Google Meet excels as a standalone video conferencing solution with simpler setup and lower costs, while Microsoft Teams offers superior integration with enterprise productivity tools and richer collaboration features through Microsoft 365. Teams is better for organizations already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem, while Meet suits smaller teams and budget-conscious users.
Google Meet vs Microsoft Teams — Side-by-side comparison on A Versus B
Choose Google Meet if you prioritize cost-effectiveness, simplicity, and don't need deep Microsoft tool integration—it's ideal for startups, remote teams, and educational institutions. Choose Microsoft Teams if your organization uses Microsoft 365, requires advanced collaboration features, chat-centric workflows, and premium meeting protection for security-sensitive work.
Enterprise video conferencing platform with AI-powered features and Google Workspace integration
Enterprise collaboration platform integrated with Microsoft 365 suite, offering messaging, video calls, and Office app integration.
Google Meet vs Microsoft Teams — Comparison Data
Structured comparison data for Google Meet vs Microsoft Teams with 166 attributes.
Maximum Free Tier Group Meeting Duration
Advanced Chat Features (Channels, Threading, Workflows)
3-Year Total Cost of Ownership (1,000 users)
Enterprise Deployment Adoption (500+ seat orgs)
3-Year TCO Advantage for 1,000 Users with M365
Annual Subscription Cost (Pro, 100 users)
Free Tier Meeting Duration for Group Calls
Global Enterprise Video Conferencing Market Share (2024)
Monthly Subscription Cost (Pro/Standard)
Annual TCO (1,000 users, 3-year average)
Maximum Video Conference Participants (Free)
Google Meet vs Microsoft Teams — Attribute Category Vocabulary
Taxonomy of attribute categories used to classify comparison data for Google Meet vs Microsoft Teams.
Which is cheaper for a small team of 10 people?
Google Meet is significantly cheaper. A small team can use Google Meet's free tier indefinitely for unlimited group video calls up to 24 hours. If you need premium features like advanced analytics, you'd pay $10/user/month for Google Workspace Business Standard. Microsoft Teams requires at least $6/user/month for Teams Essentials (100GB cloud storage) or $12.50+/user/month for full Microsoft 365 integration. For a 10-person team, that's $60-125/month for Teams vs. $0-100/month for Meet.
Does Google Meet have AI meeting notes like Teams?
Yes, as of April 2026, Google Meet's 'Take Notes for me' feature generates automatic meeting summaries and action items at no extra cost. Microsoft Teams offers similar AI meeting recaps, but only through Teams Premium at $10/user/month. This gives Google Meet a pricing advantage for AI-powered meeting documentation.
Is Teams better for companies already using Microsoft 365?
Absolutely. Teams integrates deeply with Microsoft 365 apps (Outlook, Excel, Word, SharePoint, OneDrive), enabling seamless file sharing, co-authoring, and workflow automation. If your company uses Microsoft 365 for email, documents, and project management, Teams becomes a central hub that multiplies productivity. Google Meet works best with Google Workspace but lacks these tight integrations with Microsoft tools.
Which platform has better security for enterprise use?
Microsoft Teams has superior enterprise security certifications including advanced threat protection, data loss prevention (DLP), and compliance with standards like HIPAA, FedRAMP, and ISO 27001. Teams Premium ($10/user/month) adds advanced meeting protection, recording encryption, and audit logs. Google Meet meets basic compliance standards (SOC 2, ISO 27001) but lacks the depth of security features for highly regulated industries like healthcare and finance.
Can I use Google Meet and Teams together in one organization?
Yes, many organizations run both platforms in parallel. Some teams prefer Meet's simplicity for quick video calls while using Teams for chat-based collaboration and Microsoft 365 integration. However, this creates fragmentation and increases admin burden. Most enterprises standardize on one platform to streamline communication and reduce tool sprawl.