Skip to main content

LaCroix vs Bubly: Sparkling Water Comparison 2026

A Versus B

Both LaCroix and Bubly are zero-sugar sparkling water brands with only carbonated water and natural flavors. The main differences lie in flavor intensity, brand positioning, and product line variations, with Bubly offering more aggressive marketing and broader flavor options.

LaCroix

Premium sparkling water pioneer by National Beverage Corp known for minimalist branding and light carbonation since 2015.

Health-conscious consumers seeking premium, subtle sparkling water with lifestyle appeal

Score50%
VS
Bubly

Bubly

Budget-friendly sparkling water brand by PepsiCo with 20+ flavor options launched in 2018.

Budget-conscious consumers wanting bold flavors, wider variety, and occasional higher-calorie options

Score50%
25 attributes8 differences16 pros/cons

Quick Answer

AI Summary

Both LaCroix and Bubly are zero-sugar sparkling water brands with only carbonated water and natural flavors. The main differences lie in flavor intensity, brand positioning, and product line variations, with Bubly offering more aggressive marketing and broader flavor options.

Read full verdict

Our Verdict

AI-assisted

Both LaCroix and Bubly deliver zero-sugar sparkling water with clean ingredient lists, making them healthier alternatives to traditional soda. LaCroix appeals to consumers seeking premium, subtle flavors and lifestyle branding, while Bubly attracts mainstream buyers with bolder flavors, lower prices, and diverse product lines including the higher-calorie POP variant.

Community feedback

Was this verdict helpful?

L

Choose LaCroix if

Best pick

Health-conscious consumers seeking premium, subtle sparkling water with lifestyle appeal

Bubly

Choose Bubly if

Budget-conscious consumers wanting bold flavors, wider variety, and occasional higher-calorie options

Share this verdict

Track this comparison

Get notified when prices change, new specs ship, or our verdict updates.

Triggers: price change new spec verdict update

No spam. Stop anytime.

Key Differences at a Glance

  • Brand Origin:French-inspired, established 2001 vs PepsiCo subsidiary, launched 2016
  • Sugar Content:0g per serving vs 0g per serving (standard) / 3g or less (POP line)
  • Flavor Intensity:✓ Bubly wins(Bold, pronounced flavors vs Subtle, delicate flavors)
See all 8 differences

Key Facts & Figures

21 numeric metrics compared

MetricLaCroixBublyRatio
Sugar Content(g per serving)0g0g
Average Retail Price(USD per can)$1.75$0.60
Flavor Intensity Level(scale 1-10)Subtle (4/10)Bold (8/10)
Number of Flavors Available(count)12 core flavors15+ standard + POP variants
Ingredient Simplicity(number of ingredients)2 (carbonated water, natural flavors)2-4 (standard) / 4-6 (POP with fruit juice)
Market Launch Year(year)20012016
Brand Recognition (US Market)(percentage awareness)High (market leader)Very High (aggressive expansion)
Average Retail Price per Can(USD)$1.49——
Market Share 2026(percent)32.0%——
Distribution Countries(count)50+——
Price per 12-Pack (USD)(USD)$5.99$4.99
U.S. Market Share(percent)22%18%
Availability in Major U.S. Supermarkets(percent)98%95%
Consumer Taste Preference (Blind Taste Test 2024)(score out of 10)7.4/107.2/10
Calories per Serving(kcal)0 calories——
Flavor Variety(flavors)40+ flavors——
Market Share (US Sparkling Water)(percent)40% market share——
Social Media Following(millions)1.2M followers——
Calories per 12oz Serving(calories)0 kcal——
Total sugars per 12oz(grams)0g——
Caffeine Content Per 12oz(mg)0mg——

Sourced from publicly available data ·

Key Differences

8 attributes compared head-to-head

L
1LaCroix
Bubly leads3 ties
Bubly
4Bubly
  • Brand Origin

    LaCroix

    French-inspired, established 2001

    Bubly

    PepsiCo subsidiary, launched 2016

  • Sugar Content

    LaCroix

    0g per serving

    Bubly

    0g per serving (standard) / 3g or less (POP line)

  • Flavor Intensity

    LaCroix

    Subtle, delicate flavors

    Bubly

    Bold, pronounced flavors(winner)

  • Product Line Diversity

    LaCroix

    Classic flavors only

    Bubly

    Classic + POP (fruit juice) + collaborations(winner)

  • Market Position

    LaCroix

    Premium, lifestyle-focused(winner)

