Figma is a browser-based collaborative design tool with real-time co-editing and superior prototyping built-in, while InVision is a dedicated prototyping and handoff platform that excels at design-to-development workflows. Figma has captured 61% market share in design tools, compared to InVision's declining user base.
Figma vs InVision — Side-by-side comparison on A Versus B
Professional collaborative UI/UX design platform with advanced prototyping and design systems.
Design platform with dedicated prototyping, user testing, and developer handoff capabilities
Real-Time Collaboration. Prototyping Built-In. Platform Architecture. Developer Handoff Features. Plugin Ecosystem. Pricing Model. Market Position (2024)
Choose Figma if you need a modern, integrated design-to-prototype workflow with real-time team collaboration and lower costs—it's the clear standard for most product teams in 2024-2025. Choose InVision if your organization already has significant investment in their platform, needs legacy desktop support, or specifically values their specialized handoff documentation features, though migration to Figma is increasingly common.
Figma: $1.36-1.37 billion | InVision: N/A
Figma: $10.53-13.8 billion (public) | InVision: N/A
Figma: 9x-35x (varies by metric) | InVision: N/A
Figma: Public (NASDAQ: FIG) | InVision: N/A
Figma: 14-15% (non-GAAP) | InVision: N/A
Figma: Enterprise Design Teams | InVision: N/A
Figma: Advanced multiplayer editing | InVision: N/A
Figma: Built-in real-time collaboration | InVision: N/A
Figma: Sites CMS beta (200 items) | InVision: N/A
Figma: Variables, components, tokens | InVision: N/A
Figma: Requires external hosting | InVision: N/A
Figma: Dev Mode with inspection | InVision: N/A
Figma: Unlimited (per plan) | InVision: N/A
Figma: Cloud-only, no self-hosting | InVision: N/A
Figma: Voice-to-text, Make controls, question cards, design suggestions | InVision: N/A
Figma: Proprietary closed-source | InVision: N/A
Figma: 5,000+ plugins and integrations | InVision: 200+ integrations
Figma: Unlimited with live cursors | InVision: N/A
Figma: Web browser + Desktop (Windows, Mac, Linux) | InVision: N/A
Figma: Master Variables with full version control | InVision: N/A
Figma: Limited (separate ecosystem) | InVision: N/A
Figma: Voice-to-text, Make features, automation | InVision: N/A
Figma: Browser-dependent, can slow with 1000+ frames | InVision: N/A
Monthly Subscription Cost (Single Editor)
Figma: Web, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android | InVision: N/A
Figma: Performance issues above 2GB | InVision: N/A
Figma: Limited offline, primarily cloud-based | InVision: N/A
Figma: Advanced design specs, Dev Mode, code generation | InVision: N/A
Figma: Intermediate (basic flows, transitions) | InVision: Advanced (micro-interactions, animations)
Figma: 500+ (performance degrades) | InVision: Unlimited
Figma: Generous (3 projects, 2GB) | InVision: Limited (view-only)
Figma: Unlimited simultaneous editors | InVision: Comment-based workflow
Starter Plan Monthly Cost (Annual Billing)
Figma: Variable by seats | InVision: N/A
Figma: Four-tier with seat types (Full, Dev, Collab) | InVision: N/A
Figma: Industry-leading precision tools | InVision: N/A
Figma: Excellent for design workflows | InVision: N/A
Figma: Basic design assistance | InVision: N/A
Figma: Good team controls | InVision: N/A
Figma: 15+ concurrent editors (unlimited) | InVision: N/A
Figma: Yes—unlimited projects, 3 editors per file | InVision: N/A
Figma: Advanced variables system with 20+ variant combinations per component | InVision: N/A
Figma: 71% among design teams | InVision: N/A
Figma: Limited offline mode (view-only) | InVision: Desktop app supports offline work
Figma: Advanced auto-animate, conditional logic, 35+ interaction types | InVision: N/A
Figma: 30 days of version history | InVision: N/A
Figma: Unlimited (draft-based) | InVision: N/A
Figma: Community plugins only | InVision: N/A
Figma: Interactions, conditional logic, component states, animations, flows | InVision: N/A
Figma: Enterprise-grade (variants, tokens, documentation) | InVision: N/A
Figma: Yes (100% browser-native) | InVision: N/A
Figma: Mac, Windows, Linux, Web | InVision: N/A
Figma: Native (built-in) | InVision: N/A
Figma: Limited (browser-dependent) | InVision: N/A
Figma: Yes, full features for 1 file | InVision: N/A
Figma: Web + macOS + Windows + iPad | InVision: N/A
Figma: 300-400 before lag | InVision: N/A
Figma: Shared libraries with variants | InVision: N/A
Figma: Advanced with variables | InVision: N/A
Figma: Live multiplayer editing with cursor tracking | InVision: Asynchronous feedback and comments
Figma: $12 per editor | InVision: $7 per viewer
Figma: Basic preset animations without timeline | InVision: Advanced Smart Animate with frame-by-frame timeline
Figma: 4 days | InVision: 21 days (3 weeks)
Figma: Unlimited on paid plans | InVision: Unlimited on paid plans
Figma: Dev Mode with code snippets and specs | InVision: Inspect mode with code export and specifications
Figma: Component versioning in main product | InVision: Native versioning in InVision DSM (separate product)
Figma: $12 per editor/month | InVision: $25 per month (flat rate)
