Figma is a design and prototyping tool primarily for creating UI/UX mockups and collaborative design systems, while Webflow is a no-code web builder focused on designing, building, and hosting production-ready websites. Figma excels at design iteration; Webflow at full-stack web development without coding.
Figma vs Webflow — Side-by-side comparison on A Versus B
Choose Figma if you're a designer or team needing collaborative design systems, wireframes, prototypes, and visual component libraries for web and app projects. Choose Webflow if you need to build, deploy, and host production websites without writing code, with full control over responsive design and site performance. They complement each other: many teams design in Figma, then build in Webflow.
Cloud-based collaborative design platform for UI/UX design, prototyping, and design systems with real-time multiplayer editing.
Comprehensive no-code platform for building production websites, e-commerce stores, and content-driven applications.
Structured comparison data for Figma vs Webflow with 241 attributes.
Monthly Subscription Cost (Single Editor)
Starter Plan Monthly Cost (Annual Billing)
Monthly Subscription Cost (Professional Plan)
Estimated Time to First Design (Beginner)
Figma vs Webflow — Attribute Category Vocabulary
Taxonomy of attribute categories used to classify comparison data for Figma vs Webflow.
Is Webflow suitable for complex web applications?
Webflow handles marketing sites, landing pages, e-commerce stores, and content-heavy websites well. For complex applications requiring real-time databases, custom APIs, or advanced authentication, Webflow has limitations. In those cases, code-first frameworks (React, Vue) are more appropriate.
Yes, and this is a common workflow. Designers create UI mockups and design systems in Figma, then developers or no-code builders import those designs into Webflow to build and deploy the website. Figma's export capabilities and Webflow's design tools are complementary rather than competitive.
Which tool is better for freelance web designers?
It depends on your service model. If you design mockups for clients and hand off to developers, use Figma. If you design AND build complete websites for clients without developer involvement, Webflow is superior because it includes hosting, SEO, and CMS—letting you deliver end-to-end solutions and charge premium rates.
Can Figma generate production-ready code?
Figma can export assets and CSS, but it requires plugins (like Anima or Inspect mode) to generate functional code. This code often needs developer refinement. Webflow, by contrast, generates production-ready, hosted websites directly without manual coding.
What's the total cost difference over 12 months for a small agency?
For a 5-person team: Figma Professional ($12/month × 5 = $60/month = $720/year) + Webflow Basic ($14/month × 2 seats = $28/month = $336/year) totals ~$1,056/year. A single developer using both tools costs approximately $180/year, making this stack cost-effective for freelancers and small agencies.