    Bubly

    Mainstream, value-oriented

Full Comparison

LLaCroix
Bubly
Sugar Content(g per serving)
0g
—
Calories per Serving(kcal)
0 calories
—
Calories per 12oz Serving(calories)
0 kcal
—
Total sugars per 12oz(grams)
0g
—
Caffeine Content Per 12oz(mg)
0mg
—
Average Retail Price(USD per can)
$1.75
$0.60
Flavor Intensity Level(scale 1-10)
Subtle (4/10)
Bold (8/10)
Carbonation Level(rating)
High
—
Number of Flavors Available(count)
12 core flavors
15+ standard + POP variants
Ingredient Simplicity(number of ingredients)
2 (carbonated water, natural flavors)
2-4 (standard) / 4-6 (POP with fruit juice)
Market Launch Year(year)
2001
2016
Brand Recognition (US Market)(percentage awareness)
High (market leader)
Very High (aggressive expansion)
Brand Recognition(index)
9.5/10
—
Average Retail Price per Can(USD)
$1.49
—
Price per 12-Pack (USD)(USD)
$5.99
$4.99
Product Categories(count)
1
—
Market Share 2026(percent)
32.0%
—
U.S. Market Share(percent)
22%
18%
Market Share (US Sparkling Water)(percent)
40% market share
—
Environmental Certification(level)
Standard packaging
—
Distribution Countries(count)
50+
—
Availability in Major U.S. Supermarkets(percent)
98%
95%
Consumer Taste Preference (Blind Taste Test 2024)(score out of 10)
7.4/10
7.2/10
Flavor Variety(flavors)
40+ flavors
—
Social Media Following(millions)
1.2M followers
—

Pros & Cons

8 pros·8 cons across both

L
Bubly
L

LaCroix

+4-4

Pros

Sophisticated brand image and minimalist packaging
Consistently subtle and refined flavor profiles
First-mover advantage in premium sparkling water market
Clean ingredient list with only carbonated water and natural flavors

Cons

Higher price point than competitors
Limited flavor variety and innovation
Less bold taste may not appeal to consumers seeking strong flavors
Smaller product line without premium variants
Bubly

Bubly

+4-4

Pros

More affordable pricing and wider retail availability
Bold, pronounced flavor options appealing to diverse palates
Diverse product portfolio including Bubly POP with real fruit juice
Strong marketing and pop culture collaborations (Galaxy Cans with Rosalina 2026)

Cons

Less premium brand positioning than LaCroix
POP variant contains 3g sugar and 20 calories, less clean than standard
Larger corporate backing may lack artisanal appeal
Flavor intensity may be polarizing for subtle taste preferences

Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions

  1. Bubly is generally considered to have slightly more pronounced flavor intensity than LaCroix. LaCroix is known for its very subtle, almost whisper-light flavor profile — the natural flavors barely exceed lightly scented carbonated water. Bubly's flavors are a bit bolder and more identifiable, which many consumers prefer, especially those transitioning from sweetened sodas. That said, individual flavors vary significantly between both brands — some LaCroix flavors (Pamplemousse, Passionfruit) are notably more distinct than others. If flavor intensity matters to you, try Bubly Mango or Bubly Lime against LaCroix equivalents to compare directly.

  2. Both are identically healthy — carbonated water plus natural flavors, zero calories, zero sugar, zero sodium, zero sweeteners of any kind. The carbonation is slightly acidic (lower pH than still water), which has generated some concern about tooth enamel, but the American Dental Association notes that carbonated water without added sweeteners or citric acid poses minimal enamel risk compared to soda or diet soda. Neither LaCroix nor Bubly is "better for you" — they are functionally equivalent zero-calorie hydration options. The only differentiation is if you consider the very minor flavor compound differences between natural flavor sources.

  3. LaCroix's national explosion around 2014-2016 was driven by a convergence of factors: growing consumer interest in healthier beverages (particularly among Millennials), social media virality of its colorful retro-aesthetic cans and the invented pronunciation debate ("la-CROY"), grocery store placement expansion, and the absence of sweeteners at a time when consumers were increasingly skeptical of artificial sweeteners like aspartame and sucralose. LaCroix offered the carbonation of soda with the "cleanliness" of water, and its branding resonated visually on Instagram. National Beverage Corp also provided consistent wholesale pricing that kept LaCroix accessible.

  4. Yes. Bubly is a brand owned and produced by PepsiCo. It was launched in 2018 as PepsiCo's strategic response to the sparkling water category growth, which was largely dominated by LaCroix and also included Spindrift (fruit-juice-based), Perrier, and San Pellegrino. PepsiCo's massive distribution network, grocery relationships, and marketing budget have made Bubly one of the fastest-growing beverage brands in the U.S. since its launch. Bubly sits in PepsiCo's portfolio alongside Pepsi, Gatorade, Lipton Tea, and Tropicana.

