{"slug":"heroku-vs-fly-io)","title":"Heroku vs Fly.io","url":"https://www.aversusb.net/compare/heroku-vs-fly-io)","faqCount":5,"faqs":[{"question":"Why is Fly.io so much cheaper than Heroku?","answer":"Fly.io uses a utility-based pricing model (pay-per-minute) and self-serve infrastructure without managed add-ons, while Heroku's dyno-based model includes managed services, support, and overhead. For a typical app, Heroku's $7 minimum + database ($9) + logging ($50) easily reaches $100+/month, whereas Fly.io's similar setup costs $15-25/month."},{"question":"Can I migrate from Heroku to Fly.io easily?","answer":"Migration requires some effort. You'll need to: (1) containerize your app in Docker, (2) export your Heroku PostgreSQL database, (3) recreate it on Fly.io, (4) update your app's configuration. Most simple apps take 1-3 hours; complex multi-app setups may take longer. Heroku's Procfile won't work directly—you need a Dockerfile."},{"question":"Is Heroku still worth using in 2026?","answer":"Yes, for specific use cases: rapid prototyping, non-technical founders, teams that value simplicity over cost, and apps with minimal scale. However, the 2022 free tier removal and price increases have pushed cost-conscious developers to Fly.io, Railway, and Render. Heroku remains strong for enterprises already locked into Salesforce ecosystems."},{"question":"Which is better for a global SaaS product?","answer":"Fly.io wins decisively for global apps. Its 28 regions enable automatic edge deployment, 50-100ms latency worldwide, and per-minute billing scales efficiently. Heroku's 4 regions and dyno-based pricing become expensive for truly global workloads. Fly.io's architecture is designed for this; Heroku's is not."},{"question":"Do I need Docker experience to use Fly.io?","answer":"Not required but highly recommended. Fly.io can auto-generate Dockerfiles for common frameworks (Rails, Django, Next.js), but understanding Docker basics helps with troubleshooting and customization. Heroku requires zero Docker knowledge, making it gentler for complete beginners."}],"faqPageSchema":{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"FAQPage","@id":"https://www.aversusb.net/compare/heroku-vs-fly-io)#faq","url":"https://www.aversusb.net/compare/heroku-vs-fly-io)","inLanguage":"en-US","name":"Heroku vs Fly.io — FAQ","description":"Frequently asked questions about Heroku vs Fly.io","dateModified":"2026-07-08T05:54:45.623Z","author":{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https://www.aversusb.net/#organization","name":"A Versus B"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https://www.aversusb.net/#organization","name":"A Versus B"},"isPartOf":{"@type":"Article","@id":"https://www.aversusb.net/compare/heroku-vs-fly-io)#article"},"license":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":["#faq",".faq-item"]},"mainEntity":[{"@type":"Question","name":"Why is Fly.io so much cheaper than Heroku?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Fly.io uses a utility-based pricing model (pay-per-minute) and self-serve infrastructure without managed add-ons, while Heroku's dyno-based model includes managed services, support, and overhead. For a typical app, Heroku's $7 minimum + database ($9) + logging ($50) easily reaches $100+/month, whereas Fly.io's similar setup costs $15-25/month.","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https://www.aversusb.net/compare/heroku-vs-fly-io)"}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Can I migrate from Heroku to Fly.io easily?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Migration requires some effort. You'll need to: (1) containerize your app in Docker, (2) export your Heroku PostgreSQL database, (3) recreate it on Fly.io, (4) update your app's configuration. Most simple apps take 1-3 hours; complex multi-app setups may take longer. Heroku's Procfile won't work directly—you need a Dockerfile.","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https://www.aversusb.net/compare/heroku-vs-fly-io)"}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Is Heroku still worth using in 2026?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Yes, for specific use cases: rapid prototyping, non-technical founders, teams that value simplicity over cost, and apps with minimal scale. However, the 2022 free tier removal and price increases have pushed cost-conscious developers to Fly.io, Railway, and Render. Heroku remains strong for enterprises already locked into Salesforce ecosystems.","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https://www.aversusb.net/compare/heroku-vs-fly-io)"}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Which is better for a global SaaS product?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Fly.io wins decisively for global apps. Its 28 regions enable automatic edge deployment, 50-100ms latency worldwide, and per-minute billing scales efficiently. Heroku's 4 regions and dyno-based pricing become expensive for truly global workloads. Fly.io's architecture is designed for this; Heroku's is not.","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https://www.aversusb.net/compare/heroku-vs-fly-io)"}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Do I need Docker experience to use Fly.io?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Not required but highly recommended. Fly.io can auto-generate Dockerfiles for common frameworks (Rails, Django, Next.js), but understanding Docker basics helps with troubleshooting and customization. Heroku requires zero Docker knowledge, making it gentler for complete beginners.","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https://www.aversusb.net/compare/heroku-vs-fly-io)"}}]}}