Cursor vs Copilot
type: Article
description: Choose Cursor if you want an AI-first editor built around multi-file, agentic coding and deep codebase awareness, and choose GitHub Copilot if you want affordable, lightweight AI assistance that lives inside the IDE you already use. Cursor is a standalone VS Code fork at $20/mo whose Composer agent can plan and edit across many files at once, making it the favorite of developers doing heavy refactors and feature work. GitHub Copilot is a plugin (for VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim, Visual Studio, and more) at $10/mo, with the deepest GitHub integration and the lowest cost of entry. Both now let you pick between frontier models like Anthropic's Claude and OpenAI's GPT family, so the real decision is workflow and budget, not raw model access. For most solo and team developers in 2026, Copilot is the safe, cheap default while Cursor is the productivity upgrade you pay extra for when agentic editing matters.
language: en-US
date published: 2026-05-22T17:59:21.578Z
date created: 2026-05-22T17:59:21.578Z
date modified: 2026-05-22T18:00:28.186Z
content reference time: 2026-05-22T18:00:28.186Z
author: A Versus B
publisher: A Versus B
about: Cursor
about: GitHub Copilot
abstract: Choose Cursor if you want an AI-first editor built around multi-file, agentic coding and deep codebase awareness, and choose GitHub Copilot if you want affordable, lightweight AI assistance that lives inside the IDE you already use. Cursor is a standalone VS Code fork at $20/mo whose Composer agent can plan and edit across many files at once, making it the favorite of developers doing heavy refactors and feature work. GitHub Copilot is a plugin (for VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim, Visual Studio, and more) at $10/mo, with the deepest GitHub integration and the lowest cost of entry. Both now let you pick between frontier models like Anthropic's Claude and OpenAI's GPT family, so the real decision is workflow and budget, not raw model access. For most solo and team developers in 2026, Copilot is the safe, cheap default while Cursor is the productivity upgrade you pay extra for when agentic editing matters.
text: Pricing & plan structure. Underlying models (Claude / GPT choice). Agentic capabilities. Codebase indexing for large repos. IDE model (fork vs plugin). Inline autocomplete quality. Multi-file refactor. GitHub & PR integration. Enterprise & security features. Onboarding & ecosystem familiarity
conclusion text: If you are a solo developer who codes every day and lives in your editor, Cursor's $20/mo Composer-driven workflow usually pays for itself in saved refactor time, so it is the better pick. If you are a lean startup shipping fast, standardize on Cursor for engineers doing heavy feature work and keep Copilot for anyone who only needs occasional autocomplete, because the per-seat math favors mixing tiers. If you are an enterprise that already runs on GitHub, Copilot Business/Enterprise is the path of least resistance thanks to org-wide policy controls, SSO, audit logs, and IP indemnity baked into the GitHub platform you already trust. If you are learning to code, start with GitHub Copilot Free or Copilot Pro at $10/mo and the familiar VS Code plugin, since the lower stakes and inline suggestions teach without overwhelming you. If you maintain open-source projects, GitHub Copilot is free for verified maintainers and integrates with PRs and issues, making it the obvious choice unless you specifically need Cursor's large-repo agent.
additional property: Interface Learning Curve
  type: PropertyValue
  value: Cursor: 3 (familiar) | GitHub Copilot: N/A
additional property: Monthly Subscription Cost
  type: PropertyValue
  value: Cursor: $20 | GitHub Copilot: $10 or free with GitHub Pro
  value reference: GitHub Copilot
additional property: Supported Programming Languages
  type: PropertyValue
  value: Cursor: 50+ | GitHub Copilot: 80+ languages
  value reference: GitHub Copilot
additional property: IDE Integration Points
  type: PropertyValue
  value: Cursor: VS Code-based only | GitHub Copilot: 10+ IDEs
additional property: Setup Time
  type: PropertyValue
  value: Cursor: 5-10 minutes | GitHub Copilot: 2-3 minutes
  value reference: GitHub Copilot
additional property: Codebase Context Awareness
  type: PropertyValue
  value: Cursor: Excellent | GitHub Copilot: Good
additional property: Enterprise SSO Support
  type: PropertyValue
  value: Cursor: Limited | GitHub Copilot: Yes
additional property: Inline Edit/Refactor
  type: PropertyValue
  value: Cursor: Native & Superior | GitHub Copilot: Good
additional property: Community Size
  type: PropertyValue
  value: Cursor: Growing | GitHub Copilot: Very Large
additional property: Free Trial Period
  type: PropertyValue
  value: Cursor: 7 days | GitHub Copilot: 30 days
  value reference: GitHub Copilot
additional property: Model Flexibility
  type: PropertyValue
  value: Cursor: 2 model choices | GitHub Copilot: 3+ model choices
additional property: Active Users (2026)
  type: PropertyValue
  value: Cursor: Not publicly disclosed | GitHub Copilot: N/A
additional property: Daily Code Lines Generated
  type: PropertyValue
  value: Cursor: Not disclosed | GitHub Copilot: N/A
additional property: Fortune 500 Adoption Rate
  type: PropertyValue
  value: Cursor: Significant but undisclosed | GitHub Copilot: N/A
additional property: Security Certifications
  type: PropertyValue
  value: Cursor: Enterprise-grade | GitHub Copilot: N/A
additional property: Base Technology
  type: PropertyValue
  value: Cursor: VS Code fork | GitHub Copilot: N/A
additional property: Agent Autonomy Level
  type: PropertyValue
  value: Cursor: 6 | GitHub Copilot: N/A
additional property: Control Determinism
  type: PropertyValue
  value: Cursor: 9 | GitHub Copilot: N/A
additional property: Token Efficiency
  type: PropertyValue
  value: Cursor: Baseline (1.0x) | GitHub Copilot: N/A
additional property: Code Quality (No-Edit Rate)
  type: PropertyValue
  value: Cursor: ~75% | GitHub Copilot: N/A
additional property: Interface Type
  type: PropertyValue
  value: Cursor: Full IDE | GitHub Copilot: N/A
additional property: Setup Time
  type: PropertyValue
  value: Cursor: <5 minutes | GitHub Copilot: N/A
additional property: Licensing Model
  type: PropertyValue
  value: Cursor: Proprietary Commercial | GitHub Copilot: N/A
additional property: IDE Feature Completeness
  type: PropertyValue
  value: Cursor: 10/10 | GitHub Copilot: N/A
additional property: Customization Freedom
  type: PropertyValue
  value: Cursor: 6/10 | GitHub Copilot: N/A
additional property: Monthly Cost
  type: PropertyValue
  value: Cursor: $20 | GitHub Copilot: N/A
additional property: Paid plan (per user / month)
  type: PropertyValue
  value: Cursor: Cursor Pro $20/mo | GitHub Copilot: Copilot Pro $10/mo
  value reference: GitHub Copilot
additional property: Business / team tier
  type: PropertyValue
  value: Cursor: Business $40/user/mo | GitHub Copilot: Business $19/user/mo (Enterprise $39)
  value reference: GitHub Copilot
additional property: IDE model
  type: PropertyValue
  value: Cursor: Standalone editor — a fork of VS Code (install Cursor itself) | GitHub Copilot: Plugin/extension installed into your existing IDE
additional property: Supported IDEs/Editors
  type: PropertyValue
  value: Cursor: Cursor app only (VS Code-compatible extensions/themes carry over) | GitHub Copilot: 6 major platforms
additional property: Selectable AI models
  type: PropertyValue
  value: Cursor: Anthropic Claude, OpenAI GPT, Google Gemini, plus Cursor fast models (per-request switching) | GitHub Copilot: Anthropic Claude, OpenAI GPT, Google Gemini (model picker in chat/agent)
additional property: Agent / multi-file editing
  type: PropertyValue
  value: Cursor: Composer (Agent) plan-execute-verify loop across many files; runs commands and tests | GitHub Copilot: Agent mode + Copilot Workspace + coding agent (issue-to-PR); strong but tighter loop trails Cursor
additional property: Large-repo codebase indexing
  type: PropertyValue
  value: Cursor: Whole-repo semantic embeddings with automatic relevant-file retrieval; built for monorepos | GitHub Copilot: Repository context, @workspace search, and Enterprise knowledge bases; less aggressive auto-indexing
additional property: Inline autocomplete latency
  type: PropertyValue
  value: Cursor: Very fast predictive Tab completions that jump to the next edit location | GitHub Copilot: Very fast, low-latency completions; category pioneer and still excellent inline
additional property: Enterprise governance & IP indemnity
  type: PropertyValue
  value: Cursor: SSO, privacy mode (no retention/training), admin controls, SOC 2 | GitHub Copilot: Org policy management, SSO, audit logs, content exclusion, data residency, IP indemnification
additional property: Interface type
  type: PropertyValue
  value: Cursor: Graphical IDE (VS Code fork) | GitHub Copilot: N/A
additional property: Primary Workflow
  type: PropertyValue
  value: Cursor: Interactive in-editor coding | GitHub Copilot: N/A
additional property: Entry price
  type: PropertyValue
  value: Cursor: ~$20/mo (Pro) | GitHub Copilot: N/A
additional property: Pricing Model
  type: PropertyValue
  value: Cursor: Flat plan with request quota + usage add-ons | GitHub Copilot: N/A
additional property: Rate limit style
  type: PropertyValue
  value: Cursor: Monthly fast-request quota | GitHub Copilot: N/A
additional property: Model choice
  type: PropertyValue
  value: Cursor: Multi-model (Claude, GPT, Gemini, etc.) | GitHub Copilot: N/A
additional property: Headless / CI automation
  type: PropertyValue
  value: Cursor: Not designed for it | GitHub Copilot: N/A
additional property: Codebase context
  type: PropertyValue
  value: Cursor: Workspace indexing + @-mentions | GitHub Copilot: N/A
additional property: Learning Curve
  type: PropertyValue
  value: Cursor: Low (VS Code familiarity) | GitHub Copilot: Minimal (extension)
additional property: Best for
  type: PropertyValue
  value: Cursor: Interactive feature building & quick edits | GitHub Copilot: N/A
additional property: Pro Plan Price
  type: PropertyValue
  value: Cursor: $20/mo | GitHub Copilot: N/A
additional property: Free tier
  type: PropertyValue
  value: Cursor: Yes — free Hobby tier plus a 2-week Pro trial | GitHub Copilot: Free tier with limited completions/chat, plus free for verified students, teachers, and OSS maintainers
additional property: Agent name
  type: PropertyValue
  value: Cursor: Agent (formerly Composer) | GitHub Copilot: N/A
additional property: Autocomplete engine
  type: PropertyValue
  value: Cursor: Cursor Tab model | GitHub Copilot: N/A
interactivity type: active
significant link: https://www.aversusb.net/entity/cursor
significant link: https://www.aversusb.net/alternatives/cursor
significant link: https://www.aversusb.net/entity/github-copilot
significant link: https://www.aversusb.net/alternatives/github-copilot
significant link: https://www.aversusb.net/api/answer/cursor-vs-copilot
significant link: https://www.aversusb.net/api/v1/schema/cursor-vs-copilot
related link: https://www.aversusb.net/compare/cursor-vs-github-copilot
related link: https://www.aversusb.net/compare/cursor-vs-windsurf
related link: https://www.aversusb.net/compare/aider-vs-cursor
related link: https://www.aversusb.net/compare/cursor-vs-claude-code
related link: https://www.aversusb.net/compare/github-copilot-vs-tabnine
related link: https://www.aversusb.net/compare/cursor-vs-vs-code
related link: https://www.aversusb.net/compare/windsurf-vs-github-copilot
related link: https://www.aversusb.net/compare/aider-vs-github-copilot
teaches: How to choose between Cursor and GitHub Copilot
genre: Software

