Skip to main content
technology3 min read

Iron Dome vs S-400 vs Patriot vs THAAD: Missile Defense Systems Compared

From Israel's Iron Dome to Russia's S-400, we compare the world's most important air defense systems across range, capability, combat record, and cost.

A Versus B Editorial Team

Missile Defense Systems Compared: 2026 Guide#

With Iran launching thousands of missiles and drones, air defense has never been more relevant. Here's how the world's top systems compare.

Quick Comparison#

SystemCountryRangePrimary TargetCombat ProvenCost per Battery
Iron DomeIsrael4-70 kmRockets, dronesYes (10,000+ intercepts)$50M
David's SlingIsrael40-300 kmCruise missilesYes$200M
Arrow 3Israel2,400 km (exo-atmospheric)Ballistic missilesYes$300M+
Patriot PAC-3 MSEUSA160 kmAircraft, ballistic missilesYes$1B+
THAADUSA200 kmBallistic missiles (terminal)Yes (limited)$2B+
S-400 TriumfRussia400 kmAircraft, ballistic missilesLimited$500M
S-300PMU-2Russia200 kmAircraft, cruise missilesLimited (poor in Syria)$300M

Israel's Layered Defense — The Gold Standard#

Israel operates the world's only multi-layered missile defense:

Layer 1: Iron Dome — see Iron Dome vs S-400

  • Intercepts short-range rockets (4-70 km)
  • 90%+ success rate against Hamas/Hezbollah rockets
  • AI-based threat assessment (ignores rockets heading for empty areas)

Layer 2: David's Sling

  • Intercepts cruise missiles and large rockets (40-300 km)
  • Fills the gap between Iron Dome and Arrow
  • Used against Iranian cruise missiles

Layer 3: Arrow 2/3

  • Intercepts ballistic missiles outside the atmosphere
  • Arrow 3 can intercept in space (exo-atmospheric)
  • First operational space-interceptor system

US Systems#

Patriot PAC-3 MSE — see Patriot vs S-300

  • Hit-to-kill interceptor (no warhead, pure kinetic energy)
  • Combat-proven against ballistic missiles in Ukraine and Middle East
  • NATO standard air defense

THAAD (Terminal High Altitude Area Defense)

  • Intercepts ballistic missiles in terminal phase
  • Higher altitude than Patriot (150 km)
  • Deployed to protect US bases and allies
  • Never used in actual combat against ballistic missiles

Russian Systems#

S-400 Triumf

  • Longest range (400 km claimed)
  • Sold to China, India, Turkey
  • Unproven against stealth aircraft or peer adversary
  • Theoretical specs may exceed actual performance

S-300PMU-2

  • Iran's primary long-range air defense
  • Failed to prevent Israeli strikes in Syria
  • Operator skill matters as much as hardware

Key Takeaways#

  • Israel has the most proven defense with 10,000+ real interceptions
  • US Patriot is the most combat-proven long-range system
  • Russian S-400 has impressive specs but lacks combat validation against peers
  • No single system is enough — layered defense is essential
  • Mass salvos can overwhelm any defense — Iran's 3,000+ missile strategy is designed to saturate

Conclusion#

Israel's layered approach (Iron Dome + David's Sling + Arrow) is the model the world is following. No defense is perfect against thousands of simultaneous missiles, but these systems dramatically reduce the damage from missile attacks.

---

This article is for informational and educational purposes only. System capabilities are based on publicly available data and may not reflect classified performance.

#iron-dome#s-400#patriot#thaad#missile-defense#air-defense#military#2026

Share this article

Share:

Get the best comparisons in your inbox

Weekly digest of trending comparisons, new categories, and expert insights. No spam.

Join 1,000+ readers. Unsubscribe anytime.