers(number of platforms) | 3 (AWS, Azure, GCP) | 3 (AWS, Azure, GCP) | |
| Setup Time to First Query(minutes) | 20-30 minutes | 20-30 minutes | |
| Data Marketplace Size(number of datasets) | 1,000+ datasets | 1,000+ datasets | |
| Annual Customer Growth Rate (2025)(percent) | 22% YoY | 22% YoY | |
| Average Enterprise Contract Value(USD thousands per year) | $200-500 | $200-500 | |
| Base Cost per TB (Monthly)(USD) | $4-6 | $4-6 | |
| Available Cloud Providers(count) | AWS, Azure, GCP | AWS, Azure, GCP | |
| Average Query Response Time(seconds) | 2-4 seconds | 2-4 seconds | |
| Time to Production (median)(weeks) | 1-3 weeks | 1-3 weeks | |
| Market Share 2026(percent) | 32% | 32% | |
| Query Latency (1 billion rows)(seconds) | 30 seconds | 30 seconds | |
| Monthly Cost (100 GB compressed)(USD) | $1,500 | $1,500 | |
| Ingestion Throughput(events/sec) | 100,000 events/sec | 100,000 events/sec | |
| Data Retention for Time-Travel(days) | 90 days | 90 days | |
| Compression Ratio(ratio) | 4:1 to 8:1 | 4:1 to 8:1 | |
| Learning Curve (1-10 scale)(difficulty) | 3/10 (very easy) | 3/10 (very easy) | |
| Data Warehouse Query Speed (Typical)(seconds) | <5 seconds | <5 seconds | |
| Query Latency (1TB dataset)(seconds) | 30-120 seconds | 30-120 seconds | |
| Deployment Time(seconds) | 0.3-0.5 weeks (1-2 days) | 0.3-0.5 weeks (1-2 days) | |
| Annual Cost (100TB storage, 10 users)(USD) | $120,000-180,000 | $120,000-180,000 | |
| Maximum Scalability(concurrent container instances) | Up to 50+ PB (cloud limits) | Up to 50+ PB (cloud limits) | |
| Time to First Query (production)(days) | 1-3 days | 1-3 days | |
| Required Technical Expertise Level(years experience needed) | 1-2 years (SQL knowledge) | 1-2 years (SQL knowledge) | |
| Annual License Cost (100TB data)(USD) | $240,000 | $240,000 | |
| Query Response Time (10TB scan)(seconds) | 8.2 | 8.2 | |
| Data Format Support Count(formats) | 8 (Parquet, CSV, JSON, ORC, AVRO, XML, PDF, Images) | 8 (Parquet, CSV, JSON, ORC, AVRO, XML, PDF, Images) | |
| Available Integrations(count) | 600+ | 600+ | |
| Time to Production(days) | 0.5 | 0.5 | |
| Query Latency (Typical)(milliseconds) | 1,000-10,000ms | 1,000-10,000ms | |
| Enterprise Customers (2025)(count) | ~10,000 enterprises | ~10,000 enterprises | |
| Base Setup Cost (Annual)(USD) | $10,000-1,000,000 (credits-based) | $10,000-1,000,000 (credits-based) | |
| Time to Insight (Complex Query)(seconds) | 3-15 (depends on data size) | 3-15 (depends on data size) | |
| Maximum Daily Data Volume(terabytes) | Unlimited (petabyte-scale) | Unlimited (petabyte-scale) | |
| Operational Complexity (1-10 scale)(complexity score) | 3/10 (managed cloud service) | 3/10 (managed cloud service) | |
| SQL Query Performance (1TB dataset)(seconds) | 2-5 seconds | 2-5 seconds | |
| Base Monthly Cost (minimum)(USD) | $120-240 | $120-240 | |
| Data Format Support | Structured (optimized for tables/CSV/JSON) | Structured (optimized for tables/CSV/JSON) | |
| Concurrent Users Support(users) | Unlimited (multi-cluster shared warehouse) | Unlimited (multi-cluster shared warehouse) | |
| Data Warehouse Setup Time(minutes) | 5-10 minutes | 5-10 minutes | |
| Global Market Share (2024)(%) | 32% of cloud data warehouse market | 32% of cloud data warehouse market | |
| ML Model Training Cost Efficiency(relative cost index) | 2.8x baseline (external ML tools required) | 2.8x baseline (external ML tools required) | |
| Initial Setup Time(minutes) | 0.1 weeks (24 hours) | 0.1 weeks (24 hours) | |
| TPC-DS 100TB Query Performance(seconds) | 38 seconds | 38 seconds | |
| Starting Monthly Cost (10GB active data)(USD) | $480 | $480 | |
| SQL Query Performance (TPC-DS Benchmark)(seconds) | 28 | 28 | |
| BI Tool Native Connectors(count) | 150+ | 150+ | |
