Discord vs Element 2026: Gaming vs Privacy
Discord is a closed-source, feature-rich communication platform optimized for gaming and communities with 150M+ monthly users, while Element is an open-source, privacy-focused messenger built on the decentralized Matrix protocol for users prioritizing end-to-end encryption and data sovereignty.
Discord
Proprietary VoIP and instant messaging platform with 150M+ monthly users focused on gaming, communities, and real-time communication.
Gamers, streamers, large communities, business teams prioritizing ease-of-use and reliable voice communication
Element
Open-source, privacy-focused messaging client built on the Matrix protocol with end-to-end encryption and full decentralization support.
Privacy-conscious users, journalists, activists, tech-savvy teams requiring encryption, organizations needing full data sovereignty
Quick Answer
AI SummaryDiscord is a closed-source, feature-rich communication platform optimized for gaming and communities with 150M+ monthly users, while Element is an open-source, privacy-focused messenger built on the decentralized Matrix protocol for users prioritizing end-to-end encryption and data sovereignty.
Our Verdict
AI-assistedChoose Discord if you prioritize a polished user experience, massive community ecosystem, superior voice quality for gaming, and don't mind closed-source infrastructure with moderate privacy constraints. Choose Element if you require maximum privacy, end-to-end encrypted conversations by default, open-source transparency, self-hosting capabilities, and value decentralization over convenience.
Was this verdict helpful?
Choose Discord if
Best pickGamers, streamers, large communities, business teams prioritizing ease-of-use and reliable voice communication
Choose Element if
Privacy-conscious users, journalists, activists, tech-savvy teams requiring encryption, organizations needing full data sovereignty
Track this comparison
Get notified when prices change, new specs ship, or our verdict updates.
Triggers: price change new spec verdict update
No spam. Stop anytime.
Key Differences at a Glance
- Source Code Availability:✓ Element wins(Open-source (Apache 2.0) vs Proprietary/Closed-source)
- Monthly Active Users:✓ Discord wins(150+ million (2024) vs 2-3 million estimated)
- Data Storage Location:✓ Element wins(Decentralized across Matrix homeservers vs Discord's centralized servers)
Key Facts & Figures
61 numeric metrics compared
| Metric | Discord | Element | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Audio Latency(milliseconds) | 50-100ms with spatial audio | — | — |
| Free Audio Quality(kbps) | 128 kbps | — | — |
| Base Pricing (Monthly)(USD) | Free (with Nitro at $9.99) | — | — |
| Maximum Video Meeting Participants(participants) | 25 participants | — | — |
| Language Translation Support(languages) | 0 (no native support) | — | — |
| Registered Users Globally(millions) | 500+ million registered users | — | — |
| Free Tier Cost(USD) | Completely free | — | — |
| Group Video Call Duration Limit (Free)(minutes) | 1440 (24 hours) | — | — |
| Maximum Meeting Participants(participants) | Up to 50 (voice channel) | — | — |
| Max File Upload Size(MB) | 100 MB | — | — |
| Mobile App Size (iOS)(MB) | ~150 MB | — | — |
| Bot/Integration Ecosystem Size(available bots) | 10,000+ bots | — | — |
| Cost for Personal Use(USD/month) | Free (with Nitro at $9.99/mo optional) | — | — |
| Public Bot Library Size(bots) | 500,000+ | — | — |
| Monthly Cost (Basic Premium)(USD) | $9.99 | — | — |
| Monthly Cost (Pro Plan)(USD) | $9.99 per server/month | — | — |
| Voice Audio Codec Quality(kHz) | 48 kHz | — | — |
| Maximum Video Call Participants(people) | 50+ participants | — | — |
| Voice Chat Bitrate(kbps) | 128 kbps optimized | Variable (48-128 kbps) | |
| Third-party Integrations(count) | 400+ | 200-300 | |
| Paid Plan Starting Price(USD/month) | Free (Nitro $9.99/year) | — | — |
| Max Video Conference Participants(people) | 50 | — | — |
| Voice Codec Quality Rating(score (1-10)) | 9.5 | — | — |
| Enterprise Security Certifications(count) | Encryption, limited certifications | — | — |
| Time to Deploy(hours) | 1 | — | — |
