Loom is an async video messaging platform focused on screen recording and video communication, while Slack is a real-time chat and collaboration hub that integrates with 2,000+ apps. Loom excels at asynchronous video documentation, whereas Slack dominates team messaging and workflow automation.
Loom vs Slack — Side-by-side comparison on A Versus B
Choose Loom if your team needs to reduce synchronous meetings, create video documentation, and communicate asynchronously across time zones—it's ideal for onboarding, tutorials, and feedback delivery. Choose Slack if you need a central hub for real-time team communication, workflow automation, and broad third-party integrations across your entire organization.
Asynchronous video messaging platform for screen recording and video communication.
Team messaging and workflow automation platform with video and screen sharing capabilities.
Structured comparison data for Loom vs Slack with 263 attributes.
Free Tier Monthly Recording/Creation Limit
Average Setup Time for New Recording/Meeting
AI Transcription Support (Standard Tier)
Auto-Generated Captions Languages Supported
Paid Workspaces/Users (Enterprise Adoption)
Annual Subscription Cost (Pro, 100 users)
Maximum video call participants (free tier)
Monthly Subscription Cost (Pro/Standard)
Maximum Video Conference Participants (Free)
Cost Per User (Annual, Lowest Paid Tier)
Monthly Cost Per User (Standard Tier, Annual Billing)
Maximum Video Conference Participants (Standard Plan)
Paying Organizations/Enterprise Customers
Loom vs Slack — Attribute Category Vocabulary
Taxonomy of attribute categories used to classify comparison data for Loom vs Slack.
Yes, Loom integrates directly with Slack. You can share Loom videos to Slack channels and DMs with a single click, and receive Slack notifications when someone comments on your video. This makes them highly complementary—Loom for async video documentation and Slack for team coordination.
Which is better for distributed, remote-first teams?
Loom is specifically designed for async-first teams across time zones, reducing meeting fatigue by replacing live calls with recorded videos. Slack works well too but encourages real-time messaging that can disrupt deep work. Many distributed teams use both: Slack for coordination and Loom for substantive communication.
How much will it cost for a 50-person team annually?
Loom: ~$9,000/year (at $15/user/month billed annually at $180/user). Slack: ~$4,800/year (at $8/user/month billed annually at $96/user). Slack is 47% cheaper at scale, though total cost-of-ownership depends on which other apps you integrate.
Does Slack have video recording features like Loom?
Slack has built-in video calls and screen sharing but not dedicated video recording and playback like Loom. You can record Slack calls using third-party integrations (e.g., Otter.ai, Fireflies), but there's no native async video messaging equivalent to Loom's core feature.
Which requires less onboarding and training?
Slack has a gentler onboarding curve for most teams since it's familiar group chat (like text messaging scaled up). Loom requires users to adopt the mindset of recording videos instead of talking, which adds friction initially but pays dividends in async-heavy cultures. Both have <2 hour learning curves.