technology3 min read

Iron Dome vs S-400 vs Patriot vs THAAD: Missile Defense Systems Compared

From Israel's Iron Dome to Russia's S-400, we compare the world's most important air defense systems across range, capability, combat record, and cost.

By A Versus B Team|March 21, 2026

Missile Defense Systems Compared: 2026 Guide

With Iran launching thousands of missiles and drones, air defense has never been more relevant. Here's how the world's top systems compare.

Quick Comparison

SystemCountryRangePrimary TargetCombat ProvenCost per Battery
Iron DomeIsrael4-70 kmRockets, dronesYes (10,000+ intercepts)$50M
David's SlingIsrael40-300 kmCruise missilesYes$200M
Arrow 3Israel2,400 km (exo-atmospheric)Ballistic missilesYes$300M+
Patriot PAC-3 MSEUSA160 kmAircraft, ballistic missilesYes$1B+
THAADUSA200 kmBallistic missiles (terminal)Yes (limited)$2B+
S-400 TriumfRussia400 kmAircraft, ballistic missilesLimited$500M
S-300PMU-2Russia200 kmAircraft, cruise missilesLimited (poor in Syria)$300M

Israel's Layered Defense — The Gold Standard

Israel operates the world's only multi-layered missile defense:

Layer 1: Iron Dome — see Iron Dome vs S-400

  • Intercepts short-range rockets (4-70 km)
  • 90%+ success rate against Hamas/Hezbollah rockets
  • AI-based threat assessment (ignores rockets heading for empty areas)

Layer 2: David's Sling

  • Intercepts cruise missiles and large rockets (40-300 km)
  • Fills the gap between Iron Dome and Arrow
  • Used against Iranian cruise missiles

Layer 3: Arrow 2/3

  • Intercepts ballistic missiles outside the atmosphere
  • Arrow 3 can intercept in space (exo-atmospheric)
  • First operational space-interceptor system

US Systems

Patriot PAC-3 MSE — see Patriot vs S-300

  • Hit-to-kill interceptor (no warhead, pure kinetic energy)
  • Combat-proven against ballistic missiles in Ukraine and Middle East
  • NATO standard air defense

THAAD (Terminal High Altitude Area Defense)

  • Intercepts ballistic missiles in terminal phase
  • Higher altitude than Patriot (150 km)
  • Deployed to protect US bases and allies
  • Never used in actual combat against ballistic missiles

Russian Systems

S-400 Triumf

  • Longest range (400 km claimed)
  • Sold to China, India, Turkey
  • Unproven against stealth aircraft or peer adversary
  • Theoretical specs may exceed actual performance

S-300PMU-2

  • Iran's primary long-range air defense
  • Failed to prevent Israeli strikes in Syria
  • Operator skill matters as much as hardware

Key Takeaways

  • Israel has the most proven defense with 10,000+ real interceptions
  • US Patriot is the most combat-proven long-range system
  • Russian S-400 has impressive specs but lacks combat validation against peers
  • No single system is enough — layered defense is essential
  • Mass salvos can overwhelm any defense — Iran's 3,000+ missile strategy is designed to saturate

Conclusion

Israel's layered approach (Iron Dome + David's Sling + Arrow) is the model the world is following. No defense is perfect against thousands of simultaneous missiles, but these systems dramatically reduce the damage from missile attacks.

---

This article is for informational and educational purposes only. System capabilities are based on publicly available data and may not reflect classified performance.

#iron-dome#s-400#patriot#thaad#missile-defense#air-defense#military#2026

Share this article

Share:

Get the best comparisons in your inbox

Weekly digest of trending comparisons, new categories, and expert insights. No spam.

Join 1,000+ readers. Unsubscribe anytime.