| Uptime Guarantee(percent) | 99.99% | — | — |
| Monthly Cost (1 Pro User)(USD) | $0 (free tier) | — | — |
| Screen Sharing Maximum FPS(fps) | 60fps | — | — |
| Supported Language Captions(languages) | 15 languages | — | — |
| Enterprise Fortune 500 Adoption Rate(percent) | Less than 5% | — | — |
| Maximum Simultaneous Video Participants (Free)(participants) | 50 with Nitro ($99.99/year) | — | — |
| Audio Sampling Rate(kHz) | 48kHz premium | — | — |
| Real-Time Auto-Transcription Languages(languages) | Speech-to-text via integrations only | — | — |
| Average Daily Time Spent(minutes) | 195 minutes | — | — |
| Maximum Voice Call Participants(users) | 50 participants | — | — |
| Content Retention Period (Free)(days) | 30 days | — | — |
| Premium Subscription Cost(USD/month) | $9.99 (Discord Nitro) | — | — |
| Number of Public Communities(thousands) | ~8,000 public servers (estimated) | — | — |
| Mobile App Store Rating(stars) | 4.3 stars (3.8M reviews) | — | — |
| Maximum Free Storage Per Upload(MB) | 100 MB | — | — |
| Voice Latency(milliseconds) | 50-80ms | 100-200ms avg | |
| Third-Party Bot Integrations Available(count) | 10,000+ bots | — | — |
| Base Pricing (Team/Workspace)(USD per month) | Free | — | — |
| Voice Latency (Lower is Better)(milliseconds) | 20-30ms | — | — |
| Free Tier Monthly Active Users(millions) | 150 million | — | — |
| Video Participants (Free Tier)(maximum simultaneous) | 8 video participants | — | — |
| Workspace/Server Creation Cost(USD per month) | Free (unlimited) | — | — |
| Monthly Cost (Pro/Premium Plan)(USD) | $9.99 | — | — |
| Maximum Group Call Participants (Free Tier)(users) | 100 | — | — |
| Screen Share FPS (Free Tier)(fps) | 60 | — | — |
| Maximum Webinar Participants (Paid Plan)(users) | 100 | — | — |
| Average Voice Latency(milliseconds) | Under 100ms optimized | 50-200ms (varies by server) | |
| Free Tier File Upload Size Limit(MB) | 8 MB per file | Server-dependent (typically 100+ MB) | |
| Maximum Concurrent Voice Users (Free Tier)(users) | Unlimited | 50-100 (server-dependent) | — |
| Native App Integrations Available(count) | ~150 via bridges | ~150 via bridges | |
| Monthly Cost (Pro Plan, 50 users)(USD) | $0-1,500/month (self-hosted varies) | $0-1,500/month (self-hosted varies) | |
| Paid Workspaces/Users (Enterprise Adoption)(workspaces) | ~100,000 public servers | ~100,000 public servers | |
| Daily Active Users(millions) | 2-3 million (estimated) | 2-3 million (estimated) | |
| Available Integrations(count) | 200+ | 200+ | |
| Cost Per User (Annual, Lowest Paid Tier)(USD/month) | $0 (open-source) or $9/month (managed) | $0 (open-source) or $9/month (managed) | |
| Organizations Using Platform(count (thousands)) | 50,000+ (estimated) | 50,000+ (estimated) |
Sourced from publicly available data ·
Key Differences
7 attributes compared head-to-head
- Proprietary/Closed-sourceSource Code AvailabilityOpen-source (Apache 2.0)(winner)
- 150+ million (2024)(winner)Monthly Active Users2-3 million estimated
- Discord's centralized serversData Storage LocationDecentralized across Matrix homeservers(winner)
- Transit encryption only (TLS)Default EncryptionEnd-to-end encryption (E2EE) enabled by default(winner)
- 8 MB per fileFree Tier File Upload LimitNo hard limit (depends on server)(winner)
- Unlimited concurrent users(winner)Voice Channel CapacityTypically 50-100+ (server-dependent)
- Not availableSelf-hosting OptionFull self-hosting supported(winner)
- Source Code Availability
Discord
Proprietary/Closed-source
Element
Open-source (Apache 2.0)(winner)
- Monthly Active Users
Discord
150+ million (2024)(winner)
Element
2-3 million estimated
- Data Storage Location
Discord
Discord's centralized servers
Element
Decentralized across Matrix homeservers(winner)
- Default Encryption
Discord
Transit encryption only (TLS)
Element
End-to-end encryption (E2EE) enabled by default(winner)
- Free Tier File Upload Limit
Discord
8 MB per file
Element
No hard limit (depends on server)(winner)
- Voice Channel Capacity
Discord
Unlimited concurrent users(winner)
Element
Typically 50-100+ (server-dependent)
- Self-hosting Option
Discord
Not available
Element
