Skip to main content

F-35 vs F-22: Fighter Comparison 2025

A Versus B

The F-22 Raptor wins in pure air-superiority performance with Mach 2.25 speed and unmatched dogfighting agility, but the F-35 Lightning II wins for modern air forces with 40% lower cost, multinational export capability, and superior multi-role mission flexibility and allied network integration.

F-22 Raptor

F-22 Raptor

U.S. Air Force air-superiority fighter optimized for dominance in beyond-visual-range and dogfighting engagements.

Air forces requiring air dominance against peer adversaries in contested airspace with unlimited budgets; U.S. Air Force homeland and forward-deployed operations.

Score63%
VS
F-35 Lightning II

F-35 Lightning II

Multi-role 5th-generation fighter designed for air combat, ground strike, and allied network integration across 19+ nations.

Allied air forces requiring modern, networked multi-role capability; missions spanning air defense, ground support, and coalition operations; forces prioritizing fleet size and interoperability over single-mission dominance.

Score63%
7 attributes7 differences16 pros/cons
TL;DRVoice-readyF-35 Lightning II (for most allied air forces); F-22 Raptor (for U.S. air-dominance role) wins

The F-22 Raptor wins in pure air-superiority performance with Mach 2.25 speed and unmatched dogfighting agility, but the F-35 Lightning II wins for modern air forces with 40% lower cost, multinational export capability, and superior multi-role mission flexibility and allied network integration.

Deciding factor: F-35's 40% lower unit cost ($82M vs. $142M), export to 19+ allied nations, and real-time sensor fusion across coalition assets outweigh F-22's raw speed advantage in modern contested airspace where network advantage prevails over single-aircraft performance.

Key fact: As of 2025, 1,100+ F-35 aircraft are in production or service across 19 allied nations, while only 187 F-22 Raptors were ever built due to export restrictions and cost constraints; F-35 production continues at full rate while F-22 production ended in 2011.

Our Verdict

AI-assisted

Choose the F-22 if your primary mission is air-to-air superiority and you need the fastest, most maneuverable fighter for contested airspace with peer adversaries. Choose the F-35 if you need a modern, network-enabled multi-role platform that can perform diverse missions, integrate with allied forces, and operate sustainably within current and future defense budgets—it is the future of NATO and allied air forces worldwide.

F-22 Raptor

Choose F-22 Raptor if

Air forces requiring air dominance against peer adversaries in contested airspace with unlimited budgets; U.S. Air Force homeland and forward-deployed operations.

F-35 Lightning II

Choose F-35 Lightning II if

Best pick

Allied air forces requiring modern, networked multi-role capability; missions spanning air defense, ground support, and coalition operations; forces prioritizing fleet size and interoperability over single-mission dominance.

Share this verdict

Get notified when F-22 Raptor vs F-35 Lightning II changes

One email when prices, specs or our verdict on F-22 Raptor vs F-35 Lightning II change. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Compare next

Key Differences at a Glance

  • Maximum Speed:✓ F-22 Raptor wins(Mach 2.25 (1,190 mph / 1,915 km/h) vs Mach 1.6 (1,061 mph / 1,707 km/h))
  • Primary Role:✓ F-35 Lightning II wins(Multi-role (air combat, ground attack, close air support, reconnaissance) vs Air superiority / Aerial combat)
  • Unit Cost (2024):✓ F-35 Lightning II wins($82 million per aircraft vs $142 million per aircraft)
See all 7 differences

Key Facts & Figures

7 numeric metrics compared

MetricF-22 RaptorF-35 Lightning IIRatio
Maximum Speed(Mach)Mach 2.25Mach 1.6
Unit Cost (2024 USD)(million USD)$142 million$82 million
Combat Radius(miles)590 miles680 miles
Total Aircraft Produced (through 2025)(aircraft)187 aircraft1,100+ aircraft (planned 2,400+ across all partners)
Engine Thrust (Combined)(lbf)65,000 lbf (Pratt & Whitney F119)43,000 lbf (Pratt & Whitney F135)
Operational Service Entry Date(year)20052015
Allied Export Authorization (2025)(nations)0 (U.S. only)19+ allied nations

Sourced from publicly available data ·

Key Differences

7 attributes compared head-to-head

F-22 Raptor
2F-22 Raptor
F-35 Lightning II leads
F-35 Lightning II
5F-35 Lightning II
  • Maximum Speed

    F-22 Raptor

    Mach 2.25 (1,190 mph / 1,915 km/h)(winner)

    F-35 Lightning II

    Mach 1.6 (1,061 mph / 1,707 km/h)

  • Primary Role

    F-22 Raptor

    Air superiority / Aerial combat

    F-35 Lightning II

    Multi-role (air combat, ground attack, close air support, reconnaissance)(winner)