| Maximum Concurrent Queries Per Warehouse(queries) | 8-128 (warehouse-dependent) | 8-128 (warehouse-dependent) | |
| Customer Satisfaction Rating (G2 2025)(percent) | 85% | 85% | |
| Setup Complexity (1-10 scale)(difficulty score) | 4 | 4 | |
| Query Latency (P99 percentile)(milliseconds) | 2500ms | 2500ms | |
| Maximum Ingestion Rate(events/second) | 500,000 | 500,000 | |
| Storage Cost(USD per TB per month) | $50 | $50 | |
| Concurrent Query Capacity(concurrent users) | 1000+ | 1000+ | |
| Time to First Query(minutes) | 5 (account creation) | 5 (account creation) | |
| Minimum Cluster Size(nodes) | 1 (virtual warehouse) | 1 (virtual warehouse) | |
| Query Performance (10TB TPC-DS benchmark)(seconds) | 5 seconds | 5 seconds | |
| Annual Cost (100TB, 24/7 usage)(USD) | $200,000 | $200,000 | |
| Data Recovery (Time Travel)(days) | 90 days automatic | 90 days automatic | |
| Required DevOps Team Size(FTE) | 0.5 engineers | 0.5 engineers | |
| Community Size (GitHub Stars)(stars) | 2,800 stars | 2,800 stars | |
| SQL Query Speed (relative benchmark)(relative to baseline) | Industry leading (100% baseline) | Industry leading (100% baseline) | |
| Minimum Setup Time(minutes) | 5-10 minutes (serverless) | 5-10 minutes (serverless) | |
| ML/AI Feature Maturity(1-10 scale) | 4/10 (limited native, requires integrations) | 4/10 (limited native, requires integrations) | |
| Base Compute Cost (per hour)(USD) | $2.00-$4.00 per credit | $2.00-$4.00 per credit | |
| Enterprise Customer Adoption(% of market) | 32% enterprise market share (2025) | 32% enterprise market share (2025) | |
| ETL/ELT Performance (1TB dataset)(minutes) | 20-35 minutes (SQL based) | 20-35 minutes (SQL based) | |
| Minimum Annual Cost(USD) | $4,000-8,000 | $4,000-8,000 | |
| Native BI Tool Connectors(count) | 30+ (Tableau, Power BI, Looker, Qlik, Sisense) | 30+ (Tableau, Power BI, Looker, Qlik, Sisense) | |
| Uptime SLA(percentage) | 99.9% | 99.9% | |
| Time-Travel Query Window(days) | 90 days retention | 90 days retention |
Sourced from publicly available data ·
Key Differences
7 attributes compared head-to-head
- Massively Parallel Processing (MPP) - dedicated clustersArchitecture ModelShared compute and storage separation - auto-scaling(winner)
- AWS onlyCloud SupportAWS, Azure, GCP multi-cloud(winner)
- $180,000-$240,000(winner)Estimated Annual Cost (1PB analysis)$280,000-$360,000
- 3-4 weeks (cluster provisioning, tuning)Setup Time to Production2-3 days (minimal configuration)(winner)
- Slower due to cluster pre-sizing requirementsAd-hoc Query PerformanceFaster with dynamic compute scaling(winner)
- 50-100 typical per clusterConcurrent User Support500-1000+ with elastic scaling(winner)
- Limited (requires replication)Data Sharing Native FeatureBuilt-in zero-copy sharing(winner)
- Architecture Model
Amazon Redshift
Massively Parallel Processing (MPP) - dedicated clusters
Snowflake
Shared compute and storage separation - auto-scaling(winner)
- Cloud Support
Amazon Redshift
AWS only
Snowflake
AWS, Azure, GCP multi-cloud(winner)
- Estimated Annual Cost (1PB analysis)
Amazon Redshift
$180,000-$240,000(winner)
Snowflake
$280,000-$360,000
- Setup Time to Production
Amazon Redshift
3-4 weeks (cluster provisioning, tuning)
Snowflake
2-3 days (minimal configuration)(winner)
- Ad-hoc Query Performance
Amazon Redshift
Slower due to cluster pre-sizing requirements
Snowflake
Faster with dynamic compute scaling(winner)
- Concurrent User Support
Amazon Redshift
50-100 typical per cluster
Snowflake
500-1000+ with elastic scaling(winner)
- Data Sharing Native Feature
Amazon Redshift
Limited (requires replication)
Snowflake
Built-in zero-copy sharing(winner)
Full Comparison
| Attribute | Amazon Redshift | |
|---|---|---|
| Query Latency (p99)(milliseconds) | 8000ms | — |
