Minnesota Timberwolves vs Golden State Warriors - Player Stats Comparison
The Timberwolves feature Karl-Anthony Towns and Anthony Edwards as primary scorers with strong defensive versatility, while the Warriors rely on Stephen Curry's elite playmaking and three-point shooting alongside Klay Thompson's perimeter scoring.
Minnesota Timberwolves vs Golden State Warriors - Player Stats Comparison — Side-by-side comparison on A Versus B
The Warriors excel in perimeter shooting, ball movement, and bench depth with Stephen Curry's elite scoring and playmaking, making them the superior offensive team. The Timberwolves counter with elite defense and rebounding, creating a contrasting playstyle. Choose the Warriors if you value three-point volume and offensive efficiency; choose the Timberwolves if defensive intensity and paint presence matter more.
Compare Minnesota Timberwolves vs Golden State Warriors
Elite defensive roster led by Anthony Edwards and Karl-Anthony Towns
Offensive firepower led by Stephen Curry and Klay Thompson's elite three-point shooting
Defensive Rating (Points Allowed per 100 Possessions)
Minnesota Timberwolves vs Golden State Warriors - Player Stats Comparison — Comparison Data
Structured comparison data for Minnesota Timberwolves vs Golden State Warriors - Player Stats Comparison with 96 attributes.
Current Win-Loss Record (2024-25 season)
Net Rating (scoring margin per 100 possessions)
Average Regular Season Wins Per Year (2010-2024)
Minnesota Timberwolves vs Golden State Warriors - Player Stats Comparison — Attribute Category Vocabulary
Taxonomy of attribute categories used to classify comparison data for Minnesota Timberwolves vs Golden State Warriors - Player Stats Comparison.
Who is the better scorer between Anthony Edwards and Stephen Curry?
Stephen Curry averages 26.8 PPG compared to Anthony Edwards' 24.3 PPG. However, Edwards has a higher field goal percentage (47%) while Curry's scoring comes from higher-volume three-point shooting (245+ makes). Both are All-Star caliber scorers with different styles—Curry excels at volume and range, Edwards at efficiency and versatility.
Which team has better three-point shooting?
The Golden State Warriors shoot 38.7% from three-point range, ranking 2nd in the NBA, compared to the Timberwolves' 35.2%. This 3.5-percentage-point difference translates to approximately 6-8 more successful threes per 100 attempts. The Warriors' shooting advantage comes from their system design and multiple elite three-point shooters (Curry, Thompson, Moody).
Who has the better defense: Timberwolves or Warriors?
The Timberwolves significantly outdefend the Warriors with a 110.4 defensive rating versus the Warriors' 115.2 DRTG (4.8-point gap). The Timberwolves rank in the top 5 defensively with versatile perimeter defenders and shot-blockers, while the Warriors' defense relies more on system execution. In head-to-head matchups, the Timberwolves' defensive intensity typically poses greater challenges.
The Warriors' bench significantly outscores the Timberwolves' bench, averaging 22.1 PPG compared to 18.4 PPG—a difference of 3.7 points per game. This depth allows the Warriors to maintain offensive momentum during rotations and provides more offensive flexibility throughout games.
What are the key statistical advantages for each team?
Warriors lead in: three-point shooting (38.7% vs 35.2%), assists (27.3 vs 25.6 APG), bench scoring (22.1 vs 18.4 PPG), and overall field goal percentage (48.3% vs 46.8%). Timberwolves lead in: defensive rating (110.4 vs 115.2), offensive rebounding (11.8% vs 8.9%), and turnovers (13.1% vs 14.2%). The matchup favors offense-heavy Warriors but gives defensive-minded Timberwolves systematic advantages.