  • Unit Cost (2024)

    F-22 Raptor

    $142 million per aircraft

    F-35 Lightning II

    $82 million per aircraft(winner)

  • Combat Radius

    F-22 Raptor

    590 miles (950 km)

    F-35 Lightning II

    680 miles (1,093 km)(winner)

  • Production Status (2025)

    F-22 Raptor

    Production ended 2011 (187 total built)

    F-35 Lightning II

    Active production ongoing (1,000+ aircraft across allied nations)(winner)

Full Comparison

F-22 Raptor
F-35 Lightning II
Maximum Speed(Mach)
Mach 2.25
Mach 1.6
Unit Cost (2024 USD)(million USD)
$142 million
$82 million
Combat Radius(miles)
590 miles
680 miles
Total Aircraft Produced (through 2025)(aircraft)
187 aircraft
1,100+ aircraft (planned 2,400+ across all partners)
Engine Thrust (Combined)(lbf)
65,000 lbf (Pratt & Whitney F119)
43,000 lbf (Pratt & Whitney F135)
Operational Service Entry Date(year)
2005
2015
Allied Export Authorization (2025)(nations)
0 (U.S. only)
19+ allied nations

Pros & Cons

10 pros·6 cons across both

F-22 Raptor
F-35 Lightning II
F-22 Raptor

F-22 Raptor

+5-3

Pros

Supersonic cruise (Mach 1.82) without afterburner; fastest combat jet in production history
Exceptional agility with thrust-vectoring engines; supermaneuverability in dogfight scenarios
Operational since 2005; mature avionics and combat-proven in Middle East operations
Unmatched air-to-air detection range (>100 nautical miles in some modes)
Advanced Pratt & Whitney F119 engines with 65,000 lbf combined thrust

Cons

Prohibitively expensive ($142M/unit); only 187 aircraft built due to cost and Congressional budget constraints
Cannot be exported to allies; severely limits interoperability and coalition operations
Limited ground-attack capability; requires external stores that compromise stealth profile
F-35 Lightning II

F-35 Lightning II

+5-3

Pros

Multi-role capability: dogfighting, ground attack, close air support, and ISR from single platform
Exportable to 19+ allied nations; drives NATO interoperability and collective defense
Superior combat radius (680 miles) and mission flexibility with internal/external stores
Distributed Aperture System (DAS) + sensor fusion; real-time data-link with allies and ground forces
Lower unit cost ($82M) enables larger fleet deployments; 1,000+ aircraft in production pipeline

Cons

Subsonic cruise speed (Mach 1.6); slower than F-22 in intercept scenarios against fast bogeys
Development delays and cost overruns totaled $100B+ through 2023; program complexity remains high
Cannot match F-22's instantaneous turn rate; relies on sensor fusion and net-centric advantage rather than raw maneuverability

Frequently Asked Questions

5 questions

  1. The F-22 contains classified technologies including radar-absorbing materials (RAM), engine nozzle designs, and sensor fusion algorithms deemed too sensitive for export under the Arms Control Act. The F-35, conversely, was designed from inception as an allied multinational platform with proper classification compartmentalization, enabling export to NATO and partner nations under strict end-use agreements.

  2. No. The F-22 has a maximum speed of Mach 2.25 (1,190 mph), while the F-35 maxes out at Mach 1.6 (1,061 mph). However, the F-35 has a longer combat radius (680 miles vs. 590 miles) and superior sustained-maneuver performance when leveraging sensor fusion and network advantages over adversaries.

  3. The F-22 has superior instantaneous turn rate and supermaneuverability due to thrust-vectoring engines and lower wing loading. However, the F-35 is not designed for dogfighting as its primary engagement; it relies on beyond-visual-range kills enabled by its Distributed Aperture System, sensor fusion, and real-time data-link with allied assets. In modern air combat, the F-35's network advantage typically negates the need for close-in maneuvering.

  4. Both aircraft are planned to remain operational into the 2050s. The F-22 (187 units) is being modernized with block upgrades and avionics refreshes by the U.S. Air Force. The F-35 (1,000+ units across 19+ nations) will serve as the backbone of coalition air forces through mid-century. The F-35's larger fleet and multinational sustainment infrastructure suggest it will have longer total operational longevity across allied forces.

  5. The F-22 costs $142 million per unit vs. $82 million for the F-35 (2024 pricing). The F-22's higher cost stems from: (1) fewer aircraft produced (187 vs. 1,100+), which amortizes development across smaller volume; (2) unique exotic materials and engine technology; (3) early 5th-gen development costs not yet realized through economies of scale. The F-35's lower unit cost is driven by large international orders and established production infrastructure.

Community feedback

Was this verdict helpful?

Last updated
AI-assistedOur methodology

Debate this on r/ThisOrThatDebate (run by the AversusB team)