| Query Latency (Average)(milliseconds) | 1-10 seconds | — |
| Query Latency (1B row scan, 10 column aggregate)(milliseconds) | 500-2000ms | — |
| Data Ingestion Latency(seconds) | Batch (minutes to hours typical) | — |
| Query Performance (TPC-DS 100GB)(seconds) | ~16 seconds | ~14 seconds(winner) |
Show 29 more attributesTPC-DS Query Benchmark (100GB dataset)(seconds) 42 38 Average Query Latency (1 Billion Row Scan)(ms) 350ms — Data Ingestion Rate(GB/sec) 0.5-2 Batch-based (bulk loading) Typical Query Latency (100GB Dataset)(milliseconds) 500ms-5000ms — Data Ingestion Freshness(seconds) 300-3600 seconds — Maximum Concurrent Queries (Standard Node)(queries) 15-25 — Median Ad-hoc Query Response Time(seconds) 120-240 seconds 3-5 seconds Query Performance (TPC-DS)(seconds) 15-20 — Maximum Query Timeout(hours) Limited by warehouse size — Concurrent User Support(scalability level) Limited by warehouse size, manual tuning — Average Query Response Time(seconds) 2-4 seconds — Query Latency (1 billion rows)(seconds) 30 seconds — Ingestion Throughput(events/sec) 100,000 events/sec — Data Warehouse Query Speed (Typical)(seconds) <5 seconds — Query Latency (1TB dataset)(seconds) 30-120 seconds — Deployment Time(seconds) 0.3-0.5 weeks (1-2 days) — Maximum Scalability(concurrent container instances) Up to 50+ PB (cloud limits) — Query Response Time (10TB scan)(seconds) 8.2 — Query Latency (Typical)(milliseconds) 1,000-10,000ms — Time to Insight (Complex Query)(seconds) 3-15 (depends on data size) — SQL Query Performance (1TB dataset)(seconds) 2-5 seconds — TPC-DS 100TB Query Performance(seconds) 38 seconds — SQL Query Performance (TPC-DS Benchmark)(seconds) 28 — Maximum Concurrent Queries Per Warehouse(queries) 8-128 (warehouse-dependent) — Query Latency (P99 percentile)(milliseconds) 2500ms — Query Performance (10TB TPC-DS benchmark)(seconds) 5 seconds — SQL Query Speed (relative benchmark)(relative to baseline) Industry leading (100% baseline) — ETL/ELT Performance (1TB dataset)(minutes) 20-35 minutes (SQL based) — Query Performance on Data Lakes(relative speed) Slower without ingestion; 5-10x slower on unoptimized data lake queries — | ||
| Typical Query Cost (per TB scanned)(USD) | $1.50-$5.00 | — |
| Base Monthly Cost (Small Cluster)(USD) | $2,160-8,640 (dc2.large, 2-4 nodes) | — |
| Storage Cost (per TB/month)(USD) | Included in node cost(winner) | $23 (on-demand) |
| Annual TCO (100TB storage, average usage)(USD) | $200,000(winner) | $260,000 |
| Monthly Cost per TB Stored(USD) | $2.25 | — |
Show 3 more attributesStorage Cost per TB per Month(USD) $0.25-$0.50 — Estimated Annual Cost (1 PB throughput)(USD) $180,000-$240,000 $280,000-$360,000 Annual Cost (100TB storage, 10 users)(USD) $120,000-180,000 — | ||
| Setup Time (to production)(days) | 1-3 | — |
| Scaling Adjustment Time(minutes) | 10-15 (requires cluster resize + restart) | ~1 (auto-scaling, no downtime)(winner) |
| Configuration Tuning Required(hours (estimated)) | 40-80 (distribution keys, sort keys, vacuum) | 4-8 (clustering hints optional)(winner) |
| Required DevOps Team Size(FTE) | 0.5 engineers | — |
| Supported Data Retention(duration) | Unlimited historical storage | — |
| SQL Standard Compliance(% compatibility) | 95% (PostgreSQL-compatible) | 95% (full ANSI) |
| SQL Dialect Compatibility(percentage) | Full PostgreSQL compatible (95%+ ANSI SQL) | — |
| SQL Compliance | ANSI SQL compliant | — |
| Typical Memory Per Node(GB) | 160-256 | — |
| Maximum Cluster Size(nodes) | Petabyte scale | — |
| Maximum Concurrent Users(users) | 50 (standard) | Unlimited |
| Maximum Concurrent Queries(queries/sec) | 10,000+ | — |
| Horizontal Scalability(text) | Linear scaling with node count limits | — |
| Concurrent Users per Instance(users) | 50-100 typical | 500-1000+ elastic(winner) |
