Bugsnag specializes in application crash reporting and error monitoring with faster setup for developers, while Datadog offers comprehensive full-stack observability covering infrastructure, logs, APM, and security across 600+ integrations. Datadog suits enterprises needing unified monitoring; Bugsnag suits teams prioritizing error handling speed.
Bugsnag vs Datadog — Side-by-side comparison on A Versus B
Choose Bugsnag if your team needs rapid error tracking deployment, wants focused application crash monitoring, and operates with smaller infrastructure footprint—ideal for startups and development-first organizations. Choose Datadog if you require unified observability across infrastructure, applications, logs, security, and need extensive integrations with enterprise tools—essential for large organizations managing complex distributed systems.
Error tracking and crash reporting platform for mobile and web applications
Cloud-native monitoring platform for infrastructure, logs, and application performance across hybrid and multi-cloud environments.
Structured comparison data for Bugsnag vs Datadog with 216 attributes.
APM (Application Performance Monitoring)
Mid-Market Annual Cost (100GB/month ingest)
Default Data Retention (included in pricing)
Base Monthly Pricing (1GB/day ingestion)
Maximum Data Ingestion Per Day (Enterprise)
Typical Enterprise Annual Cost (1000 hosts)
Bugsnag vs Datadog — Attribute Category Vocabulary
Taxonomy of attribute categories used to classify comparison data for Bugsnag vs Datadog.
What's the main difference between Bugsnag and Datadog?
Bugsnag focuses specifically on application error and crash reporting with fast setup, while Datadog provides comprehensive full-stack observability covering infrastructure, applications, logs, APM, and security monitoring. Bugsnag is ideal for error-focused teams; Datadog suits enterprises needing unified visibility across entire systems.
Bugsnag typically works better for small startups due to faster setup (5-10 minutes), more generous free tier (14-day retention, unlimited events), and simpler onboarding for development teams. Datadog's complexity and scaling costs make it better suited for larger organizations with diverse infrastructure needs.
Can Datadog replace Bugsnag, or vice versa?
Datadog can replace Bugsnag since it includes error tracking as part of APM, but many developers prefer Bugsnag's specialized error experience. Bugsnag cannot replace Datadog's infrastructure, security, and compliance monitoring capabilities. The choice depends on whether you need specialized error handling (Bugsnag) or unified observability (Datadog).
Bugsnag charges per-event with simpler pricing that's predictable for moderate event volumes. Datadog uses consumption-based pricing across multiple products (APM, infrastructure, logs, RUM), which can become expensive in high-volume environments—enterprises often spend $20k-$100k+ annually on Datadog, while Bugsnag typically costs $500-$5,000 for equivalent error monitoring.
Which integrates better with DevOps and cloud platforms?
Datadog has 600+ integrations including AWS, Azure, Kubernetes, Docker, GitHub, GitLab, and 1000+ SaaS tools, making it ideal for complex DevOps environments. Bugsnag has 150+ integrations focused on development tools and error management. For teams heavily invested in DevOps and cloud infrastructure, Datadog is significantly better integrated.