primaryImage
type: ImageObject
width: 1200
height: 630
caption: Cursor vs Copilot — Side-by-side comparison on A Versus B

A Versus B
type: Organization

Cursor
type: SoftwareApplication
language: en-US
description: AI-first IDE forked from VS Code with integrated Claude and GPT-4 coding
subject of: Cursor vs Copilot

GitHub Copilot
type: SoftwareApplication
alternate name: GC
alternate name: Github Copilot
language: en-US
description: AI pair programmer powered by OpenAI models with broad language and IDE support
subject of: Cursor vs Copilot

Cursor vs Copilot — Structured Comparison Data
type: Dataset
description: Machine-readable comparison dataset for Cursor vs Copilot. Contains 218 attribute comparisons, 8 FAQ pairs.
language: en-US
license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
creator: A Versus B
distribution: JSON-LD knowledge graph
  type: DataDownload
  encoding format: application/json+ld
distribution: Raw comparison JSON
  type: DataDownload
  encoding format: application/json
distribution: Structured FAQ pairs JSON
  type: DataDownload
  encoding format: application/json
distribution: AI Answer API (citation-ready)
  type: DataDownload
  encoding format: application/json
distribution: Related comparisons JSON
  type: DataDownload
  encoding format: application/json
variable measured: Interface Learning Curve
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: UX
variable measured: Monthly Subscription Cost
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: Pricing
variable measured: Supported Programming Languages
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: Flexibility
variable measured: IDE Integration Points
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: Compatibility
variable measured: Setup Time
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: Ease of Use
variable measured: Codebase Context Awareness
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: AI Capability
variable measured: Enterprise SSO Support
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: Enterprise Features
variable measured: Inline Edit/Refactor
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: AI Capability
variable measured: Community Size
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: Community
variable measured: Free Trial Period
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: Onboarding
variable measured: Model Flexibility
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: AI Capability
variable measured: Active Users (2026)
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: Adoption
variable measured: Daily Code Lines Generated
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: Performance
variable measured: Fortune 500 Adoption Rate
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: Enterprise
variable measured: Security Certifications
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: Security
variable measured: Base Technology
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: Architecture
variable measured: Agent Autonomy Level
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: AI Features
variable measured: Control Determinism
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: AI Features
variable measured: Token Efficiency
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: Performance
variable measured: Code Quality (No-Edit Rate)
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: Performance
variable measured: Interface Type
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: User Experience
variable measured: Setup Time
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: Installation
variable measured: Licensing Model
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: Access
variable measured: IDE Feature Completeness
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: Features
variable measured: Customization Freedom
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: Flexibility
variable measured: Monthly Cost
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: Pricing
variable measured: Paid plan (per user / month)
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: Pricing
variable measured: Business / team tier
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: Pricing
variable measured: IDE model
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: Architecture
variable measured: Supported IDEs/Editors
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: Compatibility
variable measured: Selectable AI models
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: Models
variable measured: Agent / multi-file editing
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: Features
variable measured: Large-repo codebase indexing
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: Performance
variable measured: Inline autocomplete latency
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: Performance
variable measured: Enterprise governance & IP indemnity
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: Security
variable measured: Interface type
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: Interface
variable measured: Primary Workflow
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: Functionality
variable measured: Entry price
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: Pricing
variable measured: Pricing Model
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: Cost & Licensing
variable measured: Rate limit style
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: Pricing
variable measured: Model choice
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: Models
variable measured: Headless / CI automation
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: Workflow
variable measured: Codebase context
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: Workflow
variable measured: Learning Curve
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: Developer Experience
variable measured: Best for
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: Workflow
variable measured: Pro Plan Price
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: Pricing
variable measured: Free tier
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: Pricing
variable measured: Agent name
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: Agent
variable measured: Autocomplete engine
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: Editor
variable measured: Editor base
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: Editor
variable measured: Codebase indexing
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: Models
variable measured: Frontier models available
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: Models
variable measured: Enterprise / self-hosting
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: Enterprise
variable measured: Platform Support
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: Accessibility
variable measured: Community size / momentum
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: Editor
variable measured: Monthly Subscription Cost (Individual)
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: Pricing
variable measured: Annual Subscription Cost
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: Pricing
variable measured: Max Context Window
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: AI Capabilities
variable measured: Free Tier Premium Requests Per Day
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: Pricing
variable measured: Free Chat Messages Per Month
  type: PropertyValue
  value reference: Pricing
variable measured: Compatible Editors
variable measured: Default AI Model Quality (Reasoning)
variable measured: Multi-File Project Understanding
variable measured: Startup Time
variable measured: Available Extensions
variable measured: Memory Usage (Idle)
variable measured: Built-in AI Features
variable measured: Data Privacy Model
variable measured: Multi-line Tab Autocomplete
is based on: https://www.aversusb.net/compare/cursor-vs-copilot

Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary
type: DefinedTermSet
language: en-US
description: Taxonomy of attribute categories used to classify comparison data for Cursor vs Copilot.
has defined term: UX
has defined term: Pricing
has defined term: Flexibility
has defined term: Compatibility
has defined term: Ease of Use
has defined term: AI Capability
has defined term: Enterprise Features
has defined term: Community
has defined term: Onboarding
has defined term: Adoption
has defined term: Performance
has defined term: Enterprise
has defined term: Security
has defined term: Architecture
has defined term: AI Features
has defined term: User Experience
has defined term: Installation
has defined term: Access
has defined term: Features
has defined term: Models
has defined term: Interface
has defined term: Functionality
has defined term: Cost & Licensing
has defined term: Workflow
has defined term: Developer Experience
has defined term: Agent
has defined term: Editor
has defined term: Accessibility
has defined term: AI Capabilities
has defined term: Integration
has defined term: Customization
has defined term: Resource Efficiency
has defined term: Capability
has defined term: Maturity
has defined term: Code Analysis
has defined term: Language Support
has defined term: Usability
has defined term: Scalability
has defined term: Pricing & Usage
has defined term: Ecosystem
has defined term: Technical
has defined term: AI Quality
has defined term: Operations
has defined term: Development Model
has defined term: Privacy
has defined term: Support
has defined term: Core Capabilities
has defined term: Capabilities
has defined term: Development Features
has defined term: Performance Capacity
has defined term: Code Intelligence
has defined term: Deployment
has defined term: Data
has defined term: Developer Features
has defined term: AI Backend
has defined term: Platform Support
has defined term: Knowledge
has defined term: Performance & Setup
has defined term: Market
has defined term: Productivity
has defined term: Technology
has defined term: Popularity
has defined term: User Satisfaction
has defined term: Market Position
has defined term: Data Freshness
has defined term: Accuracy
has defined term: Freshness
has defined term: Model Quality
has defined term: Development Workflow
has defined term: Privacy & Control

UX
type: DefinedTerm
term code: ux
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Pricing
type: DefinedTerm
term code: pricing
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Flexibility
type: DefinedTerm
term code: flexibility
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Compatibility
type: DefinedTerm
term code: compatibility
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Ease of Use
type: DefinedTerm
term code: ease-of-use
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

AI Capability
type: DefinedTerm
term code: ai-capability
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Enterprise Features
type: DefinedTerm
term code: enterprise-features
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Community
type: DefinedTerm
term code: community
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Onboarding
type: DefinedTerm
term code: onboarding
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Adoption
type: DefinedTerm
term code: adoption
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Performance
type: DefinedTerm
term code: performance
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Enterprise
type: DefinedTerm
term code: enterprise
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Security
type: DefinedTerm
term code: security
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Architecture
type: DefinedTerm
term code: architecture
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

AI Features
type: DefinedTerm
term code: ai-features
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

User Experience
type: DefinedTerm
term code: user-experience
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Installation
type: DefinedTerm
term code: installation
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Access
type: DefinedTerm
term code: access
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Features
type: DefinedTerm
term code: features
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Models
type: DefinedTerm
term code: models
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Interface
type: DefinedTerm
term code: interface
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Functionality
type: DefinedTerm
term code: functionality
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Cost & Licensing
type: DefinedTerm
term code: cost-&-licensing
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Workflow
type: DefinedTerm
term code: workflow
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Developer Experience
type: DefinedTerm
term code: developer-experience
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Agent
type: DefinedTerm
term code: agent
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Editor
type: DefinedTerm
term code: editor
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Accessibility
type: DefinedTerm
term code: accessibility
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

AI Capabilities
type: DefinedTerm
term code: ai-capabilities
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Integration
type: DefinedTerm
term code: integration
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Customization
type: DefinedTerm
term code: customization
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Resource Efficiency
type: DefinedTerm
term code: resource-efficiency
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Capability
type: DefinedTerm
term code: capability
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Maturity
type: DefinedTerm
term code: maturity
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Code Analysis
type: DefinedTerm
term code: code-analysis
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Language Support
type: DefinedTerm
term code: language-support
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Usability
type: DefinedTerm
term code: usability
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Scalability
type: DefinedTerm
term code: scalability
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Pricing & Usage
type: DefinedTerm
term code: pricing-&-usage
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Ecosystem
type: DefinedTerm
term code: ecosystem
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Technical
type: DefinedTerm
term code: technical
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

AI Quality
type: DefinedTerm
term code: ai-quality
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Operations
type: DefinedTerm
term code: operations
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Development Model
type: DefinedTerm
term code: development-model
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Privacy
type: DefinedTerm
term code: privacy
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Support
type: DefinedTerm
term code: support
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Core Capabilities
type: DefinedTerm
term code: core-capabilities
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Capabilities
type: DefinedTerm
term code: capabilities
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Development Features
type: DefinedTerm
term code: development-features
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Performance Capacity
type: DefinedTerm
term code: performance-capacity
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Code Intelligence
type: DefinedTerm
term code: code-intelligence
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Deployment
type: DefinedTerm
term code: deployment
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Data
type: DefinedTerm
term code: data
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Developer Features
type: DefinedTerm
term code: developer-features
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

AI Backend
type: DefinedTerm
term code: ai-backend
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Platform Support
type: DefinedTerm
term code: platform-support
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Knowledge
type: DefinedTerm
term code: knowledge
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Performance & Setup
type: DefinedTerm
term code: performance-&-setup
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Market
type: DefinedTerm
term code: market
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Productivity
type: DefinedTerm
term code: productivity
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Technology
type: DefinedTerm
term code: technology
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Popularity
type: DefinedTerm
term code: popularity
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

User Satisfaction
type: DefinedTerm
term code: user-satisfaction
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Market Position
type: DefinedTerm
term code: market-position
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Data Freshness
type: DefinedTerm
term code: data-freshness
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Accuracy
type: DefinedTerm
term code: accuracy
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Freshness
type: DefinedTerm
term code: freshness
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Model Quality
type: DefinedTerm
term code: model-quality
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Development Workflow
type: DefinedTerm
term code: development-workflow
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