Figma: Unlimited on any plan | InVision: Limited to commenter model
Figma: 40+ interactive components and states | InVision: 35+ gesture and animation controls
Figma: 800+ community plugins | InVision: 300+ integrations
Figma: Optimal up to 5,000 artboards | InVision: Optimal up to 3,000 artboards
Figma: 61% of design professionals | InVision: 8-12% declining adoption
Figma: 70% of professional design teams | InVision: N/A
Figma: No built-in hosting | InVision: N/A
Figma: 2000+ official plugins and integrations | InVision: N/A
Monthly Subscription Cost (Professional Plan)
Figma: $12/month (billed annually) | InVision: N/A
Figma: 500+ simultaneous users | InVision: N/A
Figma: 40-60% (design to code via plugins) | InVision: N/A
Figma: Basic interactions, limited keyframe animation | InVision: N/A
Figma: Variables, tokens, component library, extensive version control | InVision: N/A
Figma: 3 files maximum, unlimited pages per file, basic prototyping, browser-based | InVision: N/A
Figma: 50-100 (community-sourced) | InVision: N/A
Figma: 10+ simultaneous editors with live cursors | InVision: N/A
Figma: 0 (third-party integrations available) | InVision: N/A
Figma: Components, variables, tokens, auto-layout, design tokens management | InVision: N/A
Figma: Limited AI—mostly design optimization and naming suggestions | InVision: N/A
Figma: N/A | InVision: Comment-based feedback only
Figma: N/A | InVision: Manual responsive workflow
Figma: N/A | InVision: Requires external integration
Figma: N/A | InVision: Specialized interactive prototypes
Figma: N/A | InVision: $25-$50/month ($300-$600/year)
Figma: N/A | InVision: 4 (Web, Desktop, iOS, Android)
Figma: N/A | InVision: Advanced with interactions
Figma: N/A | InVision: 3 (Email, Phone, Tickets)
Figma: N/A | InVision: Good - occasional lag
Figma: N/A | InVision: Supported via DSM add-on
How to choose between Figma and InVision
Figma vs InVision — Structured Comparison Data
Machine-readable comparison dataset for Figma vs InVision. Contains 132 attribute comparisons, 5 FAQ pairs.
Figma vs InVision — Attribute Category Vocabulary
Taxonomy of attribute categories used to classify comparison data for Figma vs InVision.
Can I use Figma and InVision together in my workflow?
Yes, many teams use both tools complementarily. Figma handles design and prototyping, while some teams keep InVision for user testing and specialized handoff documentation. However, most organizations are consolidating to Figma alone due to its integrated feature set. InVision offers a Figma plugin for importing designs, but native integration remains limited.
Which tool is better for design system management?
Figma has a significant advantage with its Variables feature, component documentation, and 800+ plugins specifically designed for design systems. InVision lacks comparable design system tools. Figma's auto-layout and token management make it the industry standard for design system teams—Shopify, Microsoft, and Google all use Figma for this purpose.
Does InVision offer better user testing than Figma?
InVision has dedicated user testing features built into the platform with recording and feedback collection. Figma requires third-party integrations for testing. However, Figma integrates with UserTesting, Maze, and Validately, so the testing capability difference is narrowing. For dedicated, built-in testing, InVision remains stronger.
Can developers use Figma and InVision for handoff equally?
Both tools provide developer handoff capabilities. Figma's Inspect tool offers code snippets and design token exports; InVision provides detailed specifications and measurements. Figma's approach is more modern with direct CSS/token export, while InVision's is more traditional with static measurements. Figma is increasingly preferred by developers due to automation and code integration.
Is Figma replacing InVision in the industry?
Yes, substantially. Figma's market share grew from 12% in 2019 to 61% by 2024, while InVision declined to 8-12%. Major companies like Stripe, Airbnb, and Slack migrated from InVision to Figma. InVision's acquisition by Miro in 2023 signaled the company's pivot away from standalone design tools, effectively conceding the market to Figma.
How to Choose Between Figma and InVision
Real-Time Collaboration: Figma has Native multiplayer editing with live cursors, while InVision has Comment-based collaboration only.
Prototyping Built-In: Figma has Advanced prototyping with interactive components, while InVision has Dedicated prototyping platform (separate tool).
Platform Architecture: Figma has 100% browser-based, no desktop app required, while InVision has Hybrid: web-based with legacy desktop integration.
Developer Handoff Features: Figma has Inspect tool with code snippets and design tokens, while InVision has Dedicated handoff specs with measurement tools.
Plugin Ecosystem: Figma has 800+ plugins via Figma Community, while InVision has 300+ integrations via App Store.
Pricing Model: Figma has $0 free tier with unlimited projects, while InVision has $0 free tier with 3 projects only.
Market Position (2024): Figma has 61% of design teams use Figma, while InVision has Declining: ~8-12% adoption rate.