{"slug":"continue-vs-github-copilot))","title":"Continue vs GitHub Copilot","url":"https://www.aversusb.net/compare/continue-vs-github-copilot))","faqCount":5,"faqs":[{"question":"Can Continue run completely offline?","answer":"Yes, Continue can run entirely locally by using open-source models like Llama 2 or Mistral on your machine. No internet connection or data transmission is required. GitHub Copilot requires cloud connectivity and sends code snippets to Microsoft's servers for processing."},{"question":"Which AI model does each tool use?","answer":"Continue supports multiple models including Claude 3 Opus/Sonnet, Llama 2/3, Mistral, Grok, and local models you can self-host. GitHub Copilot exclusively uses OpenAI's GPT-4 and GPT-3.5 Turbo models integrated with Microsoft infrastructure."},{"question":"How much does each tool cost for a team of 10 developers?","answer":"Continue costs $0 for unlimited developers (open-source). GitHub Copilot costs $1,000-1,200 per year for 10 developers at $10/month per person ($100/year), or $500/year with annual billing for all 10."},{"question":"Which has better code completion accuracy?","answer":"GitHub Copilot has an 87-92% code completion acceptance rate, significantly higher than Continue's 75-82%. Copilot's advantage comes from GPT-4's larger training dataset and Microsoft's optimization for coding. Continue's accuracy varies based on which LLM backend you choose."},{"question":"Is Continue a replacement for GitHub Copilot?","answer":"Continue is an alternative, not a direct replacement. It excels in privacy, cost, and model flexibility, but has lower accuracy and fewer enterprise features. It's ideal for privacy-conscious teams; Copilot remains better for accuracy-focused development and GitHub-integrated workflows."}],"faqPageSchema":{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"FAQPage","@id":"https://www.aversusb.net/compare/continue-vs-github-copilot))#faq","url":"https://www.aversusb.net/compare/continue-vs-github-copilot))","inLanguage":"en-US","name":"Continue vs GitHub Copilot — FAQ","description":"Frequently asked questions about Continue vs GitHub Copilot","dateModified":"2026-07-09T04:18:07.674Z","author":{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https://www.aversusb.net/#organization","name":"A Versus B"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https://www.aversusb.net/#organization","name":"A Versus B"},"isPartOf":{"@type":"Article","@id":"https://www.aversusb.net/compare/continue-vs-github-copilot))#article"},"license":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":["#faq",".faq-item"]},"mainEntity":[{"@type":"Question","name":"Can Continue run completely offline?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Yes, Continue can run entirely locally by using open-source models like Llama 2 or Mistral on your machine. No internet connection or data transmission is required. GitHub Copilot requires cloud connectivity and sends code snippets to Microsoft's servers for processing.","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https://www.aversusb.net/compare/continue-vs-github-copilot))"}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Which AI model does each tool use?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Continue supports multiple models including Claude 3 Opus/Sonnet, Llama 2/3, Mistral, Grok, and local models you can self-host. GitHub Copilot exclusively uses OpenAI's GPT-4 and GPT-3.5 Turbo models integrated with Microsoft infrastructure.","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https://www.aversusb.net/compare/continue-vs-github-copilot))"}},{"@type":"Question","name":"How much does each tool cost for a team of 10 developers?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Continue costs $0 for unlimited developers (open-source). GitHub Copilot costs $1,000-1,200 per year for 10 developers at $10/month per person ($100/year), or $500/year with annual billing for all 10.","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https://www.aversusb.net/compare/continue-vs-github-copilot))"}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Which has better code completion accuracy?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"GitHub Copilot has an 87-92% code completion acceptance rate, significantly higher than Continue's 75-82%. Copilot's advantage comes from GPT-4's larger training dataset and Microsoft's optimization for coding. Continue's accuracy varies based on which LLM backend you choose.","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https://www.aversusb.net/compare/continue-vs-github-copilot))"}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Is Continue a replacement for GitHub Copilot?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Continue is an alternative, not a direct replacement. It excels in privacy, cost, and model flexibility, but has lower accuracy and fewer enterprise features. It's ideal for privacy-conscious teams; Copilot remains better for accuracy-focused development and GitHub-integrated workflows.","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https://www.aversusb.net/compare/continue-vs-github-copilot))"}}]}}