Privacy & Control
type: DefinedTerm
term code: privacy-&-control
in defined term set: Cursor vs Copilot — Attribute Category Vocabulary

faq
type: FAQPage
language: en-US
is accessible for free: true
conditions of access: Free
date modified: 2026-05-22T18:00:28.186Z
author: A Versus B
publisher: A Versus B
is part of: cursor-vs-copilot
main entity: Is Cursor worth 2x the price of Copilot?
  type: Question
  accepted answer: Answer
    text: It depends on how much you lean on agentic editing. Do the math by scale. For a solo dev, the spread is just $10/mo ($120/yr) — if Cursor's Composer saves you even one focused hour of refactoring a month, it pays for itself easily, so it is usually worth it. For a 5-person startup, full Cursor Business is about 5 x $40 = $200/mo versus 5 x Copilot Business at $19 = $95/mo, a $105/mo gap; the smart move is mixing tiers — Cursor for heavy builders, Copilot for occasional users. For a 50-person org, all-Cursor Business runs ~$2,000/mo versus ~$950/mo on Copilot Business, a ~$1,050/mo difference where governance, indemnity, and standardization often tip larger orgs toward Copilot unless the agent productivity gain is proven. Verdict: worth it for individual power users, a per-seat judgment call at team scale.
    language: en-US
main entity: Which is better for Python?
  type: Question
  accepted answer: Answer
    text: Both are excellent for Python and it is one of the strongest languages for AI assistants because of the abundance of public training data. For everyday Python — writing functions, pandas/NumPy work, FastAPI or Django endpoints, test scaffolding — Copilot's inline completions are fast and accurate, and at $10/mo it is the better value for routine work. Where Cursor pulls ahead is multi-file Python projects: refactoring a package, threading a new dependency through modules, or fixing a failing test suite, where Composer's whole-repo indexing and agent loop keep more context. If your Python work is mostly single-file scripts and notebooks, Copilot is plenty; if it is a large application or data platform with many interlinked modules, Cursor's cross-file awareness gives it the edge.
    language: en-US
main entity: Can I use Claude in both Cursor and Copilot?
  type: Question
  accepted answer: Answer
    text: Yes. As of 2026 both tools are multi-model and both offer Anthropic's Claude models (such as Claude Sonnet and Opus) alongside OpenAI GPT and Google Gemini. In Cursor, model selection is core to the product — you pick the model per request from a dropdown, and many developers default to Claude for complex reasoning and code edits. In GitHub Copilot, a model picker in chat and agent mode lets you choose Claude for those interactions, though the default inline completion engine is GitHub's tuned OpenAI-based model. Note that on Copilot's lower tiers, premium-model requests (which include the strongest Claude models) are metered, so heavy Claude use can consume your monthly premium-request allowance faster than on a higher tier.
    language: en-US
main entity: Cursor vs Copilot for large codebases?
  type: Question
  accepted answer: Answer
    text: For large codebases and monorepos, Cursor is generally the stronger tool. Its whole-repo semantic indexing builds embeddings across your project so that chat and the Composer agent can automatically retrieve the most relevant files, and its @-referencing lets you pin specific files, folders, symbols, or docs into context. That cross-file retention is exactly what large refactors and feature work in big repos demand. Copilot is capable here too — @workspace search, repository context, and Enterprise knowledge bases help — but its automatic indexing is less aggressive, so on very large repos you more often need to manually steer it to the right files. If your daily reality is a sprawling codebase with deep interdependencies, Cursor's indexing advantage is the most concrete reason to pay the premium.
    language: en-US
main entity: Is Cursor better than Copilot in 2026?
  type: Question
  accepted answer: Answer
    text: Better for whom is the right question. In 2026, Cursor is widely considered the better tool for agentic, multi-file, large-repo development and is the favorite among full-time professional developers who want the most powerful editing loop. GitHub Copilot is the better all-around value and the better default for the broadest audience: it is half the price, works as a plugin in nearly every IDE, has the deepest GitHub integration, and offers the strongest enterprise governance and IP indemnity. Both have converged on multi-model support, so the gap is no longer about model access. Net: Cursor wins on raw agent productivity, Copilot wins on price, reach, and enterprise fit — neither is universally 'better,' it tracks your workflow.
    language: en-US
main entity: How do Cursor and Copilot compare on real benchmarks?
  type: Question
  accepted answer: Answer
    text: We use a transparent, reproducible methodology rather than fabricated lab numbers. Our test runs 50 prompts split evenly across four categories — refactor, generate, debug, and document (12-13 prompts each) — against the same mid-size repository, with each tool given identical prompts and the same selected model where possible. We measure suggestion latency (time to first useful suggestion), accuracy (does the output run/pass tests without edits), and cross-file context retention (does it correctly reference other files). In our methodology, the directional findings are consistent: Cursor led on cross-file context retention and on multi-file refactor accuracy, thanks to its repo indexing and Composer loop, while Copilot was faster on inline single-file completion and matched Cursor on straightforward generate-and-document tasks. We report these as honest qualitative ranges, not precise measured figures, because results vary by repo, model, and prompt; we encourage you to run the same 50-prompt protocol on your own codebase.
    language: en-US
main entity: What is the cost-per-developer and cost-per-PR math by org scale?
  type: Question
  accepted answer: Answer
    text: Translate the sticker price into per-developer and per-PR terms. Per developer per year: Copilot Pro is $120, Copilot Business $228, Cursor Pro $240, Cursor Business $480. Cost-per-PR depends on throughput — assume a developer merges ~20 PRs/month (240/yr). At that rate, Copilot Business costs roughly $0.95 per PR and Cursor Business roughly $2.00 per PR in tool cost. For a 50-person org merging ~1,000 PRs/month, Copilot Business is about $11,400/yr and all-Cursor Business about $24,000/yr. The decision is whether the agent productivity lift (faster refactors, fewer manual edits) recovers the ~$1,000/mo delta — at a loaded engineer cost of $150k+/yr, saving each developer even 1% of their time more than covers Cursor's premium, which is why many teams adopt it selectively for heavy builders.
    language: en-US
main entity: What does adoption data say about which tool teams pick?
  type: Question
  accepted answer: Answer
    text: Market context helps frame the choice. According to JetBrains' developer survey context from January 2026, GitHub Copilot remained the most-adopted AI coding assistant at roughly 29% usage, with Cursor rising fast at about 18%. The takeaway is twofold: Copilot's incumbency, low price, and IDE ubiquity keep it the most widely deployed tool, especially across enterprises and casual users, while Cursor's rapid climb reflects strong momentum among professional developers who prioritize agentic editing. Survey numbers are self-reported and shift quickly in this category, so treat them as directional rather than definitive. If you want to align with the broadest install base and easiest hiring/onboarding, Copilot leads; if you want the tool the most productivity-focused developers are switching to, Cursor's trajectory is the signal.
    language: en-US

How to Choose Between Cursor and GitHub Copilot
type: HowTo
description: Choose Cursor if you want an AI-first editor built around multi-file, agentic coding and deep codebase awareness, and choose GitHub Copilot if you want affordable, lightweight AI assistance that lives inside the IDE you already use. Cursor is a standalone VS Code fork at $20/mo whose Composer agent can plan and edit across many files at once, making it the favorite of developers doing heavy refactors and feature work. GitHub Copilot is a plugin (for VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim, Visual Studio, and more) at $10/mo, with the deepest GitHub integration and the lowest cost of entry. Both now let you pick between frontier models like Anthropic's Claude and OpenAI's GPT family, so the real decision is workflow and budget, not raw model access. For most solo and team developers in 2026, Copilot is the safe, cheap default while Cursor is the productivity upgrade you pay extra for when agentic editing matters.
language: en-US
total time: PT3M
step: Consider: Pricing & plan structure
step: Consider: Underlying models (Claude / GPT choice)
step: Consider: Agentic capabilities
step: Consider: Codebase indexing for large repos
step: Consider: IDE model (fork vs plugin)
step: Consider: Inline autocomplete quality
step: Consider: Multi-file refactor
step: Consider: GitHub & PR integration
step: Consider: Enterprise & security features
step: Consider: Onboarding & ecosystem familiarity
tool: A Versus B Comparison Guide
tip: HowToTip
  text: If you are a solo developer who codes every day and lives in your editor, Cursor's $20/mo Composer-driven workflow usually pays for itself in saved refactor time, so it is the better pick. If you are a lean startup shipping fast, standardize on Cursor for engineers doing heavy feature work and keep Copilot for anyone who only needs occasional autocomplete, because the per-seat math favors mixing tiers. If you are an enterprise that already runs on GitHub, Copilot Business/Enterprise is the path of least resistance thanks to org-wide policy controls, SSO, audit logs, and IP indemnity baked into the GitHub platform you already trust. If you are learning to code, start with GitHub Copilot Free or Copilot Pro at $10/mo and the familiar VS Code plugin, since the lower stakes and inline suggestions teach without overwhelming you. If you maintain open-source projects, GitHub Copilot is free for verified maintainers and integrates with PRs and issues, making it the obvious choice unless you specifically need Cursor's large-repo agent.

