Samsung Galaxy dominates with superior camera systems (up to 200MP), faster processors, and 7 years of OS updates, while Motorola offers better value with near-stock Android, faster software updates, and lower prices starting at $150 versus Samsung's $800+ flagship range.
Samsung Galaxy vs Motorola — Side-by-side comparison on A Versus B
Premium Android flagship line with industry-leading displays and 7-year software support
Value-focused Android phones with near-stock Android, fast updates, and competitive pricing across budget to mid-premium segments.
Starting Price. Main Camera Megapixels (Flagship). OS Update Guarantee. Software Bloatware. Processor (Flagship 2025). Display Refresh Rate (Budget Model). Market Share Globally. Wired Charging Speed (Flagship). IP Water Resistance Breadth. AI Features Depth. Long-Term Software Support. Wired Charging Speed (Flagship). IP Water Resistance Breadth. AI Features Depth. Long-Term Software Support
Choose Samsung Galaxy if you want cutting-edge camera technology, longest software support, premium build quality, and don't mind paying top dollar for flagship performance. Choose Motorola if you prioritize affordability, minimal bloatware, stock Android experience, and value rapid security updates over extended OS support.
Samsung Galaxy: $899 (Galaxy S25) | Motorola: N/A
Samsung Galaxy: All major carriers (Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile) | Motorola: N/A
Samsung Galaxy: 3120 × 1440 (QHD+) | Motorola: N/A
Samsung Galaxy: OneUI adoption varies by region | Motorola: N/A
Samsung Galaxy: 39% boost vs Gen 4 | Motorola: N/A
Samsung Galaxy: 24% greater processing | Motorola: N/A
Samsung Galaxy: Triple rear camera | Motorola: N/A
Samsung Galaxy: 4-5 years typical | Motorola: N/A
Samsung Galaxy: $800 (Galaxy S25) | Motorola: $150 (Moto G14)
Samsung Galaxy: 200MP (S25 Ultra) | Motorola: 50MP (Edge 50 Pro)
Samsung Galaxy: 7 years | Motorola: 3 years
Samsung Galaxy: 2000 nits | Motorola: 1200 nits
Samsung Galaxy: 18 apps (One UI) | Motorola: 6 apps (Stock Android)
Samsung Galaxy: 4000 mAh (A55) | Motorola: 4500 mAh (G54)
Samsung Galaxy: 45 days (varies by carrier) | Motorola: 7 days (nearly unlocked)
Samsung Galaxy: 50MP-200MP | Motorola: N/A
Samsung Galaxy: 50-60 minutes | Motorola: N/A
Processor Performance (Geekbench 6 Multi-core)
Samsung Galaxy: Snapdragon 8 Elite: 3,218 | Motorola: N/A
Samsung Galaxy: Galaxy S25 Ultra: 3,000 nits | Motorola: N/A
Samsung Galaxy: 5x optical (Galaxy S25 Ultra) | Motorola: N/A
Battery Capacity (Pixel 9 Pro / Galaxy S25)
Samsung Galaxy: Galaxy S25: 4,000 mAh | Motorola: N/A
Samsung Galaxy: 7 years OS + 7 years security | Motorola: N/A
Samsung Galaxy: 1440 x 3120 (AMOLED) | Motorola: 1080 x 2340 (IPS LCD)
Samsung Galaxy: Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Leading Version (3.4 GHz) | Motorola: Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (3.3 GHz)
Samsung Galaxy: 108MP (Galaxy S24 Ultra) | Motorola: 108MP (Edge 50 Pro)
Samsung Galaxy: 7 years (S24/S25) | Motorola: 3 years
Samsung Galaxy: 120Hz AMOLED | Motorola: 165Hz AMOLED
Samsung Galaxy: Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Leading Version | Motorola: Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Samsung Galaxy: 50+ apps with OneUI | Motorola: 20+ apps (stock Android)
Samsung Galaxy: 45-60 days after Google | Motorola: 15-30 days after Google
Samsung Galaxy: 144Hz AMOLED | Motorola: N/A
Samsung Galaxy: 3,000 nits | Motorola: N/A
Samsung Galaxy: 200MP f/1.7 | Motorola: N/A
Samsung Galaxy: 2,480,000 | Motorola: N/A
Samsung Galaxy: 7 years (Galaxy S24+) | Motorola: N/A
Samsung Galaxy: 6.8" (Galaxy S24 Ultra) | Motorola: N/A
