Miro is a visual collaboration platform optimized for real-time whiteboarding and diagramming with teams, while Notion is an all-in-one workspace for documentation, databases, and project management. Miro excels at visual brainstorming; Notion excels at centralized information organization.
Miro vs Notion — Side-by-side comparison on A Versus B
Choose Miro if your team needs real-time visual collaboration, brainstorming, and diagramming with minimal setup friction. Choose Notion if you want a centralized knowledge base, complex databases, and documentation hub that replaces multiple tools, accepting a steeper learning curve.
Visual collaboration platform for real-time whiteboarding, diagramming, and brainstorming.
All-in-one workspace platform combining databases, documents, wikis, and project management tools.
Structured comparison data for Miro vs Notion with 441 attributes.
Starter Plan Monthly Cost (Annual Billing)
Monthly Cost Per User (Team Plan, Annual Billing)
Maximum Concurrent Users Per Board/Workspace
Free Tier Monthly Recording/Creation Limit
Monthly Subscription Cost (Personal Plan)
Maximum Database Rows (optimal performance)
Real-time Simultaneous Collaborators (unlimited tier)
Native Data Visualization (charts, pivots)
Max Database Items Before Performance Degradation
Starting Price per User/Month (Annual Billing)
Base Monthly Cost Per User (Annual Billing)
Miro vs Notion — Attribute Category Vocabulary
Taxonomy of attribute categories used to classify comparison data for Miro vs Notion.
Can I use Miro for project management and task tracking?
Miro has limited native project management features. While you can create task lists and kanban boards on the canvas, Notion excels here with dedicated kanban views, timeline tracking, and task dependencies. For comprehensive project management, Notion is the better choice; Miro is best used as a visual planning tool integrated with dedicated PM software like Jira or Asana.
Which is better for building a team knowledge base or company wiki?
Notion is significantly better for this use case. Its hierarchical page structure, advanced search, backlinks, and wiki-style organization make it ideal for centralizing documentation. Miro lacks native search and organizational hierarchy, making it unsuitable as a primary knowledge repository. Use Miro for visual diagrams within Notion pages, not as the primary wiki tool.
Can both tools handle large teams (100+ people)?
Yes, both scale to large organizations. Miro offers enterprise SSO, advanced permissions, and dedicated support at $1,200+/year per user. Notion scales similarly with team workspaces, granular access controls, and enterprise pricing (~$10-15/user/month). Miro's advantage: real-time sync at scale. Notion's advantage: centralized knowledge management for large groups.
Miro's mobile app (iOS/Android) supports real-time editing and maintains the visual experience, making it functional for collaboration on-the-go. Notion's mobile app is primarily for viewing and light editing; it's not optimized for creating complex content. If mobile collaboration is critical, Miro has the edge. For reference, Miro's mobile app has 4.6/5 stars (200K+ reviews) vs. Notion's 4.4/5 stars (300K+ reviews).
Do I need both, or can one replace the other?
They serve different purposes and are not direct replacements. Most teams use both: Notion as the central workspace for documentation, databases, and SOPs; Miro for synchronous brainstorming, design sprints, and visual collaboration sessions. Using them together (with Miro embeds in Notion) is the optimal setup. Neither replaces the other—they complement each other.