Hostinger offers superior performance with faster load times (0.89s avg) and lower starting prices ($2.99/month), while Bluehost provides better WordPress integration as an official WordPress.org recommended host with stronger email capabilities and higher uptime guarantees (99.9% vs 99.9%).
Hostinger vs Bluehost — Side-by-side comparison on A Versus B
Budget-friendly web hosting with fast speeds and 100+ free email accounts
Budget-friendly shared hosting platform owned by Endorphina, popular for WordPress beginners.
Starting Monthly Price. Average Page Load Time. WordPress.org Official Recommendation. Email Accounts Included (Starter Plan). Free Domain (First Year). Money-Back Guarantee. 24/7 Support Available
Choose Hostinger if you prioritize speed, performance, and budget — it's ideal for bloggers, small businesses, and ecommerce sites needing fast load times at competitive prices. Choose Bluehost if WordPress is your primary platform and you want official WordPress.org backing, better email management tools, and peace of mind with WordPress-native integration.
Hostinger: Under 1 second (global) | Bluehost: N/A
Hostinger: $2.99 (promotional) | Bluehost: N/A
Hostinger: Yes, with most plans | Bluehost: N/A
Hostinger: Multiple (Asia, Europe, Americas) | Bluehost: N/A
Hostinger: Advanced (may have charges) | Bluehost: N/A
Hostinger: Included free | Bluehost: N/A
Hostinger: Separate cost | Bluehost: N/A
Hostinger: $2.99-3.99/month (Hostinger Premium) | Bluehost: N/A
Hostinger: Included with all plans | Bluehost: N/A
Hostinger: Faster (verified monthly testing) | Bluehost: N/A
Hostinger: Available but variable quality | Bluehost: N/A
Hostinger: 10 years (WordPress plans) | Bluehost: N/A
Hostinger: Unified shared/WordPress offerings | Bluehost: N/A
Hostinger: Included (security features verified) | Bluehost: N/A
Hostinger: Automatic daily backups only | Bluehost: N/A
Hostinger: Standard technical support | Bluehost: N/A
Hostinger: $2.99/month (annual) | Bluehost: $2.95
Hostinger: No (Premium+ only) | Bluehost: Yes
Hostinger: Premium plans only | Bluehost: N/A
Hostinger: Unlimited (most plans) | Bluehost: N/A
Hostinger: 8-12 minutes | Bluehost: 3-5 minutes
Hostinger: Yes (with annual plan) | Bluehost: Yes (with annual plan)
Hostinger: $35.88 + free domain | Bluehost: N/A
Hostinger: 400-800ms (shared server) | Bluehost: N/A
Hostinger: Cloudflare (Premium+ only) | Bluehost: N/A
Hostinger: 100 (Premium plan) | Bluehost: N/A
Starting Price (Monthly, Annual Commitment)
Hostinger: Not available | Bluehost: N/A
Starting Hosting Price (Annual Commitment)
Hostinger: N/A | Bluehost: Traditional Data Centers
Hostinger: N/A | Bluehost: None (Third-party required)
Hostinger: N/A | Bluehost: Standard resource allocation
Hostinger: N/A | Bluehost: Yes (Official List)
Hostinger: N/A | Bluehost: Restrictive limits enforced
Hostinger: N/A | Bluehost: Paid migration service
Hostinger: N/A | Bluehost: Phone, chat, email
Shared Hosting Monthly Cost (Introductory)
Hostinger: N/A | Bluehost: Free (with hosting)
Hostinger: N/A | Bluehost: Yes, all plans
Hostinger: N/A | Bluehost: Yes, listed as recommended
Hostinger: N/A | Bluehost: No - Phone/Email only
Hostinger: N/A | Bluehost: No - Extra charge
Hostinger: N/A | Bluehost: 24-48 hours (email)
Hostinger: N/A | Bluehost: No (paid add-on)
Hostinger: N/A | Bluehost: Basic (limited)
Hostinger: N/A | Bluehost: First year only
Hostinger: N/A | Bluehost: Yes (automatic)
How to choose between Hostinger and Bluehost
Hostinger vs Bluehost — Structured Comparison Data
Machine-readable comparison dataset for Hostinger vs Bluehost. Contains 107 attribute comparisons, 5 FAQ pairs.
Hostinger vs Bluehost — Attribute Category Vocabulary
Taxonomy of attribute categories used to classify comparison data for Hostinger vs Bluehost.
Is Bluehost really better for WordPress than Hostinger?
Bluehost is officially recommended by WordPress.org and features WordPress-native integration, making it technically superior for WordPress-specific workflows. However, Hostinger runs WordPress equally well in practice and loads 39% faster (0.89s vs 1.24s). Choose Bluehost for official endorsement and support; choose Hostinger for performance and cost savings.
Hostinger has lower introductory pricing ($2.99/month) and significantly lower renewal rates ($5.99/month vs $8.95/month). Over 3 years, Hostinger costs approximately $185 vs Bluehost's $270 for equivalent plans — a 31% savings with Hostinger.
Bluehost's support team responds 50-60% faster (3-5 minutes vs 8-12 minutes average). Both offer 24/7 live chat, email, and phone support, but Bluehost's WordPress expertise and faster response times make it superior for support-dependent users.
Yes, both support WooCommerce and other ecommerce platforms. Hostinger performs better for ecommerce due to 39% faster load times, which directly impacts conversion rates. Bluehost is more beginner-friendly with WordPress integration but may require optimization for high-traffic stores.
What's the difference in email capabilities?
Hostinger offers unlimited email storage across all accounts, while Bluehost limits email to 50GB per account. For email-heavy businesses managing 10+ accounts, Hostinger is significantly more cost-effective. Bluehost includes more advanced email features like better spam filtering.
How to Choose Between Hostinger and Bluehost
Starting Monthly Price: Hostinger has $2.99/month, while Bluehost has $2.95/month.
Average Page Load Time: Hostinger has 0.89 seconds, while Bluehost has 1.24 seconds.
Consider: WordPress.org Official Recommendation
WordPress.org Official Recommendation: Hostinger has Not recommended, while Bluehost has Official recommended host.
Consider: Email Accounts Included (Starter Plan)
Email Accounts Included (Starter Plan): Hostinger has Unlimited, while Bluehost has Unlimited.
Free Domain (First Year): Hostinger has Yes, with annual plans, while Bluehost has Yes, with annual plans.
Money-Back Guarantee: Hostinger has 30 days, while Bluehost has 30 days.
24/7 Support Available: Hostinger has Yes (live chat, email, phone), while Bluehost has Yes (live chat, email, phone).