Asana is a comprehensive project management platform with advanced reporting, timeline views, and dependency tracking ideal for complex projects, while Trello is a lightweight, visual card-based tool perfect for simple workflows and smaller teams. Asana costs 2-3x more but scales better for enterprise use.
Asana vs Trello — Side-by-side comparison on A Versus B
Choose Asana if you manage complex projects with dependencies, need portfolio-level reporting, work with 10+ person teams, or require sophisticated resource planning. Choose Trello if you prefer simplicity, manage 5 or fewer concurrent projects, have tight budgets, or work with small agile teams where visual card-based workflows suffice.
Enterprise-grade work management platform focused on task hierarchy and timeline planning.
Visual project management platform built on kanban boards for task tracking
Structured comparison data for Asana vs Trello with 198 attributes.
Starting Monthly Cost (per user, annual)
Base Monthly Price (Individual/Starter Plan)
Annual Cost for Full Stack (Single User with AI)
Starting Monthly Price (Per User/Workspace)
iOS & Android App Quality Rating (App Store/Google Play)
Base Monthly Cost Per User (Annual Billing)
Monthly Cost (Single User, Standard Plan)
Professional Plan Price (Per User/Month)
Asana vs Trello — Attribute Category Vocabulary
Taxonomy of attribute categories used to classify comparison data for Asana vs Trello.
Which is better for small teams (under 5 people)?
Trello is superior for small teams. Its $5/user/month pricing, 1-2 day learning curve, and visual Kanban interface make it ideal. You'll save $30-50/month per person compared to Asana while maintaining full functionality for simple workflows. Only switch to Asana if your projects involve complex dependencies or you need portfolio-level reporting.
Which handles complex projects with multiple dependencies?
Asana is the clear winner. It has native Gantt timelines with dependency tracking, prerequisite sequencing, and critical path visualization—features Trello lacks entirely. Trello requires workaround Power-Ups that add cost and complexity. If your projects have task A→B→C sequencing or resource constraints, Asana's $10.99/user cost is justified.
Yes, migration is possible but manual. Asana lacks native Trello import, so you'll need to use third-party tools like Zapier or manually recreate boards. For teams with 50+ cards, this takes 4-8 hours. Trello→Asana transfer loses some custom field data. Plan 1-2 days for full migration including team training on Asana's interface.
Which has better reporting for executive stakeholders?
Asana dominates in reporting. It offers portfolio dashboards, burndown charts, custom KPI reports, and team capacity analytics—all native. Trello provides only basic activity logs and card counts. If you need monthly executive summaries, progress tracking, or burndown visualization, Asana is mandatory. Trello requires custom Power-Ups that don't provide equivalent depth.
What are the total costs for a 10-person team annually?
Asana costs $1,318.80/year ($10.99 × 10 × 12), while Trello costs $600/year ($5 × 10 × 12)—a $718.80 annual difference. However, Asana's superior reporting, workload management, and dependency tracking may save 5-10 hours/week in project overhead for larger teams, offsetting the cost premium. For small teams, Trello's savings are material.