Show 4 more attributesMaximum Daily Data Volume(terabytes) Unlimited (petabyte-scale) — Concurrent Users Support(users) Unlimited (multi-cluster shared warehouse) — Concurrent Query Capacity(concurrent users) 1000+ — Minimum Cluster Size(nodes) 1 (virtual warehouse) — | ||
| Data Freshness(seconds) | Minutes to hours typical | — |
| Ingestion Streaming Support(events per second) | Limited via Kinesis/S3 batch | — |
| Concurrent User Support(users) | 2,000+ | — |
| Data Sharing Zero-Copy(capability level) | Native (Secure Shares, production-ready) | — |
| License Type | AWS Proprietary Managed Service | — |
| Deployment Flexibility | AWS only | — |
| Minimum Cluster Size (nodes)(nodes) | 2 (minimum production) | — |
| Cloud Platform Support | AWS only | AWS, Azure, GCP |
| Cloud Provider Support(count) | 1 (AWS only) | 3 (AWS, Azure, GCP)(winner) |
| Supported Cloud Providers(number of platforms) | 3 (AWS, Azure, GCP) | — |
Show 2 more attributesAvailable Cloud Providers(count) AWS, Azure, GCP — Deployment Options Cloud-only (SaaS) — | ||
| Typical Data Compression Ratio(x) | 4-8x | — |
| Data Compression Ratio(ratio) | 10:1 average(winner) | 3-5:1 average |
| Max Concurrent Queries (default config)(queries) | 32 (base, expandable via Concurrency Scaling) | — |
| AWS Service Integration (native)(count) | 20+ (native connectors) | — |
| Data Marketplace Size(datasets) | ~200 (limited) | 1,500+(winner) |
| GitHub Stars (as of 2026)(thousands) | Not open-source (proprietary) | — |
| Base Hourly Cost (2-node cluster)(USD/hour) | $0.50 (DC2.large)(winner) | $4.00-$6.00 (Medium warehouse) |
| Annual Contract Discount(percent) | Up to 30%(winner) | Up to 20% |
| Reserved Instance Discount(percent) | 70%(winner) | None (on-demand only) |
| Starting Monthly Cost(USD) | $2,000-$5,000 | — |
| Base Query Cost(USD per TB scanned) | $2-4 per credit | — |
Show 11 more attributesAverage Enterprise Contract Value(USD thousands per year) $200-500 — Base Cost per TB (Monthly)(USD) $4-6 — Monthly Cost (100 GB compressed)(USD) $1,500 — Annual License Cost (100TB data)(USD) $240,000 — Base Setup Cost (Annual)(USD) $10,000-1,000,000 (credits-based) — Base Monthly Cost (minimum)(USD) $120-240 — Starting Monthly Cost (10GB active data)(USD) $480 — Storage Cost(USD per TB per month) $50 — Base Compute Cost (per hour)(USD) $2.00-$4.00 per credit — Minimum Annual Cost(USD) $4,000-8,000 — Per-Query Compute Cost Model(structure) $2-4 per credit (1 credit = compute + storage) — | ||
| Maximum Single Query Data Scanned(petabytes) | 100+(winner) | 20+ |
| Cloud Providers Supported(count) | 1 (AWS only) | 3 (AWS, Azure, GCP)(winner) |
| Native AWS Service Integration(count) | 12+ (S3, Glue, Lambda, Athena, QuickSight, IAM, EventBridge, etc.) | — |
| Setup Time to Production(minutes) | 40-60 hours | 10-15 hours(winner) |
| Setup Time to First Query(minutes) | 20-30 minutes | — |
| Time to Production(days) | 0.5 | — |
| Compute-Storage Decoupling | Coupled (scale together) | Independent scaling |
| Compute-Storage Decoupling | Complete separation | — |
| Compute & Storage Coupling | Fully independent (separate pricing) | — |
| Data Movement Required(percentage) | 100% (must ingest into Snowflake) | — |
| Data Lake S3/ADLS Support(native support) | No (requires data copy into Snowflake) | — |
| Uptime SLA Guarantee(percent) | 99.99% | 99.99% |
| Uptime SLA(percentage) | 99.9% | — |
| Typical Setup Time for Production(days) | 3-7 days | — |
| Columnar Compression Ratio(ratio (data reduction %)) | 6:1 to 15:1 | — |
| Compression Ratio(ratio) | 4:1 to 8:1 | — |
| Time to Production Deployment(days) | 21-28 days | 2-3 days(winner) |
| Required Technical Expertise Level(years experience needed) | 1-2 years (SQL knowledge) | — |