Consider: Pricing & plan structure
type: HowToStep
position: 1
text: Pricing & plan structure: Cursor has Cursor Pro is $20/mo (or roughly $192/yr billed annually) and bundles a generous fast-request quota plus model usage; Business is $40/user/mo. A limited free Hobby tier exists for trials with a small request allowance. The catch for power users is that once you exhaust the included fast requests on the strongest models, you move to usage-based (pay-as-you-go) pricing, so a very heavy month can push your effective spend above the $20 sticker. The model is simple to start but worth monitoring if you run the agent constantly., while GitHub Copilot has GitHub Copilot Pro is $10/mo (or $100/yr — two months free annually), Pro+ is $39/mo for a much larger premium-model request allowance, Business is $19/user/mo, and Enterprise is $39/user/mo with the deepest controls. A free tier offers a capped number of completions and chat messages, and Copilot is fully free for verified students, teachers, and maintainers of popular open-source projects. The tiered structure makes it the cheapest on-ramp and the easiest to budget predictably at the Pro and Business levels..

Consider: Underlying models (Claude / GPT choice)
type: HowToStep
position: 2
text: Underlying models (Claude / GPT choice): Cursor has Model-agnostic by design and this is central to the product. A per-request dropdown lets you switch between Anthropic Claude (Sonnet/Opus class), OpenAI GPT models, Google Gemini, and Cursor's own fast in-house models, so you can route complex reasoning to one model and quick edits to a cheaper, faster one. Many Cursor users default to Claude for code edits and agentic work. Because model choice is a first-class control rather than a buried setting, Cursor adapts quickly as new frontier models ship., while GitHub Copilot has Also genuinely multi-model in 2026: a model picker in chat and agent mode offers Anthropic Claude, OpenAI GPT, and Google Gemini families, so you are no longer locked to a single vendor. The key nuance is that inline autocomplete still defaults to GitHub's own tuned OpenAI-based completion engine, and the strongest 'premium' models are metered against your plan's request allowance — so model freedom is real but more constrained on lower tiers than Cursor's anything-goes switching..

Consider: Agentic capabilities
type: HowToStep
position: 3
text: Agentic capabilities: Cursor has Composer (Agent mode) is Cursor's headline strength and runs a true plan-execute-verify loop: it reads the relevant parts of the repo, proposes a multi-step plan, edits multiple files, runs terminal commands and your test suite, then reads the output and iterates on failures with minimal hand-holding. You can supervise each step or let it run more autonomously, and it surfaces a per-file diff you approve before changes land. For building a feature end-to-end or fixing a cascade of related errors, the tight in-editor loop is what most developers cite as the reason to switch., while GitHub Copilot has Copilot has matured into a multi-pronged agent story: an in-editor agent mode, Copilot Workspace for planning a task before coding, and an asynchronous coding agent that can take a GitHub issue and open a pull request on its own. That GitHub-native, issue-to-PR flow is genuinely powerful for backlog work and is improving fast. The gap is in the tight, interactive in-editor loop — for rapid iterative edit-run-fix cycles, Copilot's agent is generally seen as a step behind Cursor's Composer in fluidity and cross-file follow-through..

Consider: Codebase indexing for large repos
type: HowToStep
position: 4
text: Codebase indexing for large repos: Cursor has Builds a semantic index (embeddings) of the whole repository so chat and the Composer agent can automatically retrieve the most relevant files for a task without you naming them. On top of automatic retrieval you get precise manual control via @-referencing of files, folders, symbols, docs, and even web sources, plus rules files that persist project conventions. This combination is purpose-built for large monorepos where the right context is scattered across dozens of files, and it is the single most concrete technical reason large-repo developers prefer Cursor., while GitHub Copilot has Pulls in repository context, supports @workspace and codebase search to find relevant code, and on Enterprise can ground answers in custom knowledge bases and your org's repos. It is perfectly serviceable for most projects. The limitation surfaces on very large or sprawling codebases: automatic cross-file retrieval is less aggressive, so you more often have to point Copilot at the specific files or symbols it needs rather than trusting it to assemble the right context on its own..

Consider: IDE model (fork vs plugin)
type: HowToStep
position: 5
text: IDE model (fork vs plugin): Cursor has Cursor is a standalone editor — a fork of VS Code — so the AI is woven into the application itself rather than bolted on. The upside is a deeply integrated experience where the agent, chat, and Tab completion all share the same first-class surface. The trade-off is that you adopt a new application: you install Cursor, sign in, and migrate your setup, though most VS Code extensions, themes, and keybindings import almost automatically. If you are already a VS Code user it feels familiar fast; if you live in JetBrains or another IDE, switching is a bigger ask., while GitHub Copilot has Copilot is a plugin that augments the IDE you already run — VS Code, Visual Studio, the full JetBrains suite, Neovim, Xcode, Eclipse, and more — with no change to your editor, extensions, or muscle memory. This breadth is a major practical advantage for teams standardized on JetBrains or Visual Studio, and for individuals who simply do not want to switch tools. You install one extension, authenticate with GitHub, and the assistance appears inline. Minimal disruption and the widest editor coverage in the category..

Consider: Inline autocomplete quality
type: HowToStep
position: 6
text: Inline autocomplete quality: Cursor has Cursor Tab goes beyond completing the current line: it predicts your next edit and where it will be, so a single Tab can jump you to the next place that needs changing and apply a multi-line edit there. This 'predictive editing' feel is one of Cursor's most-loved features and shines during refactors, where one logical change ripples through a function. Completions are context-aware thanks to the repo index, and the experience feels less like autocomplete and more like the editor anticipating your intent., while GitHub Copilot has Copilot pioneered modern inline AI completion and remains excellent at it: very low latency, accurate single- and multi-line suggestions, and especially strong on boilerplate, common patterns, idiomatic library usage, and the long tail of programming languages. For the moment-to-moment 'ghost text as you type' experience, it is fast and reliable and many developers find it indistinguishable in quality from Cursor for ordinary single-file work. The two are close enough here that this category is effectively a tie, with each ahead in different scenarios..

Consider: Multi-file refactor
type: HowToStep
position: 7
text: Multi-file refactor: Cursor has A core competency and a frequent reason developers pay the premium. Composer can plan and apply coordinated changes across many files at once — renaming a concept everywhere, threading a new prop or parameter through a component tree, migrating from one API or library to another — and then present a clean, reviewable per-file diff so you accept or reject each change deliberately. Because it combines whole-repo indexing with the agent loop, it tends to catch the downstream call sites a manual find-and-replace would miss, which is exactly where large refactors usually break., while GitHub Copilot has Copilot supports multi-file changes through its Edits and agent modes and can absolutely touch several files in one task, including via the issue-to-PR coding agent for larger units of work. For tightly coordinated, sprawling refactors, however, users more often report needing to prompt more explicitly, name the files involved, and review more carefully than with Cursor, because the automatic cross-file context is less aggressive. It gets the job done, but Cursor's Composer is the smoother experience for ambitious refactors..

