FigJam is a real-time collaborative whiteboarding tool designed for visual brainstorming and ideation, while Notion is a comprehensive workspace platform combining databases, docs, wikis, and project management. FigJam excels at synchronous visual collaboration; Notion excels at persistent knowledge management and cross-functional organization.
FigJam vs Notion — Side-by-side comparison on A Versus B
Choose FigJam if your team needs synchronous, real-time visual collaboration for design sprints, brainstorming sessions, workshops, and creative problem-solving. Choose Notion if you need a centralized workspace for documentation, structured data management, team wikis, project tracking, and asynchronous knowledge sharing across distributed teams.
Real-time collaborative whiteboarding platform by Figma for visual brainstorming and design thinking.
All-in-one workspace platform combining databases, documents, wikis, and project management tools.
Real-time Active Collaborators Supported
Structured comparison data for FigJam vs Notion with 420 attributes.
Concurrent Real-Time Collaborators (Free)
Free Tier Monthly Recording/Creation Limit
Monthly Subscription Cost (Personal Plan)
Maximum Database Rows (optimal performance)
Real-time Simultaneous Collaborators (unlimited tier)
Native Data Visualization (charts, pivots)
Max Database Items Before Performance Degradation
Starting Price per User/Month (Annual Billing)
Base Monthly Cost Per User (Annual Billing)
Monthly Cost Per User (Team Plan, Annual Billing)
Maximum Concurrent Users Per Board/Workspace
FigJam vs Notion — Attribute Category Vocabulary
Taxonomy of attribute categories used to classify comparison data for FigJam vs Notion.
Yes. Many teams embed FigJam boards into Notion pages using iframe embeds, or export FigJam session recordings/notes and import them into Notion databases for persistent archival. FigJam handles synchronous ideation; Notion stores the resulting decisions and action items asynchronously.
Which tool is better for remote/distributed teams?
Notion is better for distributed, async-first teams because it prioritizes asynchronous collaboration, comment threads, version history, and persistent documentation. FigJam requires synchronous participation to be most effective. However, FigJam excels when distributed teams can schedule live brainstorming sessions.
Does FigJam replace project management tools like Asana or Monday.com?
No. FigJam is a brainstorming tool; it lacks task assignment, timelines, Gantt charts, and workflow automation. Notion has basic project management via databases and kanban views but lacks advanced features of dedicated PM tools. For serious project management, use FigJam for ideation + Notion/Asana for execution.
FigJam has limited offline support—you can view previously loaded boards but cannot edit. Notion also has limited offline editing; primarily both require active internet. FigJam syncs automatically when reconnected; Notion queues changes and syncs asynchronously.
Migration from FigJam to Notion is manual—you'd screenshot or export boards and recreate structured data in Notion. Migration from Notion to FigJam is impractical (Notion's strength is structured databases; FigJam works with visual elements). Both export capabilities are strong, but data structure differences make full automation difficult.