Full self-hosting supported(winner)
Full Comparison
| Attribute | Discord | Element |
|---|---|---|
| Free Tier Participant Limit(participants) | Unlimited | — |
| Free Tier Video Call Duration(minutes) | Unlimited | — |
| Maximum Group Call Participants (Free Tier)(users) | 100 | — |
| Maximum Webinar Participants (Paid Plan)(users) | 100 | — |
| Maximum Concurrent Voice Users (Free Tier)(users) | Unlimited | 50-100 (server-dependent) |
| Audio Latency(milliseconds) | 50-100ms with spatial audio | — |
| Mobile App Size (iOS)(MB) | ~150 MB | — |
| Voice Audio Codec Quality(kHz) | 48 kHz | — |
| Maximum Video Call Participants(people) | 50+ participants | — |
| Voice Chat Bitrate(kbps) | 128 kbps optimized(winner) | Variable (48-128 kbps) |
Show 5 more attributesMessage Search Speed(seconds) 0.1-0.3 seconds 1-5 seconds Screen Sharing Maximum FPS(fps) 60fps — Voice Latency(milliseconds) 50-80ms 100-200ms avg Voice Latency (Lower is Better)(milliseconds) 20-30ms — Average Voice Latency(milliseconds) Under 100ms optimized 50-200ms (varies by server) | ||
| Free Audio Quality(kbps) | 128 kbps | — |
| Video Meeting Notes with AI | No | — |
| Maximum Video Meeting Participants(participants) | 25 participants | — |
| Language Translation Support(languages) | 0 (no native support) | — |
| Group Video Call Duration Limit (Free)(minutes) | 1440 (24 hours) | — |
| Real-Time Translation Support(Languages) | Limited, experimental | — |
Show 17 more attributesMessage History Retention(text) Permanent (searchable) — AI Assistant Capabilities(text) Basic moderation bots — Max File Upload Size(MB) 100 MB — Voice Channel Participant Limit(users) Unlimited — Screen Share Quality(fps @ resolution) 1080p @ 60fps — Free Message History(days) Unlimited — Max Video Conference Participants(people) 50 — Supported Language Captions(languages) 15 languages — Maximum Voice Call Participants(users) 50 participants — Content Retention Period (Free)(days) 30 days — Maximum Free Storage Per Upload(MB) 100 MB — Free Tier Message History(messages) Unlimited — Video Participants (Free Tier)(maximum simultaneous) 8 video participants — Native Meeting Recording No (bot-dependent) — Persistent Message History Yes (unlimited) — Free Tier File Upload Size Limit(MB) 8 MB per file Server-dependent (typically 100+ MB) Self-Hosting Capability Yes (full open-source support) — | ||
| Enterprise SSO Support | Limited/Third-party only | — |
| Developer API for Integrations | Comprehensive API with bot framework (GDC 2026) | — |
| Bot/Integration Ecosystem Size(available bots) | 10,000+ bots | — |
| Third-Party Bot Integrations Available(count) | 10,000+ bots | — |
| Calendar Integration | Limited third-party apps | — |
| Microsoft 365 Integration | No native integration | — |
| Base Pricing (Monthly)(USD) | Free (with Nitro at $9.99) | — |
| Free Tier Cost(USD) | Completely free | — |
| Paid Plan Cost (Single User/Month)(USD) | Discord Nitro $9.99-99.99/year | — |
| Cost for Personal Use(USD/month) | Free (with Nitro at $9.99/mo optional) | — |
| Monthly Cost (Basic Premium)(USD) | $9.99 | — |
Show 8 more attributesMonthly Cost (Pro Plan)(USD) $9.99 per server/month — Paid Plan Starting Price(USD/month) Free (Nitro $9.99/year) — Free Tier Call Duration Limit(minutes) Unlimited — Monthly Cost (1 Pro User)(USD) $0 (free tier) — Premium Subscription Cost(USD/month) $9.99 (Discord Nitro) — Workspace/Server Creation Cost(USD per month) Free (unlimited) — Monthly Cost (Pro Plan, 50 users)(USD) $0-1,500/month (self-hosted varies) — Cost Per User (Annual, Lowest Paid Tier)(USD/month) $0 (open-source) or $9/month (managed) — | ||
| Voice Chat Quality Rating(subjective score) | Outstanding (advanced codecs) | — |
| Voice Codec Quality Rating(score (1-10)) | 9.5 | — |
| Video Resolution Support(maximum resolution) | 1080p (1920x1080) | — |
| User Learning Curve(difficulty rating) | Minimal (intuitive design) | — |
| Registered Users Globally(millions) | 500+ million registered users | — |
| Free Tier Monthly Active Users(millions) | 150 million | — |
| Enterprise Security Compliance(certifications) | SOC 2, GDPR (limited enterprise focus) | — |