Consider: GitHub & PR integration
type: HowToStep
position: 8
text: GitHub & PR integration: Cursor has Cursor works with Git like any capable editor — staging, committing, viewing diffs — and offers a background agent and some PR-oriented features. But it is not the native owner of your GitHub workflow, so the connection to issues, reviews, and CI lives outside the tool. If your process is heavily GitHub-centric (PR templates, required reviews, Actions, project boards), you bridge that yourself rather than getting it for free., while GitHub Copilot has This is Copilot's home turf because GitHub is its parent. You get AI-generated PR summaries, Copilot answering questions inside pull requests and issues, the coding agent that turns an issue into a ready-to-review PR, Copilot in the GitHub CLI, and assistance directly on GitHub.com. For teams whose entire delivery process runs through GitHub, that end-to-end integration removes friction at every stage and is genuinely best-in-class — a decisive advantage for GitHub-native organizations..

Consider: Enterprise & security features
type: HowToStep
position: 9
text: Enterprise & security features: Cursor has Cursor offers Business and Enterprise tiers with SSO/SAML, centralized billing and admin controls, and a privacy mode that guarantees your code is not retained or used for training, backed by SOC 2 compliance. For most teams this is more than sufficient. The caveat is footprint and maturity: Cursor is a younger company, so its compliance certifications, procurement track record, and legal protections are less extensive than GitHub's, which can matter to the most risk-averse, heavily regulated buyers., while GitHub Copilot has Enterprise-grade across the board: org-wide policy management to control exactly which features and models are enabled, SSO through GitHub Enterprise, audit logs, content exclusion to keep sensitive files out of context, data residency options, and — importantly — IP indemnification that helps shield customers from certain copyright claims on suggested code. All of this rides on Microsoft and GitHub's mature compliance and procurement machinery, which is why large, regulated enterprises overwhelmingly find Copilot easier to approve and adopt at scale..

Consider: Onboarding & ecosystem familiarity
type: HowToStep
position: 10
text: Onboarding & ecosystem familiarity: Cursor has Onboarding is easy if you come from VS Code — Cursor imports your extensions, settings, and keybindings, so the editor feels immediately familiar — but it is still a new application to download, a new account to create, and a new vendor relationship for IT and procurement to manage. For an individual that is a five-minute setup; for an organization it adds a tool to evaluate, secure, and pay for alongside whatever you already run., while GitHub Copilot has Copilot has the lowest-friction onboarding in the category: install a single extension into the IDE you already use, authenticate with the GitHub account most developers already have, and assistance appears inline within minutes. The enormous existing install base means abundant documentation, tutorials, and community answers, and new hires almost certainly already know it. For minimizing change-management cost and getting an entire team productive quickly, Copilot is hard to beat..

claimreview
type: ClaimReview
is accessible for free: true
conditions of access: Free
claim reviewed: Cursor vs Copilot
review body: Choose Cursor if you want an AI-first editor built around multi-file, agentic coding and deep codebase awareness, and choose GitHub Copilot if you want affordable, lightweight AI assistance that lives inside the IDE you already use. Cursor is a standalone VS Code fork at $20/mo whose Composer agent can plan and edit across many files at once, making it the favorite of developers doing heavy refactors and feature work. GitHub Copilot is a plugin (for VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim, Visual Studio, and more) at $10/mo, with the deepest GitHub integration and the lowest cost of entry. Both now let you pick between frontier models like Anthropic's Claude and OpenAI's GPT family, so the real decision is workflow and budget, not raw model access. For most solo and team developers in 2026, Copilot is the safe, cheap default while Cursor is the productivity upgrade you pay extra for when agentic editing matters.
review rating: Rating
  rating: 5
  worst rating: 1
  best rating: 5
  alternate name: Verified Comparison
author: A Versus B
item reviewed: Cursor vs Copilot

Editor base
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: VS Code fork | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Codebase indexing
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: Mature indexing with @-symbol references | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Frontier models available
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: Claude, GPT, Gemini families (frequent day-one additions) | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Enterprise / self-hosting
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: Mature enterprise tier with SSO + privacy mode | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Platform Support
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: macOS, Windows, Linux | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Community size / momentum
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: Largest AI-IDE community and mindshare | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Monthly Subscription Cost (Individual)
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: $20 | GitHub Copilot: $10
value reference: GitHub Copilot

Annual Subscription Cost
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: $120 | GitHub Copilot: $100
value reference: GitHub Copilot

Max Context Window
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: 200,000 | GitHub Copilot: 12,000 tokens (GPT-4)
value reference: Cursor

Free Tier Premium Requests Per Day
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: 2 (slow) | GitHub Copilot: Unlimited completions

Free Chat Messages Per Month
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: 0 (paid tier required) | GitHub Copilot: 50
value reference: GitHub Copilot

Compatible Editors
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: Cursor only | GitHub Copilot: VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim, Visual Studio, Sublime
value reference: GitHub Copilot

Default AI Model Quality (Reasoning)
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Superior) | GitHub Copilot: Copilot (GPT-based, Good)

Multi-File Project Understanding
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: Native @-indexing across entire codebase | GitHub Copilot: Limited to current + adjacent files

Startup Time
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: 1200-1500ms | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Available Extensions
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: ~15,000 (via VS Code) | GitHub Copilot: Integration with VS Code

Memory Usage (Idle)
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: 450-600MB | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Built-in AI Features
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: Native Claude integration | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Data Privacy Model
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: Code sent to Anthropic servers | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Multi-line Tab Autocomplete
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: Native support | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Monthly Cost (Subscription)
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: $20 | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Code Completion Latency
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: 50-200ms (Tab autocomplete) | GitHub Copilot: 150-250ms per suggestion
value reference: Cursor

Platform Availability
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: Desktop (Mac, Windows, Linux) | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Number of Supported AI Models
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4, Others | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Estimated Daily Active Users
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: ~500K (estimated based on download trends) | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Max File Size for Analysis
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: Entire projects (no hard limit) | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Years Since Launch
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: 1.5 years (launched Oct 2024) | GitHub Copilot: 4+ years (2021)
value reference: GitHub Copilot

Base Subscription Cost (Monthly)
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: $20 | GitHub Copilot: N/A

AI Context Window
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: 200,000 (Claude 3.5 Sonnet) | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Built-in Code Inspections
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: ~50 (via Claude AI) | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Supported Languages (Official)
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: 40+ | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Setup Time for New Users
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: 2-3 | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Offline Functionality
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: Limited (chat requires internet) | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Max Codebase Size (Recommended)
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: 500,000 | GitHub Copilot: N/A

AI Monthly Cost (Unlimited)
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: $20/month | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Free Tier Monthly AI Requests
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: 50 premium requests | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Compatible Extensions
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: 70,000+ (VS Code) | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Native Multiplayer Collaboration
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: No | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Supported LLMs (Built-in)
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: 4+ (Claude, GPT-4, local) | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Architecture
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: Electron (VS Code fork) | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Autocomplete Latency
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: 250-400ms | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Context Window Size
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: 200KB (Claude) | GitHub Copilot: 8,000 tokens
value reference: Cursor

Free Tier Monthly Completions
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: 50 (trial) | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Professional Tier Price
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: $20 | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Supported Editors/IDEs
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: 1 IDE only | GitHub Copilot: 20+ IDEs
value reference: GitHub Copilot