  5. Pamplemousse (grapefruit) is consistently ranked as LaCroix's most popular and iconic flavor — it is largely responsible for LaCroix's viral rise and remains the brand's best-seller. Passionfruit, Peach-Pear, Coconut, and Sparkling Water (unflavored) round out the most popular options. LaCroix's Tangerine and Key Lime are also strong performers. Seasonal flavors (like Strawberry-Basil and Watermelon) are sold in limited quantities. Among Bubly's best-sellers, Mango, Lime, and Cherry are the most frequently cited by consumers as flavor favorites.

  1. Bubly is generally considered to have a stronger, sweeter flavor profile. Bubly uses brighter, more distinct fruit essences that are easily noticeable. LaCroix's flavors are more subtle and natural-tasting. Most taste comparisons find Bubly's flavors more prominent, though some prefer LaCroix's understated approach. Both are unsweetened with no sugar.

  2. Both are nearly identical nutritionally: zero calories, zero sugar, zero artificial sweeteners, and no sodium. The only real difference is carbonation level — Bubly tends to have lighter, smaller bubbles while LaCroix has more intense carbonation. Neither is healthier than the other. Both are excellent zero-calorie alternatives to soda.

  3. LaCroix is generally slightly cheaper. A 12-pack of LaCroix typically costs $5-7 at major retailers, while Bubly runs $6-8. Both are significantly cheaper than premium imported sparkling waters like Perrier or San Pellegrino. Costco and warehouse clubs often have the best prices on both brands.

  4. LaCroix offers 20+ flavors including lemon, lime, grapefruit, passionfruit, and seasonal Cúrate blends. Bubly offers 18+ flavors including cherry, mango, strawberry, watermelon, and peach. LaCroix has a slight edge in variety, but both cover the most popular sparkling water flavors. Both also release limited seasonal varieties.

  5. LaCroix pioneered flavored sparkling water in the US and dominated the market through the 2010s. Bubly launched in 2018 backed by PepsiCo's marketing power and celebrity endorsements, quickly gaining significant market share. As of 2026, LaCroix retains the highest overall sparkling water sales volume, but Bubly is the fastest-growing competitor in the premium segment.

Analysis: LaCroix vs Bubly

LaCroix and Bubly are the two dominant brands in the U.S. flavored sparkling water market, competing for share in a category that has grown substantially as consumers move away from soda and seek zero-calorie, zero-sugar hydration alternatives. Both are carbonated water with natural flavors and no sweeteners — the competitive difference is in branding, flavor range, and corporate backing rather than meaningful product differentiation.

LaCroix (pronounced "la-CROY") is the original American sparkling water phenomenon. Founded in La Crosse, Wisconsin in 1981, LaCroix spent decades as a regional brand before its national explosion beginning around 2015 — driven by social media virality, Millennial consumer interest in "clean" beverages, and the brand's colorful, retro-aesthetic cans. LaCroix is owned by National Beverage Corp (FIZZ on Nasdaq) and has maintained its market leadership through its flavor portfolio (over 25 flavors including Pamplemousse, Peach-Pear, Coconut, Passionfruit, and seasonal varieties) and its strong retail presence across grocery and club stores. LaCroix's ingredient list is minimal: carbonated water, natural flavor. Flavor intensity is notably subtle — LaCroix's flavor profile is light, which some consumers love (it tastes "water-adjacent") and others find underwhelming.

Bubly is a newer entrant: launched by PepsiCo in 2018 as a direct competitive response to LaCroix's growth. PepsiCo's scale and distribution muscle quickly made Bubly one of the top sparkling water brands in the country. Bubly differentiates through branding (its cans feature tab messages in a similar playful-social-media-friendly style), a broader flavor portfolio (over 15 flavors plus seasonal varieties), and slightly bolder flavor intensity than LaCroix. In 2021, Bubly introduced Bubly Burst (lightly sweetened sparkling water) and has experimented with caffeinated and energy versions. PepsiCo's distribution network ensures Bubly is available wherever PepsiCo products are sold, including restaurants and smaller retail locations.

Read 2 more paragraphs

Head-to-head taste comparisons consistently show consumer preference variance by flavor: LaCroix's Pamplemousse (grapefruit) and Passionfruit are fan favorites with distinctive flavor identities; Bubly's Mango and Lime are frequently ranked as bolder and more approachable. Blind taste tests often show no consistent winner — both are subtly flavored carbonated waters that rely on fizz level and flavor nuance. Prices are similar: typically $5-7 for a 12-pack in most grocery stores, though Costco and Sam's Club pricing can be significantly lower for both brands.

The summary: LaCroix is the category-creating brand with the strongest loyal following and widest flavor portfolio; Bubly is the PepsiCo-backed challenger with broader distribution, slightly bolder flavors, and marketing muscle. Neither is objectively superior — the choice is primarily flavor preference and where you shop. Many consumers buy both, rotating by flavor.

Drafted with AI from web research. How we research
Last updated
AI-assistedOur methodology