| SOC 2 Compliance(text) | Yes, SOC 2 Type II | — |
| Default End-to-End Encryption | No (opt-in only) | Yes (all chats) |
| End-to-End Encryption | Not enabled by default (optional for 1-on-1 only) | Enabled by default on all chats |
| End-to-End Encryption Default(null) | Yes, default in all rooms | — |
| Maximum Meeting Participants(participants) | Up to 50 (voice channel) | — |
| Public Bot Library Size(bots) | 500,000+ | — |
| Voice Codec Quality(codec type) | Opus (optimized, 128kbps default) | — |
| Maximum Video Resolution(pixels) | 1080p (premium servers) | — |
| Screen Share FPS (Free Tier)(fps) | 60 | — |
| Message History Scanning for AI Training(status) | Yes (Discord trains AI on content) | — |
| SOC 2 Type II Certified | No | — |
| Enterprise Security Certifications(count) | Encryption, limited certifications | — |
| HIPAA Compliance | Not HIPAA certified | — |
| HIPAA Compliance Certification | Not certified | — |
| Custom Workflow Automation | Basic (bots only) | — |
| Users Per Workspace(count) | Unlimited | — |
| Third-party Integrations(count) | 400+(winner) | 200-300 |
| Self-Hosting Option | No | Yes (fully) |
| Source Code Availability | Proprietary/Closed | Open-source (GPLv3) |
| Monthly Active Users(millions) | 150+ million (2024)(winner) | 2-3 million (estimated 2024) |
| Daily Active Users(millions) | 2-3 million (estimated) | — |
| Message History (Free Plan)(days) | unlimited | Unlimited (self-hosted) |
| Time to Deploy(hours) | 1 | — |
| Learning Curve(hours) | 1.5 | — |
| Uptime Guarantee(percent) | 99.99% | — |
| HIPAA Compliance Certified | No | — |
| SOC 2 Type II Compliance | Yes | — |
| Maximum Free Server Categories(categories) | Unlimited | — |
| Enterprise Fortune 500 Adoption Rate(percent) | Less than 5% | — |
| Free Video Call Duration Limit(minutes) | Unlimited | — |
| Maximum Simultaneous Video Participants (Free)(participants) | 50 with Nitro ($99.99/year) | — |
| Audio Sampling Rate(kHz) | 48kHz premium | — |
| Message History Retention (Free)(searchable messages) | Unlimited | — |
| Message history retention (free plan)(days) | Unlimited with self-hosting | — |
| Google Calendar Integration | No direct integration | — |
| Real-Time Auto-Transcription Languages(languages) | Speech-to-text via integrations only | — |
| Average Daily Time Spent(minutes) | 195 minutes | — |
| Number of Public Communities(thousands) | ~8,000 public servers (estimated) | — |
| Mobile App Store Rating(stars) | 4.3 stars (3.8M reviews) | — |
| Base Pricing (Team/Workspace)(USD per month) | Free | — |
| Free Group Video Call Duration Limit(minutes) | Unlimited | — |
| Free Tier Group Video Call Duration Limit(minutes) | Unlimited | — |
| Monthly Cost (Pro/Premium Plan)(USD) | $9.99 | — |
| Source Code Accessibility | Proprietary/Closed-source | Open-source (Apache 2.0 license) |
| Self-Hosting Support | Not supported; Discord-only infrastructure | Full self-hosting with multiple homeservers |
| User Data Retention Control | Limited control; Discord retains indefinitely | Full user control over local/server retention |
| Native App Integrations Available(count) | ~150 via bridges | — |
| Paid Workspaces/Users (Enterprise Adoption)(workspaces) | ~100,000 public servers | — |
| Native Video/Audio Calls | Via Jitsi integration (not native) | — |
| Available Integrations(count) | 200+ | — |
| Organizations Using Platform(count (thousands)) | 50,000+ (estimated) | — |
| GDPR Compliance | Compliant by architecture (user data control) | — |
DiscordShow 5 more attributes
Show 17 more attributes
Show 8 more attributes
Pros & Cons
10 pros·5 cons across both
Discord
Pros
- 150M+ monthly active users providing massive network effect and community access
- Superior voice quality optimized for gaming with low-latency streaming (under 100ms)
- Rich feature set including threads, forum channels, scheduled events, and Stage voice channels
- Intuitive UI with minimal learning curve; available on all major platforms (web, mobile, desktop, console)
- Free tier supports unlimited text channels, up to 8 simultaneous voice participants, and HD video sharing
Cons
