Figma is a browser-based collaborative design tool with real-time multiplayer editing and superior performance, while InVision is a prototyping and design handoff platform with stronger developer handoff features. Figma dominates the market with 4+ million users versus InVision's declining user base, making it the modern standard for design teams.
Figma vs InVision — Side-by-side comparison on A Versus B
Choose Figma if you need modern, real-time collaborative design with a large active community, superior performance, and cost-efficiency—it's the de facto standard for most design teams in 2026. Choose InVision if your team prioritizes advanced prototype animations, micro-interactions, and best-in-class developer handoff specs, especially if you need a native desktop app for offline work.
Cloud-based collaborative design and prototyping platform with real-time multiplayer editing.
Collaborative design platform built for team workflows, design systems, and stakeholder feedback management.
Structured comparison data for Figma vs InVision with 212 attributes.
Monthly Subscription Cost (Single Editor)
Starter Plan Monthly Cost (Annual Billing)
Monthly Subscription Cost (Professional Plan)
Estimated Time to First Design (Beginner)
Team Collaboration - Simultaneous Editors
Figma vs InVision — Attribute Category Vocabulary
Taxonomy of attribute categories used to classify comparison data for Figma vs InVision.
Can multiple designers work on the same file simultaneously in Figma vs InVision?
Figma supports unlimited real-time multiplayer collaboration in all plans—any editor can jump into a file and see others' cursors and edits live. InVision requires a paid Team tier subscription for real-time collaboration, and the feature is less seamless. Figma's native implementation is significantly faster with lower latency.
Which platform is better for creating interactive prototypes with complex animations?
InVision excels at advanced prototyping with detailed micro-interactions, gesture controls, and complex animation timelines. Figma's prototyping is more basic—suitable for user flows and simple interactions but limited for intricate animations. If animations are critical, InVision is the stronger choice.
What's the difference in pricing for small teams?
Figma's standard editor plan is $12/month vs InVision's $15/month. For a 5-person design team, Figma costs $60/month while InVision costs $75/month. Both offer free tiers, but Figma's free tier allows 3 projects while InVision's free tier is more limited. For budget-conscious teams, Figma has a cost advantage.
Which platform is better for handoff to developers?
InVision has historically provided superior developer specs with detailed measurements, code snippets, and CSS exports built-in. Figma's handoff has improved significantly and now rivals InVision, especially with plugins like Zeplin integration. For enterprise-level developer workflows, InVision still edges ahead, but the gap is narrowing.
Is Figma or InVision being used by more design teams in 2026?
Figma dominates with 4+ million active users compared to InVision's 500K-750K, representing a 5-8x user base advantage. Figma's market share has grown steadily, while InVision's user base has declined. Most new design teams default to Figma, though established teams with InVision investments often continue using it alongside Figma.