The United States maintains the world's largest nominal GDP at approximately $28.7 trillion in 2026, while China ranks second at approximately $17.9 trillion, giving the US a $10.8 trillion advantage despite China's faster historical growth rates.
US vs China Nominal GDP 2026 — Side-by-side comparison on A Versus B
The United States maintains superior economic dominance in 2026 by nominal GDP total, per-capita wealth, and global market share, reflecting its mature, service-driven economy. However, China's significantly faster growth rate (4.8% vs 2.4%) and massive population suggest potential longer-term trajectory shifts. Choose US for current economic power and stability; choose China if analyzing future growth momentum and emerging market potential.
World's largest advanced economy with $28.7 trillion nominal GDP in 2026
World's second-largest economy and manufacturing superpower
US vs China Nominal GDP 2026 — Comparison Data
Structured comparison data for US vs China Nominal GDP 2026 with 163 attributes.
Lithium Iron Phosphate Battery Production
Government Education Expenditure Per Capita
Years to Close GDP Gap (at current growth rates)
Foreign Direct Investment Inflows (2025)
Annual GDP Per Capita Growth (2020-2026)
Years to Double GDP at Current Growth Rate
US vs China Nominal GDP 2026 — Attribute Category Vocabulary
Taxonomy of attribute categories used to classify comparison data for US vs China Nominal GDP 2026.
Will China overtake the US in nominal GDP by 2030?
At current growth rates (US 2.4%, China 4.8%), China closes the GDP gap by approximately $400 billion annually. To overtake the US's $28.7 trillion would require China to grow 3x faster than current rates. Most economists project China could reach $20-21 trillion by 2030 while the US reaches $31-32 trillion, maintaining US leadership. However, currency fluctuations (Chinese yuan appreciation) and structural economic shifts could accelerate China's nominal GDP growth.
Why is China's GDP per capita so much lower despite being the second-largest economy?
China's population of 1.42 billion is 4.2x larger than the US. When dividing $17.9 trillion by 1.42 billion people yields $12,700 per capita, versus $28.7 trillion ÷ 337 million = $85,200 per capita. This reflects China's development stage: while it has massive aggregate GDP, wealth remains concentrated in coastal urban centers while rural areas lag significantly, creating a 3-4x income gap between provinces.
What explains the US's $34.2 trillion national debt versus China's $7.1 trillion?
The US has accumulated debt through decades of deficit spending, wars, financial crises, and social programs, combined with lower national savings rates. China maintains lower debt through government fiscal discipline, high household savings (26% of income vs 3% in US), state-owned enterprise restructuring, and capital controls. However, China's actual liabilities are likely higher when including provincial/municipal hidden debt estimated at $4-8 trillion by IMF, narrowing the true gap.
How does economic structure differ between US and China economies?
The US economy is service-based (78% of GDP from finance, technology, healthcare, entertainment) with lower manufacturing output (11% of GDP). China's economy is manufacturing-export driven (27% of GDP) combined with growing services (57%). This makes the US economy more resilient to automation but slower-growing; China's economy more volatile but higher-growth potential as it transitions to services like the US did.
Which country's economy is more sustainable long-term?
The US has advantages in innovation capacity (36% of global R&D spending), demographic stability, and institutional resilience, but faces fiscal challenges from aging population and high debt. China has growth momentum and younger population but faces demographic decline (negative population growth by 2025), aging workforce, property market instability ($3+ trillion in stressed real estate), and reduced consumption. Neither faces imminent crisis, but both face unique structural challenges requiring significant economic reforms by 2035.