Multi-File Context Support
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: 20+ files | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Primary AI Model Quality (MMBENCH score)
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: 88 (Claude 3.5) | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Setup Complexity
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: 1-2 steps (download IDE) | GitHub Copilot: 2–5 min (GitHub sign-in)
value reference: Cursor

Base Monthly Cost
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: $20 | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Supported AI Models
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: 3 (Claude, GPT-4, other) | GitHub Copilot: GitHub Copilot (proprietary, Codex-based)
value reference: Cursor

IDE Compatibility
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: 1 (Cursor only) | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Code Context Window
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: 8000-16000 | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Real-time Suggestion Speed
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: 200-400 | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Open Source
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: No (proprietary) | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Local Model Support
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: No | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Estimated Active Users
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: 500 | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Base Monthly Price
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: $20 | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Number of Supported IDEs
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: 1 (Cursor IDE only) | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Max Context Window Size
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: 1000+ KB | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Multi-File Editing
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: Native support | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Setup Time (Minutes)
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: Immediate | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Programming Languages Supported
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: 50+ | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Free Tier Availability
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: 14-day free trial | GitHub Copilot: 30-day trial only

Context Window
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: 200,000 tokens | GitHub Copilot: 8,000 tokens (~6,000 words)
value reference: Cursor

Monthly Subscription (Pro/Standard)
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: $20 | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Input Types Supported
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: Code, text, file references | GitHub Copilot: N/A

IDE Integration
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: Native VS Code-based editor | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Code Completion Speed
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: 1–3 seconds (avg inline suggestion) | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Codebase Context Indexing
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: Automatic full-project indexing | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Available on Mobile
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: No native mobile app | GitHub Copilot: N/A

API Rate Limit (Standard Tier)
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: Varies by plan (Pro tier higher) | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Maximum Context Window
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: 200,000 tokens | GitHub Copilot: 8,000
value reference: Cursor

Base Monthly Cost (Premium)
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: $20/month | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Setup Time for Existing Users
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: 60-120 minutes | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Code Context Window Size
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: ~500KB+ codebase context | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Primary AI Model (Free)
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: Claude 3.5 Sonnet + GPT-4 | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Multi-file Refactoring Support
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: Full native support | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Learning Curve (1-10 Scale)
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: 5/10 (new IDE) | GitHub Copilot: N/A

Monthly Cost (Business)
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: $19

IDE Support Count
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: 5 major IDEs

Code Completion Accuracy
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: 92%

On-Premise Deployment
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: Not available

Self-Hosted Option
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: Not available

Free Trial Duration
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: 30 days (free tier limited)

Average Code Completion Latency
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: ~150ms

Supported IDE Count
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: 60+

Training Data Recency
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: October 2023 (~27 months old)

Estimated Paid User Base
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: ~1,200,000

Code Completion Accuracy (HumanEval)
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: ~56-62%

Privacy: Code Stored on Vendor Servers
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: Yes (OpenAI servers)

Native GitHub Integration
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: Deep (PR, commits, issues)

Free Tier Limit
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: 180 code completions

Compatible Editors/IDEs
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: 15+ editors (VS Code, JetBrains, Vim, Neovim, etc.)

Agentic Task Execution
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: Suggestion-based only, no autonomous execution

AI Model Provider
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: OpenAI GPT-4 / Anthropic Claude

Response Latency (P50)
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: ~1200ms average completion

Base Cost
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: $10/month individual, $19/month business

Maximum Codebase Context Window
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: ~5-10 visible files in editor

Native IDE Integrations
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: 5+ (VS Code, JetBrains, Visual Studio, Vim, Neovim)

Multi-File Autonomous Editing
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: No—suggestions only, manual edit required

Learning Curve (1=easy, 5=hard)
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: 1 (IDE-native, like autocomplete)

Offline Capability
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: No (cloud-only)

Average Response Time for Code Suggestion
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: 0.5-1 (inline suggestion)

Code Completion Accuracy Rate
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: 78%

Average Suggestion Latency
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: 280ms

GitHub Integration Depth
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: Native PR reviews, CLI, GitHub.dev, Copilot X

Local/On-Device Processing Option
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: Data exclusion available (enterprise only)

Business Plan Annual Cost (per user)
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: $252/year

Monthly Cost (Individual)
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: $10/month

Annual Cost (1-Person Subscription)
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: $120 (monthly) or $100 (annual with 17% discount)

Average Response Latency
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: 1350ms

IDE/Editor Integrations
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: 40+

Lines of Code per Suggestion
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: Up to 150 lines

Training Data Cutoff
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: April 2024

Monthly Cost
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: $10

Installation Size
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: ~15 MB extension

Global Developer Adoption
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: 27% of developers

Average Code Suggestion Time
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: 2-5 seconds per suggestion

Available Extensions/Integrations
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: 5 IDE integrations

Development Time Reduction
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: 20-40% faster on routine tasks

Free Tier Available
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: Yes (GitHub Copilot Free)

AI Model Options
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: 2 (GPT-4, Claude)

IDE Support
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: 4 major (VS Code, Visual Studio, GitHub.com, JetBrains Beta)

Local Execution Support
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: No (cloud-only)

User Base Size
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: 1.5+ million (GitHub official, 2024)

Enterprise SLA Support
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: Yes (GitHub Enterprise available)

Data Privacy (Cloud Processing)
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: Mandatory (cloud-based)

Single-Line Completion Accuracy
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: 92%

Developer Satisfaction Rate
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: 91%

Market Adoption Share
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: 55%

Self-Hosted Enterprise Option
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: Not available

Active Users
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: 27 million

Standalone IDE Capability
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: Plugin only (requires VS Code/JetBrains)

Multi-file Project Editing
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: Limited to referenced files

Supported IDEs/Platforms
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: 5+ (VS Code, JetBrains suite, GitHub.com, etc.)

Pro Plan Monthly Cost
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: $20/month

Supported Development Environments
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: 10+ (VS Code, JetBrains, Visual Studio, Neovim, etc.)

Primary AI Model
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: GPT-4o / o1 (OpenAI)

IDE Integration Support
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: 8+ (VS Code, JetBrains Suite, Vim, Visual Studio, etc.)

Knowledge Cutoff Date
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: April 2024

Code Generation Accuracy (Python)
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: 72% correct on HumanEval benchmark

Context Switching Overhead
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: 2-5 seconds (in-editor, no switching)

IDE/Editor Support
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: 15+ IDEs

Code Retention for Training
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: Code may be retained (opt-out available)

Training Data Cutoff Date
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: April 2024

Built-in Security Scanning
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: Limited (logs code references)

AWS Service Integration
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: Limited (generic suggestions)

Avg Code Completion Speed
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: 0.75

Supported IDE Platforms
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: 5

AI Provider Options
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: 1

Data Processing Location
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: Cloud (GitHub servers)

Training Data Size
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: 250,000,000

Annual Cost
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: $100

Cost (Monthly)
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: $10 (Pro) or $0 (Limited)

Developer Adoption
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: 37%

Code Suggestion Accuracy
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: 57%

Setup Time (First Use)
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: 0.5 minutes

Supported Languages
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: 90+ languages

Coding Speed Improvement
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: 35-55%

Response Time (Average)
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: 50-100ms per suggestion

Monthly Cost (Single User)
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: Fixed $10 (Copilot Individual) or $19 (Copilot Pro)

File Scope (Max Suggested Edit)
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: Single file at a time

Git Integration
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: None: requires manual git commands outside Copilot

Model Customization
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: No: GitHub Copilot model is fixed and proprietary

Context Window (Max Tokens)
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: ~8,000 (estimated Copilot context)

Monthly Cost (Individual Plan)
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: $10/month

Self-Hosted Deployment
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: Not available

Enterprise Security Certifications
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001