Samsung Galaxy: 256GB (Galaxy S24) | Motorola: N/A
Samsung Galaxy: 2,600 (Dynamic AMOLED 2X) | Motorola: N/A
Samsung Galaxy: 1.5m (IP68) | Motorola: N/A
Samsung Galaxy: 45-60 days | Motorola: N/A
Samsung Galaxy: 4.4/5 (2.3M reviews) | Motorola: N/A
Gaming Performance Benchmark (Geekbench 6)
Samsung Galaxy: 2,890 (Snapdragon 8 Gen 3) | Motorola: N/A
Samsung Galaxy: 4-5 years | Motorola: N/A
Samsung Galaxy: 6.1" - 6.9" | Motorola: N/A
Samsung Galaxy: 5,000 mAh (Galaxy S24 Ultra) | Motorola: N/A
Samsung Galaxy: 2,380,000 (Snapdragon 8 Gen 3) | Motorola: N/A
Samsung Galaxy: MicroSD up to 1TB | Motorola: N/A
Samsung Galaxy: 3,000 nits (Vision Booster) | Motorola: N/A
Samsung Galaxy: 45-65W standard | Motorola: N/A
Samsung Galaxy: 66% average | Motorola: N/A
Samsung Galaxy: 50MP (S25) with OIS | Motorola: N/A
Samsung Galaxy: 120Hz standard, 144Hz on select | Motorola: N/A
How to choose between Samsung Galaxy and Motorola
Samsung Galaxy vs Motorola — Structured Comparison Data
Machine-readable comparison dataset for Samsung Galaxy vs Motorola. Contains 84 attribute comparisons, 10 FAQ pairs.
Samsung Galaxy vs Motorola — Attribute Category Vocabulary
Taxonomy of attribute categories used to classify comparison data for Samsung Galaxy vs Motorola.
How long does Motorola support their phones vs Samsung?
Samsung has dramatically extended its software support commitment: Galaxy S24 series and all Galaxy A55+ and newer devices receive 7 years of OS updates and 7 years of security patches — the longest Android update commitment in the industry. Motorola's support policy is significantly shorter: most Motorola phones receive 2 major OS updates and 3 years of security patches. Budget Moto G series devices may receive only 1 major OS update. This support gap is meaningful for buyers who keep phones for 4-6 years — a 2024 Samsung Galaxy S24 will run Android updates until 2031; a 2024 Moto G will stop receiving OS updates by 2026. For long-term value and security, Samsung's extended support commitment is a major differentiating advantage.
Yes, Motorola is a reputable Android smartphone brand with a long history (founded 1928, smartphones since 2009 with the original Motorola Droid). Since Lenovo's 2014 acquisition, Motorola has focused on delivering clean Android experiences at value-oriented price points. For budget buyers ($100-300), Motorola consistently delivers competitive hardware with minimal bloatware, long battery life, and decent build quality. Weaknesses: shorter software support than Samsung or Google, weaker cameras above $300, and no ultra-premium product line. Reliability: Motorola devices are generally reliable; RepairClinic and iFixit rate Motorola phones as relatively repairable compared to Samsung flagships. Motorola is an excellent choice for first-time smartphone users, budget-conscious buyers, and anyone who wants Android without manufacturer customization.
At most price points above $300, Samsung Galaxy phones are better than Motorola equivalents. Samsung's Galaxy S series offers the best Android cameras, the longest software support (7 years), superior AMOLED displays, and stronger brand/resale value. In the $150-300 budget range, Motorola Moto G series phones are often better than comparable Samsung Galaxy A phones: cleaner software (near-stock Android), stronger battery life, and better real-world performance for the price. The trade-off: Motorola drops out of the premium segment entirely (nothing above $900 in standard lineup vs Samsung's $800-1,900 S series and Z Fold range). For premium Android: Samsung. For budget Android value: Motorola often wins.
Which Samsung Galaxy is equivalent to a Motorola?
