Google Meet excels as a standalone video conferencing solution with simpler setup and lower costs, while Microsoft Teams offers superior integration with enterprise productivity tools and richer collaboration features through Microsoft 365. Teams is better for organizations already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem, while Meet suits smaller teams and budget-conscious users.
Google Meet vs Microsoft Teams — Side-by-side comparison on A Versus B
Choose Google Meet if you prioritize cost-effectiveness, simplicity, and don't need deep Microsoft tool integration—it's ideal for startups, remote teams, and educational institutions. Choose Microsoft Teams if your organization uses Microsoft 365, requires advanced collaboration features, chat-centric workflows, and premium meeting protection for security-sensitive work.
Google's video conferencing platform integrated with Workspace, emphasizing simplicity and accessibility.
Unified communications platform integrated with Microsoft 365, combining chat, calls, and meetings.
Google Meet vs Microsoft Teams — Comparison Data
Structured comparison data for Google Meet vs Microsoft Teams with 238 attributes.
Maximum Free Tier Group Meeting Duration
Advanced Chat Features (Channels, Threading, Workflows)
Maximum Simultaneous Video Participants (Free)
Enterprise Plan Starting Price (Monthly)
3-Year Total Cost of Ownership (1,000 users)
Enterprise Deployment Adoption (500+ seat orgs)
3-Year TCO Advantage for 1,000 Users with M365
Annual Subscription Cost (Pro, 100 users)
Free Tier Meeting Duration for Group Calls
Global Enterprise Video Conferencing Market Share (2024)
Monthly Subscription Cost (Pro/Standard)
Annual TCO (1,000 users, 3-year average)
Maximum Video Conference Participants (Free)
Google Meet vs Microsoft Teams — Attribute Category Vocabulary
Taxonomy of attribute categories used to classify comparison data for Google Meet vs Microsoft Teams.
Yes — Google Meet is free for personal use through a Gmail account. The free tier allows meetings with up to 100 participants, unlimited 1-hour meetings (reduced from 24 hours), and includes core features like screen sharing, background blur, real-time captions, and noise cancellation. The 60-minute limit applies to 3+ participant meetings in the free tier. For Google Workspace business accounts (starting at $6/user/month for Business Starter), Google Meet has no time limits and supports more participants (100-1,000 depending on tier) with additional features like meeting recordings, attendance tracking, and noise cancellation AI. For comparison, Zoom's free tier also has a 40-minute limit for 3+ participants, and Microsoft Teams requires a Microsoft 365 subscription for full enterprise functionality (though Teams has a free tier for small organizations). Google Meet is also accessible without creating a Google account — external participants can join via link in any modern browser without installing software.
Why do companies use Teams instead of Meet or Zoom?
Microsoft Teams wins in enterprise deployments primarily because it's included with Microsoft 365 licenses that most large organizations already pay for, and because it unifies video conferencing, persistent chat, file collaboration, and VoIP calling in a single application. The total-cost-of-ownership argument is powerful: a company already paying $12.50/user/month for Microsoft 365 Business Standard gets Teams at no additional cost versus paying separately for Zoom at $15-$20/user/month or Google Workspace at $12/user/month. Teams' integration with Outlook (the dominant enterprise email), SharePoint, and OneDrive creates workflow continuity — meetings launch from calendar, documents open from Teams, files save to SharePoint automatically. Teams Phone (VoIP) allows organizations to consolidate their business phone system into Teams, eliminating separate PBX costs. The compliance controls (conditional access, DLP, eDiscovery) required by regulated industries (finance, healthcare, legal, government) are more mature in Teams. The trade-off: Teams is complex and has a steeper learning curve than Zoom or Meet.
Can Google Meet and Microsoft Teams work together?
Yes, to a limited extent. Both platforms support guest/external participant access: a Microsoft Teams user can join a Google Meet call via link in their browser (no Teams app needed), and vice versa. However, native interoperability between the two platforms requires additional middleware. Microsoft Teams supports 'Direct Guest Join' for interop with Cisco Webex and Zoom Rooms-certified hardware — but not native Google Meet hardware. Google Meet hardware (Series One devices) can join Microsoft Teams meetings via a browser-based workaround. For organizations that need cross-platform meeting rooms (where a Teams-based conference room joins a Meet call, and vice versa, with a click), solutions like Pexip or Cisco Meeting Server provide enterprise-grade video interoperability. For most users, the practical answer is: if you need to meet with someone on a different platform, share a link and have them join via browser — both Meet and Teams support browser-based guest access without account requirements.
Yes — Google Meet has comprehensive AI features in 2026 as part of Google's Gemini AI integration. Core AI features available in Google Meet: (1) Automatic captions with real-time translation — transcribes meeting audio in real-time in 60+ languages, free in most Workspace tiers; (2) Meeting summaries — Gemini generates a post-meeting summary with action items; (3) 'Take notes for me' — Gemini actively listens and creates a structured notes document in Google Docs during the meeting; (4) AI noise cancellation — filters background noise algorithmically without requiring specific hardware; (5) Intelligent framing — automatically adjusts camera angle to keep speakers centered. Advanced AI features (meeting summaries, 'take notes for me') are part of Google Workspace's Gemini add-on or included in Enterprise tiers. Microsoft's Copilot for Teams ($30/user/month add-on) provides comparable functionality including intelligent meeting recaps, action item extraction, and the ability to query past meeting content. Both platforms have made AI assistance a core differentiator from Zoom.