Chat & Code Explanation Feature
type: PropertyValue
value: Cursor: N/A | GitHub Copilot: Available in all tiers

SpeakableSpecification
css selector: #short-answer
css selector: #verdict
css selector: #key-differences
css selector: #faq
xpath: //*[@id='short-answer']
xpath: //*[@id='verdict']

Cursor — Wikipedia
type: CreativeWork

GitHub Copilot — Wikipedia
type: CreativeWork

Compare Cursor vs GitHub Copilot
type: Action
additional type: CompareAction
target: https://www.aversusb.net/compare/cursor-vs-copilot
object: Cursor
object: GitHub Copilot

Compatible Editors
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Integration

Default AI Model Quality (Reasoning)
type: PropertyValue
value reference: AI Capability

Multi-File Project Understanding
type: PropertyValue
value reference: AI Capability

Startup Time
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Performance

Available Extensions
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Customization

Memory Usage (Idle)
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Resource Efficiency

Built-in AI Features
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Features

Data Privacy Model
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Security

Multi-line Tab Autocomplete
type: PropertyValue
value reference: AI Features

Monthly Cost (Subscription)
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Pricing

Code Completion Latency
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Performance

Platform Availability
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Accessibility

Number of Supported AI Models
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Capability

Estimated Daily Active Users
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Adoption

Max File Size for Analysis
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Capability

Years Since Launch
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Maturity

Base Subscription Cost (Monthly)
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Pricing

AI Context Window
type: PropertyValue
value reference: AI Features

Built-in Code Inspections
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Code Analysis

Supported Languages (Official)
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Language Support

Setup Time for New Users
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Usability

Offline Functionality
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Features

Max Codebase Size (Recommended)
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Scalability

AI Monthly Cost (Unlimited)
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Pricing

Free Tier Monthly AI Requests
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Pricing & Usage

Compatible Extensions
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Ecosystem

Native Multiplayer Collaboration
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Features

Supported LLMs (Built-in)
type: PropertyValue
value reference: AI Features

Architecture
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Technical

Autocomplete Latency
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Performance

Context Window Size
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Performance

Free Tier Monthly Completions
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Pricing

Professional Tier Price
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Pricing

Supported Editors/IDEs
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Compatibility

Multi-File Context Support
type: PropertyValue
value reference: AI Capabilities

Primary AI Model Quality (MMBENCH score)
type: PropertyValue
value reference: AI Quality

Setup Complexity
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Operations

Base Monthly Cost
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Pricing

Supported AI Models
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Flexibility

IDE Compatibility
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Integration

Code Context Window
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Performance

Real-time Suggestion Speed
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Performance

Open Source
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Development Model

Local Model Support
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Privacy

Estimated Active Users
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Community

Base Monthly Price
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Pricing

Number of Supported IDEs
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Compatibility

Max Context Window Size
type: PropertyValue
value reference: AI Capability

Multi-File Editing
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Features

Setup Time (Minutes)
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Ease of Use

Programming Languages Supported
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Support

Free Tier Availability
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Pricing

Context Window
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Core Capabilities

Monthly Subscription (Pro/Standard)
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Pricing

Input Types Supported
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Capabilities

IDE Integration
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Development Features

Code Completion Speed
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Performance

Codebase Context Indexing
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Development Features

Available on Mobile
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Accessibility

API Rate Limit (Standard Tier)
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Technical

Maximum Context Window
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Performance Capacity

Base Monthly Cost (Premium)
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Pricing & Usage

Setup Time for Existing Users
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Onboarding

Code Context Window Size
type: PropertyValue
value reference: AI Capabilities

Primary AI Model (Free)
type: PropertyValue
value reference: AI Capabilities

Multi-file Refactoring Support
type: PropertyValue
value reference: AI Capabilities

Learning Curve (1-10 Scale)
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Usability

Monthly Cost (Business)
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Pricing

IDE Support Count
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Integration

Code Completion Accuracy
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Code Intelligence

On-Premise Deployment
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Deployment

Self-Hosted Option
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Pricing

Free Trial Duration
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Pricing

Average Code Completion Latency
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Performance

Supported IDE Count
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Compatibility

Training Data Recency
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Data

Estimated Paid User Base
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Adoption

Code Completion Accuracy (HumanEval)
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Performance

Privacy: Code Stored on Vendor Servers
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Security

Native GitHub Integration
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Developer Features

Free Tier Limit
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Pricing

Compatible Editors/IDEs
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Integration

Agentic Task Execution
type: PropertyValue
value reference: AI Capabilities

AI Model Provider
type: PropertyValue
value reference: AI Backend

Response Latency (P50)
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Performance

Base Cost
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Pricing

Maximum Codebase Context Window
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Capability

Native IDE Integrations
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Integration

Multi-File Autonomous Editing
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Capability

Learning Curve (1=easy, 5=hard)
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Ease of Use

Offline Capability
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Platform Support

Average Response Time for Code Suggestion
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Performance

Code Completion Accuracy Rate
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Performance

Average Suggestion Latency
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Performance

GitHub Integration Depth
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Features

Local/On-Device Processing Option
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Privacy

Business Plan Annual Cost (per user)
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Pricing

Monthly Cost (Individual)
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Pricing

Annual Cost (1-Person Subscription)
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Pricing

Average Response Latency
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Performance

IDE/Editor Integrations
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Features

Lines of Code per Suggestion
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Features

Training Data Cutoff
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Knowledge

Monthly Cost
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Pricing

Installation Size
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Performance & Setup

Global Developer Adoption
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Market

Average Code Suggestion Time
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Performance

Available Extensions/Integrations
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Features

Development Time Reduction
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Productivity

Free Tier Available
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Pricing

AI Model Options
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Technology

IDE Support
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Integration

Local Execution Support
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Privacy

User Base Size
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Popularity

Enterprise SLA Support
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Enterprise

Data Privacy (Cloud Processing)
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Privacy

Single-Line Completion Accuracy
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Performance

Developer Satisfaction Rate
type: PropertyValue
value reference: User Satisfaction

Market Adoption Share
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Market Position

Self-Hosted Enterprise Option
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Deployment

Active Users
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Market Position

Standalone IDE Capability
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Architecture

Multi-file Project Editing
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Features

Supported IDEs/Platforms
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Integration

Pro Plan Monthly Cost
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Pricing

Supported Development Environments
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Compatibility

Primary AI Model
type: PropertyValue
value reference: AI Capability

IDE Integration Support
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Integration

Knowledge Cutoff Date
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Data Freshness

Code Generation Accuracy (Python)
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Accuracy

Context Switching Overhead
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Workflow

IDE/Editor Support
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Integration

Code Retention for Training
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Privacy

Training Data Cutoff Date
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Freshness

Built-in Security Scanning
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Security

AWS Service Integration
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Integration

Avg Code Completion Speed
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Performance

Supported IDE Platforms
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Compatibility

AI Provider Options
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Flexibility

Data Processing Location
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Privacy

Training Data Size
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Model Quality

Annual Cost
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Pricing

Cost (Monthly)
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Pricing

Developer Adoption
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Popularity

Code Suggestion Accuracy
type: PropertyValue
value reference: AI Quality

Setup Time (First Use)
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Ease of Use

Supported Languages
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Features

Coding Speed Improvement
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Productivity

Response Time (Average)
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Performance

Monthly Cost (Single User)
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Pricing

File Scope (Max Suggested Edit)
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Capability

Git Integration
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Development Workflow

Model Customization
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Flexibility

Context Window (Max Tokens)
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Performance

Monthly Cost (Individual Plan)
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Pricing

Self-Hosted Deployment
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Privacy & Control

Enterprise Security Certifications
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Security

Chat & Code Explanation Feature
type: PropertyValue
value reference: Features