# Best Slack Alternative 2026: Mattermost vs Microsoft Teams vs Discord for Work Teams
By Daniel Rozin | A Versus B | July 31, 2027
Slack's pricing has pushed many teams to reconsider. At $7.25–$12.50/user/month, Slack is one of the most expensive per-seat collaboration tools in a category where free alternatives now cover most needs. In 2026, four alternatives dominate: Microsoft Teams, Mattermost, Discord, and Rocket.Chat.
---
2026 Pricing Comparison#
Slack#
| Plan | Price/User/Month |
|---|---|
| Free | $0 (90-day message history, 10 integrations) |
| Pro | $7.25 |
| Business+ | $12.50 |
| Enterprise Grid | Custom |
Microsoft Teams#
| Plan | Price/User/Month | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Teams Essentials | $4.00 | Standalone Teams only |
| Microsoft 365 Business Basic | $6.00 | Includes Teams, Exchange, SharePoint, OneDrive |
| Microsoft 365 Business Standard | $12.50 | Adds Office desktop apps |
| Teams Free | $0 | 10,000 message history; basic features |
Key point: For organizations already paying for Microsoft 365 Business Basic ($6/user/month), Teams is essentially free — it's included in the subscription most organizations already have.
Mattermost#
| Plan | Price/User/Month | |
|---|---|---|
| Free (Self-Hosted) | $0 | Unlimited users; community support |
| Professional (Self-Hosted) | $10 | LDAP, AD, advanced permissions |
| Enterprise (Self-Hosted) | $30 | Compliance, advanced security, support |
| Cloud Free | $0 | 10K messages; 10 integrations |
| Cloud Professional | $10 | Unlimited |
Mattermost self-hosted free is genuinely unlimited — no message history caps, no user limits. You provide the infrastructure (an AWS t3.medium handles teams under 100 users).
Discord#
| Plan | Price/User/Month | |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 (unlimited message history) | |
| Nitro (individual boost) | $9.99/user/month | |
| Server Boost | $4.99/month/boost | Adds server perks |
Discord has no "business" plan — but it's free for unlimited users with permanent message history, making it surprisingly capable for non-enterprise teams.
---
Feature Comparison#
| Feature | Slack | Teams | Mattermost | Discord |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Message history | 90 days (free) | Unlimited | Unlimited | Unlimited |
| Video calls | Via Huddles | Native (Teams Meetings) | Via integrations | Native (voice channels) |
| File storage | 5GB/workspace (free) | 10GB (with M365) | Self-hosted storage | 25MB/file |
| Threads | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ (forums) |
| Self-hosted option | ✗ | ✗ (Sovereign only) | ✓ | ✗ |
| Open source | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ |
| Integrations | 2,700+ | 700+ | 700+ plugins | Limited |
| Screen sharing | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Async video | ✓ (Clips) | ✓ (Clipchamp) | ✓ | ✗ |
| Guest access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
---
Best Slack Alternative by Use Case#
For Microsoft 365 Organizations → Microsoft Teams#
If your team already uses Outlook, OneDrive, Word, Excel, or Azure AD, Teams is the obvious choice. It integrates natively with every Microsoft product, supports video meetings with up to 1,000 participants, and is included in the M365 subscription you're already paying. The main downside vs Slack: Teams' channel/thread model is more confusing, and the UX is less polished. But the integration with Microsoft Graph (search, permissions, compliance) is unmatched in the Microsoft ecosystem.
For Security/Privacy-Focused Organizations → Mattermost#
Government agencies, healthcare systems, financial institutions, and defense contractors choose Mattermost because:
- Self-hosted: data never leaves your network; air-gapped deployment possible
- Open source: auditable code, no black-box data collection
- Compliance: HIPAA, FedRAMP, GDPR controls built-in at the Enterprise tier
- E2E encryption: Enterprise encryption for messages at rest and in transit
The tradeoff: you manage the infrastructure. An IT team is required to run self-hosted Mattermost properly, including updates, backups, and SSL.
For Developer Communities & Gaming → Discord#
Discord's killer features for developer teams:
- Permanent message history on the free plan (Slack charges for this)
- Voice channels that are always-on (no need to "start a call")
- Community server features (roles, public/private channels, bots)
- Excellent mobile app with low latency voice
Discord lacks enterprise features (SAML SSO, directory sync, compliance tools) that corporate IT requires. It's excellent for open-source projects, developer communities, gaming studios, and small creative teams.
For Dev-Forward Tech Companies → Rocket.Chat#
Rocket.Chat (not in our main comparison) is worth mentioning: open-source, self-hosted, with an interface nearly identical to Slack. Pricing: Free self-hosted (like Mattermost); $7/user/month cloud.
---
Making the Switch: What You'll Lose vs Gain#
Leaving Slack for Teams:
- Lose: cleaner UX, better third-party integrations, Slackbot automations
- Gain: native video meetings, M365 integration, lower cost in M365 bundle
Leaving Slack for Mattermost:
- Lose: breadth of Slack app integrations, polish of UX, Slack-Connect for external team messaging
- Gain: full data ownership, self-hosted control, significant cost savings at scale
Leaving Slack for Discord:
- Lose: enterprise compliance, directory sync, formal workflow tools
- Gain: free unlimited message history, always-on voice, community features
---
2026 Verdict#
For the full Slack vs Mattermost comparison, see Mattermost vs Slack.
- Microsoft 365 orgs: Switch to Teams — it's already paid for.
- Security-first orgs: Choose Mattermost self-hosted — the data control is worth the infrastructure overhead.
- Developer communities / small async teams: Discord is free, has permanent history, and has excellent voice channels.
- Everyone else: Slack remains the best-in-class UX for product teams, but the pricing is increasingly hard to justify vs Teams for orgs already in M365.
Share this article
Get the best comparisons in your inbox
Weekly digest of trending comparisons, new categories, and expert insights. No spam.
Join 1,000+ readers · Unsubscribe anytime
Related Comparisons
3 head-to-head comparisons