| Native Multi-Cloud Data Sharing(boolean) | No (requires replication) | Yes (zero-copy) |
| Data Sharing Standard(technology) | Snowflake Marketplace (proprietary) | — |
| Data Sharing Capability | Native, cross-account/cross-cloud | — |
| Zero-Copy Cloning | Available (instant, free) | — |
| Data Retention for Time-Travel(days) | 90 days | — |
Show 6 more attributesData Format Support Count(formats) 8 (Parquet, CSV, JSON, ORC, AVRO, XML, PDF, Images) — Available Integrations(count) 600+ — Native ML/AI Capabilities Limited (external integration required) — Data Format Support Structured (optimized for tables/CSV/JSON) — Data Recovery (Time Travel)(days) 90 days automatic — Time-Travel Query Window(days) 90 days retention — | ||
| Minimum Compute Billing Unit(seconds) | Per-second (reserved/on-demand) | Per-second (1 credit minimum per query) |
| Setup Time(minutes) | 1-3 days | — |
| Setup Time(minutes) | 15 minutes | — |
| Initial Setup Time(minutes) | 0.1 weeks (24 hours) | — |
| Customer Satisfaction Rating (G2 2025)(percent) | 85% | — |
| ML/AI Integration Score(out of 10) | 4/10 | — |
| Native ML Framework Integration | Cortex AI (basic) | — |
| ML/AI Feature Maturity(1-10 scale) | 4/10 (limited native, requires integrations) | — |
| Global Enterprise Customers(count (2026)) | 10,000+ | — |
| Market Share 2026(percent) | 32% | — |
| Global Market Share (2024)(%) | 32% of cloud data warehouse market | — |
| Enterprise Customer Adoption(% of market) | 32% enterprise market share (2025) | — |
| Supported Data Formats(types) | Structured (Parquet, CSV, JSON) | — |
| Multi-Language Support(languages) | SQL primarily | — |
| Data Marketplace Size(number of datasets) | 1,000+ datasets | — |
| Annual Customer Growth Rate (2025)(percent) | 22% YoY | — |
| Time to Production (median)(weeks) | 1-3 weeks | — |
| Time to First Query (production)(days) | 1-3 days | — |
| Licensing Model | Consumption-based (compute + storage) | — |
| Annual Cost (100TB, 24/7 usage)(USD) | $200,000 | — |
| Learning Curve (1-10 scale)(difficulty) | 3/10 (very easy) | — |
| Supported Query Languages(count) | SQL, Python, Java, JavaScript, Scala | — |
| Real-time Analytics Capability | Yes (sub-second latency) | — |
| SQL Query Support | ANSI SQL with advanced optimizations | — |
| Enterprise Customers (2025)(count) | ~10,000 enterprises | — |
| Operational Complexity (1-10 scale)(complexity score) | 3/10 (managed cloud service) | — |
| Data Warehouse Setup Time(minutes) | 5-10 minutes | — |
| Setup Complexity (1-10 scale)(difficulty score) | 4 | — |
| Minimum Setup Time(minutes) | 5-10 minutes (serverless) | — |
| ML Model Training Cost Efficiency(relative cost index) | 2.8x baseline (external ML tools required) | — |
| Data Format Lock-in Risk | High (proprietary format) | — |
| BI Tool Native Connectors(count) | 150+ | — |
| Native BI Tool Connectors(count) | 30+ (Tableau, Power BI, Looker, Qlik, Sisense) | — |
| Maximum Ingestion Rate(events/second) | 500,000 | — |
| Time to First Query(minutes) | 5 (account creation) | — |
| Community Size (GitHub Stars)(stars) | 2,800 stars | — |
| Unstructured Data Support(capability level) | Limited (structured tables primary) | — |
Show 29 more attributes
Show 3 more attributes
Show 4 more attributes
Show 2 more attributes
Show 11 more attributes
Show 6 more attributes
Pros & Cons
10 pros·6 cons across both
Amazon Redshift
Pros
- Lowest total cost of ownership for sustained, large-scale workloads (25-40% cheaper than competitors)
- Excellent compression ratio (10:1) reduces storage costs significantly
- Mature ecosystem with 10+ years in market, proven stability
- Deep AWS integration (IAM, VPC, S3 access) eliminates data transfer costs
- Superior performance for complex joins on massive datasets (100GB+)