- Proprietary closed-source infrastructure with limited transparency on data handling practices
- No end-to-end encryption by default; messages stored on Discord's centralized servers with limited retention controls
Element
Pros
- Full end-to-end encryption (E2EE) enabled by default on all direct messages and group chats
- Open-source codebase (Apache 2.0) enabling community auditing and security verification
- Decentralized architecture allowing users to self-host or choose alternative Matrix homeservers
- No data collection; users retain complete control over message storage and metadata
- Cross-protocol bridges enable communication with Discord, Slack, Telegram, and other platforms
Cons
- Significantly smaller user base (2-3M users) limiting community network effects and adoption
- Less polished UI with steeper learning curve compared to Discord; Matrix protocol complexity deters casual users
- Voice/video quality limitations and lower concurrent user capacity (~50-100) on free/standard servers
Frequently Asked Questions
5 questions
Discord uses TLS encryption for messages in transit but does not enable end-to-end encryption by default. Only 1-on-1 direct messages support optional E2EE. This means Discord's servers can technically access and read message content. Element encrypts all messages end-to-end by default, preventing even Element's developers from reading message content.
Resources & Learn More
Curated sources to dive deeper
Where to Buy
As an affiliate, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you. Learn more about our affiliate disclosure
Wikipedia
- W
Discord on Wikipedia (opens in new tab)
Proprietary VoIP and instant messaging platform with 150M+ monthly users focused on gaming, communities, and real-time communication.
- W
Element on Wikipedia (opens in new tab)
Open-source, privacy-focused messaging client built on the Matrix protocol with end-to-end encryption and full decentralization support.
Related Comparisons
12 more to explore
Discord vs Element
softwareGoogle Meet vs Discord
softwareDiscord vs Zoom
productsDiscord vs Telegram
softwareDiscord vs Guilded
softwareDiscord vs Revolt
softwareSlack vs Element
softwareReddit vs Discord
softwareslack vs teams vs discord
softwareMicrosoft Teams vs Discord
softwareReddit vs Discord
softwareSlack vs Element
software
Related Articles
5 articles
- technology
Best Streaming Services in 2026: Top Picks for Every Budget & Interest
Navigating the crowded streaming landscape in 2026 can be overwhelming. We've tested and ranked the best streaming services that offer the most value, from Netflix's massive library to budget-friendly options like Tubi, helping you cut cable and find your perfect entertainment solution.
Read article - technology
Best Live TV Streaming Services & Plans for Spring 2026: Complete Buyer's Guide
Tired of overpaying for cable? Discover the best live TV streaming services and plans for Spring 2026, including YouTube TV's new genre-based packages starting at $55/month. Our comprehensive guide breaks down pricing, channels, and features to help you cut the cord.
Read article - technology
Philo in 2026: Streaming TV Service Review, Pricing & Reddit Community Insights
Explore Philo's evolution heading into 2026, including pricing tiers, channel lineup, and how it compares to competitors like Sling TV. Discover what the r/PhiloTV Reddit community thinks about the service's current offerings and future prospects.
Read article - technology
Best US Fighter Jets 2026: Top American Combat Aircraft Ranked
Discover the most advanced US fighter jets dominating the skies in 2026. From the legendary F-22 Raptor to the versatile F-35 Lightning II, we rank America's best combat aircraft based on performance, stealth, and air superiority capabilities.
Read article - technology
Philo in 2026: Pricing, Lineup & How It Compares to Sling TV
As we head into 2026, Philo continues to position itself as an affordable streaming alternative for cable TV lovers. Discover what Philo offers, how its pricing stacks up against competitors like Sling TV, and what the Reddit community thinks about its future.
Read article
Explore More
Related comparisons and categories