San Antonio Spurs vs Oklahoma City Thunder
The Oklahoma City Thunder lead the 2025-26 season series with superior offensive efficiency (115.2 PPG vs 108.7 PPG) and a younger, more athletic roster, while the Spurs show improved three-point shooting (37.2% vs 34.8%) under their recent coaching changes.
San Antonio Spurs vs Oklahoma City Thunder — Side-by-side comparison on A Versus B
The Oklahoma City Thunder are the stronger team in 2025-26, demonstrating superior offensive efficiency, better perimeter defense, and more depth with their younger roster. Choose the Thunder if you're betting on consistency and long-term contention; choose the Spurs if you appreciate grit, excellent three-point shooting, and a coaching staff attempting a rebuild with emerging talent.
Compare San Antonio Spurs vs Oklahoma City Thunder
NBA team averaging 108.7 PPG with elite three-point shooting (37.2%) in 2025-26 season.
NBA team with league-leading 115.2 PPG and top-10 defense (109.8 rating) in 2025-26.
Defensive Rating (Points Allowed Per 100)
San Antonio Spurs vs Oklahoma City Thunder — Comparison Data
Structured comparison data for San Antonio Spurs vs Oklahoma City Thunder with 129 attributes.
Average Regular Season Wins Per Year (2010-2024)
Current Win-Loss Record (2024-25 season)
Net Rating (scoring margin per 100 possessions)
Nikola Jokic vs Shai Gilgeous-Alexander (Best Player Comparison)
San Antonio Spurs vs Oklahoma City Thunder — Attribute Category Vocabulary
Taxonomy of attribute categories used to classify comparison data for San Antonio Spurs vs Oklahoma City Thunder.
Why does Oklahoma City dominate San Antonio in their matchups?
The Thunder's superior athletic defense (109.8 rating vs 113.4) combined with their higher offensive efficiency (115.2 PPG vs 108.7 PPG) creates a two-way advantage. Oklahoma City's younger roster transitions faster defensively, limiting the Spurs' three-point shot creators. Additionally, Thunder's 28.9 APG vs Spurs' 27.3 APG shows OKC's superior ball movement overwhelms San Antonio's half-court defensive schemes.
What is the Spurs' biggest strength against elite teams?
San Antonio's 37.2% three-point shooting (4th in NBA) is their signature strength, nearly 2.4 percentage points better than Oklahoma City's 34.8%. Combined with their 79.4% free throw shooting, the Spurs can execute high-efficiency perimeter-based offenses. This spacing is designed to exploit defensive weaknesses in playoff matchups where elite teams rely on interior defense.
Is Oklahoma City's youth a sustainability concern?
While youth (25.1 avg age) can create consistency issues during high-pressure playoff moments, the Thunder's current 115.2 PPG and 109.8 defensive rating suggest stability. Their elite playmaking (28.9 APG) indicates mature decision-making. However, comparisons to historical young teams show that maintaining such efficiency requires proven playoff success, which OKC is still building.
How do the teams' roster construction differ philosophically?
San Antonio invests in veteran experience (28.4 avg age) with a focus on shooting and skill development, typical of a rebuilding phase. Oklahoma City builds around younger, athletic versatility with emphasis on perimeter defense and transition offense. The Spurs are building incrementally; the Thunder are positioned for immediate contention.
What does the 3-1 series record mean for playoff positioning?
Oklahoma City's dominance in head-to-head play suggests superior execution in playoff-style intensity games. The Thunder's balanced offensive and defensive approach (both top-10) gives them advantages in elimination scenarios. San Antonio would need to emphasize their three-point advantage and control pace to overcome this disparity in a playoff series.