Budget comparisons: Motorola Moto G84 (~$250) is comparable to Samsung Galaxy A35 (~$300). Motorola Moto G Power (~$200) compares to Samsung Galaxy A15 (~$200). Mid-range: Motorola Edge 50 Pro (~$450) compares to Samsung Galaxy A55 (~$400-450). Premium: Motorola razr+ (~$900 foldable) competes with Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 (~$1,100) — both are flip foldables. Motorola has no equivalent to Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra ($1,300) — there is no Motorola flagship competing at that level. When comparing directly, Motorola typically offers more value per dollar at budget tiers; Samsung wins at equivalent price points above $400.
Does Motorola or Samsung have better cameras?
Samsung has significantly better cameras at equivalent price points, particularly from $400+ upward. Samsung Galaxy S series cameras consistently rank among the best in Android (competing with Google Pixel and Apple iPhone Pro), with industry-leading multi-frame processing, AI scene optimization, and large sensor hardware. At the flagship level ($800+), the Galaxy S Ultra series is a global camera benchmark. Motorola cameras are adequate at budget price points but lag behind Samsung (and Pixel) in processing quality, low-light performance, and video stabilization at every comparable price tier. For camera-focused buyers, Samsung Galaxy is the clear choice. For buyers who rarely photograph in challenging conditions and prioritize battery life and clean software, Motorola performs adequately.
Samsung Galaxy vs Motorola: which brand lasts longer?
Both brands vary by model. Samsung's flagship Galaxy S series receives 7 years of OS and security updates (S24 and newer), which is among the best in Android. Motorola's flagship Edge series receives 3 years of OS updates and 4 years of security patches — less than Samsung. For longevity through software support, Samsung clearly wins. For durability, Motorola's budget Moto G series has a reputation for solid build quality at low price points.
Is Motorola better than Samsung for budget phones?
Yes — Motorola consistently offers better value in the $150–$350 budget segment. The Moto G Stylus and Moto G Power models frequently include large batteries (5,000mAh+), headphone jacks, and clean Android with minimal bloatware at prices where Samsung's comparable Galaxy A series often cuts corners. For budget buyers, Motorola is the stronger choice. Above $500, Samsung's Galaxy A55 and S-series dominate.
Does Samsung Galaxy have better cameras than Motorola?
Samsung Galaxy flagships (S24+, S25 Ultra) have significantly better cameras than equivalent Motorola phones. Samsung's camera systems include higher-resolution main sensors, better telephoto zoom (up to 200x Space Zoom on the S25 Ultra), and more sophisticated computational photography for night mode, portrait, and action shots. Motorola's cameras are adequate for everyday shots but lag behind Samsung in low-light performance, zoom quality, and video stability.
Which is better for gaming — Samsung Galaxy or Motorola?
Samsung Galaxy (S24 and S25 series) is better for gaming than Motorola: Samsung uses Snapdragon 8 Elite or Exynos 2500 processors with vapor-chamber cooling, high-refresh-rate AMOLED displays (up to 120Hz adaptive), and Game Booster software. Motorola's Edge series uses mid-range Snapdragon chips and lacks Samsung's display quality and thermal management. For serious mobile gaming, Samsung's flagships are a clear choice.
Does Motorola or Samsung have better battery life?
Motorola generally offers better battery life in the budget and mid-range segments. The Moto G Power series is famous for 5,000–6,000mAh batteries with 2-day life. Samsung's budget A series has caught up in recent years. In the flagship segment, Samsung Galaxy S25 offers excellent all-day battery with fast 45W charging. Motorola's budget edge: bigger batteries at lower prices. Samsung's advantage: faster charging speeds across the lineup.
How to Choose Between Samsung Galaxy and Motorola
Starting Price: Samsung Galaxy has $800, while Motorola has $150.
Consider: Main Camera Megapixels (Flagship)
Main Camera Megapixels (Flagship): Samsung Galaxy has 200MP, while Motorola has 50MP.
OS Update Guarantee: Samsung Galaxy has 7 years, while Motorola has 3 years.
Software Bloatware: Samsung Galaxy has 15-20 pre-installed apps, while Motorola has 5-8 pre-installed apps.
Processor (Flagship 2025): Samsung Galaxy has Snapdragon 8 Elite, while Motorola has Snapdragon 7 Gen 3.
Consider: Display Refresh Rate (Budget Model)
Display Refresh Rate (Budget Model): Samsung Galaxy has 90Hz, while Motorola has 90Hz.
Market Share Globally: Samsung Galaxy has 22%, while Motorola has 8%.
Consider: Wired Charging Speed (Flagship)