Cons
- Requires manual cluster sizing and capacity planning; poor elasticity for variable workloads
- Locked into AWS; no multi-cloud option limits future flexibility
- Slow ad-hoc query response (minutes vs seconds) due to cluster pre-configuration
Snowflake
Pros
- Deploy to AWS, Azure, or GCP in one interface—true cloud portability
- Automatic elastic scaling handles variable workloads without pre-sizing
- Lightning-fast ad-hoc queries (average 3-5 seconds vs 2-4 minutes on Redshift)
- Built-in zero-copy data sharing eliminates complex replication workflows
- Low operational overhead: no tuning, indexing, or cluster management required
Cons
- 30-40% higher costs than Redshift for sustained, high-volume workloads
- Per-compute-second billing (minimum 1 credit ~$4) penalizes short queries
- Less mature optimization for extremely complex analytical queries on massive joins
Frequently Asked Questions
5 questions
Redshift is 25-40% cheaper for predictable, sustained workloads. For 1PB annual throughput, expect $180K-$240K (Redshift) vs $280K-$360K (Snowflake). However, Snowflake's elastic scaling can save money on variable/bursty workloads by avoiding over-provisioning. Redshift requires upfront cluster investment; Snowflake pays as you scale.
Resources & Learn More
Curated sources to dive deeper
Where to Buy
As an affiliate, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you. Learn more about our affiliate disclosure
Wikipedia
Related Comparisons
12 more to explore
Redshift vs Snowflake
softwareRedshift vs Snowflake
softwareSnowflake vs ClickHouse
softwareSnowflake vs Azure
softwareDruid vs Amazon Redshift
softwareHadoop vs Snowflake
softwareDruid vs Snowflake
softwarePinot vs Redshift
softwareSnowflake vs Dremio
softwareClickHouse vs Amazon Redshift
softwareSnowflake vs Databricks
softwareBigQuery vs Snowflake
software
Related Articles
5 articles
- technology2 min read
Best Streaming Services in 2026: Top Picks for Every Budget & Interest
Navigating the crowded streaming landscape in 2026 can be overwhelming. We've tested and ranked the best streaming services that offer the most value, from Netflix's massive library to budget-friendly options like Tubi, helping you cut cable and find your perfect entertainment solution.
Read article - technology2 min read
Best Live TV Streaming Services & Plans for Spring 2026: Complete Buyer's Guide
Tired of overpaying for cable? Discover the best live TV streaming services and plans for Spring 2026, including YouTube TV's new genre-based packages starting at $55/month. Our comprehensive guide breaks down pricing, channels, and features to help you cut the cord.
Read article - technology2 min read
Philo in 2026: Streaming TV Service Review, Pricing & Reddit Community Insights
Explore Philo's evolution heading into 2026, including pricing tiers, channel lineup, and how it compares to competitors like Sling TV. Discover what the r/PhiloTV Reddit community thinks about the service's current offerings and future prospects.
Read article - technology2 min read
Best US Fighter Jets 2026: Top American Combat Aircraft Ranked
Discover the most advanced US fighter jets dominating the skies in 2026. From the legendary F-22 Raptor to the versatile F-35 Lightning II, we rank America's best combat aircraft based on performance, stealth, and air superiority capabilities.
Read article - technology2 min read
Philo in 2026: Pricing, Lineup & How It Compares to Sling TV
As we head into 2026, Philo continues to position itself as an affordable streaming alternative for cable TV lovers. Discover what Philo offers, how its pricing stacks up against competitors like Sling TV, and what the Reddit community thinks about its future.
Read article
Explore More
Related comparisons and categories