Webflow is a visual, no-code web design platform ideal for designers building custom sites without coding, while WordPress is a content management system requiring more technical setup but offering unmatched plugin ecosystem and lower hosting costs. Webflow charges $12-165/month for hosting included, whereas WordPress requires separate hosting ($2-50/month) plus paid plugins and themes.
Webflow vs WordPress — Side-by-side comparison on A Versus B
Choose Webflow if you're a designer or agency building premium custom websites with full visual control and want an all-in-one platform—the hosted solution eliminates infrastructure complexity. Choose WordPress if you're managing content-heavy sites, need maximum plugin flexibility on a budget, run a blog, or prefer established hosting independence—the ecosystem and lower total cost of ownership win for long-term scaling.
Visual web design and hosting platform with built-in CMS and ecommerce, no coding required.
Open-source content management system powering 43% of all websites with massive plugin ecosystem.
Structured comparison data for Webflow vs WordPress with 226 attributes.
Monthly Newsletter Subscriber Allowance (Free Tier)
Monthly Bandwidth Included (Starter Plan)
Reported Security Vulnerabilities (2024)
Webflow vs WordPress — Attribute Category Vocabulary
Taxonomy of attribute categories used to classify comparison data for Webflow vs WordPress.
Is Webflow cheaper than WordPress long-term?
No. Webflow's $12-165/month hosting costs $144-1980/year minimum, while WordPress hosting averages $5-20/month ($60-240/year). Even with $500/year in premium WordPress plugins, WordPress totals $560-740/year versus Webflow's minimum $144/year. However, Webflow eliminates server management costs and technical expertise needed for WordPress security/backups, which can cost agencies $50-200/month to outsource.
Can I switch from Webflow to WordPress later?
Partially. Webflow exports clean HTML/CSS code, but you'll lose Webflow's visual builder setup and must manually migrate to WordPress architecture. Content migration is manual (Webflow CMS doesn't have native WordPress export). Most users hire developers ($2000-5000) to rebuild on WordPress if switching. WordPress exports to other platforms more easily via native tools.
Both rank equally well when configured properly. Webflow includes built-in SEO tools, HTTP/2, CDN, and automatic sitemap generation. WordPress requires installing Yoast SEO or Rank Math ($99-199/year) for equivalent features. Both platforms generate clean code and are Google-crawlable. The deciding factor is execution: a well-optimized Webflow site beats a neglected WordPress site, and vice versa.
WordPress has larger community support (forums, 15+ years of documentation, Stack Overflow) but no official company support—support comes from hosting providers or paid developers. Webflow offers official 24/5 support, community forums, and extensive tutorials, but the smaller ecosystem means fewer third-party resources. For technical issues, WordPress community responses are usually faster; for platform features, Webflow support is more direct.
Yes, but differently. WordPress beginners can publish content immediately with Gutenberg editor (1-2 hours setup), but customizing design or building complex sites requires PHP knowledge. Webflow beginners must learn the visual builder (2-3 weeks) but never need to code. For non-technical content creators, WordPress wins; for non-technical designers, Webflow wins.